/biz/ - Business & Finance

Make it stack = 10k.
10k x $100 = profit.

>>14524929
Congratulations, you've figured out why we've always said 10k to make it.

>>14524883

$100 * 1 billion in circulation = 100 billion.

You think that a shitty data bounty contract and a sever that polls HTTP endpoints is worth $100 billion dollars.

I understand the meme angle but the people here that actually seem to think this is legitimate are beyond my fucking comprehension. Cash the fuck out and move on you absolute mongoloids.

>>14524989
>You think that a shitty data bounty contract and a sever that polls HTTP endpoints is worth $100 billion dollars.
HA, he thinks people will pay money for something that explodes gasoline and turns some wheels, pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft

200 lines of code...

can someone tell me how to linkpool? i'm a fucking retard

>>14525019
just go to the website.
linkpool was made for retards

>>14524989
O I'm laffin

fuck off nulinker. it's always been 1000

>>14524883
Don't think about it in terms of ROI, "fair price", "reasonable" etc.
Think about it in terms of Marketcap, and compare it to the marketcaps of other alts during the last bullrun.
If Chainlink got the same marketcap as Ripple during the last bullrun, then it would be in the 700$ range.

even if Link keeps it place as top 16, then if another bullrun comes and it reaches the same marketcap as "the top 16" did last time, then it would still be over 100$.

>>14524989
but data is the new oil anon

NEVER FUCKING SELL!

>>14524989
Newfags, here we have an actual fudder from mumbai. Learn to spot the difference between oldfags telling you how to manage risk and pajeets like this.

>>14525026
is it worth doing if you're a linklet?

>>14525033
PRICE ONLY STAY HIGH
PRICE NEVER COME DOWN

>>14525010

Cool good analogy. Ya got me jeez.

>>14525027

Faggot

>>14525031

Data is valuable. Why is data that you make yourself pay LINK for more valuable? Do you fucks even know how LINK works?

>>14525034

Do you even speak english? What is this?>

>>14524883
Nice FUD faggot.
Link will be AT LEAST 100k$

>>14524883
wait till the Stripe announcement hits. 1000k eoy will look like fud.

>>14524989
You're 100% correct, apart from the parts where you're completely wrong. There aren't 1 billion in circulation. 650 are being kept by the team for dev purposes and (perhaps) allow institutions like SWIFT to use. Spend 5 mins looking into it and you'll see I'm right.

>>14524883
Lol fuck off.

>>14524883
Weak fud desu

>>14525231

I didn't say in circulation. I said total supply.

>>14525064
A fellow linker, why I can smell you from here.

T. Extra stinky

>>14525072
What is Stripe

>>14524883
I used ti think the same as you, but I no longer do and I bought in pre SIBOS and have a 60k stack. We are going to 1k. Derivatives will absolutely take us PAST 1k if we get the market share to allow it, and we likely will. With derivatives being a 1.2 quadrillion dollar market YEARLY, and Link being a collateral token, even a small percentage of market share captured with Link would push us over 1k.

>>14524883

chainlink is pure ponzi scam build on lies

OP post is classic scammers talk and how you recognise scam artists

they promise people the moon
they say that you are early adaptor
they promise to you ridicilous amount of money if you buy their product
they repeat this lie, day after day

>>14524953
This was for the newfags that keep saying 10k is the suicide stack.

>It’s a price FUD episode
Sasuga biz

>>14524883
Sgt. Major here with 11K LINK.

$100 would be way beyond my wildest dreams, I would be a millionaire. It would be actually life-changing money.

HOWEVER, this will only happen if we get business adoption, not just partnerships (Oracle, Google) but companies using it to pull data. And this will happen in 5+y at the earliest.

$1000 would make it more valuable than the most valuable company on earth. That is not going to happen.

>>14525430
fuck off Karampon

>>14525465
>And this will happen in 5+y at the earliest.
No it wont. It will happen this year. Sergey said he wants derivatives online and running this year. There is no reason we need to wait 5 fucking years. Do you think mainnet was surprise launched and put out for nothing. Docusign desperately needs it and Sergey needs the network to catch up to the demand.

I am so sick of this whale FUD that has been seeded here. Whales want to accumulate until 2025, they are not going to. We will be seeing major adoption and price action north of $100 before the end of 2020.

>>14525465
Ripple is useless yet has billions in marketcap, why can't Link get close to that? Especially considering when Bitcoin will surpass its ath within 2 years

>>14525496

What are you even talking about. Derivatives?

Explain what you think Derivatives on Chainlink actually means. Do you know what derivatives are?

Docusign doesn't actually need LINK for fucking anything.

Stop saying "FUD" you absolute faggot retard. Confront the scam you are in like a man.

>>14525550
>4 FUDposts by this ID

I'm going to screencap this thread, non-believers will get BTFO, if you can't see this hitting $1k then you never will, but don't feel bad, you're in the 99% and will never make it in life because you'll always follow the 99% and can't conjure original thought

>>14525407
Dont get me wrong, every LINK holder should keep at least 1k untouched for at least 5 years in case the impossible happens.

Consider this though. What is more likely? A 2017-esque speculation bubble for chainlink, followed by a crash and then an eventual restabilisation at its fundamental value down the road (if it achieves what it aims to do)...

or it somehow magically climbs to its fundamental value (which may not be instilled until years later) impervious to any market movements, euphoria and subsequent parabolic moves downwards?

Holding to $180 then back down to $45 in the hope that it'll stabilise at $1000 is insanely retarded.

