/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14828673
Stop it Gilles...We're not funding your stinky tranny coin anymore. This post stinks of cock.

Go and find another scam to fund your cocaine fueled tranny fiestas...

>>14828673
Fuck off baguette

>>14828701

https://etherscan.io/address/0x4D9b368ED4a1f2a5193b45D2051dAAA89851897f#tokentxns

This is Gilles ether wallet. Notice something about it? Unlike that slovenly dressed philosopher coder you mistake for a God, the iexec team believe in their project and dont dump 700k tokens at the first hints of profit.

>>14828673
pajranjeept

>>14828770
>>14828673
Based and chadpilled

>>14828770
Sergey will suck that big french cock

>>14829418
LOOK AT IT, IT'S MASSIVE AND CONTROLS THE ENTIRE AUDIENCE

>>14829418
you're disgusting. But yet i'm somehow turned on

>>14828673
Even your wojak looks like he doesn't believe you

please sirs, when will gilles bless us with many golden cows?

>>14829594

Yes sir very soon sir. RLC very popular coin sir. Great god Vishnu blessed with golden cow very soon, i promise you.

>>14829594
>>14829895
great fud guys

>>14828673
B-but why do they make fun of Haiwu He so much? Evil team.

>>14830306
They hired him just because they like making fun of downies. Sick fucks.

what are youn talikng about? This shit is at 26 cent
Yes, ok it's
0,00002736 BTC (++2,57%)
0,00128727 ETH (++2,33%)


But this is the usual meme biz bro use to thin they are smart
>muh he measures in $ and not in satoshi

MEME, MEME, MEME, MEME you live off memes guys

A cone went from 4$ to 26 cent ''muh...satoshi value''

>>14830490
everyone point and laugh at this retard

>>14830502
explain why.
It went from 4$ to 26 cents, and you think you are smart because it's not bleeding in satoshi?

>>14830516
because utilitycoins require usage to stay up. It'll fly upwards around v4 and v5. You should be thankful instead of being a retard.

>>14830516
its all about the tech man, you wouldnt understand.

>>14830516
also the entire cryptomarket crashed retard kys

>>14830532
make a calculation of how much usage would have to be to push up the price at this point. It is entirely unrealistic to fly because of adoption at v4. maybe one or two years later.

>>14830553
no idea but as it begins to get used by enterprises the speculative value will increase exponentially

>>14830532
I meant ''explain why are you so happy of a +2,55% in satoshi value''
How are you happy to be in a small green in satoshi?

>>14830604
because i bought below ICO and the longer it doesn't crash in sats the more likely it is to rise.
Also, it's really funny watching crypto crash while RLC doesn't give a fuck because it's oversold. Buy high sell low!

>>14830553
with v4 sidechain staking will be introduced

>>14830575
Big enterprises won't use consumer hardware to do calculations.. be realistic. They are interested in SELLING you their hardware (thats what the partnerships with intel, ibm & alibaba are about), but not actually using it for calculations. Why would they, they have their own massive data-centers. The potential price reduction of using CONSUMER hardware is what will generate usage for this project, but it will compete against existing P2P offers like https://vast.ai.. To have any noticeable effect on the price, you will need to see in the order of millions of tasks every day. That won't happen soon, trust me. It takes a long time for adoption, especially if there a no applications specifically built for iExec yet to harness distributed computing, etc.

>>14830628
>Big enterprises won't use consumer hardware to do calculations
Wrong, baseless uneducated fud.
>They are interested in SELLING you their hardware (thats what the partnerships with intel, ibm & alibaba are about)
Wrong again, baseless uneducated fud.
>they have their own massive data-centers
Yeah but they could increase their operations massively for way less upfront and maintenance costs as well as added security. There are many reasons to use it.
>https://vast.ai
literal who?
>noticeable effect on the price, you will need to see in the order of millions of tasks every day
Nah, it's a speculative asset as well
> It takes a long time for adoption
This is true, however we are almost towards the "end" of the development period of iExec and it'll most likely have a lot of development around use cases done in the next 3 years.

Overall trash fud

>>14830628
on price >>14830623

Why are iexec retards so obsessed with Link?

>>14830734
why are linkfags so obsessed with rlc? should we just make out or what?

>>14830734
it is the other way round actually.
linkies got butthurt brcause iexec created superior oracles. also sergey is dumping to buy rlc

>>14830758
yes yes many golden cows

>>14830739
>>14830758
Nobody in Link threads ever mentions iexec, except for the odd shillpost by you.

Meanwhile, the third post itt is an iexec shill bringing up Sergey out of nowhere.
And it's the same in every iexec thread.

>>14830773
linkfags always come into rlc threads kek

>>14830795

see >>14830773
>the third post itt is an iexec shill bringing up Sergey out of nowhere.
>And it's the same in every iexec thread.

>>14830802
because we love to make fun of sergey

>>14830795

Linklets seething and holding onto their bags as Sergey dumps them to zero kek. All the more ironic that he's accumulating RLC

>>14830817
People make fun of their betters when terrified, we get it.

>>14830862
>better
>kyc nodes and devs dumping coins because the supply is centralized
kekekekekekekkeekkekekekekekekekekekekekkekekekekekekekkek

>>14830877
>French
>keeps dumping for all eternity

>>14830619
>because i bought below ICO and the longer it doesn't crash in sats the more likely it is to rise.

I had another idea.
It means that even if bitcoin is crashing, RLC is rising (if compared to bitcoin) and this would mean that the project is somehow valuable.
Now I know that you will say ''yes'' because RLC is your holding, I would have an honest answer.
Because it's a trick to see the trustfulnees of a project

>>14830829
>All the more ironic that he's accumulating RLC
kek'd at this

>>14830829
>Sergey dumps them to zero
The highest rank Link ever got on CMC at the top of the pump was 16.
Right now, Link is still rank 16.

I red this on a website, I just leave it here:

''In 5 years cloud platforms will be way to expensive so everything will move back in house. Cloud prices are already going up as it is.''

>>14830936

>Chainlink dumps faster than a garbage truck, leaving a generation of Linklets financially ruined and borderline suicidal
>"hurrrrr we are still ranked 16 market cap durrr"

Youre going straight to zero but youre too retarded to look past your nose to see it. Get out while you're already this far behind and get with the program.

>>14830971
Staying at the same CMC rank means Link is not "dumping" any harder than literally everyone else.

>>14830902
Anyone can solve my problem?
>>14830619
>because i bought below ICO and the longer it doesn't crash in sats the more likely it is to rise.

I had another idea.
It means that even if bitcoin is crashing, RLC is rising (if compared to bitcoin) and this would mean that the project is somehow valuable.
Now I know that you will say ''yes'' because RLC is your holding, I would have an honest answer.
Because it's a trick to see the trustfulnees of a project