[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 117 KB, 1080x1080, main-qimg-83672c97b1f638dd8ae4798142f1822b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15096842 No.15096842 [Reply] [Original]

How come Chainlink holders can only respond to debates with insults and fallacies, especially burden of proof fallacies ("No spoon feeding, we discussed this to death, check the archives.")?

>> No.15096859

shut up faggot

>> No.15096866

>>15096842
kys retard

>> No.15096869
File: 224 KB, 810x713, 1564767500377.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15096869

>>15096842
How come Chainlink fudders can only respond to debates with insults and fallacies, especially burden of proof fallacies ("Sergey is selling, Sergey is fat, Sergey is a Philosophy major, jason parser, 2 man team.")?

>> No.15096870

How come Nonlinkers are such absolute cocksuckers?

>> No.15096879

>>15096842
how come you've never had sex OP?

>> No.15096883
File: 30 KB, 710x577, 1556054596064.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15096883

>>15096842
Insults, fallacies, and forced memes are literally all they have left.
I feel bad for them.

>> No.15096900

>>15096859
>>15096866
LINK bots can't read what I said.
>>15096869
>>15096870
>>15096879
Like clockwork. And we've seen plenty of people ask legit questions only to be flamed by LINKers with no answers.
>>15096883
At least once LINK crashes pajeets will never be able to promote a scam based on memes again, as no one will trust them.

>> No.15096904
File: 67 KB, 1024x288, BB2BF499-2BC8-4A16-B8DC-73D8F3E09088.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15096904

>>15096842
2 years.
Priced out.

>> No.15096917

>>15096870

cause they desperately wish they were linkers, but they dont want to buy in "late" so their only option is to suck our cocks for a fraction of a linky

>> No.15096922
File: 941 KB, 3546x1456, 1525390296068.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15096922

>>15096900
This is you in -17 and -18
Next year you'll be a part of the updated version

>> No.15096955

>>15096842
because any debate you bring up is the equivalent of me walking into a math conference and asking how theyre so sure that 2+2=4

its not only stupid and a waste of time, its downright disrespectful to those who have put in the effort to understand something at a higher level than most others

>> No.15096977

>>15096955
also this thread is 200% bait for OP to get someone to say
"ok what exactly do you want to debate"

so OP can get spoonfed.

>> No.15096985

have you thought that the link holders fight each other in every thread? it's funny

>> No.15097004
File: 27 KB, 660x371, _103897772_npc_meme_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15097004

>>15096904
>>15096917
>>15096922
>>15096955
NPC's doing exactly what I called them out for lololol. No self awareness. If it's too dumb to be worth your time, you wouldn't respond. You respond with scripted lines because you have a scam to advertise.

>> No.15097018

>>15097004
alright you got me, im smoking a blunt right now and have an hour or so until my next commitment

lets hear it.
what exactly do you want to debate?

>> No.15097019

>>15096977
you too>>15097004

>> No.15097071

>>15097018
This >>15096680

>> No.15097098

>>15097071
>insult everyone for acting like a retard
>insist that you are being genuine and everyone else is a troll
>get asked "what do you want to debate"
"chainlink sold town crier to chainlink"

its all so tiresome
OP kill yourself, i was excited that you maybe didnt understand one of the technicals supporting chainlink and i would have the opportunity to dumb it down in laymans terms
instead you were just baiting the whole time

>> No.15097112

>>15096842
stupid retard

>> No.15097116

>>15096842
Linkers have literally become the flat earthers of /biz/

>> No.15097145

>>15097116
if being a flat earther means making money, sure

>> No.15097164

>>15097098
So you do exactly what I say LINKers do. Deflect deflect deflect. Hilarious. No one's falling for your desperate deflection.

>> No.15097181

>>15096900
you still haven't told me why you've never had sex OP

>> No.15097236

>>15097164
Kill yourself

>> No.15097261

>>15097164
kill yourself.
your argument is that 1 of the 5 people who wrote the TC white paper is 1 of the 3 people who wrote the chainlink whitepaper

so in your theory, Ari Juels was the sole owner of all of town crier, as well as the sole owner of all of chainlink
do you realize how fucking stupid and beyond retarded that sounds?

imagine being 1/5 authors of the white paper of a project, and then someone approaches you and wants to buy the project
and you tell them, yep as 1 of the 5 people who wrote this projects white paper, i have the authority to authorize the sale of the entire project

what a cock sucker you are for wasting my time with this nonsense

>> No.15097305

>>15096842
Because you had 2 YEARS.
now fuck off; we're full.

