/biz/ - Business & Finance

I am so damn hurted by these mad dumps that i can't afford buying now that the price is low as fuck

Im holding 100k and accumulating. Anyone who is an oldfsg like me can see the value in nano and how ridiculous it is that we can still accumuate under $10

>>14849052
>Tfw we used to be chads

>>14849052
NO
INCENTIVES
TO RUN
A NODE

Go back to plebbit you piece of shit throwawaytrashlouisa

>>14849148
Reddit sold Nano at the bottom. Nano is a bizcoin again and I’m getting raiblocks vibes
>he wasn’t around when raiblocks was a bizcoin, he’s never going to make it

>>14849143
NOOOO miners deserves every Satoshi for their hard work

>>14849143
there is no incentive to run a node for most coins.
its not like the average person can mine them.

Imagine thinking an insecure chain is a good idea for global payments. I hope you meant Fantom Pay rather than this btc with double spending checks removed shitcoin.

>>14849052
$OTO is the new Nano, fren.

>>14849245
Nobody cares the average person. Its business like anything and you cant do it with donations.

>>14849459
>insecure chain
get rekt faggot
“We are pleased to confirm that after conducting the security audit of the consensus code, no critical vulnerabilities were detected, proving Nano to be the most secure cryptocurrency we’ve tested,” said Diego Jurado, co-founder of Red4Sec.
https://medium.com/nanocurrency/the-nano-protocol-passes-rigorous-red4sec-security-audit-no-critical-vulnerabilities-found-4a90cf0279ae

So Nano is unironically our bitcoin now? Glad I got in under a dollar.


And btw there is incentive to run a mode retards. If you own some you have an incentive to make sure the network still runs. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

>>14849924
I own some but I wouldnt like to run a node. Who cares if you do the hard part of the job like a good soldier?

>>14849924
DUDE JUST RUN A NODE FOR FREE LMAO

>>14850201
The cuckold of crypto?

Running a node is cheap and if you are a whale or a financial entity utilizing nano it only makes sense to secure your investment.

>>14850201
Why would anyone do this when they can run an UND staking node and have lifetime income.

>>14849052
You might be too low IQ to understand what I'm about to say, but the same thing that makes it feeless and instant is also what makes it worthless

not gonna lie op , nano is kinda gay, i admit im holding some but it feels bad

>>14850724
bullish
this fud is trash

>>14850711
people are seriously still buying 2017 alts. don't even bother showing them fren, they don't deserve this yet.

>>14850696
Why should I spend even $100 if you are doing it yourself?

>>14849052
To me the whole point of crypto is passive income, if you can't have that with nano then it's pure shit. Cash is also instant and no fees.
Enjoy fhe bag holding.

nano is literally less programmable than bitcoin. it has no reason to exist.

>>14849052
Ive been saying the same thing
When the majority realize this Nano will eventually be #1
Its far superior to everything
Instant, no fees, it can scale
Theres no competition

>>14851076
We are living in a capitalist world which isnt compatible with your charity network. Sorry.

>>14849573
>you cant do it with donations
Wikipedia disagrees. Oh and so does pretty much all modern research.

>>14851121
>a capitalist world which isnt compatible with your charity network
Your narrow-minded thinking is why you're poor.

>>14851076
louisa.. fuck off. nano does nothing interesting, it is not competitive.

>>14851163
>Your narrow-minded thinking is why you're poor

Yeah tell that to people who bought this shit for 6$+ Lmao.

>>14851173
>>14851121
>>14850998
>>14850724


The same mind set of the early days of butcorn. You will always be poor.

>>14851874
COPE

>>14849052
Crypto is evolving fag, nano was a big deal in 2017 but now instant tx with no fees is just not enough. What do i get for holding this shit? If you don't give people incentive to hold they won't hold, simple as that.

>>14852166
WAGIE

>>14849052
You Nano idiots are so predictable, comparing yourself to BTC. Bitcoin has earned its reputation due to enormous hashpower and proven track record for a long time resisting all kinds of attack. Nano has nothing of this. No one is buying BTC due to the great and cutting edge tech.

Worse, Nano was pushed by sociopathic devs, lying about 7000 TPS Dec 2017, pic, and Italian scammers at Bitgrail. Due to the incestuous relationship, devs and their friends got 15 million USD out of Bitgrail, as admitted on Nano discord, while normal retail investors were stuck and lost 170 million USD.

