/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14717463
we'll see.

>>14717463
Link is shit

>>14717463
they will never ever say the word chainlink, ever, they will just call it some obscure name like gpiLINK, thats why on chainlinks website it says its HELPING swift with oracles, nothing else

Absolutely 0% chance Chainlink is even mentioned. Don't get your hopes up, anons

>>14717463
didnt read not selling

>>14717480
it was mentioned by a team member in a youtube video that they are in a partnership with swift

Don't get your hopes up

Drunkanon here.

Focus on the month leading up to the deadline of the PSD2 integration for banks.

DUDE

>>14717594
Duuuuudee....

>>14717639
NO WAGECAGE FOR ME

>>14717580
What you should be saying is sell now and rebuy during that month. Imagine buying at $4.60 and it's headed towards a 50% drop

anyone attending this?

>>14717685
I do

>>14717469
It would certainly help explain the massive coordinated dump if whales have insider knowledge

>>14717685
I am

>>14717685
How does one attend a webinar?

>>14717867
https://www.swift.com/news-events/webinars/iso-20022-for-api-new-technologies

Register here.

>>14717463
Corda needs link oracles dummy

>>14717534
And he was dealt with.

>>14717901
thats not what they had said in a paper i will have to find it

>>14717921
What happened to him? They cut off his stinkie?

>>14717901
>https://www.swift.com/news-events/webinars/iso-20022-for-api-new-technologies
DELETE THIS

Can some kind anon stream the webinar?

>>14717463
>When it comes down to it, its a war between Corda and Link.
Corda is a blockchain and link is oracle solution. Corda uses oraclize which will move to link soon

i pulled down the corda code from github. they have an example oracle as part of their irs-demo code.
here is the amazing data source inside this oracle class:

private class InnerState {
// TODO Update this to use a database once we have an database API
val fixes = HashSet<Fix>()
var container: FixContainer = FixContainer(fixes)
}

they basically have nothing, devs have to write their own oracle. that doesn't mean you have to use chainlink, but enterprise devs know, don't build if you can buy.

their documentation is worth a read:
https://github.com/corda/corda/blob/master/docs/source/oracles.rst

clearly they are thinking of a number of different scenarios.

It would make sense to me to have the chainlink team write a generic chainlink adapter in the corda ecosystem, that would be very convenient for corda developers to use for all sorts of oracle use cases. on the other hand they could easily roll their own and not use chainlink. as a dev manager though, if there's a fully audited and approved out of the box one size fits all backend for oracles i'm using it, so the opportunity is there.

>>14717947
T W O Y E A R S
W
O
Y
E
A
R
S

Swift is using a middleware layer developed by Smart Contract, but not through Chainlink. They use GPI as a blockchain based Oracle that is private. Run a Swift terminal, you're running a GPI node.

>>14717995
is corda for public or private chains? too tired to look it up myself right now, but if corda is on a private chain, they could just run their own centralized chainlink to work as a centralized json parser right? which would kind of be an endorsement of chainlink but wouldn't help the price as they would just be using it in a centralized, free way

>>14718063

why would SmartContract spend millions of dollars in developer hours to develop something that doesn't benefit them at all?

brainlet

>>14718146
private chain. i agree within the bounds of one institution private oracles make sense. cross institution data feeds are a pita. and you end up paying anyway. would be incredibly convenient to have a one size fits all adapter that also solves payment at the same time. the near term ability to change who you trust.
the future potential for trustless decentralized oracles is a bonus, not a blocker, to my mind (i oversee many integration projects in my work)

What I'm thinking is why would they cash out some of the dev wallet before SWIFT happens. I'm assuming if the breadcrumbs are true, the team would know its happening with considerable probability.

Plausible deniability to possible collusion allegations later on down the line between SWIFT and SmartContract?

>>14718198
Nice thought. Maybe.

>>14718198
buying orcalize would be one idea

>>14718198
We don't know that they've cashed out yet.

>https://www.swift.com/news-events/webinars/iso-20022-for-api-new-technologies
Is this thing starting in 40 minutes since it's currently July 11th in Hong Kong now? Or is it actually tomorrow?

>>14718310
Its starting in 37 minutes from now.

>>14718310
Former

>>14718198
We still don’t have confirmation that they sold any link tokens.
They could be getting ready to liquidate for an anouncement and moving their tokens before hand.