>>14525509
Extremely redpilled take. Much like Ripple, LINK is not protected from euphoria nor the hangover.

>>14525588
go and screencap it you brainlet newfag. If it ever does hit 1k, I'll be right there too with my untouched staking stack. The only difference is that I'm smarter about my actions before and IF that eventually happens.

>>14525578

Cool so you have no idea what a derivative is or how it would ever have anything to do with LINK, thanks dumb faggot shit brains.

>>14525595

Why do you think LINK has any value at all?

>>14524883
fuck off back to where you belong, reddit fag

>>14525617
Sorry you panic sold anon at a loss and your emotions affected your investment decisions
>brainlet.jpg

>>14525595
I expect volatility to decrease as the adoption comes and for Link to start behaving like a blue chip on Nasdaq and not a PnD crypto shitcoin.

>>14525322
Granted, but 650m aren't going to be on the market, so effectively the supply available to buy is only going to be 350m

>>14525595
>A 2017-esque speculation bubble for chainlink, followed by a crash and then an eventual restabilisation at its fundamental value down the road (if it achieves what it aims to do)...
I completely and fundamentally think so.

>>14525722

- There will never be a network of nodes where they provide data to be paid LINK. No part of their network has made that possible via decentralization. You have to just run your own nodes which makes it useless.
- The second point doesn't make sense. Why would they care about the number of tokens. It's immaterial since the entire network would ostensibly all be denominated in LINK. If its in relation to another asset then it only matters what the amount worth that asset is.
- Wanting to have a higher slashing stake would make sense if that was actually worked out in their whitepaper but it isnt. Also that doesnt translate to a network demand for "more value".
- Yes its true the scammers want their scam coin to be worth more.
- God this is fucking dumb.

>>14525768

the 350m for the company will be eventually.

the other 350m for companies kind of kills the idea of companies actually purchasing. More likely they'll just be bribed with free tokens from this pool that they dump on idiots.

>>14525811
If you actually believe that, sell all your tokens then as Link will fail.

>>14525811
>the 350m for the company will be eventually.

>the other 350m for companies kind of kills the idea of companies actually purchasing. More likely they'll just be bribed with free tokens from this pool that they dump on idiots.

That is my biggest fear. Sure companies could save cost through usage within a long time span BUT they could make millions and millions here and now if they just dumped their gifted tokens right away.
Linkies can't answer this.

>>14525841

I'm doing one better. I'm shorting LINK on Nuo.

>>14525882
Great. Can't wait for you to lose your entire stack. Make sure to 100x short retard.

>>14525722
Having an incentive means nothing if the party in question isn't an actor capable of affecting the situation. Nearly all node operators (except maybe the top 0.01%) and all participants in the CL network simply don't have the power to be capable actors.

I will concede that institutional users (and maybe SmartContrcat themselves) do in fact have an incentive though and a possible capability to act upon that incentive. However, if you extrapolate their range of actions, they are probably limited to only reducing supply and supply is only one (albeit important) variable that determines the price of an asset.

Relying on this to protect LINK from volatility is an extremely risky maneuver if you ask me.

>>14525895

Ouch sounds like you're a little short on responses faggot. Having a hard time mustering up another "FUD"?

>>14524883

You are wrong OP. These highs you are mentioning are the speculation price highes. And I also want to remind you that during a bullrun like in 2017 irrational buying can occur, which is what happened with xrp. If this would happen to link we could be at $500 per link.
BUT if the chainlink network actually succeeds and is widely adopted.... Well, in that case 1k is fud.

>>14525907
Then sell at $100 then. I don't give a fuck if you sell too early to be honest.

>>14525496

>We will be seeing major adoption and price action north of $100 before the end of 2020.

Look anon, I want this as much as you, but currently this would put LINK at spot #2 right before ETH. The same ETH LINK and a gazillion of other projects are based on.

No way. Sorry.

>>14525509
>Ripple is useless yet has billions in marketcap, why can't Link get close to that?

XRP is from 2013. Of course LINK can and will get there, but not so soon. 2y after creation, XRP had a $300m valuation, one XRP was $0.01 (yes, 1ct). Now it is at 50x of that, and LINK will be at 50x of what it is right now as well in a couple of years.

>>14525946
I don't think we actually disagree on anything mate. If LINK truly does bridge legacy systems and smart contracts the way it was intended to, a $350B MC (and thus, $1000) is actually reasonable. I just think that a LINK speculation run will inevitably lead to a parabolic dump after a parabolic, speculation fuelled rise. All I'm saying to anons is to sell before the speculation run dumps on them.

1000 isnt a meme

>>14525465
>$1000 would make it more valuable than the most valuable company on earth. That is not going to happen.

What's the value of all roads or the internet? Is it more than the most valuable company on earth?

>>14526169
Both are not one entity with a price tag attached. All roads == all cryptos

>>14526169

You are delusional beyond all comprehension.

>>14525019
Not gonna wait until the staking %'s are confirmed?

chainlink scam exposed

https://ourbitcoinnews.com/is-holding-onto-chainlink-link-a-good-idea-apparently-not-and-heres-why/amp/

quote:

News outlet and journalists keep reporting on “partnerships” with Google and Swift. But if you actually read the source for the “partnership”, it’s just a blog post by Google Cloud that promotes their own service (BigQuery) and shows an example about how Chainlink users can use Google Cloud if they want. In no way is Google partnered or planning on using Chainlink themselves.

>>14526169
Reproduce.

>>14526210
>>14526225
Don't reproduce.