VISA is calibrated for 60 000 TPS due to peaks like emergency catastrophe, holidays like Christmas etc. What is Nano's real TPS now? 130 according to last spam test. Or 250 from last summers test? No way in hell can Nano have the tech to be a global micro-payment system. Even if you did, let's say you managed to have the minimum TPS for a global micro-payments system, 100 000 TPS, what would the enormous costs for bandwith, CPU and IO be? Have you crazy Nano fanatics or your scammer devs ever done the cost analysis? Remember that your whole crazy and dysfunctional business model is that all that costs and work must be done by volunteers fro free for all eternity with no downtime ever. Nano is a dead project with sociopathic and borderline criminal devs and a crazy cult-like fanbase. Worst in crypto.

>>14849052
Real TPS summer 2018, not the 7000 TPS they lied about Dec 2017

>>14852531
While retail investors were stuck with frozen accounts and maintenance, devs and their friends had no problem to move assets out of Bitgrail before the exchange collapsed. Pic.

>>14852531
While retail investors were stuck for months to get verification before Bitgrail collapsed, friends of the devs had no such problem.

>>14852531
Dev Zack Shapiro, just days before the collapse of Bitgrail.

>>14852564
(((Zack Shapiro)))

>>14849052
Tragic incompetence

>>14852576
>>14852564
>>14852554
>>14852546
>>14852536
>>14852531

Glad to see you back DAG boy. Was getting worried you Necked yourself.

>>14849052
Much of the post-Bitgrail Nano community came from Bitconnect.

>>14852596
How can you cope like this? You must actually be fresh from reddit.

>>14852596
>Glad to see you back DAG boy. Was getting worried you Necked yourself.
Thanks for showing everyone the sheer stupidity from the Nano community and how you are totally unable to defend your sociopathic devs, insane business model and shockingly inadequate tech. Pic related.

Reddit the coin.

>>14852640
hahahaha
same ID spaming post. looks like DAG boys been trying to look like a nano fag then screenshot. Cute DAG boy never fail to impress.

>>14852596
Time for you to buy another 500K, all documented criticism against Nano is always a strong and bullish buy signal for you crazy nanoids, right? Pic related.

>>14851076
There is no competition because even pajeets know that you cant scale that while having no fees, you brainlet subhuman

You think is cheap to keep a network big enough to handle worldwide transactions? Who is gonna pay for that?

Kys right now, please

>>14852647
Unfunny OC, the post

>>14852667
Can you post more picture of you spamming nano threads, please? Pretty please DAG boy

>>14852660
Screenshots were taken long time before DAG, you are delusional. Are you able to present a logically sound counter-argument or is smear and ad hominem all you nanoids have?

>>14852702
>Can you post more picture of you spamming nano threads, please? Pretty please DAG boy
Sure, you nano idiots did not post your usual scam posts, I did it? Right? Pic related. Do you have any idea how stupid you sound? I was always attacked by the Nano community when I pointed out that these threads were made by Nano liars and scammers.

i would buy but nanobots are insufferable

>>14852702
Here is another one.

>>14852703
sorry, bud the only autistic is you. Same reason you can't understand the DAG reference. Your desperation speaks for its self. No need to waste time with an autistic. Just glad your back DAG boy. Dont neck yourself

>>14852531
>>14852536
>>14852546
>>14852554
>>14852564
>>14852576
>>14852588
>>14852597
>>14852640
>>14852667
>>14852703
>>14852745
>>14852757


DAG BOYS BACK! We we're beginning to think maybe you neck yourself. I'm guessing you came back because nano jump 30% today.

>>14852660
>>14852787
>>14852887
I believe in Constellation and their tech, but I stay the hell away from their main (telegram) community. Biz, however, is great. >>14678718

>>14852787
>>14852887
Do you lowlife streetshiters have anything informative to say about your dying shitcoin except DAG boy?

>the one coin that can't integrate with chainlink

>>14853124
Imagine not having the foresight to be able to integrate with the god protocol. Mfw

>>14852564
>>14852554
>>14852546
>>14852531

That's some weak sauce screenshots for the accusations your making. Get better proof or get the fuck out

>>14851121
he doesn't know BTC is marxist

NANOFUDder is back
unironically bullish

>>14853677
>>14853592
>That's some weak sauce screenshots for the accusations your making. Get better proof or get the fuck out
Okay, buddy, here you go, enjoy:

Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nano
http://archive.is/diUnZ


Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
http://archive.is/GGWIG

Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
http://archive.is/zAtyl

>>14853677
>>14853742
>DING DING DING
Great show guys! Next round coming up.

