/biz/ - Business & Finance

Original Satoshi wanted no block limits, in fact, it was just a temporary measure against spam.
I wonder how legit is the whole "KYC Wallet" thing though?

>>14373715

>>14373715
So does BCH. Except BCH also supports privacy and is improving 0conf to actually be 100% save to accept.
I hold mass quantities of both.

CREG CANT CODE HES A TOXIC SCAMMER
CALVIN IS A PEDO
BUY BTC!!!

>>14373715
Many, many coins work. Are you trying to win a brand war over a particular name, or what? Well, "Bitcoin Satoshi Vision" sounds retarded and the logo is cheap. See, you lost.

>>14373884
but bitcoin doesn't

LN works well, capacity is just growing.

>>14374362
LN is also not bitcoin, nor a cryptocurrency. It's literally Paypal 2.0. WHY do it when you can just increase block size?

Answer: because blockstream profits off it

>>14374387
The point is not that LN may be shit, the point is that you're always bringing up your dragon logo coin as some kind of an argument, when in fact lots of coins solve the same exact problem, some better than others.

>>14374387
This is retarded.
People like this make me glad the block size hasn't been increased because it's clear that it's a gateway to other changes.

>LN isn't Bitcoin
True because any chain can support it. Though LN works best on the most secure chain.
>PayPal 2.0
So it's electronic cash then? I agree.
But it's also censorship resistant.
>Just increase the block size.
Temporary and inefficient solution to a much more complicated problem.
Every block is essentially an auction. Adding more space to the auction won't fix fees during high demand and will just add bloat over time.

>>14373755

Kinda except for that 32MB block size limit. If your going to scale for major players in the crypto community ur going to need Bigger Blocks.

>>14373835
>>14374452
The dragon logo isn't even the logo

>>14373715
I'll use ETH instead, like I've been doing during periods with high fees

>>14374488
LN is not electronic cash. It's basically a centralized bank controlled by Blockstream. I mean ffs, they own patents on this shit! Same with segwit.
YOU are a fucking retard. Blockstream is literally a for-profit organization.

Corecucks are such massive faggots.
Having 80 terabytes of historical weather data permanently in the blockchain is perfectly fine.
When creating a distributed computing system you want to have every node have all of the data of that distributed system that way you have a lot of redundancy.
All this horizontal scaling is for zoomers with no risk aversion , what if 9000 of your 9001 nodes go offline? Only Bitcoin(BSV) would be able to recover because it was designed by a genius.

You have to be retarded by all measures to think that Blockstream gives a single shit about an independent, efficient currency. All they give a shit about is making $$$. Even wikipedia agrees with me on that.

>>14374540
BCH will have Gigablocks. "Adjustable blocksize" and "Unlimited" are literally in the names of the 2 largest BCH node implementations.

>>14374766
lol'd

>>14374786
Again, Blockstream may be a totally bogus venture, what does the dragon logo coin have to do with it? Everything around it is an even bigger joke.

>>14374827
Why do I give a shit about a fucking dragon logo? Why are you going about it? Who cares? Also that logo was abandoned some time ago. Get on with the times.
I am not shilling you BitcoinSV, I am just saying that what corecucks are doing is ridiculous.

>>14374787
>>>14374540
>BCH will have Gigablocks. "Adjustable blocksize" and "Unlimited" are literally in the names of the 2 largest BCH node implementations.

>>14373715
This is the correct thread.
BSV will be the true ethrum killer and also king of coinmarketcap 2019
Do you not think that the Craig Wright team has not been working hard? Guess what? It has.
And always remember, as Craig says:
Get in BSV
The real BTC!

Let us all celebrate now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwRZgtTEH08&t= [Embed]

>>14374852
Because it's obvious that BCHSV is trying to win the brand war by trying to appear as "the one", but doing it very clumsily.

>>14373715
I agree we need to switch chains, but why not switch to something that isnt shitty, like EOS?

Once you are willing to dump bitcoin I dont see why its replacement must have "bitcoin" in the name

>>14374362
It doesnt work well in that NOBODY supports it. Even just adding support between exchanges, like binance to coinbase would massively declog the mempool. Yet they still havent done it.

>>14373715
BSV is undoubtly the best Bitcoin. It's still "relative" small but the tech is far superior to all other 'Bitcoins'.
And on top of that....just imagine if this freak Craig is really Satoshi....like if he's for real and not a scam...holy fuck that would have grave consequences.

>>14373715
Craig was an employee of the real Satoshi.
When Satoshi got jailed, Craig swiftly made a copy of Satoshi disks containing the original wallet.
Then Craig tried started the endless drama "I'm Satoshi", yet never providing the ultimate proof (moving some BTC from the original Sasoshi wallet). Thing is, those disks were protected by TruCrypt (oh, the irony). Craig wasted a lot of money building up a massive datacenter that's still bruteforcing those disk images today - without luck.
He even went as far as trying to buy very old wallets.
Real Satoshi Nakamoto is still serving jail time.