/biz/ - Business & Finance

Absolute state of stinkers

Yeah everyone had it easy as fuck, it was only a one year hold. I've been in this market for 30 months and I'm getting tired lol

Also during the ICO 1 Bitcoin would have bought 2000 ETH, let that sink in

>>16147057
>>16147084
>12 months test net
>4 months main net
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
>Linkers: this is bullish!

>>16147151
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
ahem
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ahUZjuIqqwG9dZLvlm0sgHmckRVUC6kB396narYKSyU/edit

>>16147203
>name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
>Linker: posts a list that literally doesn't include a single dapp with users in production
>Linkers: This is bullish!

>>16147052
>>16147084
There were 3.5 years between ETH's mid-2014 ico and the late 2017 moonshot.

>>16147209
All of those are in production.

>>16147084
>implying people didn't sell after holding for 1 year of crab market and seeing the price rise to $40-$60 all of a sudden
I know myself, I'd either have sold at that point or never sold at all. I don't know what would hurt more desu.

>>16147217
this
most people would have sold for some % profit or they would not have sold at all

>>16147203
>Linker posts document with literally not a single dapp that has users in production
>Linkers: This is bullish!

>>16147314
Tons of them have users, and they're all "in production".

>>16147216
post link to dapp website with link to etherscan that shows users and Chainlink usage for the contract. Literally. Not. A. Single. One.

>>16147316
post the link with etherscan proof and proof they are using Chainlink. Literally. Not. A. Single. One.

>>16147052
Yes its longer wait but link will moon harder than eth so its worth it.

>16147331
>4 posts by this ID

>>16147336
>12 months test net
>4 months main net
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
>Linkers: this is bullish!

>>16147321
>>16147331
>post link to dapp website with link to etherscan that shows users and Chainlink usage for the contract. Literally. Not. A. Single. One.

Here's Swift: https://aa-debtor.smartcontract.com/bonds

Here's Google Cloud: https://docs.chain.link/docs/big-query-chainlink-testnet

>>16147217
Imagine if they believed EOY $1000 memes and sold at that price and not $60. It's almost like something else might be like that.

>>16147217
Take in consideration that Ethereum was not an obscure and unknown crypto. It was heavily shilled.

Even if you sold at $50 which was a reasonable approach you still would have made plenty of money. But the trick is always to set some target prices (five) and sell accordingly, never sell everything at the same time or you'll likely end up regretting it.

>>16147243
Didn't sell at all :/ Still a NEET.

>>16147345
>Linker post link that literally is not a dapp that has users in production
>Linkers: This is bullish!

>>16147356
They're decentralized uses of Chainlink.
Not sure what your definition of a "dapp" is, but those are the heaviest hitters in the list, which is probably why you're moving the goalposts.

Just to humor you: here's a more recent example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfrjcOB16f8&feature=youtu.be
And its etherscan: https://ropsten.etherscan.io/address/0xd770fa5b25ce0c48ccfbd925b753322c1f69bcb3

This is a "dapp" that uses Chainlink oracles to power crypto/fiat transactions.

>>16147388
Kek he doesn't know what a dapp with users is and he's a Link investor, why am I not surprised

The video and link you posted is on the testnet (not production) and has no active users.

>>16147388
And the BEST example you could come with is something on the testnet with ZERO users.

KEK

>Linkers: this is bullish!

>>16147399
They're all "in production" you noob, and people are using them in the testing phase.

>>16147405
I gave you the two "BEST" examples here: >>16147345

Early onset dementia must be a bitch.

WHY THE FUCK DO WE HAVE TO WAIT LONGER THAN ETHFAGS

>>16147412
Those are literally not dapps with users, they are nodes serving ZERO dapp/users (because LINK has zero dapps using it), and one of them is on the TESTNET (google cloud).

HOW DUMB ARE YOU? IS THIS THE STATE OF LINK INVESTORS? THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT A DAPP IS?

>>16147412
>Linker posts links that literally are not a dapps with users in production
>Linker doesn't even know what a dapp is
>Linkers: This is bullish!

bitcoin was the gods throwing you a bone and ethereum was them throwing you a second chance. i missed both. i almost bought a shitload of bitcoin at 60 cents a piece.

there will not be a third golden bull run. an unironic global economic depression is probably right around the corner. with food shortages causes by genuine ecological problems and soil erosion to follow not too long after.

oh well. invest in guns bullets and mres

>>16147211
>There were 3.5 years
we are almost there... it's 2 years of Chainlink

>>16147412
>he doesn't know what a dapp is
>he doesn't know how to check if a dapp has users
>he calls others noob
KEK. How embarrassing. Those are dapps https://www.dapp.com/

Notice not a single one of them that has users is using Chainlink for their oracles. Notice that many of them use oracles, just not Chainlink.

