/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14476385
Hi fren nice to see you what about with the top wallets/holders, anything interesting there?

Posting in a wallet autism threat

>>14476385
Nice to see you back.

So wallets are still accumulating? Or has a dump of link begun?

>>14476477
Not had a proper look in a while but I can tell you from a quick glance that in March last year you needed 440,000 LINK to be in the top 100. Now, you need only 300,000 to be in the top 100 wallets.

This is the opposite situation with those of us around the top 2000, where to stay at your relative position, you’d need to buy more LINK.

If I’m thinking about this correctly, this means that some of the noted whale accumulation has been happening somewhere between wallets #100-#2000. As I say, there have been 2000 new wallets created per day over the last 4 days - we can reason based on the above that some of these new will be wallets holding between 300k and 20k LINK.

If anyone else has been keeping track of their relative positions I would be interested to know if you’re being pushed up or down

>>14476385
How do you check how much you need to hold to be in top 2000? Also, top 2000, just wanna check.

>>14476551
I’m always here my friend, but I don’t post with trips unless it’s this particular topic.

A dump? No way lol. See post above (>>14476626)

>>14476626
Bless you, based autist.
Also, I would like to know more if /biz/ wallets in top 2000 is being pushed up or down, anyone wants to confirm?

>>14476645
Ethplorer

>only have 100 link

>>14476626
I've been keeping track of my position, I'm in the top 250. For a long time, in April may I had lived up by about 4 or 5 places, but when I checked the other day I'd gone back down by 5 so I guess people above me are accumulating more or its just getting increasingly crowded with more people owning more link but across more wallets

>>14476679
thanks

>>14476735
*in April / May I had moved up

Thanks for the update. I have 260k divided between 2 wallets. I've gone up a little it leaves me at about 150. How do you think most people divide their wallets? Are there really only about 150 people with more LINK than me or is it maybe 300+ due to how people split their holdings?

>>14476682
Lmao I have 200

>>14476385
Just outside top 1500. You?

>>14476667
Based

>>14476849
I remember posting about total addresses being 34,000 last week when some newbies were thinking of selling. Of course the total number is shooting up. Interesting how many people are actually holding and accumulating more as we continue going up in price

>>14476735
Yeah, or people are finally moving their LINK off Binance, especially Amerifags because they won’t be able to Binance soon. Or perhaps the increased number of wallets are people preparing to stake, so are finally transferring to their own wallets...

I have a top 2000 wallet. Amazing.

>>14476816
My friend, there is no way to tell.

We can make rationalisations about certain things, but we can’t know how people split up their holdings, except where people like you, anon, let us know...

>>14476830
You will make it. Just keep holding.

>>14476847
Have you tracked your position in the past? Keep a note of where you are now and check back later.

So all I can reasonably conclude is that of the 8000 new wallets in the last 4 days, *some* of those contain between 300k-20k LINK. But I don’t know what proportion of those 8000 wallets that is. Would need more information on other anons relative position. Especially linklets with less than 20k - anyone out there with 15k or fewer LINK noticed their position moving up or down?

>>14477106
8500 marine here - drop me a link to a url that tells me my rank and I’ll tell you

>>14476626
I never cared for my position, but having kept in mind what happened with the early Bitcoin whales and how some disappeared mysteriously, I've split my stack from the start into a non disclosed number of small holdings between 2xxx and 6xxx

>>14477241
https://ethplorer.io/address/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?from=search#tab=tab-holders&pageSize=100

You can keep clicking through the holders to find your position. Note it and then we can see how it changes in future

>>14477106
Correction, top 100 is 399k, not 300k. Apologies, phoneposting and wasn’t looking closely

>>14476385
Thanks autismo for the updates and your due diligence.

>>14477106
Yeah I remember checking it on etherscan with stack of around 15k and I was listed there ( so at least top 1000) but I cannot remember the spot I was on. It was around February 2018.

>>14477106
Also, went up two positions since this post started

bump

Thanks for the research fren

Thanks for your threads fren

I'm currently top 2000. I would be top 600 if I held onto my ICO stack. Unfucking real

>>14476385
This is the data that tells a story, not TA faggots. Please continue to post regularly anon.

>>14476385
Welcome back my dear anon! Hope you are doing well. Enjoying the pumps?

lower 700-1000 positions have not changed much. idk what it could mean

>>14477758
Damn, I remember I used to be top 150 with my 175k and now it's nearly 400k for top 100?

>>14477699
Should I check it once a week or month? Or?

fuck jannies and fuck them for allowing chinkies to infect this board

>>14478192
That must have been ages ago because I never saw 15k LINK equalling a position in the top 1000 since I started monitoring it.


>>14479312
Yeh but it’s riddled with uncertainty, we can’t know how many people split their wallets up.

>>14479366
It’s unreal! All gonna make it.

>>14480472
Whenever you feel like it.
It seems like there have been a lot of changes over the past week or so in terms of LINK stored on Binance, number of wallets and number of people on linktrader (which I think is a useful metric).

chainlink is going to dump like a poo from my ass
even the whitepaper states that this garbage should be traded around 0.45$ to be effective
you guys are so dumb and deluded
cringe

enjoy your bags you bought the top