FIGHT!

>>14853742
You're trying too hard anon, the easiest fud is that you don't have incentives to run a node for this piece of crap.

>>14849052
Why would I buy NANO after 2 exit scams when DAG is better in every way and has more room for growth?
Just as Nano, DAG is:
>Free
>Instant
>Green
However, they are superior to Nano in virtually every way.
>Part of a large ecosystem, with real use cases that will provide security for the network and world-wide market. Same as IOTA, but better
>This large ecosystem and not solely a currency will provide protection from Central Bank regulators, like ETH & IOTA, but unlike Nano.
>All zero-fee systems are open to spam attacks. Constellation has a much more advanced and elegant solution than Nano with their reputation system.
>Nano has an insane business model where Nano node operators have to do it for free. This will either lead to a crash, where no one bothers to run nodes for fun and take all the costs, or an insane centralization where Amazon controls nearly everything. Constellation has a very elegant solution where micropayments are free for everyone, while large consumers of bandwidth will have to either pay for it in DAG tokens, or run their own nodes

On top of that DAG's devs just burned all their coins in a sign of sign while NANO has been through more backstabbings than any other coin. Its not even that fast by todays standards

LOL at the people talking about node incentives. Theres literally 10000 btc nodes that a running as non mining nodes 'to verify the chain' TO VERIFY THE CHAIN IS OWNED BY CHINA??

Must be nice having the pleasure to see all your bitcoins transfer to china every time you move it to binance or for the life of me I'm not sure but to use it LOL. there is only like 5 nodes that matter in btc and they are all run by CHINESSEEE mining pools (hash rate is poinnted at these pools but the mining pool actually runs the node). Then you have retards saying there is no incentive to run nano nodes. Good old AMERICAN NODES. FREEDOM!

no paying china to use it, no waiting a hour while china man thanks you for your donation to transact on his chain, uses next to no energy so liberals will be all over this and it is starting a moon mission. Its really the only one that could EVER get close to actually being used as a currency. All those other retarded alts are pointless, bcash, XRP, XLM, doge LOL god damn!

>>14853856
LOL constellations fuck me

>>14853779
there is no point in engaging with him. he uses old FUD that has been debunked over a year ago and when you do prove his points to be incorrect he spazzes out and starts spamming his pasta. A NANO dev came on /biz/ last year to answer his FUD posts. the dev articulately refuted the first several posts. then NANOFUDder loses it and spams 20 pastas and then demands them all to be answered. the nano dev says he needs to slow down so they can go through each point. NANOFUDder rejoices - SEE, huuu durr, NANO devs cant even overcome my FUD, NANO IS A SCAM.

he's just some dumb eurofaggot who left his coins on bitgrail and lost his ass, blaming NANO devs for his retardation. BTC had people like this after Mt Gox and some are still assmad today.

>>14853936
maximalists rekt

>>14853856
>Its not even that fast by todays standards
get a load of this pajeet brainlet

>>14852990
Thoughts on XDAG?

>>14850106
so you run a node?

>>14854054
Only a light. There are cuckolds who run a full node for free.

>>14853972
>A NANO dev came on /biz/ last year to answer his FUD posts. the dev articulately refuted the first several posts
A Nano dev came and could not refute a single one of my points. Worse, he was so stupid that he insisted that the average TPS of PayPal was the correct benchmark, ignoring that PayPal does not engage in micro-payments, like a coffee, does not bank the unbanked and last but not least, average is totally insane as a payment system must be calibrated to handle peaks, like Christmas or emergency situations. He clearly had no understanding of basic micro economics. After that he ran away. I posted some more posts to back up my claims and the dishonest Nano community flagged all my posts, with zero attempt of any kind of rebuttal.
>FUD that has been debunked over a year ago
Never happened. Again you in the Nano community have nothing but lies. Tragic.

>>14854097
>He clearly had no understanding of basic micro economics

The biggest mistake.

