/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16101159
you are so new it physically hurts

>>16101159

I take it you haven't been following things

>>16101159
pee pee poo poo

>>16101159
if you're unable to figure it out yourself just stay away for your own good

>>16101159
We settled this two years ago faggot, read the archives.

>>16101164
>>16101173
>>16101178
Been here since early 2017. It's pretty obvious it's a scammy shitcoin.

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

I cant buy any chainlink coinbase blacklisted me and thats the only website i know that sells it i am also retarded

>>16101183
That it's useless? I said no Pajeets, faggot streetshitter.

>>16101193
>>16101207
>>16101159
absolute cringe here lads

>babby's first thread

>>16101193
sure things reddit
now get your faggot nigger ass back there

>>16101183

>>16101159
Buy a real coin like RLC.

>>16101209
>>16101215
>it's n-not a scam p-please believe me
Not an argument, Randeep. Top cringe.

>>16101222
>seething that I'm FUDing his obvious pump and dump scam

>>16101159
Link is the first “continual” scam in crypto, while devs of other shitcoins give up after pumping it once, Sergey has locked 65% of the (premined) supply away and will dump every time the coin gains traction. He would have dumped another 700k if that had happened with mixicles but it didn’t so he’s waiting for the next chance

>>16101159
Sergey is known scammer, 700k dumps all the time.

>>16101249
Stinky LINKIES BTFO. Time to suicide now Pajeet, Randeep, Rakesh and your ten million cousins who shill this coin.

>>16101207
>reading archives instead of asking to be spoonfed like a massive faggot is pajeetery
low IQ shitskin detected

>>16101159
>>16101276
>lets have a discussion!
>calls everyone who responds pajeet
really lazy, you can do better than this

>>16101284
>>16101296
>Pajeet on suicide watch that his scam has been exposed
Sorry Randeep, not today. Shill harder.

>>16101284
>that formatting

It's a total scam but managed to shill itself to a permanent top position like Litecoin or Dash did.

>>16101284
Imagine posting screen caps of obvious shills and 'insiders' as proof, the absolute state of LINKshits.

>>16101159
They literally had no communication with the LINK holders for a year and a half after the ICO. If they were scamming they'd have hyped the fuck out of it years ago and moved on.

>>16101159
its pretty obvious you're half baiting in order to better understand Chainlink yourself.
A better method of doing this on 4chan is not taking this retarded route and saying "heres what you guys should argue!", the better method would be "Heres my position and this is why Im right." If you do it that way, you'll have mountains of neets coming to defend their position. A better way to word you thread would be something like:
>Chainlink is not sybil resistant. Anyone could spin up 1,000 nodes and gain consensus over the network. Chainlink will fail and the network is useless.

Although this method requires you doing just the TINIEST bit of researching yourself, which is obviously difficult for a lazy brainlet like yourself.

>>16101337
>>16101314
>imagine having an Indian level reading comprehension
>imagine not knowing how IDs work

>>16101200
You are a MANIAC

>>16101356
we ignore those posts too, we've been over it so many times. sometimes a zealous newfag drops in and pumps out some freshman tier analysis, but that's about it

>>16101359
>imagine not knowing how IDs work
I posted twice, oh no, exposed! The absolute state.

>>16101356
>TLDR seething streetshitter doesn't address the posts that BTFO his scammy vaporware because he hopes they will go away
Oops low IQ stinky linky pooped himself.

>>16101387
i still divulge in them rarely. Not nearly as much as I use to. I'm just pointing OP in the right direction because there are plenty of ways to go about it then this.
>Voting methods aren't sybil resistant!
>token is useless, just use ETH!
>The nodes are aggregating from just one source!
>payments are tied to speculative volatility!
>Sergey isn't fiduciary!

Of course all those points can be argued but if OP wants to come to a conclusion himself he should be better informed and ready to argue actual talking points.

>>16101422
Write a book about your seethe, Pajeet. No one cares to better understand a scam, brainlet.

>>16101159
I don't know shit about chainlink. I just know its the random "investment" a bunch of sad & lonely NEET incels picked to form this weird little community to give them some kind of desperate connection to people outside their parents basement. Most these faggots don't even hold LINK, theyre brokeass losers who refuse to work, they just LARP that they've been holding wads of it since $.20 because they know they're never going to amount to anything, but at least here they can pretend. They live vicariously through their LARPs on a dead 4chin board. Fuck /biz/ , it was way better not knowing people like this existed

>>16101435
the only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance

>>16101422
One of the better threads I've ever been in was about a year ago, when a dude (I think a british guy) started a thread asking some questions about Chainlink. Everyone told him to fuck off and nobody gave him any answers, but he stayed in the thread and obviously went and tried to do some research and kept coming back and asking decent questions, and after TWO HOURS of staying in the thread suddenly a bunch of anons started replying and it turned into an excellent discussion.
It was such a clear tipping point where people just decided that this dude was obviously trying to educate himself (not just asking to be spoonfed) and was also hanging around and keeping a good attitude, and /biz/ went from its usual "go fuck yourself" to a few highly informed anons answering questions in detail.
It was a nice moment and a real indication of how to do things here if you want an actual response.

>>16101457
>Waste your time learning about an obvious pump and dump scam
No.