[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 7 KB, 225x225, bsv.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15946997 No.15946997 [Reply] [Original]

alright fuckers, you have one chance.
explain why bsv is the "real" bitcoin and why that even matters.

>> No.15947027

>>15946997
i feel generous today
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_data_interchange

>> No.15947048

>>15947027
ctrl+f "bitcoin"
zero
ctrl+f "bsv"
zero
ctrl+f "block"
zero

>> No.15947185
File: 43 KB, 1200x675, D7kUtDGUEAEaubV.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947185

>> No.15947218

>>15947048
Stay poor

>> No.15947233

>>15947185
Okay but why does this matter? I could redraw the graph centered around fucking BCH for all I care. Why does this matter one bit?

>> No.15947269

>>15947185
What is here 'copyright 2019' btw, you lying fucking shill ?
Because the actual ORIGINAL BITCOIN PROTOCOL, y'know, the one that has ABSOLUTELY FUCK ALL TO DO with fat fraud wright ? THAT saf aint copyrighted. So what are you talking about ? Which Protocol is copyrighted ?

>> No.15947278

>>15946997
BSV is a strawman to make big blockers look like maniacs.
BCH wants cheap fees and widespread usage. BTC wants high fees, hard usage limits and to capture the market cap of crypto, to shut up the nerds.
BSV was designed to fail. It was designed to show that big blocks are a bad idea. To do this, they are uploading random garbage to inflate the size and resource usage on-chain.

>> No.15947290

>>15946997
it's not but if it was it would be a really fucked up situation.

>> No.15947300

>>15947278
This actually sounds like a believable take on the situation for once.

>> No.15947305

>>15947233
the center line should always be the majority hash (and also client/user btw) chain. everything else is delusional faggotry.

>> No.15947313

>>15946997

Just ignore this scam already holy fuck you guys are retarded

>> No.15947318

>>15947300
really? come on that's the most retarded brainlet take on sv i ever heard.

>> No.15947334 [DELETED] 

>>15947269
And thank me later

https://pastebin.com/ivZtfmyT

>> No.15947346

>>15947334
and here i thought you got dirt on creg...

>> No.15947432

The U.S. Copyright Office awarded self-proclaimed Bitcoin inventor Craig Wright registrations for the whitepaper and early computer code underlying the original cryptocurrency. ... While works are automatically copyrighted when created, a federal registration is helpful for enforcement. 21.05.2019

>> No.15947441

>>15947432
>early computer code underlying the original cryptocurrency
sauce you lying fucking cunt

>> No.15947457

>>15947441
they registered his claim alright and also warned him there will be hell to pay if it turns out he was lying.

>> No.15947460

>>15946997
bsv is a permissioned shitcoin
it defeats entirely the reason for BTC to exists, which is FINANCIAL SOVEREIGNTY and PROTECTION FROM INFLATION

>> No.15947472
File: 94 KB, 905x898, bitcoin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947472

>>15947441
google blockstream shill

>> No.15947473
File: 24 KB, 347x139, 1562896007488.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947473

>>15946997
To own the libs.

>> No.15947481
File: 261 KB, 785x1000, 1565709283021.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947481

>>15947278
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T PAY MINERS TO STORE YOUR DATA ON CHAIN
>THAT'S GARBAGE

>> No.15947505

>>15947472
somone was pretty retarded that wrote that they register claims don't award copyrights copyright is naturally the creators. in this case satoshis and was fraudulently registered by craig which will get him some grief if satoshi every decides to show up.

>> No.15947510

>>15947457
The US Copyright Office most certainly did not:
>'award Craig Wright copyright registrations over early computer code underlying the original
[Bitcoin] cryptocurrency..' - no idea where Google is pulling that 'code' shit from, he filed a (false..) claim over the WP and paid a $65 fee. They had to put out a press release pointing out, he's a lying cunt, and that $65 and claim actually meant fucking jack.
The original Bitcoin protocol is not copyrighted, nor can it be after this time. I ASK AGAIN:
WHICH FUCKING PROTOCOL IS HERE 'COPYRIGHT 2019', you lying cunts ?

>> No.15947517

>>15947510
>The original Bitcoin protocol is not copyrighted
it is under mit license free to use alter or re license.

>> No.15947535

>>15947517
Hence not copyrighted because that's a public use license

>> No.15947574

>>15947535
...
// Copyright (c) 2009 Satoshi Nakamoto
// Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, see the accompanying
// file license.txt or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php..

