/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15584176
The more I argued with chainlinkers, the better I came to know their memetic ramblings. First they counted on the stupidity of their bagholders, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played up the end of the year (EOY) price. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to not read and not sell, or, if challenged, they ended the thread and reposted four hours later, quoted memes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely scammy matters, and then, if again attacked, they proposed all FUDDERs were actually chainlink holders and pretended not to know exactly why you denounced their scam. Whenever you tried to attack their beloved master sirgay, your hand closed on a jelly-like meme which divided up and poured through your fingers and they would repost the same four or five type of threads again. But if you really struck one of these bagholder idiots so telling a blow that, observed by the channers, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Chainlinker had not the slightest recollection of the thread before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, EOY, web3, swift protocol, oracles, we love sirgay and do something for a small amount of chainlink and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thread, except that he had proved the correctness of his memes the previous day.

>>15584176
I-I-it’s going to go back up right!?!?!? I DIDNT LOSE ALL MY MONEY RIGHT!?!?!?

>>15584183
Fundementally they hate /biz/. What have we done to them? Nothing at all. What did we take from them? Nothing at all. Have we threatened them? Not a single instance. Were we not ready to conclude an agreement with them? Yes we were, and we even tried. Didn't we get justed in our investments? Alas, all this was of no interest to them.

What they hate is the /biz/ which sets a dangerous example for them, this wagecuck escaping /biz/. It is the /biz/ of based shitposters and frogs which they already hated before 2017 bullrun and which they still hate today. The collective visualisation, this they hate. The /biz/ of free spech and strive for improvement - that is what they hate! They hate this /biz/ which in the course of 18 months have labored to afford a decent link stack. That is what they hate! Because they have a feeling other peoples could be "infected" thereby! It is their bogs, their known and unknown bogs, international bogs, banking bogs etc. who hate us because they see in biz a bad example potentially rousing other peoples!

Two worlds confront each other today.

/Biz/ will and must continue holding, every thought and every action must be for the accomplishment of iron hands managing to hold on until 1000 $ EOY.

No brakes on the rape train frens

>>15584354
Fundamentally based and /biz/pilled

>>15584183
>>15584354
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

>>15584176
Isn't Chainlink that pump and dump scam the news has been talking about?

>>15584354
Based and redpilled

>>15584176
You dummies gaslit yourselves, ChainLink still has no functional use case that anyone would use. What makes you think $1.50 is even a fair price? Its worth 0.

Chain Link is the epitome of a multi-level and intelligent scam. There are only three or four people on the team, who have some of the most unimpressive resumes in the blockchain field. Their Testnet consisted of nothing more than a simple JSON Parser, something that any college freshman could put together over a weekend. Remember all of those "projects" during late 2017 that ended up being nothing more than vaporware? Chainlink is one of them. Somehow they've survived for two years, but I think that's due to the different approach they have taken. Instead of hyping their coin, they've stayed extremely patient. They know that they can make more money from you over the course of a few years rather than weeks. I would be very cautious if you decided to buy Chainlink, as it could very well be the worst decision you've ever made. The CEO of SmartContract (Sergey Nazarov), the founder of Chainlink, holds a degree in Sociology and a minor in Religious Studies. Hes also worn the same shirt at every single conference for the past two years. Is that really someone you want to trust with your money? Don't fall for all of the technical terms used in this talk. Those words mean nothing. The people in the crowd don't even know what he's talking about. The Blockchain Team Leader at Microsoft, Chad O'fork, said this about Chainlink in February 2018: "While Smartcontract and Chainlink are interesting projects, I doubt there would be any real use-case in the future for such technology. Companies do not like to put their data in the hands of anonymous node operators."