/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15874159
You need it to get some vital nutrients like vitamin B12.

>>15874159

Literally hundreds of other coins have staking already but when stainstink is going to get it it's somehow like discovering fire. It tells volumes about how absolute garbage the team is and how retarded the stinklets buying into the scam are.

Steaking is healthy because it is rich in iron

>>15874159
steaking solves the pajeet problem

>>15874169
>>15874193
get out
>>15874181
>hundreds
Okay kek. Also, saying a team is shit because others have staking while this one doesnt yet doesnt actually "speak volumes" on the future of a token, dipshit
not interested in dumbass fud

>>15874181
The difference is that chainlink nodes provide value to the network by providing data in a reliable manner for smartcontract API usage incentivizing good data provision. Sorry to break this news to you, but I think you might be retarded.

>>15874181
>Literally hundreds of other coins have staking already
lmao, not one of them has staking that serves as collateral for mainstream transactions like insurance, derivatives, loans, ...

Aren't the oracles still centralized? Don't a lot of other coins have this?

>>15874203
Good point anon being in the sun (within reason) is healthy for you

>>15874231
>Aren't the oracles still centralized?
They were always decentralized.
Mainnet launched with three parallel nodes.

>Don't a lot of other coins have this?
No. See >>15874212

what happens if I lie? Fucking commiemerica sucks.
Am I supposed to use a vpn for this too or is it cool if I just click "agree"?

>>15874212

But you are literally staking nothing as collateral retard. Lmao.

At least in bitcoin you are staking energy

>>15874290
>But you are literally staking nothing as collateral
You're staking money as a guarantee of performance lol.

>>15874289
mother fucker..
why didnt the pic post

>>15874212
>>15874295
>>15874290
>wrong
>wrong
>wrong

Your debaiting on the value of a new asset class that revolves around data as stocks with use case and tree model applications

Google:pepcoin

>>15874301
spoonfeed me. What is LP and why should I buy now and not later?

>>15874295

But it’s not money. How high are you linklets on the hopium?

>>15874310
ah shit.. fucking shit I forgot the pic again

>>15874302
>Your debaiting on the value of a new asset class that revolves around data as stocks with use case and tree model applications
Nice word salad.

Staking in Chainlink goes as follows:
1) node puts money in escrow
2.1) if node shits the bed: money goes to client
2.2) if node does a good job: money goes back to node

The bigger the assignment, the larger this escrowed amount.
So in other words: the total staked amount in the network will be a proportion of the total amount of money flowing through the network.

>>15874315
>But it’s not money.
What?

>>15874326

Why do we need the link token then? Can’t we stake USD? Lmao

>>15874335
You can't transact fiat in a blockchain environment.

>>15874332

Chainlink is not money, if you don’t know that you have a fucking hole in your head.

>>15874337

Have you heard of tether? God this is why i never go i to link threads. You guys are fucking retards

>>15874339
thats like saying all of crypto "is not money". Are you a boomer? Fuck off my thread, degenerate

>>15874350

Is chainlink decentralized?

If it’s not decentralized it’s not fucking crypto and it’s not money. Kill yourself.

>>15874339
An airplane ticket isn't money either, but it still gets you on the plane.

>>15874347
>Have you heard of tether?
Yes.
And?

Stablecoins add more complexity to an already complex system.
Plus, pretty much all legit stablecoins require oracles of their own, so using them to fuel an oracle network would be a clear conflict of interests.
Also, with mainstream smart contracts there's virtually no threshold to using Link. Oracles eat fiat-to-crypto for breakfast.

>>15874354
so is all of crypto "not money" or just chainlink because of some retarded ass criteria you use? Dumbfucker

>>15874350

Also, if you weren’t retarded you would realize giving somebody else your private keys to stake for you makes your system more centralized. Sell your scam coins dumbass.

>>15874354
Chainlink mainnet launched with three parallel nodes, so yes it's decentralized.
And the token runs on ETH.

>>15874362

Invest in USD and use google oracles. You are a fucking idiot.

>>15874326
And if people don't get why the 1000$ EOY shit comes from. Its volume

1 contract that needs $10,000 collateral now locks up ~3750 tokens
10 contracts needing $10k collateral locks up 37,500 tokens

What if a contract wants 100,000$ collateral
What if there are 10,000 contracts live
Etc

At current distribution and price

>>15874371
>invest in a deflationary asset
Oh I get it now, this is satire.

>>15874365

You literally have a shitcoin CEO that won’t let people run a node unless he OK’s it first. How the fuck is that decentralized?

>>15874376

No you are just retarded. Crypto has no value unless it is decentralized. Lurk moar fuckin n00b

>>15874384
>>15874388
Being permissioned has nothing to do with being decentralized.
Hyperledger and Corda are permissioned, but they're still decentralized.

Also, this is only the initial mainnet release, read Sergey's mainnet blogpost.

>>15874371
You didnt answer my question you STUPID motherfucker

>>15874159
>those fucking typos
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

>>15874391

Lurk more dude permissioned blockchains are worth $0 and centralized blockchains are worth ZERO fucking dollars. Jesus christ this thread

>>15874388
Okay. Boomer confirmed. Get the fuck out of my thread, trashcan

>>15874159
Seriously I would not fucking touch Linkpool after reading this blurb. Unprofessional as fuck. Hire a fucking proofreader or kys
t. attorney

>>15874203

Talking about something as mundane as "staking" like it was something worthy of discussion just highlites how much this shitcoin is trying to hype itself in order to dump on poor retards buying into it. The team has boatloads of stinks that they have to get rid of and what a better way to maximize gains than making the usefull idiots like you create hype about every rumor, blogpost and announcement no matter if it is something as mundane as staking.

