[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 665 KB, 482x866, sn.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15042466 No.15042466 [Reply] [Original]

Slowly starting to realize we're overrating chainlink hugely. It comes down to the ERC20 token being completely unnecessary.

>> No.15042517

>>15042466

Erc-677 you fucking MONG

>> No.15042525

>>15042466
I'm thinking about forking it and removing the token. What should I call the tokenless chainlink fork?

>> No.15042530

>>15042517

ERC-10 you fucking mong

>> No.15042535

>>15042517
erc10, it got downgraded a few weeks ago man

>> No.15042568

>>15042530
>>15042535
>Not realizing it has since been upgraded to ERC-15 and that's why we didn't dip below $2 as ERC-15's physically can not be worth less than $2/token.
Fucking nulinkers everywhere

>> No.15042580

Exit scammer in OP’s pic

>> No.15042628

>>15042466
>what is transfer and call

>> No.15042643

>>15042466
haha this shit is open source

just imagine some huge company will use their code and make a own network

>> No.15042677

>>15042525
chadlink
or ethlink

>> No.15042685

>>15042525

a centralized data feed?

>> No.15042695
File: 157 KB, 1607x827, google cloud chainlink link tokens.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15042695

>>15042466
>It comes down to the ERC20 token being completely unnecessary.
Google Cloud disagrees.

>> No.15042723
File: 166 KB, 819x1024, 1563641804801.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15042723

>>15042695
>return JSON serialized response

J S O N P A R S E R
S
O
N

P
A
R
S
E
R

>> No.15042745

>>15042677
Checked. I like chadlink.

>>15042685
No. Decentralized with nodes. You don't need a token when you can use reciprocity and reputation. Reliable nodes get reputation points, nodes with a high reputation score get priority when requesting oracle data.

>> No.15042845

>>15042695
it can be replaced with eth while making the protocol cheaper

>> No.15042863

>>15042628
A shit argument since any token including eth can be augmented with the same capability incredibly easily.

>> No.15042906

>>15042845
>>15042863
see >>15042695
and cope.

>> No.15042922

>>15042906
are you dumb or playing dumb? that describes the current state of chainlink, which of course requires link transfers.

>> No.15042935

>>15042922
>that describes the current state of chainlink
That's Google Cloud describing how they're integrating Chainlink, yes.
cope

>> No.15042951

>>15042935
they are not integrating chainlink, you can connect to their api using chainlink. It's open to anyone.

>> No.15042966

>>15042466
Anybody who “invests” in an ethereum token has totally deluded themselves.

>> No.15042970

>>15042466
All the use cases of Chainlink you guys are excited about are actually just Ethereum's use cases
Ethereum just can't fulfill those use cases without some way to interact with outside data
Future enterprise grade smart contracts platforms will have this functionality included by default
So no one will need Chainlink

All Chainlink does is connect smart contracts. It's a fucking ethernet cable.

>> No.15042981

>>15042845
Nope. How you pay in other networks besides eth.

>> No.15043011

> please sell please please sell all of your linkies 2 man team json parser vaporware scamcoin the devs are literally dumping as we speak please spoonfeed me even though i religiously but ineffectively try to fud in every link thread instead of trying to use a filter just ignore everything the team has done and sell your linkies no im not a swinglinker i have anons financial interests at heart i promise
Yawn
Sage and hide

>> No.15043018
File: 152 KB, 1600x767, google cloud chainlink node.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15043018

>>15042951
>they are not integrating chainlink
I told you to cope a couple of times now.

>> No.15043030

>>15043011
HI!

>> No.15043035

>>15042966
>hurrr it's just a token!
Shares and bonds are pieces of paper.
Gold is soft metal.
Dollar bills are cotton paper.
You're an idiot.

>> No.15043056

>>15042981
If what you wanted to say that link is needed to pay if chainlink is used on eg. tezos, the obvious answer is that the payment uses the native token on that platform.
>>15043018
It's all very clear on that diagram, I have no idea how you continue to misunderstand it. There's a chainlink node that runs on a public cloud, like aws or google cloud. That's why it's a generic "Cloud Platform". The node makes web requests to BigQuery api, which runs as an internal service on Google Cloud.

>> No.15043061

>>15042970
>Future enterprise grade smart contracts platforms will have this functionality included by default
Lmao, October 2017 fud in the house.

Oracles are off-chain BY DEFINITION. Integrating the two into one is like covering a car in tire thread.

>> No.15043070

>>15043061
You're wrong, PoA and DPoS networks require trust in operators anyway, so they can function as oracles too.

>> No.15043072

>>15043056
>It's all very clear on that diagram
Yes it is. that's Google Cloud's Chainlink node in there.

>> No.15043105

>>15043070
Anyone can function as oracles. Just like anyone can act as a street sweeper.
But making cops sweep streets while on duty just makes no sense.

>> No.15043248

>>15043061
Fuck off, you invested in an ethernet cable lmao

>> No.15043257

>>15042466
where did you get this picture?

>> No.15043264

>>15043248
There there.

>> No.15043293
File: 418 KB, 900x1039, 1548049489951.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15043293

[chainlink is just a jason parser]

>> No.15043300

>>15042745

Who determines how the reputation system works?

>> No.15043404

>>15043300
The code

>> No.15043438

>he doesn't know
the erc council downgraded link from an erc 20 token to an erc 10 token a month ago

sergey and the devs are going before the erc council to appeal the decision in a couple of weeks

>> No.15043447

>>15043404
So you're centralizing the reputation system, lmao.
You're clueless.

>> No.15043468

Some comfy cope in this thread

>> No.15043478

>>15043447
No go against the 404 bro.

>> No.15043480

>>15043056
Instead of 1 token your solution is dozens of tokens? Kek

>> No.15043497

>>15043447
Uh??
No, you are clueless.

>> No.15043512

>>15043480
>>15043056
>requester wants to pay in BTC
>node wants ETH
>they fite

>> No.15043523

>>15042466
ERC-1OOO

>> No.15043553
File: 16 KB, 250x250, 1564187840194.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15043553

>>15043523
>ERC-1OOO
G-guys? Is this the singularity?

>> No.15043650
File: 2 KB, 125x112, 1527959803402s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15043650

>>15043035
LMFAOOOO AT THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF DELUSION LINKLETS ARE DISPLAYING

>> No.15043702

>>15042466
>Slowly starting to realize we're overrating chainlink hugely. It comes down to the ERC20 token being completely unnecessary.
Ah yes, the proper solution is to offer a service plan for utilizing chainlink that lets you make X number of calls for Y price in fiat. Almost as if each transaction is done by a token...have sex

>> No.15044077
File: 10 KB, 236x213, 1563837476426.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15044077

>>15042568
>physically
it's virtual

>> No.15044945

>>15043056
he literally highlighted both boxes for you and you're still misreading it. that's a Chainlink node running IN Google Platform.

>> No.15045134

>>15042643
This is it. This is the post that has made me sell.