>> No.15947584
File: 53 KB, 720x900, 14923897243.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947584

>>15946997
>do my work for me
no

>> No.15947620

>>15947535
basically satoshi claimed his copyright and right after he gave the right to copy alter redistribute or re-license in general do whatever the fuck you want with it.

and here is the thing, some faggots claim he could revoke (which is unheard of unless someone was violating the license) that copyright but it's not simple, since any derivative work that got re-licensed is no longer his copyright. for example bitcoin developer team re-licensed core source. and satoshi gave express permission to do that.

it would be a lost battle if craig tried to bring any other team to court. but he himself is actually the only person on earth in violation of bitcoin copyright ironically.

>> No.15947629

>>15947517
yeah, MIT, AND, its more than 10 years since publication, which would have (afaik) rendered the claim useless anyway, unless you are grandstanding for idiots, as he is.
I was also overlooking the fact he'd filed two false claims tho, one false claim for the authorship of the White Paper, and yet another false claim for the parts of the code he claims he wrote. Which given code was released under MIT and he cant fucking code for shit anyway, makes it all yet more creg horseshit.
tldr, there is STILL NO COPYRIGHT 209 BTICOIN PROTOCOL, these lying human garbage.

>> No.15947657

>>15947629
it's a fucking dumpster fire as always anon.
just chill out and warm your hands have a nice drink and try to not feel sorry for the retards that get burned.
i gave up fighting the pajeets. it's a losing battle the world never runs out of idiots. the market will sort it all out in the end.

>> No.15947843
File: 52 KB, 1024x683, Craig.Wright.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947843

>>15947657
>i gave up
>losing battle
lmao, you can't win because nothing else scales
the end.

>> No.15947846

>>15946997
>wahhhh teach me daddies please
suck my smegma you lazy faggot

>> No.15947868

Core developers changed the software, and broke the terms of the MIT licence by reissuing it under the same name and telling everyone it was the same thing.

If his tactic works, he can force BTC not to use the bitcoin name, and sue the developers for everything they have. (They will have absolutely no protection).

>> No.15947890

>>15946997

- It actually scales, imperative as the subsidy disappears; HODL is a ponzi scheme
- Lightning sucks
- It uses the original design which actually works and operates within law

>> No.15947904
File: 602 KB, 2048x1569, 1552414264567.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947904

>>15946997
>you have one chance.
>explain why bsv is the "real" bitcoin
Craig = Le Satoshi
BSV = Le BitCoin
If you do not like it, STIFF!
Questions?

>> No.15947909

>>15947843
no i can't win this particular battle because nobody can fight stupidity and claim a victory.

>> No.15947925

>>15947890
that's 3 lies out of 3 sentence, not bad.

>> No.15947944

>>15947868
>if his tactic works
It won't, because, for it to work, he'd have to actually PROVE he wrote that fucking code. And I doubt even creg would be in any hurry to demonstrate his coding skills in a witness box anytime soon, especially not against competent people who actually know what the fuck they are talking about. Altering code is not breaking the terms of MIT either, more FUD.

>> No.15947945

>>15947890
>It uses the original design which actually works and operates within law
imagine believing this
BTC was designed to be decentralized and PERMISSIONLESS
BSV is a permissioned crippled shitfork

>> No.15947962

>>15947657
Ahh poor linker being assblasted by pajeets

>> No.15948003

its not

>> No.15948026
File: 80 KB, 640x480, D1dSEW6WkAA9UR8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948026

Help! I am a BitCoin OG and all in on the original BitCoin (BSV), but the recent developments and things I learned from BSV insiders are absolutely horrifying: BSV was taken over by a satanic pedophile cabal of Calvin Ayre and Jimmy Nguyen. I was on the private slack, it was leaked that heinous degenerate Calvin Ayre hosted parties for Epstein on his island, and satanic Californian sodomite Jimmy Nguyen partnered with ILGA (the international LGBTQ organization) to use BSV and nChain for a worldwide fight against "straight supremacy" and for LGBTQ rights for children. Worst of all, they kidnapped and poisoned Craig Wright! Yes, you heard right. We all know that Craig Wright is Satoshi. But the man we see in public is NOT Craig Wright, it's Chaskel Wasserman, a deceitful puppeteer. They want Craig's private keys! These satanic mobsters along with Wasserman have strong support of degenerate furries like Krawisz, but good insiders like Ari Kuqi are already leading the fight. We must save Craig from Chaskel, Calvin and Jimmy! We must save BitCoin from satanists!