>>15874392

Are you investing in plane tickets? ANSWER MY QUESTION

>>15874405
Link is the staking asset in the Link network.
Cope.

>>15874407

No dude you are just retarded and skipped step one of crypto which is learn what gives bitcoin value before you talk about shitcoins.

Kill yourself

>>15874409
>talking about staking is hyping
You're trying too hard.

>>15874416

Perpetual energy

Link has value cuz we stake link

Retard thread alert

>>15874420
>what gives bitcoin value
Speculation.
Meanwhile the value of the Link token will be a direct reflection of the amount of actual money (derivatives, loans, insurance, ...) being used in smart contracts.

Link's value proposition has a lot more merit than Bitcoin's.

>>15874208

Every shitcoin claims their nodes provide value for the network. StainStink is in no way unique.

>>15874413
>>15874420
plane tickets dont yield rois. Crypto does, idiot. Take your own advice and do the world a favor

>>15874441

Retard confirmed and timestamped. Holy shit!

>>15874442
this is pathetic brainless fud. Dont invest into crypto then. I dont give a fuck. Off my theead along with >>15874432
this brainlet trash can

>>15874271

The nodes being "decentralized" doesn't matter when every node operator has to go through a KYC process by stainstink team. This defeats the whole purpose of the shitcoin.

>>15874446

Bitcoin yields a ROI? Or are you being scammed by a shitcoin? Hmmmmm

>>15874452
youre not even trying with your shitposts anymore kek
Waste of oxygen. Get out. You are banned from my thread.

>>15874462
Or... it really does yield ROIs? Idiot. You are not making a lick of sense. You fudders dont even try anymore

>>15874453

You just salty af because chainstink is a huge scam that has no future other than to dump on retards like you

>>15874391

>Muh blogpost

The moment when you see a linklet has given up.

>>15874470

Holy shit you have brain damage, have fun holding those perpetual energy bags lmao

>>15874484
So you deny that people have made bank with crypto just because you are a boomer that cant get with the times... LMAO just shut the fuck up. You have no peg to stand on

>>15874375
>What if a contract wants 100,000$ collateral

In reality nobody is willing to risk $100,000 on StainStink network where a small mechanical problem, bug, hack or force majeur will make you lose all your collateral. Stinklets are delusional.

>>15874474
Except I am getting a 40% roi from it... okay

>>15874432
>Link has value cuz we stake link
Link has value because it serves as a guarantee for the actual money (derivatives, insurance, loans, ...) flowing through Chainlink.

>>15874461
>The nodes being "decentralized" doesn't matter when every node operator has to go through a KYC process by stainstink team.
Being permissioned and having KYC has nothing to do with being decentralized; see Hyperledger, Corda, ...
Also, this is the initial mainnet release.

>>15874483
>haha how dare you reference the literal explanation!!

>>15874488

I hold bitcoin. I understand why bitcoin has value. Which is why i also understand why chainlink is a worthless token. You’re just a salty noob holding bags man. Deal with it.

>>15874422

>You're trying too hard.

If the board wasn't full of StainStink threads 24/7 I might believe you. Fuck off.

>>15874489
>a small mechanical problem, bug, hack or force majeur will make you lose all your collateral
t. doesn't understand the concept of a "contract".

>>15874499
>I understand why bitcoin has value.
Bitcoin's only value is speculation.

Meanwhile the value of the Link token will be a direct reflection of the amount of actual money (derivatives, loans, insurance, ...) being used in smart contracts.

Link's value proposition has a lot more merit than Bitcoin's.

>>15874497

>Link is not money
>link has value

Typical chainlink poster ladies and gentlemen

>>15874504
Maybe there's a reason /biz/ is full of Chainlink threads.
picrel

>>15874508
>only money has value
lmao

>>15874504
>this coin is too popular so it is automatically shit!
brainlet

>>15874453

>Bring up a point that every shitcoin claims their shitty project is going to be the next internet
>Bring up the fact that the thing you claim should be so important has been done numerous times by other shitcoins
>Bring up the fact that you have invested into shitcoin which has a market cap of over 800 million while there is absolutely no use

MUHHH BASELESS FUD!!

Swing linkers who got back into bitcoin. Bitcoin is worth nothing , old technology , will never be accepted

>>15874505

Keep repeating that to yourself while you refuse to learn or comprehend what exactly gives bitcoin it’s value. The best sign of a crypto noob is not understanding bitcoin while hyping up a shitcoin. Congrats

>>15874525
>you refuse to learn or comprehend what exactly gives bitcoin it’s value
Speculation.

It works as online money, so people keep betting it will get used by the mainstream.

>>15874512

How does it have value if it’s a centralized shitcoin with a ledger nobody will trust? You guys go round and round with this shit it’s hilarious

Bitcoin will never ever go to 100k. You will stay at 8k maximum 12k. No ones needs this old technology

>>15874522
>the thing you claim should be so important has been done numerous times by other shitcoins
None of them had staking underpin mainstream transactions like insurance, loans, derivatives, ...

>>15874542
Because it represents a proportion of all actual money being used in smart contracts.

>>15874538

No. Lol. I’m not here to spoon feed noobs.

>>15874497

>Being permissioned and having KYC has nothing to do with being decentralized; see Hyperledger, Corda, ...

Why are you listing one shitcoin after another? Nobody in their right mind thinks the shit is decentralized when only certain people can participate into it. It's like google owning every single node and saying "trust us, it's decentralized". You're one absolute brainlet.

>muh bible
>haha how dare you reference the literal explanation!!

This is you. You're absolutely hilarious!

Why do pajeets fud link so hard almost exclusively? It's just creepy desu. Is there really some Jewish groups paying millions for a poo smeared army of stinky Indians to make up weak fud non fucking stop like this? Unironically bullish if so.