>> No.15097311
File: 1.31 MB, 1496x2088, stinky.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15097311

>>15097164
>LINK acquiring TC is bad
2 years. How fucking poor/retarded are you that you have to still FUD after 2 fucking years? How are your bags not packed yet? Another nulinker priced out might be more /comfy/ than the 10% pump desu. Stay poor brainlet

>> No.15097323

>>15097311
They either believed that link was a meme or they tried swinging at got burnt

>> No.15097327

>>15096842
Probably cause you ignore threads where questions are actually answered and selectively pick out the brainlet answers to build a stawman.

>> No.15097422

>>15097164
Just stop. The reason we call you a retard is because we've all known ChainLink is the most important project in emerging tech since 2017. We went over every fucking piece of retarded FUD for months in late 2017, early 2018 and in doing so, we realized "Holy fuck, this is unironically bigger than any of us imagined." Some of us have very large link stacks that you will never be able to achieve unless you're already a multimillionaire. Some of us know what the future holds and we couldn't care less about helping you latecoming faggots. We struggled for years, many of us made huge sacrifices, and now we are worth six or seven figures and on the precipice of retiring within two years.

We unironically no longer have time for you peons. We've tried for years. If you don't get it, you can suck our rich assholes.

>> No.15097454
File: 819 KB, 1022x731, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15097454

Ive been debating proplery with trolls for 2 years
straight
now it's all just tiresome
I got tired
I dont care enough anymore
cant be bothered
now fuck off

>> No.15097703

>>15096904

The problem with this story is that people never agreed that smart contracts need decentralised oracles. Eventually there were questions that could not be answered like how to overcome sybil resistance and how decentralised oracles overcome the trust issues at the api source (if you trust the api source then why do you need an oracle in the first place, just plug the api source into your smart contract) and finally the issue with how api calls will actually translate into an increase in LINK value. Everyone just mumbles something about market buying from binance but no one has any realistic explanation of how this mechanism works. When I use a smart contract with chainlink it logs into a binance account and places a market order? This is absurd. All these problems could never be addressed and it became abundantly clear that LINK holders were angel investors in a cool proof of concept. Then you guys created echo chambers where you kept saying shit like 'DUDE WEAPONISED AUTISM WE ARE SO FUCKING AUTISTIC AND SPECIAL' and started all your ebin sekrit club shit with your schizo posters and oracle of delphi discord trannies etc.
The whole thing is a massive scam. However I do hold 100k LINK because massive scams tend to do well in clown world.

>> No.15097792

>>15097703
cope

>> No.15098371

>>15097422
Imagine being proud of this autism

>> No.15098667

>>15096842
Because linkis are DGB's 2.0. there is absolutely no reason to invest but they keep shilling

>> No.15098871
File: 921 KB, 2289x2037, 1563451087466.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15098871

>>15097004
dude, >>15096904 gave you the answer
it really is that simple; take it or leave it
practically none of us really care enough to try to convince you at this point
you had two years—and it's not like LINK is even a remotely bad buy at this point, either
it's still the best buy by a large margin

so, again—
take it or leave it
do your own research, search warosu or whatever, etcetera
nobody here owes you anything

>> No.15098925

>>15096842
sieg heil gas all mudslimes

>> No.15099089

>>15096842
You can learn to love ChainLink too. Just become a swing linker like me. I'm using a trade bot with a neural network to predict prices... You can use it too just join my telegram group.
t.me/cryptopredictorgroup

>> No.15099137

>>15097004
We’ve discussed this topic to death. There is nothing in it for us to spoon feed you with a personally tailored reply because another brainlet will come tomorrow asking the same question.
It been two. Long. Years.

I do nothing but browse and occasionally shitpost. This is the sentiment for most of not all of link holders who have been here for that time. If link isn’t a clear winner in your mind then sorry I don’t know what to tell you. There is nothing in it for me sitting here and explaining every little detail and holding your hand through this process. Just a huge waste of time and effort desu.

