/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15534905
he have 170 billion dollar coins and he just stacks them up in a big room and they sit there and do nothing and that's how capitalism works.

>>15534905
he owns 170b worth of amazon stock, not same as having 170b cash. he cant sell that without bringing down 170b fortune of his own, unlike someone like buffet who holds little bit of all stocks that is true liquid wealth

>>15534923
shut up ijit i already explained

>>15534919

>strawman

>>15534905
What is the point of one person killing a 100 million?

>>15534905
He needs to put it in a trust like real rich people, thus securing his future generations freedom.

>>15534928
true dat

>>15534905
>What is the point of one person having $170 billion?

that is his reward for generating a hell of a lot more than 170 billion dollars in rewards for employees and investors in amazon stock.

>>15534977

>employees are treatened like slaves
>investors jump on the train even though AMZN barely makes money (compared to its valuation) and doesn't even pay dividends

>>15534905
Imagine what you could do with 170 billion without any checks or balances or committees. A single person having complete control over that money and doing whatever they want (within the law) is how wonders are created from Mozart music to SpaceX and beyond.

>>15534923
>he owns 170b worth of amazon stock
Wait so isn't half of that going to his wife? What happens if she sells?

>>15534997

>implying law matters if you're this rich

>>15534905
$170b
divide by 2 now

>>15534996
>pay retards to do the work of retards
seems fair to me.

>>15534905
To dab on you. :)

>>15534938
>his future generations freedom
So... his future generations will somehow use it to do what exactly...?

>>15534997
thats the most retarded thing ive read in a while

>>15534997
>(within the law)

>>15534997

We’re reaching bootlicking levels that shouldn’t even be possible

>>15534997
>within law

epstein’s island says different

>>15534996
This is what liberals love though

>>15534996
Big investors aren't interested by paper money dividends, they are interested in store of value and not being cucked by inflation.
Amazon on top of its consumer base owns a shitton of real estate and hardware around the planet.
I'm a young poorfag but if I had money I would probably put something like 10-15% of my net worth in Amazon stocks simply based on the sheer size of the infrastructure, unlike let say Google or Facebook whose valuation is much more "virtual" (and so prone to be rapidly disrupted).

As long as there is no World War 3 I don't really see Amazon declining, the biggest blow would be an european competitor emerging but we all know it is not going to happen.
Even a recession would not be able to kill it at this point, it's too much ingrained in habits.

>>15535178
Not debating the fact that Amazon will stay forever and has more solid fundamentals.

However, its profits are solely based on consuming goods and usage of digital services. If both decline, I would not rule out a significant decline.

>>15534905
You're an idiot who doesnt understand how stocks nor investments work. Also probably a communist.

>>15534996
Only the customer matters
back in cagie

>>15535185
Just like every other company sells a product or a service, that's what all companies do. What's he's trying to say is that amazon is so big that it can't literally fail because it's a bunch of several components working together.

People won't stop making websites and hosting them on aws, stop watching twitch, wanting cheap refundable products, stop watching their tv shows etc. all at once and that's what anon is trying to say

>>15535305
>amazon is so big that it can't literally fail
Which I did not debate.
However, I would not put 10-15% of my worth into Amazon, as the decline I mentioned still can be significant. There are many too-big-to-fail-companies out there, who have even more solid fundamentals.

To give your wife 40 of yhose 170 leaving you with 130 billion

Hahah what a poor fag

>>15535110
Money buys freedom, by putting the money into a trust, the trust will own everything (house, car, computer, tele ect), they will essentially be poor i.e nothing to sue for. Its why you never see the Rothchilds on these BS lists.

>>15534905
Just the way you phrased that question tells me you're incapable of understanding the answer to the question you meant to ask.

>>15535363
>Money buys freedom,
They could be free with ~100 million.

>>15535116
This. Witness prime delusion.

>>15534905
>What is the point?
What do you mean? What's the point of OP being the biggest faggot on the planet?

>>15535476
Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely! He can change governments or leaders around the world if he wants to. Do you think that is good for our global wellbeing or you just wished it was you.

>>15535397
Do you have any clue about trusts? Trusts will protect the funds in many ways, such as inheritance tax, personal law suit/protect the items the trusts owns, the descendants wont have to worry about property tax/insurance as the trustee takes care of those expenses out of the trust. Lastly, a way around paying the income tax needed to live such a life as it's not income...its property owned by the trust(s).

TL:DR its the best way of securing funds for future generations

>>15534905
I would limit the wealth of individuals, there are many reasons why you should do this. To put it simply how do you think it's more easy to make 1mil dollars of you already have 170bil or if you have nothing no capital and no assets?

>>15535515
170 billion in company shares demands more submission than it gives in power. Even if he had it liquid and wanted to give it to the poor that would just devalue the currency causing misery for the poor.
What's the point of spending trillions on an outdated military and only a few billions on programs that unlock the future of humanity like NASA? What's the point of focusing on completely irrelevant concepts like "wealth inequality"? The only point you braindead marxist faggots ever make is how pathetic and petty you are. I can change governments or leaders around the world if I want to. I don't need 170 billion.