>>15874522
This is fud though. Its also retarded as shit that you are fudding after this massive pump too. You honestly just come across as someone who doesnt even read whitepapers

>>15874505
>t. doesn't understand the concept of a "contract".

T: doesn't refute my point at all. Nobody will risk $100,000 on your scribble.

>>15874553
>Nobody in their right mind thinks the shit is decentralized when only certain people can participate into it.
Decentralization has nothing to do with being permissioned or having KYC.

>>15874564
>Nobody will risk $100,000 on your scribble.
t. wishful thinker

>it's just begun
>therefore, it's over

>>15874550

But nobody is using it and it’s holding no *actual money* (lol) because it’s a centralized ledger nobody trusts

>>15874560
Yep. This fud is unironically bullish
Pajeets btfo

>>15874571
>But nobody is using it
Plenty of parties are "using it".
Even in the current initial stages.

>>15874569

Explain why chainlink is decentralized and the big american banking companies are not

Hint: if you can figure this out you might just move into the big boy threads and decide to sell your scam tokens

>>15874512
>Maybe there's a reason /biz/ is full of Chainlink threads.

Of course there is. The same reason it was full of StainStink threads the last 2 years straight.

The reason is that the retards at /biz/ pooled their money in order to buy into Stink ICO and after the release and instant dump you all became bagholders. After that it's been a constant stream of salty bagholders trying to pump their bags on newfags. When it finally pumps due to a pump and dump they double their efforts in order to get the best price possible for their shitcoins.

>>15874583

Send me to a website with the current block height please. Lol.

>>15874513

>10 guys spamming threads on /biz/ means the shitcoin is popular

No, you're just shitting the board with your absolute thrash. The same people doing thread after thread after thread.

Bro your bitcoin is done. Accept and move on. You had two fucking years bro to adapt to the change

>>15874586
>Explain why chainlink is decentralized
Multiple independent nodes providing the same data for redundancy. So there's no need to trust a single authority.

>The same reason it was full of StainStink threads the last 2 years straight.
Exactly.
And the price action proves /biz/ right.

>>15874592
>show me Chainlink's block height!
Again, juicy satire bro.

>>15874596
Well Chainlink is kinda popular.
It's the top performing crypto of the past 18 months or so.

>>15874600

Where is it????? How many nodes are on the network???

>>15874596
nice try, pajeet

>>15874607
>SHOW ME CHAINLINK'S BLOCK HEIGHT RRREEEEE
lmao

>How many nodes are on the network???
You can easily verify this yourself.

>>15874600

Ok but i have 5 american banks telling me the same information about dollars, are they decentralized?

>>15874596
is that why chainlink is rank 15? Retard retard retard.

>>15874613

Send me a website please. Oh god you don’t know any of this stuff do you

>>15874550
>None of them had staking underpin mainstream transactions like insurance, loans, derivatives, ...

Every shitcoin that uses staking claims it's used for something valuable such as security or services. In reality nobody is using them now and nobody will use them in the future. You're just decieving yourself and potential buyers if you think otherwise.

It seems like chainlink's value will vastly increase once staking gets implemented because of the game theory behind the tokenomics, but many crypto people do not realize this--except of course chainlink's obsessive followers

>>15874615
>Ok but i have 5 american banks telling me the same information about dollars, are they decentralized?
The value of the Dollar is regulated centrally by the FED.

>>15874621
>Send me a website please.
Nah I'm good.
Look it up yourself.

>>15874625

Nice paid shill post

>>15874624
>Every shitcoin that uses staking claims it's used for something valuable such as security or services.
And Chainlink's staking underpins mainstream financial markets like derivatives, securities, etc.

>>15874631

You are literally holding centralized tokens on binance which is a centralized exchange and your tokens have no blockchain and no block explorer.

>>15874631

And link tokens are regulated centrally by 1 man

Oh you gave them out to some people? LOL DECENTRALIZED GUYS!!!!!

>>15874639

We read the brochure dude. You got scammed bud.

>>15874645
>>15874648
>>15874652
>33 posts by this id
Spend more time and effort posting about a project you think is worthless.
Surely that'll convince me.

>>15874657

I’m here to help, some people just don’t get it yet.

>>15874664
>I’m here to help
Well that changes everything.

>>15874664
youre an idiot and not needed on this thread

>>15874665

Listen, the reason bitcoin has value is because the miners are staking something extrinsic to the system that has value on planet earth outside of bitcoin, that thing is energy. The people that support bitcoin do it for a uniform ideological purpose (deflationary gold like currency with a cap supply) If miners attempt to collude they lose ENERGY that has market value outside of the bitcoin network. Take what i have said into your brain and lurk moar.

>>15874675

>Oh boohoo he’s exposing my scam coins online mommy!

>>15874569
>Decentralization has nothing to do with being permissioned or having KYC.

T: Google owns 100% of the nodes and is "decentralized"

You must be a brainlet.

>t. wishful thinker

Since nobody is willing to risk even $1 on StainStink network right now it's obvious you're the wishfull thinker on a full dose of hopium.

>>15874692
Ya thats why I am 40% up. Retard

>>15874583

So you admit that nobody is using it.

>>15874657

>27 posts by this id

Spend more time trying to hype up a scam.

>>15874701

Bitbean pumped higher than 40% lol you are so fucking new it hurts

>>15874635
I guess a better way to put it is, after staking/oracle selection based on quantity of staked chainlink, all bets are off as far as valuation goes. A node-size stake could potentially earn profit comparable to a POW mining farm. We don't know for sure, because an oracle marketplace has never existed before

>>15874701

>Look I'm making money gambling on shitcoins!

I've made 10x with shitcoins such as VeriCoin and BitCrystals. They must be better than your StainStink because I made more money on them than you with this shit.

