[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 758 KB, 864x723, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15631066 No.15631066 [Reply] [Original]

Is he wrong? I have been thinking the same for some time too. Why would it even be a case if Craig is not Satoshi?

>> No.15631091

>>15631066
The case is about Bitcoins in the early stages.
You don't have to be Satoshi to have owned Bitcoin in the early years.

>> No.15631109

>>15631091
While that's a valid point, Kleiman is known because he had contact with Satoshi.

>> No.15631117

>>15631109
Kleiman was in touch with many people in the early Bitcoin community.

>> No.15631141

>>15631117
Yes, and never with Craig Wright (clearname) unless Satoshi himself.

>> No.15631142

>>15631117
No, not really. He was for the most part in contact with Craig as they were best friends.

>> No.15631163

>>15631141
I have to correct it before it gets misinterpreted. There is records of Kleiman with Craig Wright before the release and after. In most cases during the release it was with Satoshi.

>> No.15631203

>>15631066
>awarded 50% of craigs BTC holdings
>craig isnt satoshi which means he has to give from his personal stash he bought in 2012
this guy is now in a situation where he has to either pay out of his own pocket to keep up the charade, convince them he doesnt have access to it and to wait until he does, or try to sell them on BSV since its the real bitcoin anyways kek

>> No.15631267

>>15631203
>awarded 50% of craigs BTC holdings
already wrong... try again greg

>> No.15631304

>>15631066
>Why would it even be a case if Craig is not Satoshi?
If Craig was Satoshi, why would he publish the bitcoin paper under an Alias? just to spend the rest of his life convincing everyone he actual wrote it?
All his problems are self-inflicted, and the weird thing is why he would even use an alias in the first place? surely Craig is the limelight kind of guy, and would have no problem putting his name on the 'magnus opus' of his life.

>> No.15631332
File: 237 KB, 890x631, Df8OU7RVQAAu-be.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15631332

>>15631304
Because Bitcoin got taken over.
One of the patents of Blockstream says that the Bitcoin code is broken which is why it needs the Lightning Network.

>> No.15631496

>>15631304
>>15631332
html: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20160330034A1/en
pdf: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/b0/8f/72/d3607edc3739f1/US20160330034A1.pdf

>> No.15631712
File: 107 KB, 1186x407, BSVSHILL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15631712

>>15631496
>>15631332
>>15631304
>>15631267
>>15631203
>>15631142
>>15631141
>>15631117
>>15631109
>>15631091
Changing IPs i see.

>> No.15631767
File: 2.55 MB, 2140x1676, 1559227307327.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15631767

>>15631712
>1 post by this ID
Can you imagine my shock, Gregory?

>> No.15631836
File: 20 KB, 503x239, kekerus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15631836

>>15631712

>>15631496 (You)
>>15631332 (You)
>>15631267 (You)
>>15631141 (You)
>>15631109 (You)

those are mines, not the others. might need better "factcheck by snopes" next time.

>> No.15632278

>>15631066
>Is he wrong?
yes obviously he is wrong but on purpose.

>> No.15632311

here is the thing: the satoshi trove is from 2009 where satoshi mostly solo mined bitcoin on a single cpu thread (this is concluded by blockchain analysis). so any coins craig could hav epossible mined as a venture jointly with david is defintiely not the satoshi coins. which means nobody has a fucking clue how much are we talking about if any and craig was no help either.