/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16129535
I have 1200 linkies and consider myself an ultra linklet. You can use my rope after I'm done.

>>16129535
its a literal meme coin faggot

>>16129549
4k here. Someone end my suffering.

>>16129558
While I do admit its a meme on this board, I've been reading and listening to a lot of Sergey's interviews and speeches. Do you not see a future with his product? Seems to me to have a future.

>>16129581
>>16129549
Why are you all so sad? Because you don't have enough or because you dont see a future?

>>16129601
I don't consider 1200 enough to make it, I'm even all in.

Why would it be too late, just buy more if you think it has a future.

>>16129638
Well, that's a bit depressing, wish I started browsing this board a lot sooner. Regardless, I'll still dump money into it. If your problem is that you aren't able to be more in than you already are that's a good positive reaffirmation to keep stacking even if I wont have a "make it" stack.

>>16129677
You've got a point, I just wanted to see why people believe it is or isnt worth it to go in.

>>16129678
Don't listen to that retard OP, your initial suspicions on link are correct and we're gonna shatter expectations of these eternally bearish tards real soon.

>>16129535
This is the ground floor. You're not in at the literal pouring of the foundation like /biz/ is, but compared to a normie you're still extremely early.

>>16129535
I unironically own 17 link

>>16129689
Even if the project accomplishes nothing long-term, look at shit like NEO in the last bullrun. Nearly $200 purely on speculation and it does pretty much nothing other than be a chink ETH clone. Speaking of ETH, $1400 for making tokens. LINK will make ETH and all dApps work and should explode if we get even half the excitement of that last bullrun again. Think about it. Buy as much as you can while you can.

>>16129720
I'd send you 3 but I only have 950

>>16129720
I own 115

>>16129720
I own 119

>>16129691
:) You're optimism tickles my happy bone
>>16129702
:)
>>16129720
What are your other assets?
>>16129740
Appreciate the input anon :)

>>16129535
>>16129720
>>16129747
>>16129760
>>16129766
is this a new meme? Like stinkies pretending to have small dicks?

>>16129691
Kys subhuman, where the fk did I FUD Link?

10,000 is a make it stack
Its too late for average people to get a make it stack now but early enough to still make money

>>16129720
Whats you’re link address?

>>16129854
>I don't consider 1200 enough to make it
It is enough if you have a real attention span and can cope with delayed gratification

>>16129740
That type of speculation will never happen in the crypto space again, it’s all usage from here on out.

>>16129919
>will never happen in the crypto space again
This phrase alone is retarded

>>16129905
0x4307655d02c7b048a3a90d0d64d3f9831f94b5c9

>>16129931
You have 1.6 eth too, you’ll be alright kiddo.

>>16129951
i turned that eth into chainlink

>>16129919
What if we speculate on what will get usage?

>>16129535
link right now is like ETH at $5

>>16129919
Yup and its eth and link being used

>>16129872
Is making it equal $10m?

>>16129601
We're sad because we had 2 years. The crushing regret is real

>>16130051
Making it is different for everyone. Making it is never having to work and living reasonably well. How old are you? What's your country's retirement age? Figure out your remaining working years, multiply by an annual wage that would let you live comfy in your city/where you plan to live. Is your stack * 1000USD bigger than this? Congratulations you've made it.

>>16129925
he's right. 2017 completely changed crypto sentiment. if you were paying attention then it would be obvious.

>>16130051

for most that is a middle class lifestyle without having to work.
for first world, yes. that is 10MM, due to inflation etc.

>>16130116
>if you were paying attention then it would be obvious
Fucking hell are these the fucking retards browsing this board these days?

>>16130116
What are you saying exactly? In 2017 too many people made money and too many people are aware of crypto now so that's bad for crypto going forward?

>>16129535
How does more money than atoms in the universe sound 2 u?

>>16130168

>>16129535
If I need to make 50k out of LINK by end of 2021 how many LINK should I buy right now to achieve this?

>>16129581
6.3k here. Feel comfy to be honest.

>>16129535
>91 link
holy FUCK, the absolute state of nulinkers. Pathetic. how soon til we see single digit 'stacks'?

>>16129535
I have 3 LINK and I already know I'm gonna make it in a year or two.

>>16130136
You can cope until you rope, but those flash pumps from 2017, are dead and gone, be happy you can invest in chainlink and face the fact that you will have to wait for a few years for a lifetime of riches, it’s not that hard you just want to get rich quick.

>>16129931
Should have used another address, your 12 link shows you had 1300 links kek.

>ledger

300+ Link is whale level faggots

>>16130249
Cheeky but I like it

>>16130264
>investors will never suddenly start investing into a product that is making massive strides and clearly growing because it happened already

For the record I'm not betting a flash pump will happen soon I'm just saying it's nowhere near as impossible as you guys are saying.

>>16130284
>300 LINK is a whale
What are 7 figure Link marines then?

>>16130308
Liars

>>16130314
What about 6 figures?

>>16130339
Liars who will be subject to the depths of hell.

I have over 13k now, mostly purchased around .50c and I was a neet during that period. Literally the week I got a job we had the pump to over a dollar. The irony is if I had been employed in 2018 I could have accumulated 30-40k but my unemployment is what led me to learn everything about LINK. I sincerely hope all my frens make it, stay safe everyone.