>>15874710
>a coin pumped harder making all other crypto currencies a scam!
utter retard

>>15874710
Also dumbass omega retard, I said *I* am 40% up. Link went from 1.5 to 2.78. Thats 85% roi, you STUPID mother fucker. All in like 1-2 weeks. Newfag? Seems you are projecting topkek.

>>15874718

>the price means it’s not a scam

Have you heard of bernie madoff? He was in control of a lot more money than the chainlink CEO

>>15874714
get btfod
>>15874718

>>15874726

>Saying 85% gains in one to two weeks is worth shit

Holy shit you're an absolute fucking newfag!

>>15874726

Holy shit you bought at $1.50? BAHAHAHAAHAAHHAAAHHA i bought this scam at $.17 but my conscience got the best of me eventually

>>15874730

>Seething

Buying into a scam is ok as long as you admit it's a scam and are prepared to exit before the the final dump where people are scrambling to get rid of their bags.

>>15874736
????????????????
>>15874742
Not a rebuttal

>>15874751

I really don’t care, it’s just fun blowing up your faggot hype threads shilling this crap on newfriends. Kill yourselves for being scammers

>>15874757
Kill YOURSELF for this low effort fud

>>15874751

Since you seem like a newfag who started using this shit-infested board just recently lett me teach you. There are dozens of shitcoins that multiplied their price in a span of one to two weeks making these "STINK" gains look pathetic, even high marketcap shitcoins have done it. Trying to claim that this is out of the ordinary will just out you as a newfag.

>>15874761

The truth hurts, especially for shitcoiners that can’t figure out how to keep a decentralized ledger. Fucking KEK

Glad to swing my links I bought specifically to do this. I kept most of my stack though frens.

>>15874764
Ive been on this board for well over a year. Maybe even 2. Maybe more I dont even remember anymore.

No motherfucking shit other coins have pumped more such as quant doing a 100x in 1 year.

That doesnt make every other coin other than quant a "shitcoin" now does it, newfag? You come across as someone who has barely gotten a grasp on crypto and are trying to sound like the voice of reason LMAO

>>15874290
By your logic you should be hoarding shit because it stores food

>>15874777

Are you 12 years old? Seething screeching newfag mad over a shitcoin lol

>>15874784

Ok have fun never understanding bitcoin and buying scams, i guess? Haha

>>15874688
So in these terms, Chainlink will be providing truth, to buyers willing to pay for guaranteed truthful data.
Comparing BTC to chainlink is (like you said) like comparing gold(BTC) vs. stock in a company with a revenue stream(link). Totally different type of asset

>>15874800

I’m comparing the game theory dipshit. Jesus christ.

>>15874800

In comparing the game theory you quickly realize why link can’t work and is perpetual energy because you are staking something of no value outside the network

>>15874806
>>15874814
No one on biz is intelligent enough for your comparison maybe you should try reddit

>>15874823

You should try reddit if you don’t get it. You’ve had 10 years

>>15874806
nobody seriously argues BTC's value comes from the electricity staked to mine it. of course it's true that the price will not fall below the cost of electricity, because miners would stop mining.
but its still a non sequitur re:BTC's market value. why not value it to include the hardware staked to mine it, too?
and your game theory comparison doesn't acknowledge that everybody who wants to use chainlink is paying $$ for it, just like miners pay for their electricity and hardware.

>>15874588
Just post the bunch of 4 channers pasta

>>15874841

I’m not going to explain it in detail for you but you obviously don’t fucking get it.

The fact that they are using energy to stake means they cant collude with other miners

What’s stopping your linklet nodes from colluding? God shitcoiners never learn.

>>15874814
true data has value, and the game theory of staking is based on this fact--you don't think people will pay for true data?

>>15874841

Im not saying the value literally comes from the energy god you guys are the fucking worst.

The game theory using energy means collusion is extremely unlikely which gives it decentralization with a deflationary currency, which gives it value.

One step in front of the other, baby steps for shitcoiners i guess

>>15874868
tell me a few sources and I will read up, I'm not a fucking expert

>>15874878

BUT ITS NOT TRUE AND THE LINK TOKEN HAS NO VALUE IF ITS NOT DECENTRALIZED

KILL YOURSELF

>>15874886

Holy shit man lurk moar and just look up andreas antonopolous videos. He explains the game theory well

The link token has a value you dumb

>>15874893
How to google antonopolous?

>>15874708
>Spend more time trying to hype up a scam.
I'm talking about something I believe in.

You on the other hand wasted 19 posts talking about something you don't even believe in.
That's sad.

>>15874695
>T: Google owns 100% of the nodes and is "decentralized"
Not how decentralization works.
Look at Hyperledger fabric.

>>15874893
>50 posts by this id

Imagine having such a meaningless life that you spend all this time and effort yapping in depth about something you don't even believe in.

>>15874788
LMAO!!! THAT'S youre attempt of a rebuttal? Holy shit talk about a btfo. I destroyed you retards so hard you can only resort to low effort shitposts

>>15874777

You're the one claiming that StainStink isn't a shitcoin because you have made a measly 40% return on it. That's literally the final argument you have after getting anally devastated in the "debate". Holy shit you're dumb.

>>15874949
1/3 of the posts here are his KEK! What a lowlife faggot. Anyways, Im going to sleep. This thread got derailed by that extra chromosome mother fucker so I guess just continue to destroy him. The fact that his posts are 50/150 of the ones here already shows he is seething and losing. I bet his face is red as shit too kek

>>15874987

>>15874987
I could say read the white papers and partnerships along with its past performance over the 2 years along with it being top 15, but why bother? You fudders are mentally ill and only hear what you want to hear

>>15874800
>So in these terms, Chainlink will be providing truth, to buyers willing to pay for guaranteed truthful data.

