/biz/ - Business & Finance

I've accepted this token is probably not going to moon hard. It will probably never go above its satoshi ATH

>>15836854
You shouldn’t
iExec is a scam.
Chainlink is better. Don’t lose your pennies

>>15836854
>>15836883
I will in the next 12 months. kek says so

>>15836885
shitstink will be btfo on devcon day 2

>>15836885
Gilles Fedak will BTFO Chainlink so hard on stage at devcon, that Sergey will start vomiting while giving his talk and linkies suicide themselves in ever greater numbers as their ponzi crashes to zero in a matter of days.

>>15836949
Not gonna happen

>>15836854
As you can verify, this shit has been shilled here since 2017
Going nowhere
>>/biz/thread/S2125854

Ceo is allegedly a tranny fucker, "it's over Gilles" means that the the scam can't last for longer.

>what do we know about rlc
I know it's my second largest hold after bitcoin and I'm probably never going to sell.

>>15836854
>What do we know about iExec?
>And what does "it's over Gilles" mean?
>Should I buy a bag?
Gilles just stop it's embarassing at this point.
"Arrete!"

>>15836897
This was made before chainlink joined the project. iexec is just writing the smartcontracts now.

Both Chainlink and iExec are stupid as fuck.
Sergey and Gilles whoever these gaylords are can suck each others cock.

>>15837579
cope. this chart is literally from up to date tcf specification

>>15837579
>>15837745
Is the RLC token necessary for this to work?
Even if the LINK token is the moon mission, if RLC is needed for the project then it must have a seat on the rocket. It might be worthwhile to pick up a small stack.

Although I know /biz/ is just fanboys now, who don't realize that you're allowed to make money with more than one project.

>>15838609
Yes, RLC will be the central working token. I don't think link will be even required, its not in any of the diagrams.

>>15838669
>>15838609
pic is link status currently in tcf

>>15838864
That's shopped this is the real one. It's over Gilles.

>>15839076
very nice, but you got the font wrong

>>15838609
If you can’t tell by the latest influx of shitty shooped low energy link shill threads with hot girls with CL logos on them, that project has been hijacked by indians and 12 year olds

>muh hot chicks
>muh tranny party

RLC is the hyperledger solution, and Link is nowhere to be found. Link is literally all manipulation at this point. RLC presents on day 2 of devcon, in conjunction w microsoft. Linkies will be out in the parking lot selling t shirts and beating off to blog posts.

>>15839820
You said ?

>>15839820
This

>>15836854
when your own CEO doesnt keep up in the field....keep buying bags! its working out great for you guys!

>>15840556
>doesnt know iexec is partnered w intel, and plastered all over their website

Are you retarded by chance?

>>15840614
so what? this is actually even worse as it means rlc are just atrocious at making any kind of hype/marketing about their project

look what happens with chainlink

rlc couldn't sustain hype with alibaba and intel collaborations. when the market doesn't care and traders don't flock to you, game's over. we can clearly see that with rlc.

i mean dont get me wrong rlc anons - i saw the need for oracles and built two stacks last year. one was 15k rlc, the other 15k link. it's obvious which one has been the winning investment in my eyes.

all rlc does is pnds and then full retrace. link is the one that managed to keep the traders' interest open.

>>15840760
.... so you just admitted link is a trash hype project with no real value.... but are shitting on RLC for leading the industry and working with tech giants? ..... you’d better take your moms money out of the market now, because you are gonna have a bad time if thats your strategy.

Not surprised though, nobody who is intelligent and was supporting link posts anymore, its all baby bagged morons who bought the meme

>>15840776
>says nothing
> hurr durr trading

Mainstream adoption with fortune 15 companies is a reason for investment, not “look at the indian PnD groups shilling my token because of hypotheticals in blogposts”

This thread is about iEXEC and Linkies sucking each others cocks and licking each others asses.

>>15840828
whatever you say anon, the market has judged

with my then 15k link stack, if i want to, i can buy triple the iexec stack

you can go on and ramble about your tech superiority...i might sell 5k of my link for 20k rlc when it continues pumping :)

>>15841328
All the smart link holders dumped their bags around $5, when the Link devs dumped. Whats left are meme kids and blog posts about hypothetical use cases with no confirmation of actually being used in the presented capacity. I’m looking for the next potential 100x+ on my alts, not a 3x-5x hype token. God speed anon.

>>15841877
Why iExec though and not computing tokens at lower marketcaps with actual adoption (i.e EDGE) ?

>>15842006
Never heard of it. Are they partnered with intel, ali baba, ibm, ubisoft, edf, and presenting with microsoft in 2 days?

If so ill give it a look

>>15842115
> muh partnerships
You realize that you can "partner" with all the companies in the world and it won't matter if it isn't bringing any usage to the token ?