[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 208 KB, 756x1012, 1535242271555.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15957783 No.15957783 [Reply] [Original]

How accurate is this? Please help, I am retarded as fuck

>> No.15957802

drns

>> No.15957809

drns

>> No.15957812

drns

>> No.15957957

drns

>> No.15957971

drns

>> No.15957976

drns

>> No.15957983

I am from India

>> No.15957985

drns

>> No.15957990

drns

>> No.15958009

drns

>> No.15958013
File: 48 KB, 400x500, 1112.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15958013

>> No.15958035
File: 10 KB, 253x199, Unknown.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15958035

>>15957783

>> No.15958056

drns

>> No.15958058

>>15957783
drns

>> No.15958072

drns

>> No.15958090

>>15957783
82 trillion is a lower estimate than I’ve read before. The mixicles white paper estimated 200 trillion and the derivatives blogpost estimated 500 trillion to 1.4 quadrillion.

>> No.15958091

>>15957983
Yes, color of curry in id, that's a 100% proof.

>> No.15958092

>>15957783
>>15957802
>>15957809
>>15957812
>>15957957
>>15957971
>>15957976
>>15957985
>>15957990
>>15958009
>>15958013
>>15958035
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

>> No.15958096
File: 16 KB, 400x400, 1569531031533.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15958096

>>15958072
>>15958058
>>15958056
>>15958013
>>15958009
>>15957990
>>15957985
>>15957983
>>15957976
>>15957971
>>15957957
>>15957812
>>15957809
>>15957802

Nice samefag. Fag

>> No.15958099

>>15957783
Nice FUD, but I'm not selling

>> No.15958107

>>15958092
dunno how you can compare the two, they couldnt be any more dislike. oh and btw OpenLaw is going to be using chainlink so get fucked lol 1k eoy paki

>> No.15958120

>>15957783
OOOH NOOO
FUD
I'M NOT LOOKING AT IT
SORRY MR GOLDBERG, NOT TODAY

>> No.15958128

Link at $1000 is like bitcoin right now, you are lucky to own one single link.

>> No.15958129

>>15958107
No one is using Chainlink, and no one ever will. They had 3 years.

>> No.15958130

>>15957783
dubs 100 EOY after giant november news

>> No.15958133

drns

>> No.15958140
File: 8 KB, 214x235, chmon2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15958140

>>15958092
>LINK is NOTHING like ETH
And that's a good thing!

>> No.15958145

Am I enlightened or something? This sounds like LINK is leading up to producing new tokens? Could the forkening be real and not just a meme?

>> No.15958149
File: 242 KB, 500x500, frdgzdfg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15958149

read; bought more

>> No.15958151

>>15958129
no, literally, a man worth 17b and his company TODAY saod theyre going to use link and eth lol

>> No.15958205
File: 9 KB, 237x250, 1571077600423s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15958205

>>15958151
Sauce me.

>> No.15958242
File: 204 KB, 750x500, 1541194164301.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15958242

not reading, never selling

>> No.15958297

>>15957783
drns

>> No.15958344

>>15957783
It makes loose unsure assumptions on both the idea a certain amount of collateral required and the % of the market LINK will be integrated with. Honestly I don't think any of this effects the price in a direct correlation. Price should be almost entirely based on staking gains, and partly the same speculation that gives link value right now. That being said I'm never fucking selling.

>> No.15958431

Chainlink is bullshit

>> No.15958442

drns

>> No.15958456

drns

>> No.15958516

>>15958151
No he didn't. Chainlink has been lying about partnerships for 3 years. Nothing ever came true. Fake partnerships that will never use the token.

>> No.15958546

drns

>> No.15958625

Drns