In practice yes. The real problem comes from the question if the Guarantee that stink gives is greater than the guarantee they get from a singular provider and, in case if it is, is it worth it. At this point, when only data providers that have gone through the KYC process, it's bascially the same as getting data from any known source without using stink.

>>15874987
Having the best return in all of crypto for the past year and a half does preclude it from being a shitcoin.

And that's without mentioning the fundamentals and associations (Google Cloud, Swift, Hyperledger Avalon, Oracle, ...)

>>15875013
>kyc oracles = no oracles at all
lmao, imagine being this tech illiterate.

>>15874946
>You on the other hand wasted 19 posts talking about something you don't even believe in.
>That's sad.

I believe in shit-free /biz/. It just so happens that the single biggest source of shitposting and spam-threads is stinklets.

>>15874946
>Not how decentralization works.

PS: It literally is

How about if Google owns 50% of the nodes and another company (also owned by google, but you don't know it) owns the other 50%. Is it still decentralized?

>>15875025
>I believe in shit-free /biz/.
And by "shit" you mean discussions about the one coin that's been yielding the best returns in the past year?

>>15875034
>PS: It literally is
Decentralization means multiple independent parties.

Where are the serious partnership??? No docusign no swift wtf

>>15875011

Other shitcoins with a white paper, partnerships and "past performance over 2 years" along with being in top 15 have turned out to be complete scams and died of (Example, XEM).

The white paper is nothing special, the partnerships have provided nothing of value and being on the top 15? That's an even worse argument.

The single reason that it's being forced so hard down peoples throats with false information and speculation is enough to stay away from it. There are lots of other shitcoins for speculation.

>>15874552
I surely learned a lot about how LINK's staking works thanks to your fud.

t. Newfag

>>15874364
>what are smartcontracts

>>15875014
>Having the best return in all of crypto for the past year and a half does preclude it from being a shitcoin.

Sorry, but no it doesn't. It's a shitcoin through and thorough.None of the "partnerships" (Not one of them is using stainstink for anything) has provided anything of value. It's all a fugazi. Even the fundamentals are shit with them not being able to solve the Sybil-problem. It's a shitcoin built purely on hype and lies.

>>15875023

So why use StainStink? With KYC it's absolutely useless. This is where the "JSON parser" meme comes from.

>>15875081
>it's a shitcoin through and through

Then why are you still talking about it?
26 posts by you across 2 IDs, and god knows how many other IDs itt are actually you.

>>15875085
>kyc oracles = no oracles at all
fucking lmao

>>15875059
you arent even trying with the fud, you down syndrome moron
>theyve ALL failed
motherfucking BULLSHIT
Nice naming one fucking coin, cherry picker

>>15875037
>And by "shit" you mean discussions about the one coin that's been yielding the best returns in the past year?

If it was one general thread and occasionally two it would not be a problem. If it was not being spammed while it was slowly dying before this last pump and dump it would be fine but no. There are tens of threads simultainiously where the only point is "HURRR SINGULARITY 1000EOY DURRR". I hope you'll KYS when it finally dumps back to 1$.

>Decentralization means multiple independent parties.

Thus when there is a gatekeeper deciding who is allowed in they aren't truly independent. Thats like trusting Xi Jinping.

>>15874199
i get it, cos they love cows

>>15875106
You seem obsessed with link.
Look at this shit lmao.

>>15875106
>Thus when there is a gatekeeper deciding who is allowed in they aren't truly independent.
Sure they are.

Plus, KYC is literally optional, read Sergey's blogpost.

>>15874301
You can’t stake your link goy
It’s not good for you

>>15874301
kek, cucked again

no freedom from the financial elite for you goy

>>15875094

I already proved my point, retard, and immediately you start foaming at your mouth.Not one single shitcoin have found any significant real world usage and now you barge here trying to insist that your spesific KYC shitcoin is somehow going to be used? Fat chanse. It's only good for making another bunch of retarded bagholders.

>>15875111

>You seem obsessed with link.

Says the guy who keeps posting unfounded hype in the thread, and numerous others.

>>15875127

>Plus, KYC is literally optional, read Sergey's blogpost.

Holy shit you actually think it is optional. HAHAHAHAHAHHAH you are more retarded that I thought! They have no solution to Sybil attacks so feel free to get fucked by using non KYCed nodes.

ITT deluded nulinker retards who bought the top speculating on features that are nowhere near completion

>>15875188
>Says the guy who keeps posting unfounded hype in the thread, and numerous others.
I'm talking about something I believe in.

You're spending all this time and effort talking about something you don't even believe in.
That's sad.

>Holy shit you actually think it is optional. HAHAHAHAHAHHAH you are more retarded that I thought!
It's literally (LITERALLY) in the mainnet blogpost.

Keep crying about how /biz/ warned you Link was going to make money.

>>15875198
>I'm talking about something I believe in.
I believe you're retarded
we'll see which faith prevails

>>15875198
>You're spending all this time and effort talking about something you don't even believe in.

As I said, I believe in shit-free /biz/ and StainStink threads are the worst shit on the board. It's been like this for 2 years already.

>It's literally (LITERALLY) in the mainnet blogpost.

Then why is it not like that in reality, in real life, in use? How does it feel to be full of shit?

>>15875085
the KYC oracles will have to stake links as well

>>15875234

>Thinks anyone will ever use your shitcoin in real life

>>15875226
>I believe in shit-free /biz/
And by "shit" you mean discussions about the one coin that's been yielding the best returns in the past year?

You are literally crying about how /biz/ warned you Link was going to make money.

>Then why is it not like that in reality, in real life, in use?
That's also literally (LITERALLY) explained in the mainnet blogpost.

