/biz/ - Business & Finance

Better update that chart faggot, your scammy shitcoin lost 70% of its value since then.

OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

They want to buy in obviously - something is about to happen

>>15599106
it's the same shitcoin scam as any other, only the hype cycle happened in a different period

>>15599157
Um sweatie, that chart is from when Chainlink was still only 1 USD.

>>15599166
>Chainlink dominates the entire market over a 12-month period
>"i-it's just a different hype cycle!"

And mtf trannies are true women, right?

>>15599157
>>15599192
savagery

>>15599157
That chart was made when Chainlink was worth $1.20

>>15599239
your cope tells me you didn't sell anything. enjoy the slow req-tier slide to atl.

>>15599256
pathetic

>>15599192
NOOOOOOOO
j-just you wait, CHAINSHIT will be back to $1 real soon! F-FUCKING SCAM HAHAHAHAHA

>>15599256
>your cope tells me you didn't sell any
And your cope tells me you didn't buy any.

Eth went from 15$ to one dollar, bitcoin from 30 to one dollar and link will go from 5 to 1.20 max if 1.50 isn’t capitulation also if derivatives get on the network by eoy who the fuck cares?

>>15599320
>t. desperate linker pretending everything is ok
>>15599511
both btc and eth have users and a product that's actually decentralized, chainlink has neither.

Oh and also, neither have a single bagholder with 65% of the supply. KEKEKEKEKEKEKE how low IQ are you to even compare ETH and BTC to Chainlink?

Stop spamming this board with LINK scam threads.

>>15599106
What a stupid fucking image. There is no time frame shown so this could be from any time period. Both Stink and BNB have dropped in value recently. Kys OP

Linkie 4chan bagholders accumulating while Chainlink devs and whales dumping.

>>15599816
>Chainlink has no users!
https://docs.chain.link/docs/big-query-chainlink-testnet

>Chainlink isn't decentralized!
https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-live-ethereum-mainnet-connected-consensus/

>65% of the supply
30%, see pic

>KEKEKEKEKEKEKE
peak cringe

Zero effort fud.

>>15599894
>There is no time frame shown
t. legally blind

>>15599816
neither BTC nor ETH had users when they were $30 and $15, respectively

>>15599106

>omits every other coin that does better
this is just sad and a lie

>>15599157
>>15599192
kekd and rekt

best part is, most shitcoins have shed another 30-50% value since then and chainlink is up another 50%. If they redid the chart it would look make chainlink look even more amazing, not less.

>>15599511
>also if derivatives get on the network by eoy
This seems unlikely if I'm honest, as much as I would like it to be true.

>>15599106
>lost two-thirds value in ten weeks
>don’t hurt me daddy

>>15599192
kek fudders eternally btfo

>>15600975
There are none.

>inb4 Quant
Quant's ICO price was around 1.5 USD, so best it ever did was x10.

>>15600983
>best part is, most shitcoins have shed another 30-50% value since then and chainlink is up another 50%.
>If they redid the chart it would look make chainlink look even more amazing, not less.
So much this.

>>15601022
Read >>15599192
and >>15600983

>>15600943
Yeah but what year?
One Mercurian year? Because that's like 4 hours or some shit

>>15599106
>An asset that has been circulating far less time has greater ROI for a given year

The COPEiest chart I've ever seen. Scale it to include 2017, 2018, and 2019 lmao

>>15600939
Why do linkers always have to lie to try to make link sound better?

The blockchain proves they have 65% in their possession ready to dump. Your "graphic" doesn't disprove the blockchain.

And it is a fact that they have approximately 0 users. The only active transactions on the blockchain are wash txs by the team.

And Sergey is lying about Chainlink being decentralized. It is KYC and centralized. Learn to code brainlet.

Stop fucking lying to pump your bags. The gig is up. Everyone knows.

>>15601077
if your talking ONLY ico price your still wrong
and thats a stupid argument and pretty pathetic just to make your point

look at the replies you worthless, small, weak, pathetic piece of animal shit

>>15601158
>It is KYC and centralized

It’s not, you fucktard! You can spin up your node and list it on market.link right fucking now without KYC. Faggot!

