/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14719148
Not selling under $20

Im buyin SNEED instead

>>14719148
>>14719148
Chainlink literally bodied their usecase. It's over.

I actually went to their website and they have a good product.
Blockchain invoicing.
I don't think the nearly worthless req coin is needed though.

>>14719186
>>14719156
If you look closely this is a steal at it's current price. The coin will be needed for the other stuff the team are doing. The accountancy stuff could be game changing yet it bleeds to death. This will rebound in the future and explode

>>14719148
Req only works when they have fiat integration and they delayed that objective indefinitely
The team is too french to accomplish anything of worth

>>14719148
This shitcoin is about to be delisted from all exchanges. Why the fuck would you buy this?

>>14719148
I dumped this shit a few days back

Do they still do those biweekly updates? What was the last good news

>>14719393
Same. The Binance delisting is what finally convinced me to drop my 20k bag

>>14719418

Mainnet for V2 is coming soon, anytime within the next month. But I don’t expect any price changes
Also their Xero integration is also around the corner

>>14719148
wen fish tracking?

>>14719215
So the value proposition is "the token might be useful for other stuff the team might do in future"?

How much have you lost on this shitcoin so far? Be honest. We won't laugh.

>>14719596
V2 is a joke and so are the people who think anyone will use Request. Yesterday someone tried claiming a government was looking at using Request. Height of delusion.

>>14720456
Source for the last part?

>>14720581
>>14707265
Literally the only source is plebbitor anon saying it will happen.

>>14719148

i sometimes visit the req subreddit to laugh at the utter delusion of those bagholder retards

its really funny watching their investment going to zero

its like the team raped the investors and dumped their body in a ditch.
the team will probably go on having practically stolen bag holders money and forget about it like nothing ever happened.
pretty sickening really.

>>14719186
look at their fucking site bro. that shit is a mess, 1 year rebranding to do that shit.

I REQUEST MY MONEY BACK

>>14722201
One of them is still holding 900k. He's lost 4 BTC in the last two months and still hasn't sold. These fools will literally be holding to zero.

>>14719186
>I don't think the nearly worthless req coin is needed though.

It isn't.

Like most ICOs, the token part was just a dirty money grab.

There's no support for the token's value.

>>14722482
Its the same for link, look the price

>>14722339
The website is truly horrible. What the fuck are they even thinking!?!?

>>14719186
>I actually went to their website and they have a good product.

They don't actually have a product.

>>14722316
funny how this coin used to be shilled with "honest and hardworking team"

>>14719148
> there's people stupid enough to think 2017 shitcoins will ever moon again

>>14722549
Incorrect. LINK value comes from supply/demand. Tokens are locked in nodes, supply is reduced. Users want nodes to retrieve data for them, demand is increased. Price goes up. A token is required to operate a decentralized marketplace for data.
>>14722552
Imagine how much they paid for that redesign.
>>14722712
They talked a good talk in the early days but soon proved themselves incompetent and incapable of delivering anything of value.