>>14854038
>Thoughts on XDAG?
Looks interesting, but I haven't looked into it.

>>14854097
you were t even discussing PayPal transactions, you were discussing VISA transactions. he did refute your first few posts, i was itt laughing at you for being a spastic brainlet. you're clearly deluded and haven't fully recovered from your loss. i'm going to take my own advice and no longer engage with you. i did it a lot last year and it was fun, but i'm not going to debate with a wall of spam pasta.

>>14849052
posts like this shit show the redditors havent left

>>14854159
reddit sold the bottom. NANO is /biz/ coin again. old raiblocks days, do you feel it?

not fungible, not private. SHITCOIN

>>14854155
>you were t even discussing PayPal transactions, you were discussing VISA transactions. he did refute your first few posts
I mentioned VISA TPS, he used PayPal's numbers. No, he did not refute a thing. If that happened you crazy nanoids would have archived the hell out of the conversation and plastered screen shots all over the place. You don't, because you lie.

>>14849120
Literally no oldfag or OG holds Nano. The community is 100% new fags from India who doesn't understand what makes Bitcoin valuable

>>14854159
Reddit absolutely hates nano, look on /r/cryptocurrency.

They all panic sold it into my hands too.

>>14854236
> literally no oldfag or OG holds Nano

2016 here, loaded up on the recent dump.

I don't get married to my trades, I just care that the price is going to rise (dramatically)

>>14854217
>crazy nanoids would have archived the hell out of the conversation and plastered screen shots all over the place
imagine being so delusional you think people would take the time and effort to screenshot and spam post other anons refuting already-refuted-2-year-old FUD you spam pasta on an anonymous jamaican weed growing forum
WEW
E
W

>>14854139
Ok, thanks, I'm interested in your thoughts on it.
I'm mining it atm though.

>>14854236
former maximalist since 2014

>>14854297
Sure, a Nano dev took the time to "refute" my points, but sadly no nanoid ever took a single screenshot of it, so all you can do is to make the claim that he refuted me with zero documentation whatsoever. Sadly non of you nanoids could reproduce the "arguments" by the dev, nor can you present them here. Right? That's what you are telling potential investors?

>>14854311
Thank you anon, I will look into it.

>>14854378
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH

>>14854378
>all you can do is to make the claim that he refuted me with zero documentation whatsoever.

ROFL as if anyone needs to show documents to refute your bullshit claims.

>>14849052
lol. I bought this shitcoin at $3 and sold at $28, made some good money in 2017.

>>14849052
NANO is the patrician choice. 3 weeks remaining to accumulate.

Nano is the new bizcoin. You have 3-6 weeks to get your bags now

>>14854713
>ROFL as if anyone needs to show documents to refute your bullshit claims.
This must be very reassuring for potential Nano investors. Back to plebbit, Nano boomer.

>>14854894

Great image, retard. Nano is about the only coin that is easy enough for boomers to even use. Congrats you played yourself

>>14854240
>absolutely teeming with nano shills
>sometimes people point out the spam

>>14854922
checked

considering my current BTC wallet consists of a SATA drive physically cabled to the wall via an AC adapter I certainly have my fingers crossed that someone will deliver a crypto protocol that is as reliable as the rest of the internet take facebook or google for example sooner rather than later. Money.

>>14854097
Ok well nano can do infinity tps so I guess you are wrong? You just need a bigger computer as the node and you can do as many TPS as you want. The sky is the limit.

>>14855050
>You just need a bigger computer

We are lucky because everyone will run a node for free at home even if you need to invest 1000-2000$ without INCENTIVES

>>14854922
Zuckbuck coin is about the only coin that will be easy enough for boomers to even use. Congrats you played yourself, Nano is doomed.

>>14855050
Nano's claim in their whitepaper is absolutely rubbish. It's just as crazy as me stating that I will go the moon using my bicycle, proudly claiming that my speed is unlimited, only restricted by my muscle strength and I am getting stronger and stronger for each day and very soon I will be strong enough to get such a high speed that I will jump to the moon. Ridiculous. Do they have any written plan for 100 000 TPS? Any cost analysis? ETH and other competitors will roll out 100K to 1 million TPS in a matter of months or one year.

