/biz/ - Business & Finance

4 absolute gods contributing from Iexec RLC and only 3 little cucksnuckers from Chainlink.

800 Mil market cap chainlink
15 Mil market cap Iexec RLC

pick your investment wisely

>>15839950
>>15839984
>TCF is iexec's last claim to fame
>iexec's ceo is COMPLETELY out of the loop when it comes to TCF development
>the Intel guy spearheading TCF just did an in-depth explanation of Chainlink's integration

Blow it out your ass, iexecuck.

>>15840038

>>15839984
>iExec will basically code smart contracts and "improve ease of use"
fucking kek, they don't do anything intellectual, they just fucking write smart contracts TOP KEK

>chainlink is integrating the tech in decentralized oracles, and will provide computation

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH RLC was suupposed to offer oracles and computation, BUT it's chainlink wghos doing the job, RLC is kinda like that retard on the project team, that writes the simple functions everybody tells him to write

TOP kek

>>15840038
This. What a shit fucking thread.

Honestly the best hope you had was to FUD with iexec being involved at all. That would've been fucking scary tbqh, and still kinda is.

>>15839950
Most expensive JSON parser ever

>>15840050
This is probably one of the funniest things I have seen or heard of regarding peons attempting to attack the industry standard for decentralized oracles, and that's even compared to enigma devs trying to brigade the link telegram. I don't know how anyone could hold RLC bags after seeing how clueless and out of the loop these baguette faguettes are.

RLCucks are code monkeys lmaoooo

>>15840099
Not to mention he's trying to fud Chainlink with fucking Oraclize; who announced Chainlink integration many months ago.
The man is dumb as bricks.

>>15840052
>iExec reduced to writing "hello world" code over and over again
>ChadLINK has to call iExec up daily to let them know they made another typo, can't compute this gibberish

LE SMART CONTRACTS ZHEY ARE LE FUNNY

>>15840111
This

>>15840111
holy shit that's what came to mind, literally fucking code monkeys. fucking cucks

>>15840050
>iExec has a solution for attested oracles that is working now.
>>15839984
>Chainlink: ... will contribute to the TCF's plans for how to integrate with decentralized oracles and attested oracles
fucking cucks

>This puts the poo in the loo

>>15839950
RLC could do this months ago..

>>15840050
AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA

>>15840301
Too bad the tech lead of the TCF doesn't care.
From the blogpost that Mr. Yarmosh co-authored:
>...as well as outline the TCF architecture and how attested oracles via Chainlink can enable bi-directional connectivity between on-chain and off-chain environments

>>15840099
lmao he is a complete bouffon...in the end it's chainlink that's doing the heavy douty, and his role is to merely simplify ease of use...he is a retard, he should be well suited for dumbing it down to his level of intellect.

>>15840318
Gilles doesn't need chops to be a Real Life Chad

The conclusion of this episode is that french were/are/will be eternally cucks

>>15840301
You think Chainlink and this Intel guy just started working on this yesterday?

Shouting in public that you can do this or that is absolutely meaningless compared to what's actually going on behind the scenes.

>>15840301
>could do
You're supposed to actually do. That's why ChainLink won.

Top kek this whole fucking thread. RLCucks just can't win

>>15839950
>>15840470
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

>>15840171
the absolute state of fudding linkies

>>15840817
>>15840546
Cope
You shitskins had 2 years

>>15839950
Who remembers mobius

>>15841609

>>15839950
9 May 2019 RLC price: 11k sats
9 May 2019 LINK price: 10,8k sats
.
.
.
7 October 2019 RLC price: 2,95 sats
7 October 2019 LINK price: 29,5k sats

I will leave it here

>>15841687
link btc volume 3500
rlc btc volume 12

Write our smartcontracts iexecucks

>>15841687
>https://twitter.com/newwhaleorder/status/1177316295865507840
this was the time they made a comparizon table and doracles lol

Someone post the Iexce CEO using the RLC emergency funds for their sex shows

Real Losing Cucks

>R
>L
>C

That is all....

P.S. Swing at $2.80 and buy back lower.

Is someone willing to photoshop Sergeys face onto the bottom pic of my low effort meme?
t. bad at photo editing

>>15840050
>>15840050
lol this guy knows nothing