>> No.15948094
File: 232 KB, 1166x772, 1561723959717.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948094

>>15947909
no scaling + halvings = done
the stupid is all with you

>> No.15948106

>>15948094
we will see i wouldn't bet an empty beer bottle on sv.

>> No.15948190

Because BTC was compromised by Deep State / China. However, it was a decoy. BSV is the original chain. Now the pedos are stuck holding Chinese bags. Sure they can always try to compromise BSV too, but attempting to would be relinquishing control permanently to a decentralized metanet.

>> No.15948317

>>15947945
>BSV is a permissioned crippled shitfork
hmm, that's strange. I've never had to ask anyone permission when transacting on BSV.

>> No.15948335
File: 883 KB, 2435x3192, copyright_bitcoin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948335

>>15947269
Are you going to cry now greg?

>> No.15948351
File: 63 KB, 827x380, confirmed_authorship_copyright.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948351

>>15947505
Craig is Satoshi. Cope with that.

>> No.15948384

>>15948335
worthless toilet paper, as discussed
I could get one of those claiming the same copyright for my wall of fraud as well, as could anyone. Better things to waste $65 on tho. Its actually the same principle with patents, as you'll find out. Patenting and Coprighting things you haven't invented/created, you'll just end up in court when you try to claim on it. Where your whole shit story falls apart. Funny that, he hasn't tried to claim on it ? Isn't it

>> No.15948386
File: 211 KB, 645x960, 1550001284605.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948386

>>15946997
It's very easy if you try to think. Most people can't do it though.

>> No.15948407
File: 800 KB, 493x939, 1556650592203.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948407

>>15948384
Is it strange that I can tell right away that it's you Greg Maxwell? The way you type stands out like a sore thumb.

>> No.15948439

>>15948351
what is your point with this ?
he paid an extra $800 per fraudulent application, to get his fraudulent copyright claims ('the validity of which ARE NOT CHECKED - Government Copyright Office Statement) expedited. Did nChain not bother publicizing that bit ?
>hur hur we paid for expedited fraud wall certificates, and we got them quick. Must be valid claim then, eh ?
lying fucking cretins, till the end
76 Days of lies left, motherfuckers. tick tock

>> No.15948448

>>15948407
dribble dribble
76 Days
seventy-fucking-six, count em

>> No.15948453

>>15948351
https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html?loclr=twcop

Special handling is offered as an optional service for an additional fee of $800. Under special handling procedures, the Office “will make every attempt to examine the application or the document within five working days thereafter.”

The Copyright Office’s records indicate that special handling was requested in both registration Nos. TXu002136996 (text) and TX0008708058 (computer file) issued to Craig Steven Wright on April 11 and April 13, 2019, and that the Office did accordingly expedite processing of the applications.

As a general rule, when the Copyright Office receives an application for registration, the claimant certifies as to the truth of the statements made in the submitted materials. The Copyright Office does not investigate the truth of any statement made.

BTFO utterly BTFO

>> No.15948472
File: 59 KB, 432x768, seize_the_domain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948472

>>15948439
Ass. Mad.

Kiss the ring, you dumb clown.

>> No.15948484
File: 111 KB, 1125x613, copyright_office_confirm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948484

>>15948453
Try harder shill.

>> No.15948491

>>15948317
>hmm, that's strange. I've never had to ask anyone permission when transacting on BSV.
expect kyc and miners to approve you tx very soon
>The myth attacking Bitcoin as a socialist cancer has moved to a new collectivist lie: the myth of “permission-less.”
>This is most insidious, as the people promoting this slyly propound to be libertarian, and yet, in this myth of “permission-less”, promote the removal of property rights. Yes, I said that correctly, they seek to destroy property. For, with property, there cannot be “permission-less.” This is a concept alien to Bitcoin and one that must be stopped in society.
>You do not even have the right to develop a “permission-less” security in Bitcoin, let alone any blockchain-based system.
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/myths-of-permission-less-d39b4af7ad9d

>> No.15948509

>>15946997
Because humanity is a collective of pathetic retards and deserve to die from their stupidity. Everyone is against BSV, so if the masses of retards are against BSV, do the opposite of what retards do.