>>14855184
You can run a node with a $10/month droplet server. It's not that hard

>>14854025
dude its not 2017 anymore, your 3500TPS isn't that impressive anymore, especially when you are completely dependent on others to run local nodes for no incentive while also having easy exploits for users to spam nodes with empty transactions that still hasn't been addressed since November of last year.

If you want a solid DAG, hedge on IOTA if you believe in the Quantum meme, or hedge on Constellation if you believe in smart device integration memes.

NANO was niche as a device for moving things around back in 2017, but its not unique anymore for being "feeless, scalable, instant" when others do that job way better. Also the brand's trust is fucking shot after so many controversies, and it being a mostly Reddit coin, at least in /biz/ circles.

I would know, I bought in a $1 back in 2017 because I knew DAGs would be the future of crypto, but after Bitgrail I sold at 13 while it was on the way down and never looked back.
DAGs are in fact the future, but NANO ain't it chief. I would say look into the quantum preparedness tests IOTA is doing or the integration for Constellation for some more solid tech. IOTA is definitely safer but lower ROI because its already so high, DAG is a fuckton of room to grow and has devs who burned their own stacks so they can't just exit scam, while also having entered the market during the 2018 crash so its completely botttomed out in price and underbought.

>>14856122
>You can run a node with a $10/month droplet server. It's not that hard
As long as Nano is an amateur network with no traffic. What happens if Nano ever (highly unlikely) manage to reach 100 000 TPS, the bare minimum for a global currency, what are the costs then? Please present your cost analysis-

>>14853856
>>14856183
Good work, anon. If Constellation (DAG) can pull it off, it will be a 1000x. Minimum.

>>14856122
What are the incentives? Why should I care about a node? I can use that $10 for anything else and you can run two nodes.

>>14856817
You don't have to, someone will.

>>14856395
By that time larger businesses will have started nodes, and the hardware would have to scale if the network wants to handle 10kTPS, let alone 100k. It's a no brainer that the hardware will have to scale, but the network doesn't need such hardware currently.

>>14856942
>By that time larger businesses will have started nodes,
Then you have complete centralization with Amazon, Ebay etc controlling everything, and when that's the case, why not use a bank? Use of Nano will then be like Twitter and Facebook, completely controlled by the people in power.

>>14857413

Remember it's not the power of the node that determines voting control in the Nano network, it's the amount of Nano people delegate to their node of their choosing. If a node or group of nodes gets too much voting power, people can freely move their delegation to another node or nodes.

Here's a leak, Nano will be included on a new ATM operator, EletroPay.

>>14857816
Due to the strong centralization of nodes, they will have the "kill switch". They can then de facto shut down the whole network within seconds.

>>14858011

Again, that's not how it works. anyone can re-delegate to other nodes whenever they want. If anything were to get close to halting the network people will act in their best interest (as to ensure the network continues operating) and would select other nodes.

It just wont happen.

>>14858122
Nano has done zero cost analysis for 100 000 TPS bandwith, CPU and IO. Nano has done nothing to provide how it is feasible for Nano to reach 100 000 TPS within the next years. However, imagining it's possible, you yourself admitted that Amazon and large operators like them will take all the costs and burdens of operating the system. That's a clear and open single point of failure (SPOF) and is the very reason why people choose crypto currencies over banks and centralized payment systems. That Nano is not able to identify a clear and basic SPOF in their system is worrisome on multiple levels.

>>14858275


If it's cheaper than merchant processor fees then the cost savings will more than pay for any hardware costs. One of Nano's goals is to make running a Node as cheap as possible. ?

Also, why are you stuck on 100k TPS? the network has to have a need for 1000 TPS first. Nano devs are working on that and will get to scaling to 100k levels when they need to. The incentive structure is sound as it currently works as intended, and the network is trending toward more decentralization.

>>14858350
>If it's cheaper than merchant processor fees then the cost savings will more than pay for any hardware costs.

Cheaper and optional. Your whole network is optional and based on charity.

>>14849052
>not trying to change every aspect of our lives like other projects
>this much nolinker cope

>>14849052
>just trying to be currency, not trying to change every aspect of our lives like other projects

This is literally why NANO is worthless shitcoin and NANO supporters are low iq sheeple

With contracting, DLT can be applied for so many instances of nuanced communication of data that has real and massive impact on industries worldwide. Dominant enterprises in the largest markets in the world, the most influential governments- everyone is embracing blockchain in different capacity because the tech is legit and it's changing the way we interact with one another. We've already seen it beginning to take hold in industries like finance, supply chain management, insurance, video gaming, media, cloud computing, file storage, the list goes on. This doesn't even scratch the surface of the potential of DAOs.