>>15601142
Worst mental gymnastics itt.

>>15601158
>they have 65%
Split up into 30% for funding the company, and 35% for node operators.

>>15601300
>if your talking ONLY ico price your still wrong
We're talking ROI, keep up.
And I'm 100% right.
Stay seething though.

>>15599192
holy fuck
for anyone looking for the source,
https://twitter.com/CryptoSpong3/status/1132339251608207360

>>15599157
not gonna respond, huh? not programmed for this scenario?

>>15601158
Here comes the "I'm a dev/coder/programmer" faggot.
Every fucking thread he shows up, week after week after week.
Bullish af.

I think it's important to remember why we are also excited about Chainlink, it's not because of some small increase or decrease in the price, that doesn't matter at all. What matters are the fundamentals, the utility, the HUGE potential that Chainlink has. What we see right now is a small decrease in the price and, yea, who cares really. It's the utility, it's the building, it's the use, it's the fundamentals, it's the scaling, it's all the good stuff that is going on in Chainlink that matters, and small decrease in price, yea, I mean, who cares really, it's always nice when you have the pumps up, but short term, price speculation doesn't really matter. What matters is that people are building, businesses are starting to adopt Chainlink more and more. That's what matters. Adoption, utility, fundamentals. That's really the important thing, the other things, the price speculation, all that stuff, that's really just noise, that's all there to confuse you, to make you insecure. One of the thing that I found that works best for me (I used to speculate in altcoins and that wasn't my thing). And I figured out the one thing that helped me get through all the price speculation stuff was just to get more educated. I mean, start studying, study Chainlink. If you're into Chainlink, then, really get to know what it really is. Understand what the fundamentals really are and you'll see that all the other coins out there, all of them, are completely screwed. So yea, just chill guys, relax, take a deep breath and have a nice evening

>>15599106
lol if you turn it on the side it looks like the chainlink price chart

>>15599192
>>15599157
kek rekt

>>15601505
without KYC there's no sybil resistance. If there's no sybil resistance, it's not decentralized. THE END. It's not decentralized.

The fact that you're too low IQ to understand programming doesn't change that.

But the proof is right there: no one is using it. Cause it's useless. It's not decentralized.

>>15601520
As for the 65%. Is it in their wallet? Yes. Can they sell it tomorrow to buy hookers? Yes. THE END. The own 65%.

You've been BTFO. Congratulation on having low IQ

>>15601558
>t. deluded linker that doesn't know how to code thinks he knows more about software than literal software engineers.

>>15601726
>>15601736
kek linkers BTFO

>>15601726
Jesus Christ, you must be the biggest brainlet in this entire thread! Top kek!

>>15599106
Thanks, just bought more BNB.

>>15602351
>t. deluded linker that doesn't know how to code thinks he knows more about software than literal software engineers.

>>15599106
Why isnt QNT on this list?

>>15599106
>muh 2018

kek how long will they be posting this one? By 2021 this shitcoin will be forgotten just like dragoncoin and a bunch of other coins that had their day.

>>15599511
In your own words, please define 'derivative'

>>15602446
im a software engineer too and i agree with you

>>15601726
>As for the 65%. Is it in their wallet? Yes. Can they sell it tomorrow to buy hookers? Yes. THE END. The own 65%.
Split up into 30% for funding the company, and 35% for node operators.

>without KYC there's no sybil resistance. If there's no sybil resistance, it's not decentralized. THE END.
1) KYC has nothing to do with decentralization. See private blockchains.
2) that applies to any and all blockchains; like a 51% attack.

All these weeks spewing the same talking points, and you're still just as retarded as ever.

>>15602691
>muh 2018
t. legally blind

>>15603244
You have extremely low IQ.

Sergay is a known liar. If he says 30% is reserved for something, it means it is reserved for dumping. He owns it. He can do whatever he wants with it with ZERO legal repercussion. If you trust him, you are a naive low IQ deluded linker. He's already lied countless times (like when he claims partnerships and decentralization)

As for your decentralization claim, learn some programming. You are an ape trying to play chess. You speak of what you do not understand. No sybil resistance == no decentralization. End of the story. And KYC does not count. KYC is not sybil resistance. It's simply centralization.