VID holders made it in 3 months (160x, guys)

>>16147454
>12 months test net
>4 months main net
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
>Linkers: this is bullish!

>>16147419
>>16147429
>>16147455
>>16147461
obsessed

>Those are dapps
So are these: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ahUZjuIqqwG9dZLvlm0sgHmckRVUC6kB396narYKSyU/edit

>>16147444
>there will not be a third golden bull run. an unironic global economic depression is probably right around the corner.
Bitcoin was launched in a global economic depression.

>>16147482
if they are dapps, post links to their website and link to their activity on etherscan/dapps.com, not a document with literally no dapps on it. You don't even know what a dapp is, so you can't.

Not. A. Single. One.

Linkies, Linkies, all for me!
Didn't listen? None for thee!
Living in your head rent free!
Swingie linkie swings from tree!

Didn't buy? Now there's no hope.
All you do is mope and cope.
Should have listened to the trope:
Invest in LINK or invest in rope!

>>16147352
Yeah I get that approach but if you buy something below $1 and set a target price of $1000 that's just an absolutely unrealistic expectation. Even if you have some targets before that which allow you to take out your initial and gamble with essentially free money, I don't think any serious investor would or could reasonably expect a 1000x to ever happen.
The action in 2017 truly was insane

>>16147492
dapps are decentralized applications.
Most of the partners on that list are that.

>>16147518
no, dapps are applications with users, the document has links to companies that don't have apps with users.

If they have users, post link to their etherscan/dapp.com/dapp radar page.

If you don't post this, you've been BTFOed, simple. You lost. Checkmate retard.

>>16147532
>no, dapps are applications with users
The literal definition of "dapp" is "Decentralized APPlication" you mong.
And a ton of those in the list have users.

>>16147542
No. If they have users, post link to their etherscan/dapp.com/dapp radar page. If you don't post this, you've been BTFOed, simple. You lost. Checkmate retard.

>responding to the sperg with literal autism
He's not here to debate or proof anything but to indulge in his craving for conversational antagonistics, like all spergs do
Stop engaging him if you don't have asperger's yourself. It doesn't matter what direction the argument goes, he'll switch to a new topic he can sperg out about either way

>>16147482
>dat pic
Holy shit

>>16147482
>dat pic
Holy shit

>>16147558
>still not a single linker was able to name a single dapp (1) with users with proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan
>Linkers: This is bullish!

>>16147502
I agree, we won't see anymore the 2017 type of gains.

Back then a shitcoin could triple its value in a day by simply changing it's logo or website. People were openly shilling their shitcoins in fron of banks or other corporations to lure in gullible investors.

I think the trick is to set some reasonable price targets for your coins (x5 or x10) and maybe some extreme price targets like (x100) although I think it will occur over atleast 4 or 5 years. GL man

>>16147482
>come up with le funny banter
>like it so much you actually go search its thread again 4 days later so you can copy paste it
>proceed with total lose self-control
Based autismlad, able to entertain himself for hours with the most pointless shit

>>16147572
You are correct. Some linkers are fanatically optimistic about the current pace of adoption. You're very right.
What would you like to sperg out about next?

>>16147558
But you just described 90% of biz

>>16147611
I didn't make that pic, and it probably took all of 5 minutes to make.

>>16147611
I'm doing the lord's work, making sure everybody knows Chainlink has literally zero users. You're welcome.
>>16147621
>still not a single linker was able to name a single dapp (1) with users with proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan
>Linkers: This is bullish!

>>16147614
All I can do is but stretch out my hand to the few on the verge of being savable

>>16147623
>>16147611
Two more of these spamposts were added meanwhile, here's the updated version.

>doing the lord's work
By being so blatantly obsessed with Chainlink that you're actually driving people to buy more?
Based.

>>16147621
Work on that insecurity bro, my post was in address to the man in your image, not you

>>16147643
>Work on that insecurity bro
Says the faggot spamming fud this obsessively.

