/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15951322
Google, Microsoft, Intel, Amazon, Derivatives.
Staking is released and full adoption occurs we'll easily be at +$500

>>15951322
Yes and checked

>>15951330
$500 is beyond delusional, come on anon.

>>15951322

Urine passing is a result of homeostasis. It is literally a balancing of the body so the urine passes everything that is not needed in that moment. Urine contains hormones, vitamins, minerals, amino acids that are not needed in the moment but may be needed in the next. It also has STEM CELLS IN IT. Your urine has info about what ails you and then creates antibodies when you drink it So drinking your urine is like drinking a highly nutritious meal. It is also a vaccine. If you get stung or bitten by a venomous creature, the anti venom is created in your body within 15 seconds & will pass out in your urine. I cured food poisoning in 10 minutes by drinking my pee. Before pharmaceutical companies took over, urine was used to cure gangrene on the battlefields of the world, it can be used as blood plasma in a transfusion if the patient's blood is not available. Your urine is just blood plasma but a different colour. There have been more white papers written on the efficacy of drinking urine & putting on infections, than any other therapy on the planet, all covered up by the pharmaceutical companies because if the word got out, they would go bankrupt. Hundreds of Dr's have written articles & books on the subject. If any Dr or individual starts teaching this miracle therapy & gets a following, they get threatened & if they ignore those threats, they are killed, such is the world ruled by corrupt corporations hellbent on making money out of nothing. The average mark-up (profit margin) on pharmaceuticals is around 20,000%, do you really think they will give up this method of creating gold out of lead & tell the truth? No chance.

>>15951322
I can legitimately see $200-$400 contingent on all the breadcrumbs we've uncovered come to fruition, staking locking away a significant portion of the supply and we see some hype start to develop. $500+ is possible, but depends on how many tokens enter the market in the next 2-3 years.

>>15951333
oooooooooh baby a triple

>>15951322
Kek absolutely not. That meme was made just to make newfags fomo in and buy our bags. $5 max

>>15951322
No.

We know it will.

>>15951369
I would legitimately have about $40 million dollars at $100. You're telling me I'm about to be filthy rich in the next 2-3 years?

>>15951322
if it doesn't, then everything is fucked and fintech is ded

I had a dream that LINK will be worth $327 in 2022. The night before this dream when we were at $3 on t he downtrend I had another dream that the bottom was going to be ~$1.70

I never swung because I didn't believe my own dream but now I'm not so sure...

>>15951478
What the fuck? I can never actually picture any of these predictions happening but $327 by 2022 just struck some kind of chord with me.
I can see it happening.

>>15951393
Yes...that’s why we have been buying this shit since 2017...

>>15951369
>>15951393
I would be happy with just $100/link. I only have 11K but I could buy a duplex, rent out one side, and the rest of my money goes into money generating passive income sources.

I'll keep a few thousand for staking as well of course. I'm going to accumulate as much link as humanly fucking possible until we hit $10

>>15951393
I think $100B market cap is very possible given what we know.

>>15951322
It surely is valuable as companies are looking at it and working with it, It's a matter of time. It could be 1 year and it will shoot past 10$ and never return or it could take the next 3 years. In short, Nobody knows and this shit is looking grim, At least for the rest of 2019.

>>15951322
$10k eoy

>>15951347
based and pisspilled

There’s no fucking way the universe will let a bunch of degenerates have millions of dollars out of thin air, it doesn’t work like that

Think of all the anons who have 100-500k link, at $100 per link

Nope not happening

>>15951330

>>15951393
Id have well over 10m, there is no way you bought that much without comprehending where it is going.

>>15951554
>passive income sources
nonsense

>>15951333
Trips confirm

>>15951343
If chainlink captures 1% of the derivatives market (low estimates, 500 trillion), it would be worth 14,000 at current supply. And that’s without steaking

>>15951642
If you bought link at the absolute bottom when it was 12 cents and everybody was panicking 100K link would have cost over $10,000. I know there are many anons with large stacks, but I refuse to believe most oldfags have more than 100K, from what I remember most people stopped accumulating at 10-50K and were too busy focusing on ETH and BTC except the more hardcore people.

But I only came to biz a couple times a week back then and was a newfag myself that couldn't yet distinguish memes from the truth, who knows. Link will easily hit over $100, but most oldfags have been holding for 1-2 years now. Obviously some won't, but I KNOW that a majority of oldfags are going to sell off their stacks little by little before the biggest gains are ever realized. I hope they don't even if I hate their guts, but it's better than normies making bank. I personally won't be selling a single link unless an obvious top forms again

>>15951666
Nice try satan, but there are many ways to make at least 3-6% annually from your investment to live off of fairly risk free.

>>15951697
There’s definitely a bunch with huge stacks, early in the days wallets would be posted here from active anons moving stacks around trying to scare people into selling, I was in discord groups with people that had over a million

I can’t ever see this going past 20, maybe we get lucky and another crypto mania phase happens again

>>15951673
mmm steak

>>15951673
That number is from the derivatives blog post. On the mixicles white paper it’s estimated at 200 trillion and that would still be 5700 a link if chainlink captures 1%

>>15951478
3 • 7 • 2 = ???

>>15951697
It's true, Chainlink will be as similar to BTC and it's not out of reach. There will be less success stories actually as there are not many wallets holding chainlink in comparison when bitcoin was first gaining traction. We are the early adopters and we are few in numbers.

>>15951322
I don’t believe it but the only thing that’s important is that /biz/ believes it

>>15951737
42

>>15951717
I don't really remember anons ever posting their wallets around but then again I only ever came to /biz/ a few times, fell for the /pol/ meme and was too busy shitposting in all the HWNDU threads.

I guess this is what I get, could have over 50K link myself. Hell I even asked co-workers what they thought about it when link was at 20 cents. What I wouldn't give to have transplanted my current mindset into my younger self. For me it's either 100 or 0 though, if we get another crypto craze going I can see this easily going past $50 myself, that puts link's market cap slightly over twice ETH's assuming the entire supply was on the market (which it won't be).

>>15951744
>NICE NUMBERS
>I MEANT 3•2•7
>STILL RIGHT

>>15951737
>>15951744

wait


what

>>15951478
>Just wagecuck for 3 more years

>>15951343
STFU DELET

>>15951822
Czeked my nigger

>>15951393
>has 400,000 Link
>doesn't know why
Larp

>>15951322
im moving on with my life, if this shit moons great i retire early, if not oh fucking well.

>>15951322
$10000+ actually, usd of course

>>15951822
>>15951737
>>15951744

>>15951333
Digits decide if we are sub $77 EOY

>>15951642
>There’s no fucking way the universe will let a bunch of degenerates have millions of dollars out of thin air, it doesn’t work like that
except it did, with BTC, ETH, antshares, to name a few

>>15952848
Whoops, if digits we hit ~$77 EOY

>>15952853
Xrp and monero as well