But this is all hopium

Boys i miss the days of assblater... does anyone have some old tales of him

>>14718385
Assblaster is a tranny.

>>14718322
>>14718336
Thank you frens. I don't anticipate a chainlink reference but I'm always thinking positive thoughts!

Is there going to be any recording or stream or anything?

>>14717463
>confirm link partnership with [fill the blank]
>partnership
Do websites "partner" with the internet?

NO. NO THEY DO NOT

THEY USE IT.

WHY? Because doing commerce via fax machines is ANTIQUATED.

Same concept applies with LINK. Those who wish to be competitive will USE it.

https://youtu.be/8f0KJc4Lj3Y

>>14718409
Good luck getting that into the heads of the new generation of moonboi retards.

>>14717594
Please make it happen, I have 13hours till my shift starts.

These chinamen are going to be jumping through their ass holes to scoop up some Link. You're going to wake up and it's going to be $100 a token.

I hope you speds ask sped questions

SOMEONE SCREEN RECORD IT AAAAAAA

>>14717463
They won't confirm anything about chainlink, this rumor is started by discordcucks who are trying to hype up something and then when it turns out its not true the price will plummet and they will scoop up more linkies

>>14717942
he got fired. he used to work for VeChain and switched over. after that video, he got booted from Chainlink.

IT BEEEEGINS

>>14718656
God speed Mr. Anus

>>14718682

Carrenges around API

>>14718656
>>14718728
Can you get audio? I'm in the session, but no audio

Here we go, maybe.

SCREEN RECORD IT

SCREEN RECORD IT

SCREEN RECORD IT

>>14718737
On the bottom left, click on the headphone button (round), then select the bottom-most option I think, click test to see if it works.
If you don't hear anything you may need to mess with the volume control settings on your computer.

>>14718865
they are using DLT its over we lost aaaaaaaa

Have they named chainlink explicitly?

>>14718887
How do I buy DLT? Selling by LINK and going 100% in DLT.

SCREEN RECORD IT

>>14718889
Not yet, they haven't dropped any names as far as I can tell

>>14718898
Agrello(DLT) on coinmarketcap

>>14718881
thanks

>>14718860
Still nothing...
>API economy

>>14718847
dude you need to call in

>Join conference call
>Hello who just joined?
>Hi, its Karl from Business Transformation & Implementation Strategy
>Hi Karl, you're on the line with Deb & Frank from Digital Implementations & Apps, Joe from Digital Transformation, Todd from Midwest Regional Operations, an-
>*beep boop*
>Hello who just joined?
>...
>Hello did someone just join?
>-ah! Sorry, I had my phone on mute. *WOOF WOOF* WOOF! WOOF!* This is Steve from Implementation Analytics, Enterprise Intelligence & Data Science Infrastructure Solutions
>Hi Steve, you're on the line with Karl from Business Transfo-*WOOF WOOF! WOOF!* -mentation Strategy, Deb & Frank from Digital Implementations & Apps, Joe fr-
>*beep boop*
>Hello? Who just joined?

Does "Pay Later API" mean anything to anyone?
>No mention of smart contracts so far (afaik)
>Maybe one mention of "blockchain" early on during the introduction (don't remember for sure)
Now it's already in Q&A

someone asked question about chainlink. kek

Good question regarding chainlink and blockchain anon.

>>14718917
Did you get it working?

>>14718898
isn't DLT just short for distributed ledger technology aka a blockchain?

>>14719002
yes. listening now. cheers fren

>>14718994
What was the answer?

"the design of the content itself, the payload, can

first of all the busiens smodel explaining the business processes then the business transaction then defining your own thing

database and drt construct.

technologically, different tech can use a different method of ocnnection using their own protocols. even when i say api to dapp api there are saying

based on xml and can be based on json as well. concept of iso20022 is based on business definition itself. standardization is actuallya t that leve.

when you say gpi chainlink to settle payment ledgers, it's sort of off-topic, but is related to something, you guys know we are working ... on a proof of concept utilizing gpi payment linking drt, i think gpi is something separate, but from swift's perspective, gpi can be the way for any payments that come in no matter for trade or security settlements as well. that will be the future."

pretty much paraphrased. i didn't really get it all. typed as fast as i could to whoever asked the cl question.

