/biz/ - Business & Finance

what is that from anon?

>>15940070
https://blog.chain.link/solving-deep-seeded-trust-problems-in-derivatives-using-chainlink-enabled-smart-contracts/

>>15940070
https://blog.chain.link/solving-deep-seeded-trust-problems-in-derivatives-using-chainlink-enabled-smart-contracts/

>>15940062
its already worth 1 billion dollars and it does NOTHING. ALL PURE SPECULATION.
-ETHEREUM CANT SCALE
-NO OTHER SMART CONTRACT BASED BLOCKCHAINS SCALES
-THE FUCK CUNT OWNS 65% OF THE SUPPLY

THE FACT THAT THIS GARBAGE ISNT TRADING AT ICO PRICE IS A MIRACLE

>>15940062
.....Tonig—

>>15940098
the comfy thing about being a longtime link holder is that to us, even the most elaborate fud is entirely impotent, laughable really. i struggle to believe that any anon could actually take it seriously. when i see a link fudder, i think of a small child frightened and sobbing during a thunderstorm, convinced his world is in shambles. chainlink's success, and as a result my great wealth, is not merely a dream of mine, it is an inevitability, no less so than the emergence of the sun from behind the clouds.

>>15940110
please tell what what the fuck does chainlink do RIGHT NOW to justify its valuation of 1 billion dollars. please tell me WHAT THE FUCK DOES IT DO AT THIS MOMENT. IN THE PRESENT. NOT 2 YEARS FROM NOW. NOT 5 YEARS FROM NOW. NOW. WHAT THE FUCK DOES IT DO? NOTHING. KILL YOURSELF

>>15940070
https://blog.chain.link/solving-deep-seeded-trust-problems-in-derivatives-using-chainlink-enabled-smart-contracts/

>>15940134
It can tell you eth price vs USD right now Anon wake up

>>15940134

it gives smart contract access to external data so they can make useful contracts. are you even trying? if you're fudding link, you do not get blockchain..

>>15940134
If you aren't factoring in expected value then you should simply not be in this market

>>15940172
it doesn't. all it does is what >>15940171 mentioned. the truth is, in its current state, link does NOTHING that justifies its 1 billion dollars valuation.
>you do not get blockchain
says the retarded that fell for the smart contract meme. news flash retard, smart contracts have existed for decades and they dont need to be decentralized. NO ONE wants decentralization in contracts, people want LIABILITY.
and even if that wasnt the case, blockchains will NEVER scale in a secure and decentralized away. but do keep postponing the reality check as much as you can, when it its you it will hit like a ton of bricks

>>15940219
so you admit that its an overvalued piece of trash? nice. enjoy watching the collapse of your pets.com 2.0

>>15940240

>NO ONE wants decentralization in contracts
>smart contracts have existed for decades and they don't need to be decentralized
jesus christ.. brainlet can't even fathom the importance of decentralization

>>15940134
people speculating on its (well reasoned) future value

if you're looking to buy something that is already established instead of taking a risk on something that isn't, you will never make it

>>15940252
The top 20 is full of vaporware, scam forks and other trash, most of them far exceeding LINK in value. I'd say betting on LINK isn't as far fetched as you're trying to paint here.

>>15940561

So just because other trash is massively overvalued that is your investment premise for LINK?

Lmao, the absolute state of STINKlets.

>>15940252
No you dumb shit, LINK is +EV at this price

>>15940586

lol nigger trillions of dollar's in derivatives contracts will use chainstink now fuck off

>>15940586
Not what I said, but I appreciate the low effort retort. Given that vaporware projects still seem to attract a lot of money in the crypto scene, I am confident that a legit project like LINK - which solves a real problem - will make me a lot of money. In fact it already did.

Any questions, no-linker?

>>15940617
>lol nigger trillions of dollar's in derivatives

Not even the slightest chance of anyone tying up any serious money into memechain, which is already an antiquated relic that is commercial nonviable.

>>15940070
http://sys.4channel.org/derefer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblog.chain.link%2Fsolving-deep-seeded-trust-problems-in-derivatives-using-chainlink-enabled-smart-contracts%2F

>>15940637
>legit project like LINK

How much revenue does it generate?

Oh wait, it doesn't generate a single dollar in revenue...

What makes it a "legit" business again?

>>15940640

chainlink is "outdated".. by what exactly good sir?

>commercial nonviable.
care to explain this meme?

>>15940652
Do you own Bitcoin? If yes, when did you first buy?

>>15940098
STAY POOR FAGGOT HERES WHY ITS WORTH 1 BILLION https://imgur.com/a/HS9hIfr#10yJYjR

>>15940652
I don't think you understand. Buying Chainlink is a speculative play. I expect the price to go up as they expand the network, so I keep buying more to sell later at a higher price. They released their mainnet in may and have been adding nodes since. Multiple big players have been namedropping LINK which all adds to my confidence in my investment.

Like most start-ups though, they are probably not generating much revenue right now but I think LINK's monetizing solution (as described in the whitepaper) will be sufficient. Why does that upset you so much?

LINKs value isn't tied to the revenue of a centralised company.
Fucking nitwits on this board pissing me off

>>15940240

>>15940743
Holy shit. That's a lot of info to parse. Thanks.

>>15940868
anytime fren

>>15940070
https://blog.chain.link/solving-deep-seeded-trust-problems-in-derivatives-using-chainlink-enabled-smart-contracts/

>>15940070
https://blog.chain.link/solving-deep-seeded-trust-problems-in-derivatives-using-chainlink-enabled-smart-contracts/

>>15941330
The globalists believe in the devil, and the devil believes in you.

>>15941355
the you believes in the globalists, and the believes you'd the devil.

>>15940110
this

>>15940110
Based
>>15940134
Cringe

>>15940640

give it a rest