[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 117 KB, 1080x1080, main-qimg-83672c97b1f638dd8ae4798142f1822b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15286282 No.15286282 [Reply] [Original]

>tfw 1k is fud

>> No.15286287

Let's be fair, you have no idea of LINK has real users. Users on any network can easily be faked, and it unfortunately happens all the time in the tech world.

And LINK going to "low" volume is an understatement. It was completely dead, a few thousand in bot trades a day. Nothing has changed fundamentally about the project as far as I can tell. The only thing that changed is that on July 11th a shill army came to /biz/, Reddit, and a number of other crypto forums and started scheming people into putting money in. It was OBVIOUSLY coordinated, you'd have to be a total brainlet to not understand that.

Whether or not LINK is a real project I don't even care, the use case is paltry. It has no long term chance at survival, and the recent price action absolutely STINKING of PnD doesn't help it in my eyes.

That plus the volume is still embarrassingly low. Any real money in will be hard to get out if this price action continues at this amount of volume. The real fear is that volume dies off and you're literally stuck for another 2 years with not even being able to sell. That opportunity cost is high because you will, in the meantime, miss out on plenty of solid tokens & coins continuing their upwards trajectory.

Anyway, you do you, but for me the LINK risks vastly outweigh the potential rewards, and not being able to put in more than $1,000 or so without worrying about if I'll get my money back even after a pump makes it multiple levels beneath my stack grade.

Good luck to those of you chasing the pump, I hope you come out on top, but for me this is a hard pass.

>> No.15286306

>>15286282
it is fud in the sense that it makes you believe anyone who supports LINK is delusionally optimistic

>> No.15286343

>>15286282
The only question left is:
>when?

Could take 5+ years from here.

>> No.15286346
File: 279 KB, 945x745, 851318A9-A5EF-4B6F-969D-EB9B5450CB42.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15286346

>>15286287
DRNS

>>15286282
Depends on you time horizon OP. 1k in 10 years is certainly fud. 1k in one year is almost overly bullish.

>> No.15286390

>>15286282
Somebody post the screenshot from the 1488 get

>> No.15286454

>>15286343
5 years for 20 million aint bad

>> No.15286493
File: 100 KB, 1881x349, linkers btfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15286493

>>15286390

>> No.15286504

>>15286343
The longer it takes to moon the more time we have to accumulate more linkies

>> No.15286523
File: 141 KB, 625x780, 1565295150980.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15286523

>>15286493

>> No.15286715

>>15286287
Imagine trying to FUD Links volume when it's literally top 3 real volume of all crypto's on the regular.

>> No.15287243

>>15286715
its a SENT fud pasta remastered for Link

>> No.15287263

>>15287243
Oh okay kek. I filtered SENT threads so I wouldn't know.

>> No.15287276

>>15287243
As the originator of this copy, the irony of it being repurposed for LINK when I am quite literally 100% in LINK does not go unappreciated. It’s quite amusing.

>> No.15287289

>>15286287
kek

>> No.15287394

>>15286493
Wrong pic sir