>>14719003
Yes it is

>>14719019
The fact that Kenneth knew what Chainlink was and started talking about R3 in response to that question is BULLISH.

HOLY SHIT MY QUESTION DID GET ANSWERED HE LITERALLY SAID R3 AND CALLED THE THING GPI CHAINLINK NOT GPI LINK!!!!! GPI LINK=GPI CHAINLINK

>>14719019
>Off-topic
I don't think the speaker really knows or what to make of it at this time

>>14719040
LINK TO PROOF?

>>14718420
fuck the moonbois

>>14719029
perfect

>>14719049
I CANT RECORD THIS NIGGA WHY DOES THE SOUND GO THROUGH MY PHONE WTF????? THE CONFERENCE CALLED ME ON MY PHONE AND I HAVE TO WATCH ON THE PC WHAT BOOMER WIZARDRY IS THIS???

>>14719040
given that it's fairly off topic to talk about transport implementation on a payload standards overview call, i agree bullish

>>14719068
Used in industry quite often

>>14719040
>CALLED THE THING GPI CHAINLINK NOT GPI LINK

hmmm, I didn't hear him calling it 'gpi chainlink'. Did anyone else hear it?

>>14719028
>you guys know we are working ... on a proof of concept utilizing gpi payment linking drt, i think gpi is something separate, but from swift's perspective, gpi can be the way for any payments that come in no matter for trade or security settlements as well. that will be the future.

What does he mean by this?

>>14719045
Answer to the second question someone asked on smart contracts (heavily paraphrased):
>that part i think you are asking about api pointing to dlt
>api is just another channel talking to dlt
either you have to pay as a node of the dlt, or have to find a way to interface with the node
>api may be the easiest way of doing so
>content itself is the business standard
Don't know what to make of it

>>14717463
>the decentralization that is given by chainlink?

StainStink is not decentralized.

>>14719068
Well, if anybody can get that on video we can make this sheet pamp like a mofo!

>>14719091
>hmmm, I didn't hear him calling it 'gpi chainlink'. Did anyone else hear it?

A discord tranny said he recorded it but is to autistic to post audio be patient.

>>14719103
He definitely said it

standards definition and implementation details are two completely separate conversations. this iso standard is specifying the semantics of communication; the verbs and metadata payloads. it's like if you attended a city transportation strategy session and tried to get them to talk about which vendor was going to supply the bus tires

>>14719091
Yes, he said

>>14719091
lmao me insider now
>>14719095
I hope they make this public, I can't record shit with that setup...

>>14719091

no I didnt hear that

but he definitely started talking about r3 when he was responding to the link question, which means that the oracle in that meme graph getting passed around REALLY IS CHAINLINK

>>14719111
Nice trips and I’d believe it makes sense, our guy Sergy is always saying how fundamentally link’s working with swift and the whole ISO bullshit swift’s got on their site links back to the POC they presented back in Sibos.

>>14719125
I want to believe...

>>14719118
pls no larp price prediction EOY?

Also price is seeing some green candles RN

>>14719125
Yeah it looks like they're not going to mention chainlink directly but I am more confident than ever that we fucking made it. Every single slide alluded to link. Every single fucking slide.

how do oracles play a role in how swift brings ---to iso20022

everyone, banks, vendors, merchants, consumers, all play a role.

by utilizing 20022 data dictionary, we can all build standards around/ be compatible with each other.

debian,that organization is npo, includes oracle (company)

forced to use iso20022 standards to develop api for the financial industry to deliver information to the financial industry. here is where the vendors can play a role.

questions around chainlink... that one i have to go back and get an answer for you. this is not my part of specialty (in that space).

>WE WELCOME YOUR QUESTIONS THROUGH EMAIL
let's begin...

Anon, I hope you provided the right email to them lol.
Also, please share the answer in this thread if it's still alive so we know it's you (by ID)

Someone ask
>WHEN LAMBO????
>WHEN MOON???
>WHEN 1000EOY????

did anyone record this or will this be public?

>>14717463
They had 15 mins left and didnt answer my question about chainlink. the dude was sweating the whole time

>>14719216
Kek, maybe he knows a bunch of autists started attending their webinar en masse in order to confirm rumors.

