/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16083936
2019, I am forgotten

>>16083955
Checked.

when i say i am an RLC digital oil man, you will believe me

>>16083975
LINK=Snake Oil
RLC=Digital Oil

>>16083936
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

this pasta has been going around for months, 100% facts. if you didn't sell, your IQ is low

>>16083936
perhaps you're new
prices go up and down, several times, over and over
you had two years

>>16083995
>you had two years
you had 1 month to sell above $3 while people actually believed Google was a partner and that Chainlink would get users.

It's not been 4 months with ZERO dapps using it (as smart anons predicted). You missed your only chance, and it's never coming back. The longer time passes with ZERO dapps using it, the more obvious the vaporware scam becomes.

>>16083936
Well it wasn’t true but you had to be in last year.

fuck me im only up 10x

Still priced out top kek

its over
just kill me and bury me in gravel

>>16084116
hello again friend from the other thread! you had two years! HAhahahaAhaHAHAh

>>16083982
>>16083936
its over gilles

>>16083995

local bottom about 2.5, then rocket. screenshot it.

>>16084219
Please let them FUD. Why can't you just let third worders buy some Link? Why are you so racist?

>>16084224
This is bretty fucking funny tho

>>16084116
>4 months is too long
>dapps dapps dapps

You sound like a fucking newfag, seems quite clear that I take breaks from this thread longer than all of your lurking combined. Fucking kys and give me your bags, weak handed faggot fingers

who would win? 1 filter or 99999 shills?

>>16084219
>>16084245
>>16084247
you had 1 month.

ZERO

USERS

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

0.2EOY

>>16084546
Let them wallow in anguish. Do not spoonfeed linkers. They are like a cult.