>>15875331
>And by "shit" you mean discussions about the one coin that's been yielding the best returns in the past year?

No, I mean shit. Everything about stainstink in /biz/ is absolute shit.

PS: You were already served regarding "muh best returns" earlier but since you have an attention span of a gold fish we have to endure.

>That's also literally (LITERALLY) explained in the mainnet blogpost.

Meaning it's not here because they don't have it. Since you knew you'd get served why did you bother? You can't use a blog post to defend against Sybil. You can't click a button that says "By the power of Sergays blog post I'm now Sybil resistant".

>>15875351
>Everything about stainstink in /biz/ is absolute shit.
Except Link yielded the best returns in all of crypto over the past 1.5 years.
You're upset because /biz/ warned you about that.

>Meaning it's not here because they don't have it.
KYC is optional, deal with it.

>>15875354
>Except Link yielded the best returns in all of crypto over the past 1.5 years.

And I already explained to you why this doesn't mean shit. Dozens of shitcoins have made better returns than StainStink but at least they had the sense to keep themselves from spamming the board for 2 years straight. I've made multiple 10x with other shitcoins so I have the perspective that you lack.

>KYC is optional, deal with it.

Nah, no it isn't. You should learn to cope harder.

>>15875370
>And I already explained to you why this doesn't mean shit.
It means Link made money.
You're upset /biz/ kept trying to warn you Link was going to make money.

>no it isn't.
Read Sergey's blogpost, it literally is.

>>15875377

>It means Link made money.

Like a thousand other shitcoins. That means it's a shitcoin and nothing more

The people who bought over $3 lost money. How does it make you feel?

>Read Sergey's blogpost, it literally is.

So you admit that it isn't. Good

>>15875449
>Like a thousand other shitcoins
More than any of them.

>>15875449
>upset about stinky threads now

Just wait till steaking tranny, you may as well leave /biz/ now. This is nothing

>>15875452
>More than any of them.

Sorry, but you're talking out of your ass, newfag.

>>15875468

Oh I have seen shitloads of stainstink threads during the 2 years. Your "steaking" (do they have "porking" as well? Judging how fat sergay is it's possible) will be nothing compared to the google and swift disinformation campaigns.

>>15875484
>Sorry, but you're talking out of your ass
See pic here: >>15874512

>>15874569
>Decentralization has nothing to do with being permissioned or having KYC.
You are a retard if you believe this. It cant be decentralized if i have to pass through centralized approval gates to access it.

>>15875484
If your going to FUD don't use the most overplayed and easily disproved talking points.

>>15874688
Lol, you actually do not even know what gives value to BTC. I am sorrounded by fucking brainlets

>>15875542
>It cant be decentralized if i have to pass through centralized approval gates to access it.
That has nothing to do with being decentralized.

>>15874208
>The difference is that chainlink nodes provide value to the network by providing data in a reliable manner for smartcontract API usage incentivizing good data provision

>>15874474

>>15875491

You're still talking out of your ass. And in addition you just announced to the whole world that you're mentally handicapped.

>>15875545

You stinklets have weird habit of thinking your lies are true. Well, have fun in your fairy tale.

>>15875700
>You're still talking out of your ass. And in addition you just announced to the whole world that you're mentally handicapped.
lmao cope

>>15875600
>That has nothing to do with being decentralized.
>Decentralization is the process by which the activities of an organization, particularly those regarding planning and decision making, are distributed or delegated away from a central, authoritative location or group.
>need approval from a centralized group to access the network
You keep saying it but i dont think you understand what decentralization means

>>15875731
Needing approval to access the group =/= centralization.
Unless you're implying every single action by every member needs approval. Which it doesn't.

Plus, kyc is literally (LITERALLY) optional.

>>15875741
>Needing approval to access the group =/= centralization.
Yes it does. Gatekeepers are a method of centralization. In which case the USD fiat isnt centralized with your definition. Which obviously it is.

>>15875770
Just because they passed selection criteria doesn't mean they're under centralized control.
By your logic, olympic athletes aren't actually competitors because they had to be selected by the IOC.

Also, kyc is literally optional.

>>15875714
>lmao cope

Stain stink absolute bottom around $0.13 and absolute top at around $4.05 making the absolute gains 31.15 times the investment.

NXT absolute bottom around $0.007 and absolute top around $2 making the absolute gains 285 times the investment.

NXT isn't even the biggest gainer, newfag.

How does it feel to cope? How does it feel to get absolutely fucked in every single point of your shit-tier arguments?

>>15875799
We're talking about the past year / year and a half.

>>15875783
>Just because they passed selection criteria doesn't mean they're under centralized control.

It literally means they are. The moment they do something Sirgay deems a no no they'll get booted out.

>Also, kyc is literally optional.

Nope, it's mandatory. Sorry to break it to you.

>>15875810

No we aren't. And thats why you are retarded. I claimed that I've seen shitcoins gain a lot more value multiple times in the past than stainstink and that is a fact. Thus your little bullrun is nothing out of the ordinary, newfag.

>>15875825
>It literally means they are. The moment they do something Sirgay deems a no no they'll get booted out.
More wishful thinking.

>Nope, it's mandatory.
Sergey's blogpost literally says it's optional.
Not to mention the white paper and pretty much all Chainlink documentation ever.

>>15875833
>No we aren't.
Chainlink has only been out for two years you derp.
Every single mention I made of Chainlink's price action refers to the past year / year and a half.

Chainlink is the absolute best-performing crypto of the past year / year and half, cope.

>>15875846
>More wishful thinking.

More facts down the stinklets throat

>Sergey's blogpost literally says it's optional.

And reality says it's mandatory. Somehow I believe reality more than Sirgay.

>Chainlink has only been out for two years you derp.