Someone get that fucking recording asap

>>14719216
My question was answered first, I didn't even mention Chainlink but he did in his answer... It was about how do they leverage DLT in this API context and how does the data communicate to the blockchain? He literally said GPI Chainlink twice I think. That might've been a slip on his part, I don't know whether that means he revealed something secret or he's not an expert on that stuff and just said what came to his mind.

>>14719216
It's hot in Asia this time of year

>>14719231
He could see all of our names/memes.

>>14719233
Why not just quietly accumulate for the time being?

>>14719254
Become I want it fuck you, you had 2 years

Hey great job guys

>>14719184
>that one i have to go back and get an answer for you. this is not my part of specialty (in that space)

>>14718970
Affirm max Levchin

>>14719251
>He literally said GPI Chainlink
proofs or fuck off

Someone post proof for fuck's sake

Kek. For some reason my recording didn’t capture the audio.

>>14719028
Legit gibberish lol. 60 wpm feels bad.

Did he hint about them working with link or dance around it?

100 link and I post the audio

Swift isn't even anything to get excited about. It's not Google, Amazon or Samsung tier partnerships. Lol you guys are reaching...

>>14719381
nice bait

Is this Kenneth Leung - the webinar presenter:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/kenneth-leung-cams-7ab5b6a8

Even if he said GPI Chainlink I still wouldn’t believe it. There’s simply no way.

>>14719412
>Graduate from John Jay College School of Criminal Justice with a Bachelor of Science in Forensic Financial Analysis
> Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Member
> Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist

THIS WAS ALL A RUSE TO GET US LINKIES. THEY KNOW WE HAVE LINK THEY ARE GOING TO TRY AND TAX OUR GAINS TO DEATH OR THREATEN US WITH LEGAL ACTION IF WE DONT GIVE UP OUR LINKIES!

>>14719372
What a fucking dick.

>>14719462
>>>/wsg/2945134

>>14718908
kek

>>14719550
Fine

9 link and it's yours

0xF165Ed6f395BfdbD3e10A71a36ba724F0a2099F2

>>14719592

>>14719569
Youre late.

>>14719598
Holy shit nigger

They never mentioned link or chainlink you fucking retards stop believing everything.
They barely even talked about oracles and said they wanted to try their own centralized oracle first

>>14719638
it's fake you moron

>>14719652
is that so?

>>14719652
The annunciation of chaIN LInk seems pretty weird but it sounds like it was all in his voice

>>14719690

obvs, you think the swift executive would make such a simple mistake after looking at all the pee poo pee poo being spammed in the chat? get a grip

Retards. He said he wants to utilize Chang, Link. He's their Chinese wiz kid that will help revolutionize their payment system

>>14719716
sure thing

>>14718198
Clearly to expand because swift is 100% onboard and want to ramp up.

>>14718938
Topkek. Biz post of the week

Is that audio webm true or not?

>>14719772
Its true, i just bought 100k

>>14719767
hello newfriend, see this

http://conferencecall.biz/

>>14719772
It's from the webinar, it's him reading the question that was asked IIRC.

>>14719785
So its him reading the question not answering? Thx just sold my link

>>14719811
proof that you sold

>>14719811
not correct... it was my question >>14719251

>>14719851
any proofs?

>>14719915

source : dude trust me

>>14719920
Surely there's a link to the webinar, or will be at some point.

Or those who attended can perhaps rewind to wherever they want and record that way.
Filming their fucking screen for all I care.

>>14719936
the problem was this boomer technology forced you to call in through your phone... i watched the slides in the browser and coudln't record the audio on my phone

>>14719948
But someone recorded him.

Supposedly this was him answering your question in front of all webinar spectators, yes?

>>14719936
>he doesn't know

>>14719959
yeah, that means someone recorded him... I hope he'll publish everything in context. And yes it was the question.

>>14719569
M-MASAKA?!

>>14719982
>...
See, this type of ellipsis doesn't give me much confidence.

>>14719989
I know I overuse this...

>>14719340
yeah he addressed DLT (didn't mean to type drt it was his asian boy accent). he said chainlink by name but kept saying that dlt is not relevant to what they were talking about and that he's not primarily focused in it. "GPI LINK? GPI CHAIN LINK?" actually what he said. it was in response to a question, the context was he was trying to clarify what was being asked from him.

>Did he hint about them working with link or dance around it?

yeah but only in the q&a. he was dancing around how they're going to start implementing smart contracts in the future. and in the middle of clarification he asked if we were referring to chainlink.

