/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15154777
CHECKED DIDNT READ NOT SELLING

>>15154777
Checked but read this faggot

Honestly if this isn't the very fucking bottom of the massive descending wedge, which also coincides with the HTF long term support line since the beginning of our move up, then I'll be investing in kneepads.

LINK is going to run to $10 in the next month or two, guaranteed.

>>15154777
Checked. Your words are KEK’s commands.

>>15154844
this

>>15154777
checked and drns pilled

>>15154844
>LINK is going to run to $10 in the next month or two, guaranteed.
how do you know lmao, you sound like a twitter faggot

>>15154777
is 37 enough to make it?

Its also literally at the 0.618 fib level. 3 confirmations is enough for a decent trade guys. Don't fucking lose out on this, LINK won't be sub $3 for much longer.

>>15154893
And you sound like you missed the initial move from 50c

>>15154916
ive been buying since link got listed on etherdelta, thats why im saying you sound like a twitter faggot. nothing but air coming from you

>>15154844
1.60$ bottom sorry fren

>>15154844
I unironically feel this, end of August and September are going to be huge.

>>15155082
In a flash crash maybe
if it goes to 1.60, next station will unironically be 40 cents

>>15154826
True. But it’s the RISK we all know we are taking. It’s possible Chainlink could be “outlawed” in the US or some catastrophe could happen. Crypto is very risky. But Chainlink shows GREAT promise.

>>15154844
Dont let me down anon

>>15154844
$10 is ambitious, but not guaranteed. I’d be happy with $6

>>15155143
i know it can risky , but check @telecoin which uses coin mixing alongside encrypted file sharing and interaction, swiftTX transactions and rewards from staking and running the master nodes are just few features

10x your crypto with moon3d. bonus schemes awaits

>>15154777
I’m all in LINK but that’s the equivalent of putting on a blindfold so you won’t notice the world going to shit around you. Be smart with your investments.

>>15154777
Bought at $2 did I fuck up ?

>>15154844
>This astrologic thingy coincides with this other astrologic thingy

Yikes

>>15154844
I've been waiting two years, and I'll wait two more.

DR;NS makes you chainlink holders emit an arrogance as if your shit dont stink. Fucking stinky linkies are the worst poster on this board

>>15155769
Did you say something

>>15155769

>>15154777
The last thing I put in the effort to read was Alex's post about threshold signatures. It was good, I learned some stuff. It doesn't matter anymore though. Nothing's going to drastically alter the course that they've been on for five years, and nothing's going to change the fact that smart contracts need data and a robust, standardized mechanism for ensuring its validity. At this point it's a waste of time to think about Link unless you're a smart contract dev or a literal autist who needs to stim by researching breadcrumbs. Best of luck to those who know.

PLEASE ADVISE

My avg buy in has been 2.28. I want to dump 2k into link. Should I bite the bullet or wait until for the chance of it going lower?

>>15156095
News on aug 22nd. Expect a pre pump next friday or so. Buy monday- thursday, target 2.30-2

>>15154844
I hate this. I dont want it to be the bottom so we can shake some weak hands out and i can buy more for super cheap, but i want it to moon so hard so i can start my life already.

>>15156122
So wait to buy until the 12th or 19th

>>15154777
checked OP saving image and will print it on a shirt

>>15155143
That's the least of the concerns, what should concern everyone is that literally anyone can do exactly what link does. Wait until AWS, Apple, Google etc. launches their own method to connect smart contracts to off chain data. It will happen. It will kill link. If any one of those players, or any of the countless others, actually needed link, they'd have bought them out long ago.

>>15154844

>>15154844
DR;NS

>>15154777
BASED

>>15156223
Unless those companies launch their own decentralized oracle network in the next 2 years I seriously doubt they'd stand a chance at taking over Link, no matter how big they are.
You have to remember that smartcontract the company was founded in 2014, you can't just build an oracle network and have integration with (literally) hundreds of projects overnight.

It's hard to make comparisons to other industries, but the closest I can think of would be ford or GM trying to take over Tesla in the EV market. Or google creating a rideshare company and trying to overtake uber. Brand recognition and being the the OG (like bitcoin) matters more than you think.

>>15154777
>>15155800
Checked & checked based non-sellers
On a point of order; is it not selling or never selling?
Pls clarify
$1000 EOY

one day you are gonna wake up and its gonna spike to six dollars. There will be hype and it will go to ten dollars then there will be a propaganda and pamnic sellers and goback to four dollars then it will be one hundred dollars

>>15156525
I hope you're right anon
Wish I could fast forward three years and see "LINK dominance" on CMC.

