/biz/ - Business & Finance

More salt pls gives me errection

Waited 2 fucking years for salt like this

when chainlink underpins every transaction globally it will have a market cap equal to global gdp

>>15986082
i hold link aswell but ive seen whats happened to qtum, icx, bitbean, omisego... etc they all were shilled here back in the day.

you didn't answer my question: HOW link can pump even 10x, it needs 8800Million dollars marketcap. thats fucking 8.8billion dollars

>>15986098
Imagine thinking this board is rational.
If LINK $1k EOY I will eat my dick.

>>15986095
"when and when" how you can say that two-men startup team can acheive such a goal? thats too impossible to even imagine that whole world gdp would do that.

what even holds some big companies to make better chainlink?

>>15986106
Someone screencap this

>>15986098
That's not a lot of money you stupid boomer. If even 80 million people put only 100 dollars into it you'd reach that level. 80 million is not a lot of people world wide and 100 dollars is not a lot of money either.

>>15986131
again: "if"

if that happens, link only gains 10x. you need 800million people to put 100dollar to gain 100x. thats already 88 BILLION DOLLARS.

also why the fuck they would invest in link, it still has NO USERS. no utility. only thing what drives the price at the moment is hype and speculation.

>>15986145
>ou need 800million people to put 100dollar to gain 100x
you have ZERO fucking idea how marketcap works lmao
jesus fuck

>>15986131
Or to put it another way if 2% of the u.s. population put 1k into it, it would reach the same market cap.

How can you say its crazy when btc even in its current state has a market cap of 140 billion usd

>>15986106
i like posts like this because they’re a sign i’m right

nobody did answer my question. only that price hype "if and if"

that just tells me tale of stupid millenial zoomers here wanting to be rich very easily.

not going to happen.

link needs 88 billion dollars marketcap to gain 100x in the price. you can go see it by yourself at coinmarketcap

>>15986164
Or if one person pays $50 for a link. Learn what market cap is retard.

>>15986176
let him be, he actually thinks marketcap is relevant, or means anything

>>15986098
retard.

>>15986172
also 88billion is nothing. u answeted your own question

>>15986185
stay poor and get dumped by asian whale groups and russian/indian discord scammers. this shit has hit double top in sats and going down hard like omisego and the rest of the biz hype shitcoins.

theres no real OG's left who helped the community back in the day when ETH was 1$

fuck you all fucking zoomer kids.

>>15986162
he's right you simpleton

>>15986108
the team doesn’t run the nodes anon, the network is decentralized and infinitely scalable. any stakeholder can profit from the system and institutionally it is both a source of income and a global guarantor of contracts, meaning those who buy in have a progressively greater stake in the system as it grows. competitors will arise but they won’t be able to capture nearly the same level of marketshare, being relegated to private network usage that will still tap into the chainlink network when issuing contracts with external parties. only pariah states and bad actors would be interested in setting up their own competing networks because they are not interested in the global financial system, and by their nature these networks would be tiny in scale compared to the main network

>>15986203
yeah 88billion is nothing, with that logic, that amount could go to every else shitcoin there is.

you kids think that linkchain is somehow unique, like your ancestor did few years ago with omisego or ICX or QTUM or VET.

>>15986208
i know that shit already, with 2-men team, i meant that big companies would make their own "better chainlink" and use their army of coders,

what hold them not doing so? why do you think that everyone suddely wants use chainlink, as today, theres no users. what would suddenly bring everyone among chain of links?

>>15986209
retard.

>>15986221
>i meant that big companies would make their own "better chainlink"

why would they invest in development when the team is already doing it for free? all big companies have to do is sit on cheap link tokens and wait for the network to expand, then reap free money from staking while enjoying the benefits of the network. the team has already figured out how link works and how to implement the network, the next real step lies with smart contract writers creating content for the infrastructure while said infrastructure continues to grow

>>15986265
they doesnt care the price they want it to work and have good tech.

what holds them to make even better chainlink?

big companies have the moneys to develop and they're not afraid doing so. they could spend their lunch moniues like 100M to develop better chainlink and not use some shady russian uni dropout startup's code.

I love all the retards that don't understand how LINK will easily be $1000, it makes me laugh and feel sorry for them

>>15986279
>100m
keep throwing stupid numbers around to justify your arguments retard.

