/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15523893
Sibos could be nothing but there will be other developments with insurance and DocuSign

>>15523898
Sibos is always nothing, CL isn't even presenting there.

>>15523903
Team isnt going

>>15523898
There has been 0 indication of anything related to docusign and chainlink recently, stop larping

You know, I see all these integrations of Chainlink, at least 2 a week, which is amazing and I’m rooting for Chainlink to be and stay the leader in decentralized oracles, but I have seen nothing but ETH price heartbeats on the Mainnet activity. Is it because Chainlink hasn’t yet created a Reputation system? I thought Mainnet opens the door for companies to start using it.

And I want everyone to take note about the 50+ startups Oracle will be onboarding and the fact that they clarified the announcements will be spread out instead of delivered as one big fat package of 50 startups. I know a lot of people are high on hopium that Oracle will say “Hey Internet, here’s 50+ startups selling API data using the Chainlink network!”

Also, if you watch the SIBOS Innotribe 2016, it’s very clear that Sergey was absolutely the focus of attention in the conversation there. I have no doubt he impressed the shit out of SWIFT and their counterparties and did do some great POC using SmartContract.com during that time to showcase what they can do. I just find it funny that there hasn’t been any info since then. Google BigQuery was another powerful discovery of Chainlink, but after digging into the details, I’m seeing it more as a supplementary recommendation rather than a Google endorsement.

So this whole SWIFT mystery is really mind boggling to myself and many others. What I’m afraid of is that SWIFT actually uses Chainlink code for their Smart Oracle (maybe GPI Link as speculates) but they’re running it privately without the need of actually doing this on the blockchain. So in a way being a whitelabel project without using Chainlink (aka not needing to use LINK to transact)

So....anything on the timeline for Chainlink for September 20th, 2019?

>>15523963
>So this whole SWIFT mystery is really mind boggling to myself and many others. What I’m afraid of is that SWIFT actually uses Chainlink code for their Smart Oracle (maybe GPI Link as speculates) but they’re running it privately without the need of actually doing this on the blockchain. So in a way being a whitelabel project without using Chainlink (aka not needing to use LINK to transact)
Even if you take that to be true, and even if SWIFT releases what amounts to be a "permissioned" oracle network that is completely discrete from the Chainlink main net, where each node is run by SWIFT members and subsidiaries (so what would, essentially, be the oracle network equivalent of a permissioned side chain)... and even if that network uses an incentive system that isn't based around the LINK token, then it would still be incredibly bullish.
"We built SWIFT's oracle" for starters, but also in the sense that a fully mature Chainlink network will invariably have stronger security guarantees than any side chain or permissioned system, and that over time there will therefore be a strong case to migrate the SWIFT oracle onto the main net.
In the same way that many industry projects are currently hedging their bets by building hybrid systems across permissioned networks and ETH, proprietary oracle networks built by Chainlink but not operating on the main-net will still eventually have inferior security assurances compared to the Chainlink main net.

>>15523893
October 5 is the next significant date from the Oracle of Seasons.
>Europe
Really makes you think.

I’m using this thread as a drunk opportunity to shitpost as I please about Chainlink. I’ve been invested since the second it touched Binance and have held since. So whether I’m sounding negative or positive I’m using this as an opportunity to ask questions to my fellow frens. (Disclaimer: Chads exist on 4chan! I that told everyone about Chainlink back around $0.16, now I have people running to me asking about Chainlink when it hit $4 -can you believe that? And now everyone’s telling me it’s a scam) I’m only skeptical because OmiseGo was something I truly believed in and it burned me and all my friends so
bad that I now have to be skeptical of big dream plans even if it seems amazing (I thought Vitalik shilling OMG was a clear indicator it was allllll good....now I realize the people behind the crypto projects don’t care about the price as they take care of themselves before anything). Chad autists exist and I’m the type of guy to zoom in one every video of Sergey speaking so I could watch his face talking, I have feeling he doesn’t really care about the money because he probably made a killing during his NXT affairs when BTC was in the mere hundreds.

>>15523913
Not true

I feel it in my gut, fuck you all, just like I felt like the wait was reaching an end before mainnet and google
Been buying for two years, the wait gets so long you just start feeling things happening
Any other fag feels the same?
t. poorfag 2nd lieut.

First lieutenant here. I could've bought btc at five dollars or cheaper but I didn't. I bought link because they are making headwaves just like btc early days. I'm happy at this second epic chance and am comfy af.

>>15524051
>he probably made a killing during his NXT affairs when BTC was in the mere hundreds.
Your dumb fud loses credibility with every post you make just gtfo the thread

>>15523963
>What I’m afraid of is that SWIFT actually uses Chainlink code for their Smart Oracle (maybe GPI Link as speculates) but they’re running it privately without the need of actually doing this on the blockchain
no shit... anyone with a brain know since forever it's the only outcome possible, how could such mastodon handling literal trillions use and PAY for a kickstarted, cayman islanded, philo licensed, bigmac'd, meme token when they could do their own version in 2 weeks for virtually no cost at all.
Thats why link have no future, any good concept get stolen or bought by big corpo.

>>15524111
kek feels it too

>>15524022
>we built the bow for Pietta for starter, it's extremelly bullish for the 9mm industry, our technology is fully mature now

>>15523893

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

AHHHH OH NO NO NO NO

THEY'RE CORRELATING A FUCKING VIDEO GAME WITH THEIR FINANCIAL FUTURES AND BARGAINED WITH THE TEAM TO "BUY IN EARLY"

THINKING THAT A PAJEET POTTERY SHIT FLINGING FORUM WOULD MAKE THEM RICH. NOT REALIZING THAT THEIR MEME POTENTIAL WAS WASTED ON A KNOWN FAILURE, FRAUD AND SOON-TO-BE EXTRADITED RUSSIAN SCAMMER.

>>THE PRICE
TRUST ME, INSIDER. SOURCE, TRUST ME

>>THE MEMES
ANYTHING, LITERALLY ANYTHING AT ALL

>>THE BULL
YOU AND YOUR NEET MONEY. JUST THROW INTO THE FUCKING TRASH

>>THE COPE
WHAT THEY USED TO MAKE FUN OF US WITH. YOU LITERALLY FELL FOR A PAID FUCKING SCAM WITH A NON-AMERICAN RUSSIAN NATIONAL OPERATING IN THE US, WITH A FUCKING DREAM PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE BULLSHIT TOKEN

>>BAHAHAHAHAHA

>>15523903
True but they didn't need to be there for the Google and Oracle announcements either.

we're gonna make it.. like this month

>>15524864
I really hope so. I tire of this existence and need something new.

>>15524864
We already made it, it just takes some time for our brain and economy to realize it.

>>15523893
Oracle, 50 start ups - 16th Sept

>>15523973
It's going to be something out of the blue, like Google and Coinbase. Maybe Paypal or Delloite

>>15524864
priced in already

we are gonna dump.

>>15523973
Eric Holder will be indicted. Paul Walker will rise again.

ITS HAPPENING ISSNT IT?