Why should I give two fucks about it? It's not relevant.

>Chainlink is the absolute best-performing crypto of the past year / year and half, cope.

As I said, why should I give a fuck about it? The past best performers, which performed way better than StainStink ever will, dumped. You're just grasping at straws when bringing up price performance.

>>15874442
2 years too late m8 dil8

Lol. Next news drop Im swinging this stupid shit, each of the speeches have been nothingburgers and idiots pump the price the Days leading up, easy money.

>>15875874
Sergey's blogpost literally says kyc is optional.
And Chainlink is the absolute best-performing crypto of the past year / year and a half. By a wide margin.

Cope.

>>15875884
>Sergey's blogpost literally says kyc is optional.

And reality says it's mandatory. Sorry, but I believe reality more than some blog post.

>And Chainlink is the absolute best-performing crypto of the past year / year and a half. By a wide margin.

Even this is false. Energi has made 33x return during this year while Stinks absolute bot to top was 31x

How does it feel to get fucked in every single argument you make?

>>15875988
>And reality says it's mandatory.
Which is also explained in the same mainnet blogpost.
Gee, sounds like it's time for you to read that thing, huh?

>Energi has made 33x return during this year while Stinks absolute bot to top was 31x
Chainlink was 10c at ICO/presale, so it did about a 45x.

Yfw Serge is hammering away another blog post at his Toshiba laptop instead of enjoying azn girls in Osaka. Go to Nara park and feed the deer too Sergey

>>15876008

>Which is also explained in the same mainnet blogpost.

As I said. In reality KYC is mandatory. That means the KYC is mandatory in real life, reality, the plane we live in. Understand? You can pull that blogpost up your ass.

>Chainlink was 10c at ICO/presale, so it did about a 45x.

And that ICO was over 1,5 years away. You just got fucking rekked. You got absolutely destroyed. Your shitcoin is nothing special and it WILL dump on you.

>>15876008

Even fucking UDOO did a 32 return during the last year. You're absolutely fucking rekt

The instant you shatter the last vestige of resistance from a stinklet he leaves the thread and hope it dies taking his shame with it.

>>15876027
>In reality KYC is mandatory.
Read the mainnet blogpost.
It explains what's going on now, and that kyc is optional.

>And that ICO was over 1,5 years away.
Energi's airdrop started last summer; coin value: $2+.
Energi max return: x4

>>15876100
>UDOO did a 32 return during the last year
UDOO's ICO was last summer; token value: $0.08.
UDOO max return x1.5

In that same timeframe (i.e. since last summer), Link went x30.

Consider yourself absolutely REKT.

>>15874339
Wrong

>>15876027
>>15876100
>>15876138
>>15876777
>In that same timeframe (i.e. since last summer), Link went x30.
And that's with Link starting from around $0.16; which was already x1.6 ICO.

You could not be more rekt, oh my god.

>>15875988
>Energi
>>15876100
>UDOO

Crawling out of a sub-ico hole don’t count.

>>15876777
Same with Quant.
Everyone thinks they did so amazing but the best they did compared to their ICO is x10.

>>15876027
>36 posts by this user
idk if they have girls in indian but you def need to go have sex

>>15874289
Click agree. Nobody has come for me yet

>>15877271
if you break their terms of service the worst they can do is take your money. Not too bad, right anon?

>>15876027
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAH HOLY FUCK THIS SUBHUMAN RETARD ACTUALLY POSTED 36 TIMES SHOWING OFF HIS NIGGER IQ LMAO NICE JOB GETTING BTFO RETARD HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>15877478
>>15876976
He's been posting under at least two more IDs itt.

>>15874588
>thinking the 12 people on this board have any effect on the price
utterly delusional. you probably unironically think the earth is flat too

>>15874326
Your thinking too small.

>>15875988
The node setup docs say it's optional, Einstein. You just need an eth address, server and email.

>>15874354
Decentralization is not a requirement to be a crypto. You’re thinking specifically of DLT, but I suspect you don’t actually know what you’re talking about. That being said, Chainlink is decentralized and growing ever more so daily. (You) on the other hand continue to be a retard.

>>15875189
I have waited two years. Another two years is nothing to me

>>15874181
kek, well put anon

>>15874625
>game theory behind the tokenomics
Elaborate please kind anon?

>>15874560
They fud so hard because as long as our autism is focused on link they can't peddle shitcoins to Newfags.

>>15874384
>>15874391
Both of your are wrong, the guy with the batman pic is dumb.
Anyone can setup a node. I set one up literally with Thomas at the link meetup in Frisco. TO BE LISTED ON THE LINK LIST OF NODES, YOU MUST BE KYC'd. Otherwise you can find somewhere else to advertise your node.
As per Thomas, "eventually once reputation is up everyone's nodes will be visible".

>>15875988
>>15875884
>>15875846
>>15875731

see >>15878895

>>15878895
I never said you can't set up a node though.
I just kept saying kyc is optional.

>>15874384
Sounds like Skycon all over again

>>15874159
if u are not interested in staking then check out Blockchians and new coins in the market like Telecoin

>>15878995
Fair, I just think its a huge misconception that needs to be addressed, then. I constantly hear the argument being framed that only those who have been KYC'd can set up a node. That is categorically false.

>>15879078
Great to hear you set a node up with Thomas. I chatted with him way back and he's the nicest guy.
Just so we're clear: this was a mainnet node you set up right?

This thread is a great example differentiating between two completely different mindsets. One needs concrete evidence and validation from a large majority before accepting the truth. "I'll believe it when I see it." The other takes a more visionary approach. They are better able to read in between the lines, connect the dots and see the bigger picture.

It's funny to me. You have two groups arguing from both mindsets. I could see why each group would think the other is completely retarded.