Your argument boils down to:
>people having power is a bad thing
Which is consistent with your true beliefs as a demon worshiper. You want to remove all power from people and put it into the hands of non human agents also known as demons.

>>15534996
>treated like slaves
They must like it if they're not quitting.

>>15535603
NO idiot, in the hands of many people that what a democracy. Who do you even know what democracy is?

>>15535531
>>15535531
>Do you have any clue about trusts?
I know how they work.

But how can it be a bad thing to say... "limit" the possible individual wealth to a certain number, as to prevent creating the dynasties we removed from power not so long ago?

It is not that e.g. 100 million is a low number or that it would lower the motivation of people to become successful.

>>15535625
>democracy
A system of government where subjects concede all power to thoughtless mechanisms usually with murderous or world destroying goals. These are the same types of non human mechanisms described by our ancestors as demons. This was not a secret when the French revolution happened, most of Europe considered it a victory of demonic forces over the order of God. The opposition to Napoleon was most intense in Catholic Spain where people literally considered him the antichrist which in hindsight was accurate.

Your arguments all appeal to sin like envy and greed because your mind is now utterly under demonic control. All your trust is placed in demons and you don't believe humans are capable of good. You're so far gone you see human progress and prosperity as a problem.

>>15535649
>But how can it be a bad thing to say... "limit" the possible individual wealth to a certain number, as to prevent creating the dynasties we removed from power not so long ago?
You can say what you want, the rulers of this world won't let it happen! Personally, I have grown from hating the Rothchilds and the like, to actually respecting them! People are fine with the subjugation, let it happen. The people are getting what they paid for!

>>15535603

Based schizoposter

>>15535745
I understand what you mean, people are to dumb to notice and they are happy in their ignorance.

>>15535009
No, she accepted less than half, specifically so he could retain his controlling share of the company.

>>15535745
>Rothchilds
At least they're human. If they were reptile parasites at least the would still be living organisms dependent on habitable environments so they would share some of our goals. The demons we've unleashed through democracy actively pursue annihilation. Civilization used to be synonymous with the cleansing power of Christ. We're animals but the part of us that faced other supposedly civilized people was always filtered through the absolute demand that you display Christian virtues. Any sign of the sins that feed demons were punished, mostly through loss of social status. Parasites had to hide better and weren't as effective.

>>15534905
I'm honestly in awe of this shit. I ain't even mad. It's just fucking incredible how one man can be worth so much.

>>15536277

Take your meds

you become a shepherd

money = control

Power, freedom and kid fucking

>>15536870
The drug industry is a demonic jewish conspiracy to undermine human sovereignty.

>>15534905
What is the point?

>>15534905
So he can throw half of it by fucking a goblina

>NOOOOOOO STOP HATING BILLIONAIRES! ONE DAY I'LL BE A BILLIONAIRE TOO!!

>>15536277
Absolutely based and demonpilled.

>>15534905
In society money = success

>>15535009
There's not enough liquidity for her to sell that much. Not even close.

>>15534919
based deflationary bald man fighting QE and hyperinflation.

>>15534905
What is the point? What kind of question is this? What do you even mean? What is the "point" of your existence?

>>15536277
Literally there have always been parasites, it's precisely those people who gain great status and wealth simply by exhibiting the appropriate social cues (politicians, con artists, etc) who are parasites gaming the system to accumulate undeserved wealth.

At the end of the day nobody works 1,000,000x harder than somebody else and they're not entitled to 1,000,000x more wealth than the average human. If they are pulling levers to gain that much wealth, then that is a manipulation of the system to their own benefit, plain and simple.

>>15538336
>they're not entitled to 1,000,000x more wealth
Nobody is entitled to anything. The guy we're talking about "simply" sold trillions worth of dumb shit to idiots like you in exchange for compensation.
>it's that simple
You think it's simple because you're brainwashed with simple stories. If you need the simple stories so badly brainwash yourself with productive ones instead of these destructive fairytales based on envy.

>>15538336
How do you know that no one works 1,000,000x harder than someone else? How are you quantifying the "hardness of work" and what calculations are you using to show this? Also, why do you believe this metric "work hardness" should be correlated to income, and in what way do you feel this relationship should work? Ie linear, exponential, log, etc.

>>15534905
Stop going to the internet for your philosophy anon

>>15535178

>Even a recession would not be able to kill it at this point, it's too much ingrained in habits.

A real trade war could smash it about fairly well, given that it's business model is reliant on supplies from CHYNA.

the point is that money and laws and society is supposed to be set up in a way where the accumulation of good decisions lead to the accumulation of wealth based on the market value of the benefit of those decisions. it's not like that is in cash either, it mostly probably results in him having a lot of control over his company that he built still.

>>15538268
basically this
why would he want less money?