>>14720004
btw, surely your question was recorded too, right?

>>14720052
Were the questions broadcast as well?
Just want to know if the name "chainlink" was spoonfed to him, or if he brought it up on his own.

>>14718656
Here's the recording of the GPI Chainlink mention: https://gofile.io/?c=FT7pzu

>>14718385
He's dealt with.

>>14720052
Because the way he's enunciating here: >>>/wsg/2945134
makes it seem like he's reading the name off a screen.
Which wouldn't make sense when he's answering questions over the phone.

>>14720052
this is wrong.
As I said in my previous post, the first question that was read was by me. He didn't really read the question live and I haven't saved it but it's in this thread paraphrased anyways. The important part is that I specifically didn't name oracles or Chainlink. He said "GPI Chainlink" before all the questions around chainlink started popping up and he then clarified a question around that. He said it himself without anyone spoonfeeding him.

>>14720102
the questions weren't broadcasted where i could see them he was just reading off the screen, i guess. he did not get spoonfed chainlink. someone said "GPI LINK" and he said, "CHAINLINK?" the recording that's floating around here is his direct response to the question that was asked.

>>14720111
>https://gofile.io/?c=FT7pzu
CHECKED AND THIS

EXACTLY WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT >>14720128

https://www.swift.com/resource/pr-swift-open-gpi-e-commerce-and-dlt-platforms

>>14720076
>>14720102

I couldn't see questions in the chat. The only participants (from my perspective) in the webinar was myself and the hosts. No other guests were visible.
Kenny long prong did read the chainlink question out loud. He was specifically asked about chainlink in the question.

>>14720111
CHECKED
I LOVE YOU GOD

>>14719731
kek

>>14720141
>>14720111
Maybe this is where he got the name Chainlink.

>>14720141
lmfao perfect thanks for showing why i couldn't type this shit out in any readable way.

How to sell all my stinks and buy R3s?

>>14720141
he says chainlink is a different thing to GPi link plain as day

>>14720111
Checked.
Chai Link ?

>>14720214
Chainlin

>>14720204
You already did

>>14720180
Possibly - but I still think it's a bit weird that he then immediately inserted it after gpi chainlink, which, he did say "was a separate thing." So even if he isn't referencing it there directly, he still is aware of an aspect of this which is related to chainlink.
I'm going to assume that I'm delusional for the moment, at least we'll know for sure in September.

>>14720231
inserted it in gpi link*

>>14720188
You did good anon. Ching Chongs on normal mode are difficult, autistics like us that stop half sentence are

even worse.

>>14720180
maybe he did see this and kind of got confused about "gpi link" and "chainlink" and misspoke as I said here. >>14719251

ARE THEY FUCKING USING CHAINLINK OR NOT

>>14719202
Stop being a retard, this is big business.

>>14720111
That mention of Chainlink is different btw from this clip: >>>/wsg/2945134

So he was talking about Chainlink at least twice.

> SWIFT thread
> +180 posts
> Ctrl + F
> XLM
> No posts

Not gonna make it

>>14720282
He is obviously very aware of Chainlink, and in this clip at least: >>14720111
he seems to be answering the question "is GPI related to Chainlink?".

He explains that when it comes to GPI, they're working with R3 on a PoC.
He clearly says "we are working with r3 ALSO on a poc", likely referencing their PoC with Chainlink.

(btw, as we know R3 means Corda, and Corda is using any oracle they can; see their use of an XRP oracle Ripple made in 2014)

There were at least two mentions of Chainlink though, see >>14720286
And we have only been able to halfway analyze one of those mentions.

>>14719003
jesus there's so many nulinkers in here lately

>>14720333
https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/swift-to-bring-benefits-of-gpi-to-dlt-and-trade-ecosystems?utm_medium=organic_social&utm_source=youtube&utm_campaign=gpi-gpi-dlt-corda

Listen min 1:10, pic related, are we in for the ride?

>>14720405
What is the source of that image?

>>14720405
Afaik, he may be talking about R3's "Universal Settler Application" on Corda, since R3 seems to be Swift's partner for GPI.
This "Universal Settler Application" promises to settle any payment through any avenue, be it fiat or crypto.