>>15986279
the tech already works, if companies were to invest in something it would be network nodes, not pointless redevelopment of proprietary technology that would lead to litigation and delays of a system that will hugely decrease their margins upon implementation. yeah, companies “could have” developed something like chainlink, but they didn’t and the team did, that’s how IP works. now they can get on board the network or they can flail uselessly against it while delaying their own potential profits for no reason. all they’re really waiting for are user friendly smart contracts adapted to the chainlink system

>>15986310
you are yjsut passively agressive i can see why, you haven't answered any of my questions, thats just because you dont know either how link will succeed and where all the money will come from.

>>15986303
i hodl link my self too but im not convinced of any of this shit. just because i'm og crypto trader and i've seen those "omg dude this is future coin x" shit falling like a rock after they're being dumped.

>>15986389
tech doesn't work nor it isn't the best in the world, companies would already been in long time ago. still the price is rising, wonder why? its just being manipulated and only speculation / hype drives the price now. i don't say link is completely shit but i think we are years too early and price is inflated. could be wrong but definetly 1000$ or even 100$ is impossible sounding goal at the moment, theres no users... no users anon...

>>15986059
LINK will be top 1, because it’s not tied to crypto market, but to derivatives market. Once the staking is done and the derivative jobs are live you will see volume rise slowly until it hits 2-5 trillion daily volume and LINK price will rise to match the demand. I can see a trillion marketcap in 2 years, 10 trillion in 5 years. That would put 1 linkie at $10,000

>>15986106
Looks like your eating dick

>>15986059
DRNS

>>15986059
>>>/tv/122884999
Don't question it. Even on other boards link gets digits. Something bigger is at play here

>>15986608
Yes and derivatives is only one usecase.

>>15986608
This

>>15986514
>tech doesn't work
It does
>nor it isn't the best in the world,
It's literally the only one in the world and Town Crier has all the patents. No once can copy it without being sued to hell and back.

Just stay poor. I don't know why we are bothering to spoonfeed you. Retards like you deserve to die in poverty.

>>15986098
xrp went to 150B kek
numerous shitcoins had massive mcaps in 2017

the next bullrun will see the overall crypto mcap go into the trillions. assuming link is top 5, do the math.

christ, just let them buy if they want to. deluded fucks are never gonna change their mind even when they're begging for pennies on the street from sir gay as he walks past with their sister.

>>15986660
Read his replies, its your typical gay fudder trying to make his questions seem legitimate

>two man team
>russian

>>15986059
I did some pretty deep thonking yesterday and conservatively came up with 30-50 usd per link per year in staking, factoring in the top 5ish industries...ignoring plenty more.

30 dollars per year per link, completely passive income. Not right off the bat but in a year or two of network establishment. That's 300-600 per link any boomer would pay for good returns. 50 is 500-1k. Considering that the staking rewards aren't even, and are skewed to the top... the arms race to buy LINK will be fun.

What few drones left at the companies using smart contracts will run the numbers, tell their bosses to dump some of the hundreds of millions they're now saving annually back into link for even more money...and it becomes a giant unstoppable snowball, rather quickly.

>>15986108
>two man startup is FUD
What is Google?

>>15986059
I ain't even broke fuckin even yet NIH GUH

>>15986098
>HOW link can pump even 10x
Because people will buy it...?

>>15986660
you still didn't answer my question. even the tech works FOR NOW, nothing will stop the big companies make their own. why would they trust their business data to some russian startup devs. and im not poor, im also holding stainstink but you guys are literally delusional about this. your fairytale could puff in one night when some big company says they made their own.

>>15986664
XRP is 110% legit than chainlink. and 2017 was back then, now its totally different.

>>15986875
this is also that category of "if this and if that" that money could flow to any other coin aswell.

>>15986909
>Y-YOU CANT FUD MY PRECIOUS RUSSIAN DEV COIN!!!! IF AND IF MILLION PEOPLE INVESTS IT, I-IT W-WILL GO T-TO THE M-MOON!!

You literally sound like crazy cult member

>>15986904
Lmfao same cuh whats your initial

if link hits 1000$ i will fuck a tranny

>>15987097
>>15987084
>>15986694
>>15986106

>we just passed $2.70
Press S to spit on no-linkers

S

>>15987199
>2.70
lol. enjoy your 8yo ford fiesta.

