/biz/ - Business & Finance

fuckin neither lmao, i'd keep my 50k

>>15301368
Link

>>15301380
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

>>15301368
link will give you a bigger ROI
70/30 btc/link for a safer portfolio
30/70 btc/link to make more money
i would put it all in link rn because we are going to have several bullish conferences now thru september

>>15301380
thats +1 for Chainlink

>>15301376
sir you are losing money by hodling USD

>>15301368
it comes down to whether you want to be filthy rich or simply just make it. Btc is the safe play. More established. At this point everyone and their grandma knows btc. Only autistic retards like myself know what Link is. That being said with 50k and only one choice I’m going all in on link. 1k eoy.

>>15301394
wrong, usd will go up, as the the uk crashes the eu with no survivors
everyone will hedge with usd come brexit time

>>15301394
Why didnt you count my vote? i even gave you a small break down and everything...

>>15301411
Brexit is good for UK

>>15301386
seems like fundamentals have changed
>>15301391
LINK = greater upside & events on the way

+1 Chainlink

>>15301405
1K eoy

+1 Chainlink

>>15301411
thanks for your thoughts, however, you must chose one or the other for this thread!

>>15301415
Counted

I appreciate the breakdown. Look forward to following these conferences

>>15301368
Link is going to 5x in the next month just from the sheer volume of presentations...not even factoring the actual news.

>>15301456
web3 is coming, that might explain why we are steadily climbing up. keep an eye out for Sibos '19, lots of rumors going around this is going to be big for chainlink

>>15301380
Listen up newfags, I'm a tcp ip developer at a fortune 50 big data company with 25 years experience in database infosec, I've looked into chainlink and all I can tell you if that the cryptographic measures implemented in regards to the decentralized security paradigm in the API and IoT structure of chainlink's github code is fundamentally flawed after the Pivotal tracker server crashed due to the core attacks on the network enabled by its corrupt data inputs and outputs, what this really means is that by attempting to solve the oracle sybil resistance issue it instead allows customers to bypass the encrypted hardware and even hack into the smart contract Intel SGX mainframe, unless they manage to increase the signatures and scalable nodes, which isn't likely considering the Google backend isn't compatible with the legacy JSON systems and Solidity language from the EVM in the Truffle stacks, that's why the ic3 and SWIFT engineering teams developed the ISO 20220 standards but it's centralized and susceptible to the 51% front running program so yeah basically Sergey didn't foresee that the enterprise customers and cloud blockchain dapps would never allow their protocols to rely on these permissioned host mechanisms thus rendering the LINK ERC 677 token obsolete and no serious developer would consider DLT technology in these conditions, sorry linkies I'm just telling it how it is.

>>15301429
short term no, long term yes
>>15301456
you will lose it all if you buy either

BTC, it's more likely to go up big time.

https://medium.com/@100trillionUSD/modeling-bitcoins-value-with-scarcity-91fa0fc03e25

>>15301405
>1k eoy
t. autistic retard response.

I'm not retarded but I am an aspie, so I understand that even if I were long term bullish on link then there is no rush to get in anytime before the BTC halvening.

BTC is currently only held up by the chink plustoken ponzi scammers dumping. But we're just at the beginning of another bull cycle.

10K in LINK, 10K in BTC 20K for stocking up guns ammo food and bank account 10K casino

>>15301458
tough to beat a 5x - news typically is bearish for crypto but i'll take it


+1 LINK
>>15301476
thanks anon, appreciate the insights again. will look out for Sibos
>>15301490
what DLT platform crypto would you invest in? thanks for the write up. im not technical but it seems like you know your stuff

>>15301573
+1 BTC until halving