The first crypto showcased through this solution is XRP, and the oracle they're using for this is Ripple's own XRP oracle which they shat out in 2014.
So it's safe to say Corda will be using whatever oracles seem most convenient/secure to them.

>>14720405
'' Introducing gpi Link ''

>>14720477
>being this new

>>14720477
You cannot be this new with those digits. Lurk more
>>14720405
He says that APIs are now but smart contracts are the future using GPI link. I think the architecture specified by this presentation is just getting a permissioned ledger to interact with APIs directly in accordance with iso 20022. It seems less robust than chainlink proposed architecture but it may be similar to what oracle proposed (my fellow marines)

>>14717463
As long as R3 is bound to Larsens ripple, it will not be Cords. Period
http://archive.fo/2OJRh

>>14720405
hmmmm
>>14718865

>>14720484
No, SWIFT will not work together with R3 as long as they haven't gotten Larsen out, and by extend ripple. Nobody, and I mean literally nobody wants to work together with somebody like Larsen.

>>14720523
>getting a permissioned ledger to interact with APIs directly
This makes no sense, you still need oracles even with "permissioned" ledgers.

The necessity for oracles has nothing to do with whether the ledgers are "permissioned" or "permissionless"; and everything with "deterministic" vs "non-deterministic".

>>14720597
>SWIFT will not work together with R3
Well they are working with R3.

>>14720688
>working with
doesn't mean using their product or be bound by contract. Swift is working with a lot of folks, but banks made it absolutely clear, as long as ripple is around no to DLT, and it is the banks boards that have to agree, if swift doesn't want to be replaced themselves

>>14720734
Swift has a PoC going with R3 (Corda) specifically for GPI though.

>>14720741
Everybody and his grandma has currently a poc with SWIFT. That is like total non news. Let me give you some insider info. As Luxembourger, having somebody in the family that is in R&D for a non disclosed bank is something pretty normal, and his comment was very clear, nobody likes Larsen. R3 fucked itself, as long as Ripple is around, Corda has no chance

>>14720801
>Everybody and his grandma has currently a poc with SWIFT
No, they don't.
And GPI is Swift's flagship project, so double no.

>>14720804
I smell hopium

>>14720811
Do elaborate.

>>14720818
Having a prove of concept doesn't mean much. The talk is currently, if gpi shouldn't be more or less an "open" solution, so the banks themselves chose who they work together with. Iso 20022. R3 is just one of many that goes or went through the poc. IBM was another. All that said, for LINK, it doesn't matter, for others, fore and foremost R3, bound per court decision to Ripple, with Larsens reputation, nobody will use Corda, if it manages to get through the poc. Why do you think Larsen is buying shit companies for money transfers that have been dead in the water for ages? He knows banks will not work with him, so he tries to be his own shitlord on an island of shit. R3 will be dragged down with him

>>14720868
>Having a prove of concept doesn't mean much.
It means a lot, actually.

You seem like one of those post-modern schizos who like to say things like "having a penis doesn't mean you're a man" and "immigrants are the exact same as native residents".

>>14720897
Idiot. If (you) mange to create a solution, that implements ISO20022 and is able to integrate gpi, you can apply for the poc with swift. This will also require social interactions with the boards and with the banks R&D head monkeys, if the monkeys don't like you, they tell their upper head monkeys, and no matter how good your technical solution is, you will be out. So yes, the poc doesn't matter that much

>>14720938
>If (you) mange to create a solution, that implements ISO20022 and is able to integrate gpi, you can apply for the poc with swift.
Yeah sure, just like "you" can buy a lottery ticket.

If Swift decides to actually go through with MY poc (on gpi no less), then I just hit the absolute jackpot.

>>14720967
From a speculative point of view if your token/coin/company is traded publicly, maybe, but the real jackpot is when the first customer of a bank sends his invoice through your system. All said, it doesn't concern LINK in anyway. LINK is middle ware, LINK will win under all circumstances, not ripples pseudo oracle, not RLCs wannabe oracle and certainly no shit like Mobius comes even close to LINK. LINK doesn't care who will win the golden jackpot, but my bet on who will win is on IBM

>>14721109
>but the real jackpot is when the first customer of a bank sends his invoice through your system
And a PoC is the harbinger of that.

>LINK doesn't care who will win the golden jackpot
You're talking to the guy who made pic related in 2017.