>>15987204
Can use my linkies to go 30% down on a house even at these prices, soon I can buy a whole house

Not that I'll ever sell, just remember that you knew about it

>>15987214
>Not that I'll ever sell
then you are literally throwing your money away on nothing. absolutely horrific business, no wonder you buy this utter horseshit. why not buy a coin with which you could buy a damn castle, as opposed to throwing money at... oh whatever man. knock yourself out.

>>15986655
fugg :DD

>>15987227
the business model is predicated on income from staking, so it’s not that bad of an idea to hold some honestly. though some profit-taking along the way up would be intelligent

>>15987267
>staking
which presumably you're NEVER SELLING, because of dubs gets and frog cartoons, right?
bunch of kids, biz was so much better 5 years ago, i think every competent person left.

>>15987287
>5 years ago

dumb nolinker.
take your (you)

>>15986655

>>15986098
>I hold link as well
You faggots always fud like this. Go neck yourself.

>>15987287
>>15987227
begone newfag, you do not deserve this board

>>15986279
“Uni dropout”
>imagine not knowing how to do a background check

>>15987084
Stop begging for spoonfeeding and just sell already if you don't believe in the project you absolute donkey.

>>15987287
>dubs
Jannie

>>15987097

>>15986108
>2man team fud
1/10 troll

>>15987287
>biz was better before crypto when nobody made any money

kek

>>15986059
It seems crazy today but crypto is just in its infancy. In 5 years time links current mcap will look like nothing, it will be the mcap of <100 coins on CMC.

>>15986059
shtinkie linkies~

>>15986059
>ladies, tell me how the F link could go to 1000$
eoy

>>15986145
That’s not how it works anon. I’ve got bad news, you’re not a very smart person.

>>15986265
>i meant that big companies would make their own "better chainlink"
BECAUSE THEN ITS NOT TRULY DECENTRALIZED BECAUSE YOU KNOW BIG COMPANY X CREATED IT YOU STUPID FAGGOT AND COULD FUCK WITH THE RESULTS NEGATING END TO END SECURITY. JESUS FUCKING CHRIST GROW A BRAIN.
>this is meant for the person you’re responding to but I’m phonefagging and it’s hard.

>>15986059
You missed that anon's thread on how "chainlink is the dealer in the crypto futures casino" this weekend...

it can't, LINK shills just need fresh money all the time that's why they say it can

>make retard thread
>get 70 replies
congrats, OP, i guess

>>15986098
How about you tell me what the market cap of cisco systems or microsoft were during the december 1999 dot com bubble. Go on I'll wait. Tell me the market cap of all the top dot com bubble companies without working poroducts in dec 1999. So me how much of a retsrd you are.

>>15986098 #
How about you tell me what the market cap of cisco systems or microsoft were during the december 1999 dot com bubble. Go on I'll wait. Tell me the market cap of all the top dot com bubble companies without working products in dec 1999. Show me how much of a retsrd you are thinking 10 billion is an even remotely insane market cap.

>>15986164
Lol try .5%. You neet way less money than you think to get a highly inflated price.

>>15986059
>retard is baffled by the concept of speculation
Stay broke poorfag

>>15986098
>i hold link aswell

Sweet nulinker you all 2019 buyers are so naive and scared

>>15986059
There won't be any users until staking is live.
>well we invented the automobile, why isn't there anyone driving?
>why are these investors so excited about gas stations? Noone drives

>>15990009
Excellent analogy

>>15990009
>>15990009
>People have been riding horse drawn buggies for thousands of years. No one will ever use an automobile.

People have been communicating by raven/courier vorrespondence for thousands of years, noone will ever use a telegraph, it's far too complecated.

>>15990009
>People have been riding horse drawn buggies for thousands of years. No one will ever use an automobile.

>People have been communicating by raven/courier correspondence for thousands of years, noone will ever use a telegraph, it's far too complecated.

>>15986059
>88bn marketcap is not possible
Lol

Market cap doesn't actually mean a lot. It's just supply x price. Not how much money is circulating or has been spent. In theory if everyone stopped selling and the price instantly skyrocketed to $5,000 a coin and then 5 coins were bought then the market cap would be ridiculous, despite only $25,000 having been spent.

>>15986655

>>15986059
Your lack of research skills in a digital era concerns me. That's why boomers have been mostly outsmarted in cryptomarkets by a bunch of millenial and zoomers. The potential of Chainlink is at plain sight yet you refuse to invest some time into it. You are not gonna make it