>>15876777
>Read the mainnet blogpost.

KYC is mandatory regardless a blog post made by some fatass

>Energi's airdrop started last summer; coin value: $2+.

Energi absolute bottom $0.251 (sep 19 2018) and absolute top $8.99 (Jul 06 2019) is a bit under 36 times. Stink shrekked.

>UDOO's ICO was last summer; token value: $0.08.

Absolute bottom 0.003919 (Mar 08 2019) and absolute top 0.127 (Sep 29 2019) meaning max gains were 32,4 times the original amount. Stainstink shrekked again.

You personally set the time window to 1 - 1,5 years and now, when you got absolutely devastated, you are trying to move goalposts. Typical Stainstinkie cope.

>>15879192
Yeah, he's super cool. I live in Dallas, so I go to the meetups whenever I can. But the meetups made me realize I need to learn to code. So now I'm in a coding school on tues and thurs that happens at the same time, so I haven't been able to go the past two months :(

It was a testnet node... but the process is pretty much the same, so I think I should be able to replicate it no problem.

Btw, if you or anyone that reads this is ever in DFW area first week of any month I recommend you go just to hang out even. Thomas is extremely candid and forthcoming with whatever questions you want to ask about how chainlink works/will work. It has given me huge peace of mind that these guys aren't just fucking around.

Btc maxis are worse than goldbugs in 2013 at this point. They have literally no idea anymore why grandpa shitcoin has value. Pro tip it has literally nothing to do with electricity or hardware. Link is certainly a gamble but the fud, holy hell, like if butcoin reddit has a field trip without mods. A fucking 2nd grade school class is like a priest seminar comparef with them

>>15876925

>Gets served
>"OMG NOT FAIR TIS NOT COUNT"

Look at this absolute cope by stinklets.

>>15879222
>Energi absolute bottom $0.251 (sep 19 2018)
Airdrop price last summer: $2

>UDOO absolute bottom 0.003919 (Mar 08 2019)
ICO price last summer: $0.08

>You personally set the time window to 1 - 1,5 years
And the airdrop/ico prices are within that timeframe.

Also, see >>15876925

>>15879222
>KYC is mandatory
Literally optional.
Literally.

>>15879360

>And the airdrop/ico prices are within that timeframe.

So? The only thing that matters is how much gains you could have made buying into a coin during that time frame and selling it during that time frame. You're trying to move the goalposts after getting absolutely devastated.

>Literally optional.

And in the real world mandatory. You stinklets like to live in a fairyland though.

>>15879439
>The only thing that matters is how much gains you could have made buying into a coin during that time frame and selling it during that time frame.
The airdrop/ico took place within the specified timeframe.
And the fact that these two coins crashed well below their airdrop/ico price while Link never did speaks volumes in and of itself.
Cope.

>And in the real world mandatory.
For now. You are familiar with the concepts of "time" and "development", right?

>>15879490
>The airdrop/ico took place within the specified timeframe.

As I said, it has nothing to do with this.

>And the fact that these two coins crashed well below their airdrop/ico price while Link never did speaks volumes in and of itself.

Neither does this have anything to do with your claim that i just absolutely devastated. You claimed that SINK was the best performing coin during the last 1-1,5 years and I easily disproved it. If you can find a time frame where STINK multiplied it's value by more than 36, or even 32 times feel free to show it to me. Until then your claim is absolutely destroyed.

>For now. You are familiar with the concepts of "time" and "development", right?

So you're just living on hopium right now, that they are actually able to deliver something that should have been there from the start. This has been my point all the time, stinklets are selling something that doesn't exist yet while claiming it does.

This just proves that at this point there is no reason for anybody to use StainStink. They don't have any edge over traditional, or other projects that are in the same category.

>>15879789
Write more words about a project you don't even believe in.

You got absolutely REKTT on the returns, son.

>>15879801

>Write more words about a project you don't even believe in.

When a shitcoin is being forced on the board for two years non stop I sure as hell am going to serve every single stinklet that tries to hype and pump his shitcoin bags on lies.

>Get objectively destroyed
>"Muhhh no it was you who lost!"

You can't even form an argument anymore

>>15879998
>When a shitcoin is being forced on the board for two years non stop
You're welcome for the warnings about the absolute top performer of the past year / year and a half.

>p-pls argue with my empty cope!!
lmao, beg for it.

ALGOs Staking is the easiest and has really good rewards, just download their app, send coins to the wallet and press a button.

>>15879998
No argument, you're a faggot.

>>15874645
>>15874648
>>15874652
You will bend the knee one day. Say it with me
>hitler was right and chainlink will hit 1k EOY
I can already see the cognitive dissonance creeping in as other anons have explained it to you.

>>15880014
>You're welcome for the warnings about the absolute top performer of the past year / year and a half.

Look at the stinklet repeat the debunked lie. This is how these tards try to sell their shitcoin on gullible bagholders.

>>15880064

>Muhhh I got served, better call him a faggot even though I have a dragon dildo up my ass myself

This is you, high on hopium.

>>15880115
>debunked
See >>15879354

>>15880115
Not the same guy, I just independently absorbed everything written in this thread and decided you were homosexual.

Bump!

Come on anons, you c-can do it! D-don't let the thread die now!

>>15875988
are you the schizophrenic developer from a while ago

>spending hours autistically arguing over crypto graphs in order to appease your spergy urge of satisfying some made up rules in a made up game of "better roi gets to feel good"
autism. like, unironically, this is what autism is. your argument serves no purpose but venting your sperginess.
there is no insight to gain here, no reward waiting for the winner.
youre just killing time by tricking yourselves into feeling a rush of self-worth from defeating somebody in a made up game

dont respond to me, youre all side characters in your own lives