/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14908177
A material good is used by a popular celebrity. A man sees the item and assumes one of the following is true:
- The item is of high quality as a person of relative wealth chose to purchase it over other options available
- The item is of high profit margin and therefore (proportionally) lower value per dollar with the person of means having extracted some of their means from its sale
In this instance other factors are needed to take an action to purchase or not purchase an item

- A woman sees the same and wishes to extend the social proof of that high profile person to herself. She assesses the likelihood of the item bringing her some of that social proof (more simply, do a lot of other, non-high-value people also have that item?) and purchases or does not purchase it based on this
- After purchasing, the woman justifies her purchase by saying that it was a high quality good, that it was necessary for her career, that she deserved it etc.

This difference is absolutely profound. If you don't get this you will overpay for women and will be frustrated by them.

>>14908280
An investment is available to a man.
- He assesses the likelihood of it being worth more in the future than it is currently and invests based off of this calculation
- A woman sees the same investment and estimates the likelihood of the following outcomes:
>losing large amounts of value and therefore decreasing her social status
>losing or gaining a normal amount of money but having some result that ends in negative social or emotional outcomes
>losing or gaining a normal amount of money but having some result that ends in positive social or emotional outcomes
>gaining a large amount of value and also providing her a large boost in social status

She concludes that the latter two are the only reasonable investment options and post hoc justifies non-investment in the former two based on subjective factors ("weird" "nerdy" "awkward" etc.)

I rarely say this but seriously, have sex.

>>14908177
yikes. have sex.

stupid fucking thread, OP

tl;dr women are shit and are only tolerated because they have a hole we want to put our dicks into

>>14908366
Here are some logical extensions of this:
- If you are paying a woman for a job service etc. be sure you consider a "wholeistic" approach to compensation valuation. Even paying her in a more safe social proof way will allow you not only to purchase what you want from her for cheaper, but purchase things that may not be available otherwise.
>You are an older man and want to fuck a low mileage college girl. If you offer money for her fuck you she will say no because low social value (read: whores) women do this. Take her on a cruise away from her social circle and buy her high status disposable goods (even better: goods that are hard to find or off market) and you can have almost any young girl for a weekend or week.

>>14908400
>>14908411
>>14908422
This is why you are failures at women at a minimum and, most likely, life in general

It doesn't matter what you want the world to be, it matters what it is. Once you get this you will have the maturity to start shaping it to your will.

Like I do

>>14908177
everyone uses emotions dumb ass

>>14908446

your full of shit op.

>>14908177
>>14908280
>>14908366

>There are apparently a lot of misconceptions about women on /biz/
What? These are literally /biz/core opinions on women

>>14908465
>Like I do

omega cringe
in all seriousness, consider suicide

>>14908479
Of course they do, Im discussing what the primary driver is. In women it's emotion. It has to be emotion from an evolutionary standpoint. For men it must be logic.
>>14908482
Happy to hear any logical argument you have, otherwise your opinion is as valueless as my 3 year old's
>>14908486
If you look through the thread referenced there are a lot of people that clearly don't get this (read through this thread for more young men who clearly don't get it)
>>14908492
Again, if you have something of substance to say, feel free
Only ideas have value here faggot

>>14908465
lmao imagine projecting this hard

>>14908612
Again a valueless contribution devoid of any real thought or logic
Bring data reason or both, otherwise be quiet while adults talk

Here's another for the lurkers:
If you actually want to return to a patriarchial society, how would you use the above to do it in a way that
1. Ensures that the patriarchial order is robust and not subject to inevitable swings of the social pendulum
and
2. Women would be the primary drivers (and even thank you for)?

>>14908659
I love how all the retards go silent when I ask a question that requires thought

Based and red pilled fuck roasties

>>14908985
>>14908659
>>14908542
>>14908465
>>14908446
>>14908366
>>14908280
>>14908177
>8 blog posts by this ID
>calling other anons failures
Yikes. Have sex, incel.

>>14908280
>- After purchasing, the woman justifies her purchase by saying that it was a high quality good, that it was necessary for her career, that she deserved it etc.
I do the same and I'm a man

>>14909153
Heh, at least he's putting himself out there and challenging others. Not everyone wants to be a noncommittal pansy who's "above it all".

OP I'm really trying to understand you but I'm a brainlet, what does social-proof have to do with emotion?..

>>14908659
We are silent because you say bring data reason or both but you haven't provided either.

You've spewed forth a bunch of theory/shit from some pua or mgtow teachings but clearly don't have the experience to back it up. Honestly this is up there in the top cringes of this week.

Op is right but in the worst way; technically. Fundamentally women and men have different goals in consumption and it is easily visible by the most casual observer. I’m glad he figured it out and I hope it helps people that haven’t climbed that step

>>14908985
Honestly this is some of the biggest cringe I’ve seen on this board in quite a while.

>>14909313
I just stopped buying shit and became a minimalist, I save a shit ton of money and I'm way more happy, I had my place full of junk.