/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16064329
Before you buy, let me tell you a story.
I was visiting San Francisco to see one of my friends. We went to a strip club, and while I was there, I saw Sergey, surrounded by women. He was throwing tons of money at them, but not just bills. It was stacks upon stacks of $10,000, sealed up with the white paper bands, like he had just come straight from a bank.
I went up to him and congratulated him on the success of Chainlink as of late (this was about a month ago), and he started laughing. He took a hefty swig from a bottle of Dom Perignon, and said, "Yeah? You think I care, stinky?"
Confused, I asked what he meant, and said that he had obviously put a lot of work into LINK and he should be proud.
"Fundamentally, I don't give two fucks about Chainlink, kid."
He was about to say something else but one of the strippers tapped him on the shoulder. Sergey pulled out from his pocket the biggest ziplock bag full of cocaine I've ever seen in my life. It looked like one of those gallon bags, almost bulging at the seams. The stripper ran off into a back room with it.
He then pulled out a Zippo lighter.
"You wanna know what I think about Chainlink?"
He snapped his fingers and a stripper handed him a bottle of Hennessy. He then pulled about 20 stacks of bills from a duffel bag, threw them on the floor, poured cognac all over them, flicked his Zippo, and dropped it onto the pile. Almost instantly the whole stack caught.
I stared at him, speechless.
"It's called a 'PUMP and DUMP,' kid."
He laughed as he watched the pile burn before losing interest and going into a back room with his entourage of strippers following carrying duffel bags full of what I assume was money and coke.
This is the man you are supporting by buying LINK.

>>16064329
What‘s with all the fud all of a sudden? It‘s not even dumping

>>16064339
what fucking FUD are you talking about? please enlighten me on the FUD. im listening go ahead.

>>16064334
source
>trust me

>>16064339
The shitty ass blog post. 0 real partners again and only 20 showed up, with 8 of them not being utterly obvious scams.

Its not fud, even you long time bag holders are waking up. shitcoin scam that has no real use, still has no usage, and accomplishes nothing but lining fat boy's pockets. This will be the 3rd project he quits.

>>16064334
Nice copy and paste, this is why Link is dead. Too many paid indian shills

>>16064334
Kek

>>16064339

When are they not fudding?

>>16064329
who would win? 1 filter or 99999 shills?

>>16064422
Die faster so we can have our board back. It's looking real grim for your Caribbean PnD scam. Gets dumped on 700k numerous times and worships a founder who has a history of abandoning all his projects.

>>16064411
Rent free

>>16064507
Good thing laughter is free.

>>16064329
Bought at 20 cents sold at $3.50! LMAO

>>16064329
Compare lenght of Chainlink development with ETH and it really is piece of a shit

im not fudding guys, chainlink is my only chance left at life. the thing is, over these YEARS we have glorified it so fucking much. its been THREE YEARS and its still impossible to know if swift is a chainlink partner. go ask rory, he'll give you the good old "our relationships are described on our website"...are you fucking kidding me? this OPEN SOURCED company cant tell me if they are partnered with swift? where are all the amazing partnerships we dug the breadcrumbs for? WHERE THE FUCK ARE THEY ITS BEEN THREE FUCKING YEARS. I DONT WANT TO SAY THIS BECAUSE MY LIFE IS IN CHAINLINK BUT ALL YOU CAN DO WITH IT AFTER THREE FUCKING YEARS IS CHECK PRICES. WHERE IS ALL THE SHIT THEY and WE KEEP TALKING ABOUT. THREE FUCKING YEARS

>>16064629
they aren't shit for brains

It’s over...

If you have been in for “years” you should have made fuck load of money.
Did you not accumulate enough anon? You had 2 years

>>16064339

Yeah sorry, I'm out. First they couldn't even get 50. But that's beside the point. Just look at the list, it's a bunch of nobodies. Half of which look like basement dwellers creating their crypto webpage a few weeks ago. Find me ONE legit company on that list. There is none. It's a bunch of crypto nobodies serving as references for each-other with no tangible product or service. I'm out, this is pure hype that's got nothing to do with the real world.

>>16064639
i really want to believe this and i do. its just hard giving yourself a reality check of the progress they made. i'd imagine if chainlink is as important as we think it is it would be focused on more for development. im just extremely frustrated guys im sorry. fuck my life. fuck this clown ass world.

>>16064329
What do you mean it went over 4 fucking dollars why didn’t you sell when it actually mooned?

>>16064629
its at least another 3 years for some kind of actual noteable progress. do you watched the youtube hackathon seminars they currently upload? from a software developer standpoint this shit is still at its infancy. they only now started to simplify, automate, script, sandboxed their band aid PROOF OF CONCEPT solutions to create API adapters for meme shitcoin pair rates

>>16064704
stop lying nobody wants your bags

>>16064504
>our
Your a newfag and it never was your board. Gtfo

>>16064629
you're acting as if there was a better opportunity elsewhere
literally the majority of alts went -99% and are still bleeding to 0. we are just entering a new cycle, halving is in may.