Now imagine thinking none of this matters and instead throwing your weight behind a project whose sole purpose is a method for fast and feeless microtransactions.

Now imagine thinking that a coin whose only purpose is fast and feeles microtransactions will appreciate in value, even though the tokenomics are literally implicated in a manner that the coin isn't supposed to pump.

You're unironically better off dumping your neetbux in Bitcoin Cash... You dumbfucks should have been swept out through the bear winter

>>14858462
>the tokenomics are literally implicated in a manner that the coin isn't supposed to pump.

How?

Were you even here in Dec 2017/Jan 2018?

Did NANO's subreddit take over 4chan?

wtf

>>14858350
Have you read my comments at all?

>>14858802

Unfortunately yea. Circular logic is circular

>>14858550
Yeah, I actually messed around with Raiblocks client but couldn't get past audio captcha

So if you actually use NANO (in a hypothetical world, we all know nobody is actually using this garbage) you send pennies worth for porn or fractions of pennies for whatever microtransaction. Sure you "can" make larger purchases if some merchant accepts it and you'd rather send your precious NANO than your worthless fiat (+1.5% cashback), but the emphasis is on microtransactions.

Yes, you *can* buy and hold NANO, but actual users only need to buy a couple bucks worth. The only way NANO goes up in value is because you buy and hold it, and you buy and hold it only because you expect others to do the same. The economics of NANO have no profit generating mechanism, betting on NANO is the same on betting on any other shitcoin.

Yeah, it's better than Bitcoin for microtransactions. So are 999 of the top 1000 projects on coinmarketcap (with the exception being Bitcoin).You might make money on NANO if you get lucky, rising tide and all, but why not bet on a project that has legitimate utility and tokenomics in place that encourage the price to appreciate?

>>14858896
I explained why 100 000 TPS. Why Nano can't reach 100 000 TPS in the foreseeable future. Asking for documentation etc. You just state your crazy claims as facts as I have not made a single comment debunking your false claims. Show me ONE circular reasoning I have made.

>>14859399

Sorry, not circular but straw-man arguments. Nano doesn't need to scale directly to 100000 TPS at the expense of decentralization immediately, it can happen within the network organically using the current network structure.

>>14859399
"The network scalability is defined by the hardware capacity of the PRs so in the strictest sense, the amount of money PRs dedicate to their nodes will be the limiting factor of the network. Fortunately the node costs are low so there's a large amount of room for increase.
There are a couple things we're going to implement to lower the hardware requirements for non PR nodes specifically with 2 phase voting. With two phase voting, non-PR nodes don't need to listen to the negotiation votes and only final votes which reduces some traffic. We'll also add a way for nodes to not subscribe to votes at all and solicit the final votes periodically or if they've received a transaction." -Colin

>>14859677
>>14859895
>straw-man arguments.
That's when one misrepresent a opponents argument. You nanoids have not made a single valid argument. Name ONE argument you have made that I have misrepresented.
>Nano doesn't need to scale directly to 100000 TPS at the expense of decentralization immediately
You just made a straw man fallacy. I never said immediately. Again, if you want Nano to be global currency you need at least 100 000 TPS. There is no way in hell Nano can get 100 000 TPS within the next three years, or even five years.

>>14860511
You are missing the point though, it is fast, free, and works right now.
You are so attached to Bitgrail and bulletpoints revolving around the toxic moonboy community and shitty devs making claims they cannot back up at all.
Using Nano vs Using anything else in this space to move funds around is night and day, this is what all payment coins should be.
User selected reps and DPoS seems to be working also there have been no on chain double spends.
The only reason I can think you are so autistically attached to shitting on Nano like this is you still have money in the Pot, even after getting fucked by BitGrail you still play this shitcoin and it just keep justing you day after day.

Just fucking sell and let go man.

>>14860658
>and works right now.
Delusional. It works only because no one is using the Nano network. If they did, it would crash. Your "free" hippie coin only works when there is no load on the system. What cost analysis have you as an investor and the Nano foundation done for 100 000 TPS or more. Nothing, right? That should tell potential investors everything they need to know about Nano.