[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 310 KB, 654x639, 1565410797548.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15762350 No.15762350 [Reply] [Original]

So is it worth it to make your own node? I learned how to do it but not sure if I would actually get anything out of it.
Are companies just going to send me information?
Would I just be doing data entry as my job?

>> No.15762361

>>15762350
you have to go to an interview with the chainlink team. wait, you actually fell for the decentralized meme with neet nodes? lmao its a centralized piece of trash

>> No.15762385

imagine thinking anyone will ever pay you to use your json parser

>> No.15762452
File: 654 KB, 1000x1000, 1565503151698.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15762452

Also I'm thinking the price will stay sideways until just before the end of october

>> No.15762979

Does no body know anything about setting up nodes?

>> No.15763119
File: 864 KB, 1584x1232, 1554503366512.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15763119

>>15762979
I have been looking into it unironically. You can do it on a raspi 3 easily, and set up multiple of them for redundancy. Solar power/grid/generator and cell network connection for redundancy. Once musks wifi web finish launching then blockchain will be impervious unless you can destroy every satellite at once lmao.

>> No.15763259
File: 706 KB, 1743x1959, 1565484439272.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15763259

>>15763119
I don't know about raspi, i was looking at Amazon AWS or google cloud

>> No.15763344

>>15763259
those work but it isnt as decentralized and won't spawn more innovation in the tech sector for this stuff.

>> No.15763386
File: 87 KB, 700x467, 1566871173895.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15763386

>>15763344
Any resources you can share? I wish there was a full collection of information.

>> No.15763471

>>15763386
soon there will be youtube tutorials on it. But for now just do a google search "Chainlink raspi" and youll find the stuff.

>> No.15763574

>>15762350
get yaself a few nkn nodes my man
ive got 10
even tho nkn is a scam it can still be a profitable one
thats how you do decentralized NEET nodes

>> No.15763845

>>15762350
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

>> No.15763863

>>15762385
This is actually the most bullish fud there is.

>> No.15763920

>>15763259
>Using a cloud operator that charges you for volume of data transfer
Don't be a retard, your monthly bill will be astronomical

>> No.15763948

>>15763845
There's no point bro. The majority know link is a scam. Better to just leave the rest of the delusional die-hards to realise it for themselves than to waste your energy because they will not be convinced.