/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15802231
DELETE

Ctrl + f chainlink 1/1

we're gonna make it

I don't see how rlc fits in there
Chainlink, naturally, but rlc. Makes no sense

>>15802231
>It brings together sponsorship from Intel, iExec Blockchain Tech, Alibaba Cloud, Baidu, BGI, Chainlink, Consensys, EEA, Espeo, IBM, Kaleido, Microsoft, Banco Santander, WiPro, Oracle, and Monax. That’s quite a list of sponsors by any standard. The natural question is what could drive so much interest?

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>15802231
> We may even be some more things to say

>>15802231
Should catalyze the next pump once normies understand the gravity of this. Chainlink at the table with all its profecied industry partners codeveloping web3 architecture

>Now that Avalon has matriculated to a full project at Hyperledger, we are excited to continue maturing and expanding the code base. Some of the initial areas we plan to work on are solidifying the Hyperledger Fabric integration and similarly working with another new addition to Hyperledger, the Ethereum client, Hyperledger Besu. We may even be some new things to say at DevCon 5!
>We may even be some new things to say at DevCon 5!

Kek bless this thread, swingers will face the rope soon enough

>>15802231
We are really going to make it.

>>15802280
We already made it.

>>15802249
>rlc
Dropped. Genuinely. I was all excited for a sec until I saw that dumb shit show was involved

>>15802231
>iexec the scamcoin is there
>somehow this is relevant
the absolute state of crypto bagholders. cant wait to see you all in a sea of red.
PS: its coming soon

>>15802231
Honestly TCF stuff goes way over my head. I can tell this is legit by looking through the code, but I can't make much of the language or the syntax. It's all very confusing.

5/7, perfect score.

>>15802338
Yep because Alibaba, Microsoft, IBM, Microsoft, etc. are scams.

>>15802372
Microsoft so important I counted it twice.

Sergey and Vitalik video was also posted. Key quote:
>you don’t need an “oracle”- Vitalik

>Butthurt rlc FUD
why

>>15802308
moar reading https://wiki.hyperledger.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16324764

>>15802263
What fucking pajeet wrote this

The BTFO on linkies when RLC gets above LINK on coinmarketcap is going to be glorious

>>15802397
Rlc offers literally nothing needed from a technical point of view. Why have bastardized distributed chain computation in that project. It doesn't make any sense

ctrl + f chainlink = o results
nice big nothingburger stinkies!

Linkies why so butthurt?

OHHHHH LINKIES! Look who is at the core layer. Could it be LINK? Noooope. Thats not even mentioned. KEK iExec totally buttblasted stinkies. How will they ever recover ?

>ctrl+f saber
>no results
linktards?

>>15802917
Try again faggot. Right there on the front page.

>>15802338

If you read >>15802308 it doesn’t say RLC will be used in ANY way. However under Chainlink’s section “Integration of decentralized oracles.” LINK WILL be used in whatever the outcome is, for sure lol.

Seems like RLC just got invited to provide code monkey type shit. MAYBE some of the cloud compute angle will run on RLC, but it doesn’t say that.

This whole thing is knee bent status imo.

faggots

>>15803148
Keep coping fag

>>15802231
>We may even be some new things to say at DevCon 5!
Kek, does anyone proof read this shit before publishing it?

>>15802441
this is unironically bearish

>>15803220

In what way am I coping? It says Chainlink will be integrated, it says iexec French shitters are there to code smart contracts lol.

>>15803220
AHAHAHAHHAAHHAHHAA NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR KEKEE CHEESE TOKEN YOU SUBBUMAN RETARD LMAO THEY DIDN'T PICK RLC AS THE ORACLE THEY'LL BE USING HAHAHAHAHHAHA HOLY FUCK BRAINLET COPE ARE PRICED OUT OF LINK AND ARE DESPERATE FOR RLC TO DO SOMETHING EVEN THOUGH IT NEVER WILL LMAO

>>15802231
Imagine not talking about NYZO's developer fund being forfeited instead

>>15802231
how does no one proof read this stuff

last sentence "we may even be say"

I'm financially and emotionally invested in this i need them to take it seriously

>>15802308
Holy shit dude, charge you phone

Love all this cope aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh I’m coming

>>15802338
Red lambos obviously you mean.

...so this confirms Chainlink is being integrated into hyperledger? How is link still under 2 dollars?

>>15803396
Its not. It confirmed everything will run on RLC while LINK literally plays no role. Learn to read retard.

>>15803451
lmao, unironically thanks for the laugh anon

>>15802392
>you don’t need an oracle
Then he goes on to say something vague about a “lifeline” between the two chains. The fuck? Doesn’t get more handwavy than that. How can you main the data’s integrity with this lifeline? It’s just not clear enough for wide commercial use... always bet against the herd

>>15803396
Where ?

>>15803518
LMAO

MOZZ'D

AND POZZ'D INCELS HAVE TO USE A CUT AND COPY PASTE GRAPH TO DEAL WITH THE FACT THEYVE BEEN SCAMMED.

MOZZD AND POZZD

LMAO

>>15803472
He sad merkle proofs and sergey agreed just after

Might sip tonight.

>>15802231
Thanks for this anon
Were all gonna make it frens

>>15803606
ftw

>>15802266
Normies will never understand the technicals and advantages of these things. You think a normal person even understands the basics of HTTP and why HTTPS is important? The only way normies will flow back into the blockchain investing space is if someone important tells them to.

>>15803286
Literally this. I've seen grammatical errors in the crypto space in general. IDK why these monkeys don't proofread before publishing.

>>15803535
>>15803518
>>15803396
>>15803451
https://wiki.hyperledger.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16324764

>iExec: 4 contributors will develop Ethereum smart contracts, integrate TEE options that support most of the the mainstream programming languages and native applications, and improve TCF easy-of-use for developers


>Chainlink: 3 contributors that will contribute to the TCF's plans for how to integrate with decentralized oracles and attested oracles, which will be able to provide both TCF computations and various on-chain computations enabled by them with secure access to various key API inputs and enterprise/payment event outputs.

>>15804043
>Chainlink vs iExec
They called is Mixicles

>>15802231
you just win...

>>15803606

>>15802231
I'm just ready to start my real life. Lets get this fucking show on the road

>>15804896
2 more years

>>15803606
Sip my balls

im surprised link didnt moon based on this news

>attested oracles
hmm looks like TEEs are still on the menu

>>15804896
Dare you to never cash out any of your link stash. Never. If it goes to $1k hodl. I bet you can't do it. You guys no morality in this whatsoever. The point is to get away from fiat, but all eyes are on cashing out back to fiat. Then what the fuck is the point in having any crypto?

>>15805130
The only reasonn I'm hodling Link is cos I wanna sell at lest 50% of my stash at 10 USD

>>15805130
Your local grocery store doesn’t take chainlink right? Most places don’t even take bitcoin. Good luck buying stocks or bonds with even Bitcoin.
At that point smart anons will have their staking pay converted to fiat before they touch it, separate the portion for taxes, and use the remaining fiat for living, stocks, and more link, as well as buying dips.

>>15805178
>stocks or bonds
disgusting normie trash. i will never buy that shit ever