/biz/ - Business & Finance

cause you sure are gonna get a chunk of the wealth of this quasi monopolistic propaganda machine

>>15955020
Old news.

>>15955037
>#^]

>>15955020
>he thinks they using his shitcoin
fucking linklet newfag
https://blockoneiq.thomsonreuters.com/

>>15955020
I love how they’re still keeping Link a secret. The media will talk about all the great new things link will enable without mentioning link. What is even their purpose?

>>15955053
It was never meant to be a public facing project. Link will never generate public attention. Embrace that, we are still going to $1000eoy from corporate demand.

>>15955076
This. We were never supposed to hear about this. Binance added to the fire by listing it on their own. KEK. This clown world is topkek.

>>15955053
>>15955076
>>15955088
Thomson Reuters have there own oracle. They're not touching Chainlink

https://blockoneiq.thomsonreuters.com/
https://tokenpost.com/Thomson-Reuters-patents-blockchain-based-identity-management-system-1618

>>15955053
The Jews failed to stop us at ico, now their only play is to avoid all mentions and keep trying to shake some of us out.

No spec/hype waves for the goys...only fake articles about manipulation and referring to CL as "new technologies" and other vague shit.

>>15955053
>>15955076
>>15955088
It is no secret because it isn't used what are you talking about? Nobody is using LINK, we have like 13 nodes live spamming the ETH heartbeat and that's it. Maybe soon there will be another set of shitcoin prices spammed paid by 700k dumps but that doesn't mean anything because literally nobody is using it. And you know why? Because nobody is using smart contracts or decentralized finance shit, there's literally 0 volume on that shit and you deluded retards think that magically all the businesses will start buying tokens for this and for that? Come on, stop being retarded. There is 0 demand for this shit, this space only exists because of lazy want to get rich people and some oldfag bitcoiners who do this for fun and cruise from one conference to the next in their private jets and yachts.

>>15955109
You must be new. We’ve already had plenty of breadcrumbs that will point to them developing their own oracle Via Chainlink. We all know centralized identification management has no chance.

>>15955109
Finally somebody with brains.

>>15955157
For a project you seem not to care about, you’re pretty fired up right now. Seems weird.

>>15955163
Wrong. Big Business and all government wants centralization you fucking moron. They're not degenerate anarchists gambling on an unpredictable (muh decentralized) future.

The absolute fucking state

>>15955163
What is centralized about that?
>is this data for real?
>yes it is
>prove it
>this is the official public key of reuters
>ok
>now look, we have the private key and signed the data with that proving that the data is coming straight from us
>okay thanks

You don't need multiple instances of a centralized data source, it doesn't make sense.

>>15955186
Recycling 2017 fud? Sorry bro you won't get sub $0.20 link again

>>15955186
Oh fuck... keep going... don’t stop! I’m getting close!

>>15955192
>2017 fud
Reality. Stay poor

Say what you want to say. Link will become the Industry Standard of scam

>>15955212
Come on, we’ve gotta be a little nice to the new ones. They can’t help that they don’t know shit.

There seems to be a mistaken belief that chainlink’s network is decentralized for ideological reasons, when in reality it is decentralized by design. False or maliciously manipulated information from a centralized source isn’t the only pitfall, there is also the possibility of incorrect data or data outages. A centralized oracle is a single point of failure, which can have devastating results if thousands of transactions per hour rely on that one oracle.

It’s fine if they want to develop their own oracle. Chainlink is scalable and was designed to allow the existence of private networks within the greater ecosystem. They are free to join in with the rest of the network and contribute to it however they see fit.

>>15955157
You’re pointing to a highway that hasn't been finished and saying “SEE! NOBODY IS USING IT! ZERO VOLUME! IT’S WORTHLESS”.
Low IQ fud.

>>15955157
Also, you have no way of knowing who is using the heartbeat data.

>>15955157
Kys filthy jew

>>15955281
Exactly, you think anyone with half a brain will be doing testing on a public network? They will develop in private until it’s ready to go and then deploy.

>>15955281
... It's a heart beat job request by the Chainlink team, you can see that in the explorer.

>>15955212
You've lost either way. You're fud stinks, or you're just a cocky newfag. Take your pick and act accordingly.

>tfw bought at 2.68

Just hodling.

>>15955190
>You don't need multiple instances of a centralized data source, it doesn't make sense.
the hard part isn’t verifying the data the hard part is getting it onto the blockchain. the decentralization is for ensuring the data on the blockchain is the same as the signed data

>>15955305
No. The eth price is being plopped on the blockchain for free. You don’t know who is reading it just by looking at the explorer. You’d have to read the contract code of every contract to know.

>>15955192
Hahahahhahaha.

>>15955186
smart contracts are the opposite of unpredictable, they are highly deterministic actually and far more so than the way business is done traditionally.
You had 2 years.

>>15955673
Smart contracts will be big. The blockchains and all data will be centralized

/thread

https://twitter.com/chainlinkmarket/status/1139231690797174784?lang=en

What happens when the traditional data providers start to come in to the space at the end, like many oracle solutions rely on traditional data providers

>smug face

1K EOY

>>15955764
debunked, he said he was stifling a sneeze

>>15955037
As in yesterday? Or was there something else?

>>15955281
You literally don't have a clue what it is lmao

Literally no mention of chainlink

>>15955157
21 nodes actually

>>15956862
>>15956895
Can’t read two comments above you

>>15956918
No mention of it in the article. They have their oracle.

>>15955764
we're all really gonna make it aren't we

>>15955764
what even is a 'traditional data provider'?

>>15956939
literally everyone

all of the household names in tech and finance, using the link network

>>15956929
Chainlink isn't an oracle dumbfuck. How new are you?

>>15956939
ill give you an example: bloomberg provides market data

>>15956970
o fuk it just occurred to me that chainlink is a standard way to communicate between blockchains and/or legacy systems. not an "oracle" as people like to term it.

>>15955020
Lmao you pathetic linkies never fail me with your "to the moon" threads

>>15956996
>o fuk it just occurred to me that chainlink is a standard way to communicate between blockchains and/or legacy systems
not it's not. learn to code brainlet

>>15955048
Cope.
Thomsonreuters is explicitly working with OpenLaw, and the latter is saying pic related.

Blockoneiq was a piece of fud against Link ages ago, but it's obviously been a dead end.

>>15956895
W R O N G

>>15957931
>pic related
see pic in: >>15957953

>>15955020
holy shit this is unironically it. it only takes 1 huge corporate ceo to make a MASSIVE move like this before the rest notice and quickly follow.

this will quickly become a domino effect from now on.

mark it.

Ctrl+F Chainlink

https://blockonomi.com/thomson-reuters-ethereum-smart-contracts/

It's all so tiresome...

>>15958197
>6 results