>>14721136
The poc is the gatekeeper to the lunches and meetings in the banks basements, yes.
>You're talking to the guy who made pic related in 2017.
Okay you know what is going on.

My whole motivation to post is, that I see some shills trying to set up a myth to explain a possible xrp pump by spreading false breadcrumbs about Corda Settler and R3, without mentioning the drama surrounding ripple and R3; and this might sound emotional, but personally I want to see Larsen locked out of the big boy club and be cursed to handle Nigger pay day loans

>>14721196
>My whole motivation to post is, that I see some shills trying to set up a myth to explain a possible xrp pump by spreading false breadcrumbs about Corda Settler and R3
My angle is Corda Settler went with XRP as the first example of crypto simply because there was an old ready-made oracle they could easily use.
Corda Settler aims to handle ANY type of settlement; so ANY transaction in ANY type of fiat, crypto, or other financial instrument.
So the fact that Rippletards lost their shit just because Corda Settler used XRP as the very first example of a crypto is hilariously misguided.

But make no mistake; Chainlink is now very much the industry standard in oracles, even if its mainnet is still in the very early phase and therefore still extremely limited in scope.
So the Corda + Swift thing indeed bodes very well for Chainlink.

>>14721196
What exactly did Larsen do?

>>14717867
Underrated

they have confirmed partnership with Morpheus Network so it's possible

>>14717995
For smartcontracts to be legal, the oracle gots ta be DECENTRALIZED.

Yesterday Johnny had that thread about $45 up. So there's a good chance Swift does drop [redacted] at the webinar.

They are working with swift because it is clearly said in their website. Google annoucement is hyperlinked so swift and oracle news are not yet released.

>>14721247
Don't get me wrong, I wish R3 best of luck in their endeavor. Corda is actually a good tech, but as they are bound to an open megalomaniac psychopath like Larsen who can't be trusted and puts every business he touches at a risk to fail because of his personality I hope they fail and IBM gets the majority of the share, unless R3 somehow manages to get rid of Ripple and Larsen. But yes, LINK doesn't care, Sergey is a good professional lad that can be trusted and doesn't jeopardizes a business success for an ideology or his ego. A man one can work with.

>>14721398
How are they bound? I thought they just use their oracle for now? Or am i wrong?

>>14720597
What s wrong with Larsen?

>>14720111
Holy fucking shitballs, 1:25 and out

Wow, they just said Quant.

>>14721409
R3 and Ripple have a partnership. R3 had contracts with ripple buying their shit token and Larsen used those contractual bounds to make himself a stinking rich faggot by randomly burning his centralized scam tokens, scamming not just R3 but in extend a bunch of retail traders. The whole shitshow was the subject of a 2 year long court case, and court decided that R3 had to pay up. I really wish Larsen and his family dead, may his genetic code be annihilated from the face of the earth, and I say that as somebody who never owned a single xrp token

Linkies btfo once again and dumping lmao

>>14719750
There got to right? Psd2 is like 60 days away. These guys gotta get to rolling out sometime soon before that right?

>>14717947

Guys remember just because a partner announces something on their end doesn’t make it real. SIA announced Quant as a partner and we all know that’s a scam!!!! Just wait for a low level google dev blog post for confirmation.

>>14721345
100% correct. I don't need anymore confirmation than this, period. Anybody thinking Link and Swift are not a thing is a brainlet.

>>14717480
If anything I would have thought Ripple!? It would have made more sense, surely?

>>14718970
Surely surely it will make sense to use bloody Ripple!!????

>>14720231
>https://gofile.io/?c=FT7pzu
GPI change length???!!!!

>>14718648
Why even post the video if the comments were not Approved by the team?

When is the Webinar?

>>14723259
surely fucking joke of the year here

>>14723519
where does it show that he got fired from LINK?

it's dead jim

ITT:

>>14722561
delusional. sergey could be fetching their coffees and he'd be working with them. we need to know in what context are they working with swift

Eric Holder had Paul Walker assassinated to cover up his illegal gun smuggling operation in Mexico known as Fast and Furious

>>14724265
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umIEp9WZI9E

>>14720938
Lol you are dumb
I got $30k in link at 19 cents.
I guess you're right though it is just a minor bonus when you look at microsoft, IBM, samsung, etc..
Go back to r/cryptocurrency

highly doubt it