>>15156485
Except your comparing very advanced, proprietary EV tech held by a very large well financed organization to oracles. If you don't think AWS or Google could throw 1000 of the worlds best coders onto a decentralized oracle project and have it up and running in a few weeks or at most months, you don't understand the scale and resources they have. Yeah, the absurdly small dev team can totally be compared to Tesla.

>>15156617
You don't have weeks or months when the first mover already launched their mainnet and is currently onboarding customers.

>>15156617

>>15156485
> Brand recognition and being the the OG (like bitcoin) matters more than you think
Also thanks for making my point. No one has heard of chainlink. Industries will flock to the names they know and already work with. Best case scenario for link is Oracle startups work out great, and Oracle buys them. That's the reality anyone should be hoping for as it's really the only likely way they control the space.

>another LINK thread

>>15156617
So why haven't google, amazon or microsoft created their own smart contract blockchain platform and taken over eth, mr. smarty pants?

>>15156653
god you're a faggot. stay poor

>>15156634
>>15156640
>>15156670
I can't wait until SIBOS when not a single person mentions link once, and a huge name ends up launching their own method, it's going to be hilarious. I say all of this while holding link. If you're wondering why I'm holding, it's because of Oracle startups.

>>15156653
>No one has heard of chainlink
Except for google, microsoft, swift, and anyone who knows what coinbase is or is involved in blockchain technology whatsoever.
Not to mention selling out to a large company goes against the fundamentals of decentralization

>>15156744
Right, so not who would actually go to Chainlink as a customer, just companies who can do exactly what link does with actual brand recognition among industries that would adapt the usage.

>>15156801
>>15156740
Lol you know nothing about crypto and I'm willing you bet you bought Link above two dollars
Stay poor

>>15155173

fuck off pajeet

>>15156898
Are you saying it's not going to 1000? How would I be poor off a 500x?

>>15156740
nulinkers jesus fucking christ. quit talking shit to 2017 buyers redditards. ill drop this out of pity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f0KJc4Lj3Y&list=PLoFkUS-rGmABa36ykMMV_xR76mEnOEByI&index=4&t=0s

hint about pic related: openlaw made a very important announcement recently...

>>15154777
>Imagine not buying link while it's at it's monthly low.
Checked. I started buying link dips when it was listed on binance and dca to 17 cents. Feels good to not be the only one who didn't read.

>>15156740
>trying to rekindle sibos fud
>he doesn't know the link presentation was held at the toilets and it still did great.
If you weren't here for the first sibos fud then kys

>>15157040
Few of my friends are suggesting that Telecoin is great and can expect huge returns. Have any idea about it ?

>>15157095
KYS GET OUT OF OUR LINKY THREAD REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>15156095
I have 1k link at an average of $2.95

>>15157095
If few of your friends are suggesting that it is great, then obviously avoid. Maybe get them to have a look at KYS?

>>15157095
PAJEET PAJEET

GO SHIT IN THE STREET

PAJEET PAJEET

YOU HAVE NO SHOES ON YOUR FEET

PAJEET PAJEET

YOU SHIT ON THE BEACH

>>15157036
> Literally says more are coming
> The fucking list of potential risks from Chainlink includes exactly what I'm saying
You're right it's nothing, all these major tech names are going to be too scared to take on link
>>15157093
> Implying there's any reason to spread SIBOS fud
> As if they were actually presenting again
> I'm not just pointing out that sibos is much more likely to be very bad for link than it is good
> Meanwhile it's on everyones list for bullish event days, because 2 years ago they did a presentation.

>>15154893
>>15154968
You sound like a butthurt retard unable to read TA.

>>15157479
discord tranny or you didn't watch the video i linked. either way, kys and stay poor

>>15156151
>Not wanting people to buy your shitcoin
There is something seriously wrong with linkies

>>15154777
Checked. I actually didn't even finish reading what you posted.

>>15156223
Google is under antitrust criminal investigation dumbass. They don’t want to be in any way responsible for creating “a coin.” Facebook decided it’s a good idea to launch its own currency, and they will regret doing so. Google will use a partner or third party they don’t technically own to do things like this. They can’t be seen as “creating a currency.”

Understand?