>> No.15099139

>>15097792
He's holding more than you

>> No.15099587

>>15097004
I don't know of any og's that are interested in defending their investment. They have no interest in convincing someone. Rhetoric is not their goal.

If they state something, then it is to reaffirm something to people that are already in accordance with them, not to appeal to outsiders.

>To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible.

>> No.15099601
File: 36 KB, 1867x229, copelink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15099601

>>15096842

>> No.15099620

>>15096842
Shut up, dick.

>> No.15099621

>>15097422
This never happened fyi. Its revisionist history at best or chainlink propaganda at worst. I've been on this board since it split from /g/, there has NEVER been a time when Chainlink was discussed in a serious manner on this board.

>> No.15099635

>>15096842
It’s true but it’s warranted. Us linkies have been around for a while now. We’ve sacrificed two years of our lives dissecting this project, watching every live stream, every speech, followed every possible breadcrumb. And then a fucker like you comes along and asks for the rundown of all that work. This is why we say go fuck yourself. You’re slowing down the conversation. If you can’t get up to speed or make the connections we have on your own time, we’re not going to sit here and spoon feed it to you.

>> No.15099662

>>15096842
I'm just tired of the delusional claims. They aren't going to be mentioned a single time at SIBOS, and they are in no way shape or form partners with swift. Pretending this isn't the case is peak delusion.

>> No.15099735

>>15096842
check the archives

>> No.15099826

>>15096900
fuck off faggot

>> No.15100207

>>15099621
t. revisionist

>> No.15100252

>>15099662
The delusional claims only sound delusional until they become reality. The thing that so many of you don’t seem to get is that LINK is actually the real deal and what you would call “hyperbole” is likely conservative in the greater scheme of things.

>> No.15100326

>>15100252
Right, they aren't partnered with swift, until they are. Thank you for proving that you're delusional.

>> No.15100342

>>15100252
Well when you fabricate news and pretend that being mentioned in a blogpost by Google equals being in a parternship with Google it makes this whole thing seem extremely dishonest.

Credibility is everything. Chainlink has none.

>> No.15100359

Detective anon has still been not disproven.

>> No.15100387

>>15099621
Lies. Im a newfag who first bought link in april 2018 and it was def being discussed properly even then amidst the shitposting and fudding cos thats why i bought in

>> No.15100418

>>15100387
If you're actually this big a of a brainlet that you believed baseless claims of fucking Chainlink replacing the entire derivatives and insurance industries was "proper discussion" you deserve the fate that awaits you.

>> No.15100446

>>15100418
My 'fate' is im already up 10x retard. Hiw much are you up?

>> No.15100556

>>15100446
This is what somebody says at the horsetrack after putting $10 on a 10/1 horse and winning. Have you realized these gains yet? Are you done betting?

>> No.15100610

>>15096842
You're right anon. We don't know what we're doing, Chainlink is a scam and it would probably be best if you just put your filters on and never looked back. You're very smart.

>> No.15100760

>>15100556
>it was just luck that the one crypto biz has been autisitcally obsessed with went 10x in a bear market.


Are you being paid to post or something?

>> No.15101207

>>15099621
Hahahahahahahahaha

Why do you even bother with this Rajesh? You're literally not doing anything. You're cringey posts are never going to make me sell before my targets. Go shill or fud something more productive lol.

>> No.15101263

>>15096842
There have been 20+ LINK threads per day for 2 years. Every possible scenario has been discussed endlessly. I guarantee I could wreck you in a debate but I won't because it's a waste of my time. I don't want you to buy.

>> No.15101279

>>15096900
dude if you want to read about check the archives. it has been technically debated ad naseum. the only relevant things now are events and price action. latelinkers have had a good chance to get in, and its more important to discuss link and BTC price action/ link schedule in order to accumulate as much as possible.

>> No.15101321

>>15099621
liar

>> No.15101341
File: 57 KB, 500x500, 81CDF795-2AE4-4828-B625-9A72B899A8E5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15101341

>> No.15101613

>>15097703
>I dont understand validating data across multiple apis and sending this aggregated information in a private and secure manner
>we already have apis, what's the difference?

>> No.15101650

>>15101263
>I guarantee I could wreck you in a debate

Oh look, a linkie getting brave.
>>15062117
I slayed the whole fucking board and you didn't do shit but suck your thumb waiting for backup to defend your ERC shitcoin.