>>16130136
newfag. probably unironically bought chainlink
>>16130144
interest in crypto fully saturated. and those who took interest saw it for what it is, niche uses providing marginal value. this new wave of "defi" is a pathetic attempt to rekindle mainstream interest. smart contracts have been available since eth launched and NOTHING of value has been built. there are no greater fools anymore. im not a maximalist (im a boomer nocoiner, its comfy btw) but btc is and will remain the only crypto worth touching. the amount of retards still grasping at straws within crypto post-2017 is astonishing.

I have a four figure stack. If I hadn't been a neet for so long my stack would be at more than double than it is now. I was a neet for about 3 years.

My laziness and bad life decisions are literally going to cost me millions.

>>16130356
And there it is
>I miss every boat and want you to miss the boat so I can feel better about myself

In a few years we will start seeing anons include the decimals in their link stack.

>hey guys, is 2.3 LINK enough to make it?

>>16130356
>an insular non scalable anti double spending proof of concept will prevail
This board went to total shit. Time to leave

>>16129832
not my fault I was born in eastern europe

is 7.5 enough to make it ?

>>16130394
wow, who would have imagined a containment forum for schizo-tier neets hailing a plaid-wearing fatso as their deity went to shit

>>16130392
Do you really think the value of a single LINK will be so high? Why? The current # in circulation is really high compared to other high value coins. And based on what I've read that already high number will increase. Supply and demand right?

>>16130503
Staking link (and removing it from circulation) in a node to earn returns, the higher the amount of link staked can handle higher value jobs and earn higher returns. Why would anyone sell?

threads like this make me feel a lot better about my 10k

>>16129535
I have 370 Link. I started in October. I've been throwing my overtime money into crypto in general. Focusing on Link and BTC

>>16130489
It is not the stinkers. The problem are the legacy ledger retards with their 1000 and one forks. Those who clinch on ancient obsolet tech that has only two selling arguments; fake wash trade volume and off shore gambling disguised as financial products. You are worse than gold bugs post 2013, at least they were just a narratival nuissance, your kind is literally shitting up the whole damn space and holding everything back, making it look like a toxic penny stock market instead of a cutting edge technological space able to optimize work processes and cut costs. Hopefully legislators will regulate you and all the rest of the grand pa coin faggots to the poor house

>>16129832
I wish it was

>>16130240
2000

>>16130356
>smartcontracts are worthless and unusable in the real world!! And the thing that will make them suddenly revolutionary and applicable in all forms of business is worthless too!
B
R
A
I
N
L
E
T

>>16130372
Like one of the Anons said above its the neet life led you to Link so thats how you found the legup.

>>16129535
LINK will go up 20x by end of the year says The Duke, Bune.

>>16131585
Bune plz no I’m not ready

>>16131614
Trolls will end up broke kid.

>>16130356
Ok boomer. Screen capped and we will see who has the last laugh.

>>16131626
Not trolling I’m unironically not ready I must accumulate more

>>16131639
Not a boomer. Just giving fair warning. You're literally low IQ if you dont understand what's going on. Do your research. Bune always prevails, and he has more than a few giving him the power to do so (:

>>16129535
>>16129535
Keep investing, try to get at least ~250 LINK quickly.
Then once LINK's price drops back to $2.50-$2.65, setup 3x leverage long, if LINK's price doubles, you will double your stack after repaying the borrowed money. LINK is never going to go under <$2 again so you likely won't get liquidated.
Afterwards, spend time identifying one more easy setup like that, and you'll have a 1000+ LINK suicide stack.
Interest for margin is usually very low, like $1 for every 4 days your position is open, so using this method you don't have to panic if it doesn't moon immediately.
Small risk for high reward.

>>16129535
are you fuck too late, silly bugger.

walk down your highest street.

ask people if they own bitcoin it'll be like less than 1%

ask them about ethereum, probably 0.25-0.5% know

ask them about smart contracts, even less.

ask them abouit chainlink and its gonna be 0.000001% right now,

the fact you are on 4chan right now puts you ahead of 9.99999% of people in the world

>>16129919
>speculation will never happen
Every market is susceptible of bubbling, just check S&P500, after 2008 we are gonna have another financial crash

>>16131812
>>9.99999%
wew, thats reassuring thanks anon :)

>>16131739
I feel like you are giving me really good advice, but my IQ is too low to know how to pull this off correctly, sorry fren

>>16129535
Dude this shit is a proven scam. I can't believe anyone is still buying this shit. It doesn't even have its own blockchain.

>>16132165
IT'S ALMOST ONE OUT OF TEN!

>>16129919
You are speaking out of your ass

>>16132195
What does that matter?

>>16129919
luckily, usage will cause LINK to moon

word on the street is that staking is fundamentally flawed, aggregration is simple not enough to stop sybil attacks/collusion, rendering chainlink essentially useless for it's perceived high-value use cases like derivatives... you didn't think it would be THAT easy did you anon? CL still has it's place as an oracle service, centralized of course and yes, sergey is right about one thing, the space is moving BEYOND TOKENIZATION
it's over unfortunately, staking will be delayed for 6 months + in a conceited effort to "on-board" verified nodes, but really, do you think 100, even 500 verified nodes would be enough to run the trillions of dollars worth of derivatives on? No... 10,000 nodes maybe, but theres no way to make sure these nodes aren't corrupt without them being KYC'd/authorised/centralised thus rendering decentralization pointless for LINK
sorry it had to be this way anon(s) but someone had to give to this board straight and that someone is me

>>16132647
Why isn't aggregation enough?

>>16129998
nope. like ETH at $40.

>>16132700
nope, like ETH at $0.01