>>16064692
Stop being so emotional or stop relying on money management to make it.

>>16064629
It’s a scam anon. There’s no substance and there never will be any with this project, just like all his others.

Time has ran out for excuses and your shitcoin still hasn’t brought anything to the table. What do you know, you’re dumping again.

Swift is developing its own oracles. They don’t need link. Look into it.

>>16064713
how was i shilling LINK?

>>16064329
I spent $5k on Chainlink. Now I have $55k worth of Chainlink. Maybe your problem is that you bought too high instead of buying in under twenty cents like everyone else here with more than half a brain.

>>16064629
>THREE FUCKING YEARS
>2017-2019
>three years
You really are retarded, huh?

>>16064329
>let down

Sorry you’re retarded. Cope.

>>16064771
Its not dumping though

>>16064860
count em up
7,8,9

>>16065121
Everyone take a good hard look at this post and think about the kind of people fudding chainlink and the type of people you're taking financial advice from in general.

>>16064629

ICO september 2017, initial price around 10 cents. Current price, 2.70 and top 15 CMC. Best performer of 2018 and 2019.
In 2017, LINK used to be a fucking nobody. The whole thing was written in Ruby. Today, partnered with Google, Oracle, Intel and Swift.
Remember when redditors didn't want to buy in because Link wasn't listed on Bittrex? LOL

>>16065121
Holy shit. 7 + 8 + 9 = 24. 2, 4. 42.
Hurry quick with my magnesium lads I'm slipping into the schizo ether.

please buy chainlink sir

All major news reported that Chainlink was involved in a PnD scheme a few weeks back. Very high chance of being delisted.

>>16064701
i did, unironically the chainlink i have left is "free"
>>16064704
another link holder fudding, but ill bite. if its in its infancy then why is swift using this tech to make their own oracle? one can even say the oracle is done because they are coming out with GPI link.
>>16064733
i could of bought QNT for under thirty cents, it mooned to $14. there are lots of other opportunities and i didnt take any of them because i believe in chainlink so much. its now biting me in the ass.
>>16064748
good as telling a homeless person to get a job
>>16064771
shut up
>>16064828
my DCA is 20-30 cents
>>16064860
holy shit you are retarded
>>16064875
how am i retarded? i have chainlink too....
>>16065161
good times. its as if id rather go back to accumulating. this 1.50-3 crab is mental.
>>16065224
.....................

Link is dead

>All major news reported that Chainlink was involved in a PnD scheme a few weeks back. Very high chance of being delisted.

>>16064411
>only 20
it was just the first 20 and you idiots who expected microsoft to be in the first 20 out of 50 list are retarded
they're all startups and no names but that doesn't mean they're bad

>>16065691
>could of bought
lmao go broke you fucking idiot. you don't deserve link.

>>16065691
>holy shit you are retarded
>October 2017 - October 2018
>One Year
October 2018 - October 2019
>One Year

>oracle announce they will be working with 50 start ups months prior
>fast forward to today
>oracle reveal some of the start ups they're working with
>"what a letdown. they're start up literal whos"

never change, you fucking mongoloids

>>16065733
back to redit grammar queen, last time i checked this is an anon board full of rejects and retards. please go back.
>>16065736
maybe one day youll figure it out!
>>16065797
found the gravelcoin bagholder. have you even looked at this shit? its a literal scam.

nolinkers say the darndest things.

>>16065839
You're retarded, and gay.

>>16065935
>id "QEE"
ok queer

>>16064411
you had 2 years sanjesh

>>16065972
I know...so much laughter I missed out on by getting into crypto so late. At least I have a front row seat watching your little shill cult burn like it’s currently doing.

Link has google and swift and oracle + 50 new startup partnershios..what u fags crying and fudding for

>>16065161
I've literally been here telling people since 2017 that whoever believes swift will partner with link is absolutly retarded. They aren't partnered. Swift will not use a russian ERC token.

Yet, it's 2019 and you retards still haven't figured. Dumb money is keeping this floating for now.

>>16066783
>swift
go ahead and ask rory if they are partnered with SWIFT, report back please
>google
that was a blogpost of how chainlink can be used for bigquery, again go ahead and ask rory if they are "partnered" and youll get the quickest "come to your own conclusions" answer
im not fudding anon, my point is that NONE of this is clear. we can speculate all we want thats great, but there comes a time when you need clear answers and sadly the chainlink team will not give you them.

>>16066803
its crazy how all the people who say chainlink is a scam know SO MUCH about chainlink ;)

>>16066834
where the fuck did i say it's a scam?

>>16065855
What is this

>>16066848
We just win chart anon
>Or are you a nulinker

>>16064411
Literally everything you said is a lie