/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15947642
>invest in china
>chinese government seize everything
go ahead

Lul we can just nuke them. Dont be retarded. We're in the paradigm of america wins or nobody wins

>>15947840
This

>>15947840
I don't think so ... in history there have been empires (like the Roman Empire) that have lost their glory. China could become a world power who knows.
What does "invest in China" mean? Do you invest in what from China?

Does Vanguard have stocks from China available?

>>15947840
Nukes don’t exist. It is a Jewish psy-op

>>15947973
The romans didn't have the equipment to salt the entire earth however, just carthage. Now imagine 20 icbms going off across asia and europe. Way stronger

>>15948028
Your actually correct somewhat. I was memeing, nukes exist we just arent allowed to detonante them because aliens stop the launches every time. Look into all the classified reports from the Soviet bloc after it collapsed that came out of the missles being shutdown when they tried to launch multiple times kek.

>>15948048
There's an open debate about whether or not the Romans actually salted the earth near Carthage, me most don't think they did. Also if they had done so, it would have been after the total Roman victory. The carthaginians were the major threat the Romans faced on their ascendancy, after they were defeated the Romans dominated the Mediterranean.

>>15947642
Well so much for the crazy theory that this board is full of chink operatives.

Kill yourself chink cocksucker

>>15948048

Why would they put salt in their ICBMs?

romans fucked little boys. you better go hiding OP

>>15948179
Interesting, noted anon. I'll make sure to put that disclaimer next time, its one of my favorite parables however so I will continue to use it.

>>15948501
Not salt, but try farming an area irradiated ×200 times harder then Hiroshima and you'd wish it was just salt

>>15948573
Whats so bad about salt?
Not arguing, just asking.

>>15948070
U wot?

opium tradewar, let us never forget.

>>15947642
Stay off this board

>>15948724
So they’re still butthurt about the eternal Anglo preying on their propensity to smoke opium? That shit was like 200 years ago

>>15947642
Not yet desu it's too early.
Their banking system is extremely over-leveraged right now. Wait for the blood, then buy the dip.

>>15948573

There were empires and there are empires that have nukes. One of them, the USSR, doesn't exist anymore. The other ones are a laughable Pakistan, India, jeez, even the norks have nukes. So you can destroy the world. Big deal. So can everyone else.

>>15948611
It kills soil making the land unfarmable

>>15948712
No joke, there's conspiracys about nukes not existing sure whatever, and then on the other side there is verified proof that UFO's have shut down launch pads so it really doesnt matter if nukes are real or not we can't use them apparently

>>15948779
Yeah but ours are bigger and more accurate. Despite what your mother tells you size does matter

>>15948851
I dunno dude. I like a good conspiracy as much as the next guy but “aliums ate my nukes” is pretty far out there

>>15948877
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/news/ufos-near-nuclear-facilities-uss-roosevelt-rendlesham

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/weird/913279/Aliens-in-UFOs-prevented-nuclear-WW3-between-US-Russia/amp

https://www.wired.com/2010/09/tinfoil-tuesdays-ufos-neutered-nukes-air-force-officers-claim/

I don't feel like finding the actual documents, but there are some actual Soviet documents going into detail about it as i mentioned. This is a way more plausible conspiracy, if you can even call multiple admissions of it happening a conspiracy, then nukes dont exist lets be real

>>15949008
I won’t lie, I’m not reading those. Why not just apply Occam’s razor and assume that Soviet made nukes (and maybe nukes generally) are unreliable?

>>15949033
Thats fine, theres no documents just admissions however of the same happening in the US. Your very correct it might just be some BS for nukes that don't work and they dont want the other nation to know, but the timing is very coincidental as many of them were serious launches in secret because they thought this was actually an attack and the end of the world.

>>15949069
Interesting. Perhaps this is indeed the best of all pissible timelines.

>China has to import everything
>China is hated by everyone
>China is pushing their social credit system on companies and cutting them off from their market
>Xi Jinping along with other top cucks in the ccp gets baited and butt hurt easily
Labor costs are going up and other emerging markets are more attractive to business
>Even lib cucks like soros are turning on china

China would have gotten away with it if they weren't' so butthurt and fragile but the world is getting tired of their shit and the U.S(progressive libs too) is starting to realize they've gotten ripped off by a totalitarian regime that violates human rights. U.S will go into a new cold war era with china.

>>15947642

Agreed. China will rule.

If you idiots believe China or India will lead you're fallin for jewish media scare tactics tryin to simulate the downfall of the white race. Imagine street shitting becoming designated or being a soulless insect the norm. Fuck that.
I think they will get close but the western world will turn against disposable commodities and become strict on waste and quality. Give a fuck about manufacturing and you can beat the globalization devil!

>>15949587

Based

>>15948762
>Their banking system is extremely over-leveraged right now.
what does it mean when a banking system is extremely over-leveraged?

>>15949999
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiTDU8MZRYw