>>16147636
correct, I'm doing the lord's work. You're trying to lie by telling people all the companies in the documents are using Chainlink.

I'm doing the lord's work by telling the truth and exposing your lie. None of the companies in your shill document have a dapp with users, that are using Chainlink in their smart contract. You are a liar.

If you were not lying, you could simply post a link to their dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan as proof.

>>16147664
>You're trying to lie by telling people all the companies in the documents are using Chainlink.
Not me, it's all the companies in those documents themselves saying that.

>>16147654
it's not fud, it's simply telling the truth. it's called being a good person with morals

>>16147654
Ah, you were just misreading my ID

>>16147674
>I care about you guys, trust me

>>16147680
Holy shit yes I was.

>>16147672
OK well then you have low IQ for believing them without proof. Either way I'm still doing the lord's work for exposing the lie you are spreading because you're uneducated.

>>16147681
Don't believe me, believe the blockchain, etherscan, dapp.com and dappradar. Again, you prove your low IQ by having a low IQ argument that I just destroyed.

You can prove me wrong by doing a single thing. Posting a link to etherscan, dapp.com and dappradar. I've already posted my proof, none of the dapps in the top of dapp.com and dappradar use Chainlink. Not. A. Single. One. It's not my opinion, it's a proven fact.

>>16147694
>Don't believe me, believe the blockchain, etherscan, dapp.com and dappradar.
I'll believe the dozens of parties saying they're using Chainlink, including Swift and Google.

>OK well then you have low IQ for believing them without proof.
Yeah, Swift, Google, Accord, ZeppelinOS, ... have so much to gain from lying about partnering with Chainlink right?

>>16147704
again, you prove your low IQ. I said chainlink has ZERO dapps in production with users, which is a fact I've proven.

I never said they didn't have partnerships that aren't using it in production. I do believe they have partnerships that are not using their oracles.

Again, you've demonstrated your low IQ, and I've destroyed your argument.

Now I'm also doing the lord's work by demonstrating that most Linkers have low IQ and shouldn't be trusted.

>>16147717
>I said chainlink has ZERO dapps in production with users
Which is you moving the goalposts around in order to cop with this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ahUZjuIqqwG9dZLvlm0sgHmckRVUC6kB396narYKSyU/edit

>>16147719
I've never moved the goal post, I always said dapp, with users, in production.

You just moved the goal post now though. Literally right now you just did. You're trying to lie by saying that partnerships that are not using Chainlink have dapps with users in production. You're lying, to pump your bags. You're a bad person, and have low IQ.

Again, I've just exposed your low IQ and destroyed your argument. Congrats.

>>16147732
>I've never moved the goal post, I always said dapp, with users, in production.
That's you putting the goalposts where they don't belong in order to cope with this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ahUZjuIqqwG9dZLvlm0sgHmckRVUC6kB396narYKSyU/edit

>>16147735
Again, you just moved the goal post. At first you were saying "we have dapps in production with users!". Now you're saying "it doesn't matter that no one is actually using Chainlink! We have partnerships!"

Hence the:

>12 months test net
>4 months main net
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production (with proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan)
>Linkers: this is bullish!

>>16147743
>At first you were saying "we have dapps in production with users!"
Obviously, just look at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ahUZjuIqqwG9dZLvlm0sgHmckRVUC6kB396narYKSyU/edit

>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production (with proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan)
>Linkers: this is bullish!

>>16147732
Lying is a sin. Keep running your mouth spouting filthy lies and racking up karmic debt.

based anon dabbing on stinkies
memes aside i unironically don't understand why would anyone invest their lifesavings in a shitcoin if they don't even get the blockchain basics of whether something is running on the actual blockchain and whether people are interacting with it
the whole point of the technology is decentralized trust, and you blindly put your trust into a single fat russian guy

>>16147084
And at the time a bitcoin only cost 250 dollars. Let THAT sink in.

>>16148054
>I don't understand the point of investing in something before it gains widespread usage
I'm sure you don't.

>>16147748
>25 posts
Rent free you lonely faggot. Have sex.

>>16147151
bullish af

>>16147052
I'm just waiting till it goes below $2, I'll start buying biz's panic sells then sell it back to them at $4-8.

>>16147581
Link will moon because of use, not speculation. That's the point

>>16148485
>Link will moon because of use, not speculation.
It will moon because of both.