>> No.15948519

>>15948472
yes, and how IS IT going with the bitcoin.com domain seizure then ? Not that this is the seizure that cunt will be seeing, for sure. Get in fucking court, to make a claim on those copyrights. Go on. JUST one. lmao
>>15948484
>We asked wright ' are you lying to us ?'
>he replied 'No'
>so, we gave him his certificate
>and charged him $65
>he likes meaningless certificates, you see
>got them all framed, an everthing
>got one from Colombia as well

>> No.15948537

>>15946997
Because, as Bitcoin was from 2009 to mid-2017, it is the only chance we have for a better world. Transparency in government, transparency in capitalism. Corruption and cronyism are incentivized to not exist.
Oh and every other blockchain application is patented by Craig with exclusive rights to build on BSV. This is not done for nefarious reasons but a benevolent one, because the crypto space as a whole is too disjointed and ignorant to unite around one coin that can destroy the central banking strangehold on world economies, so Craig is helping everyone out by forcing it.

>> No.15948540

>>15948484
rofl yeah they asked him "are you seriously gonna lie straight to our face knowing full well we can't investigate your claim" "yes sir i do!" confirmed.

>> No.15948598
File: 71 KB, 228x200, 1559712326283.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948598

>>15948540
My favorite part is the one where you create your own delusional fanfic stories to fill in the gaps of your phony narrative.

>> No.15948629

>>15948598
it's almost verbatim what happened anon. probably with more official lingo.

>> No.15948728

>>15947481
miners don't run any nodes you fucking moron lmfao

>> No.15948959

>>15948728
1) New transactions are broadcast to all nodes.
2) Each node collects new transactions into a block.
3) Each node works on finding a difficult proof-of-work for its block.
4) When a node finds a proof-of-work, it broadcasts the block to all nodes.
5) Nodes accept the block only if all transactions in it are valid and not already spent.
6) Nodes express their acceptance of the block by working on creating the next block in the
chain, using the hash of the accepted block as the previous hash

>> No.15948980

>>15948959
miners use pools, they don't run a fucking node
the only existing bsv nodes are on amazon aws, all paid by ayre

>> No.15949110

>>15948728
>he fell for the blockstream node meme

>> No.15949139

>>15948728
the pools have to

>> No.15949150

so pool isn't node?? cool story

>> No.15949188

Who gives a shit about any flavour of bitcorn? Ultimate shit coins. All of them.

>> No.15949322
File: 41 KB, 400x536, UM-001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15949322

Craigtoshi aside, BSV is a pretty inferior chain on its own merit. It's inferior not only to first-league projects, but also to every fad of the day like Holochain, Harmony, Fantom etc.

The ideology of BSV is "let's use our chain as a pastebin for third-party servers". BSV has several prototypes for tokens, smart contracts, file access etc. All of them rely on external servers validating user data on the blockchain. Obviously, all servers are centrally controlled, can be shut down or hacked at any time. What about online micropayments? Let's use a centralized web site too.

This is an inferior pajeet approach. Such things are supposed to be done onchain.

Combined with the fact that BSV is run by literal scammers and faggots, including veteran of illegal gambling Calvin Ayre and gay Californian lawyer Jimmy Nguyen, this is pretty much the Untermensch Coin. I'm surprised /biz/ has enough of its holders.

>> No.15949336

>>15948491
You don't seem to understand how this work. KYC is something that is required by law in on and off ramps and custodial wallets. That is not unique to Bitcoin. The law applies to everyone, even BTC, Monero etc. If the wallet is not custodial (the wallet provider holds the key) then KYC is not required. I repeat, the law applies equally to all blockchains whether it be Bitcoin or BTC

>> No.15949337

>>15949322
Also, check them

>> No.15949907

>>15948491
jesus christ the dude finally lost it he went full on batshit insane.
bitcoin is permissionless because nobody can deny you service so long the mining power is well distributed. and your property is not granted to you by any authority but by cryptographic secret you control.

>> No.15951223 [DELETED] 

>>15947945

https://medium.com/@craig_10243/myths-of-permission-less-d39b4af7ad9d

It's like you trolls have never even read Satoshi's writings, yet you love to hate on him, funny

>> No.15951689

Can someone please post the pink wojak dragon logo, I beg you

>> No.15951840

>>15947278
You’re retarded.

>> No.15952776

It is not and craig is a con artist

>> No.15952811

17% pump incoming

>> No.15952933

>>15952811
why tho?

>> No.15952941

>>15952933
If dubs we go

>> No.15953097

Bsv is a scam and craig a fucking clown worthy of death by drowning