Again, you've been BTFO fucking norman non programmer brainlet.

>>15601126
So this is how we are coping today? Kek

>>15603301
>Sergay is a known liar. If he says 30% is reserved for something, it means it is reserved for dumping. He owns it. He can do whatever he wants with it with ZERO legal repercussion
So don't hold Chainlink then.

>As for your decentralization claim, learn some programming.
>No sybil resistance == no decentralization.
So according to you, Bitcoin isn't decentralized.

>>15603301
Yawn. You seem angry. How about you eat a snickers

>>15603326
kek bitcoin is 100% sybil resistant. 51% attacks have nothing to do with sybil. again. LEARN SOME PROGRAMMING. You are an ape trying to play chess. Talking to you is like talking to an ape.
>>15603330
>t. desperate linker who just lost 70% of his folio pretending everything is OK

>>15599277
screencapping this post for when it dumps back to $1 thanks

>>15603357
>kek bitcoin is 100% sybil resistant. 51% attacks have nothing to do with sybil.
It's the exact same attack vector you brainlet.

>>15601726
Nice binary thinking. It’s way more decentralized than the current financial system.

most of the coins mooned in 2017. they mooned 100x while you were holding a shitcoin that did a 6x. in 2018, they all the coins that did 100x and make everyone else rich collapsed while your shitcoin, that still didnt have a decent pump phase, started rising.
your shitcoin ended up doing a pathetic 10x and its now on its on death spiral to zero, like all the other shitcoins.

pic related, its you

>>15603357
wut? How do you derive what I hold or when I bought from pointing out that you are cranky and should do something for yout blood sugar. Btw what should I buy in your opinion cranky wendys chef. I guess no link

>>15603403
>they mooned 100x while you were holding a shitcoin that did a 6x
Chainlink did about x45.
Against the entire market.
Cope.

>>15603403
It is nice how never linker care so much for the financial well being of stinkers that they take time out of their day to warn them. thanks friendly anon every stinker should be thankful for how much you care. :)

>>15603357
It’s not about programming it’s about economics and you’re on Business & Finance.

>>15603417
i'm not warning anybody, i'm laughing at linkers because i had to endure your smug technologically illiterate spam for years. i honestly hope all linkers not only do not sell, but buy as much as they can with all their paychecks

>>15603428
That makes no sense. If you dream about linkers committing sudoku and know that it is a scam shouldn't you encourage them buying more stinkers my dear wendys chef

>>15603419
crypto is much more about programming than it is about economics. biz is just a name, you actually think people here understand anything about business and finance? 99% of the posts are about crypto and the majority of the people here think TA is a meme and never started a business in their life.
if you have a background in programming you are much better positioned to understand crypto than anyone who has a economics or business degree browsing this board. yes, you unironically need to know how to program to understand if youre getting scammed or not, otherwise your just having faith that what the shills are telling you is true

>Chainlink proves to be the chosen one
PnD spammers

chainstink scam, lmao

>>15601158
Absolutely SEETHING plebbit spacing fudder
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH

>>15603480
>>15603428
>>15603403
>claims to hate Chainlink
>is obsessed with it
Stop fighting it you chud.

>>15603579
>inb4 another 200-word essay

>>15603579
>>15603594
its a scam hahah

>>15603579
laughed at REQlets too when i saw that they outsourced all the work to jungle gooks and jeets and that they wouldnt deliver and look where REQ is now. guess i also wanted to accumulated that one

>>15603615
It's ok son, you can come out as a Linkie here.
This is a judgment-free zone you ESL-typing faggot.

>>15603615
stinkyy

>>15603615
you probably did own a bunch of REQ you stupid fuck lmao

>>15603704
yes i did, but i dont marry shitcoin. one of the first lessons you learn is that this entire market is one big pump and dump scam. i married DGB and got fucked, after that i promised to treat every coin for what it really is, a pump and dump shitcoin scam. you buy low and sell high, fairly simple

stinkerss