/biz/ - Business & Finance

I'm a burger though..

>>14326280
I was amazed to find out that there's only 350 holders. Really makes me wonder when every second linkmarine I speak to says they own LP.

>>14326315
>>14326315
So am I sweetie

>tfw only 0.04

>>14326326

>>14326315

They don't seem to enforce that very seriously. What's the penalty if you do it anyways? Or do you try to use a VPN?

>>14326345
Jail

>>14326345
Assrape in prison

>>14326325
Because there are about 30 people on biz

Looking forward to LP doing eth staking. Im gonna be stinkin rich from my shares kids

>>14326280
Is there any point in buying LP with small amounts? say 200-300 links worth.

>>14326495
>ID: bUyc9AyA
>bUy
Thank you, just bought 1k LinkPool

>>14326643
The NaaS, Dex, Marketplace, ETH & LINK staking returns. You don't need to stake with them in order to get passive income, you just hold LP shares

>>14326280
I do

>>14326389
>>14326473

Damn, really? Over some meme tokens?

>>14327432
Land of the free

I have dual citizenship so if things get a bit hairy ill just move to France.

Can someone explain this retarded table

>>14327677
Its very clear, how dumb are you?

>>14326315
>>14326326
look into their NaaS
I will only say this once
you're on your own now
You can use their service to run your own node but you cannot use their shares to receive divs, if you do you might receive dicks
t. merican

>>14326280
You faggots doubled the price the night I went to buy after you literally discussed a coordinated effort to raise the minimum price when everyone realized the first 10 orders were held by like 6 people here. Lol

fuck linkpool share!!

>>14327700
Its too late, i already received their first round of divs. I cant stop now. Im addicted

>>14327745
Link doubled from $0.90 to $1.80, so Linkpool shares doubled as well, because they pay dividends in Link.
Whatever price movement Chainlink does Linkpool will very likely follow.

What's minimum LP needed to be significant?

>>14327979
literally any
retards still don't get it

>>14327979
0.04 LP

>>14328003
>FAg in my ID
what did Kek mean by this

>>14327954
No, that isn't what happened I was in the thread. Everyone was talking about why aren't you INTJ LINK 85% LP15% MASTERRACE. They started discussing specifics and realized a few people held the orders and bumped the price. I'll try to find the waruso

>>14328021
I was there this anon is right. they realized most of the sell orders belonged to anons in the thread and decided to pull them and put them higher. They also talked about memeing price to 100 Eth

>>14328001
>>14328003
I mean is it worth throwing more in, like $1000?

>>14327910
Put your faggotry to an end Metatron. You still have time to repent

>>14328105
$1000 will get you approximately 0.08 shares. Sure it's worth it but goddamn have the prices gotten inflated

LP will definitely get SECED.
Maybe Link will be able to avoid a security classification because it technically never promised profits and can be used as as utility token, but LinkPool is 100% profit-orientated. It WILL get fucked by the SEC.

>>14326280
It’s just hard to justify each token being worth 40 eth although I guess if there’s only 4,000 tokens that makes cents

Possible to profit off of LP if I use VPN's and run through Monero?

>>14328105
in my opinion 1 Lp share will generate returns of $2.5 million over the next 5 years

>>14328342
only 1000 LP available. Fewer than 400 active addresses. The market for LP shares is tiny. I still cant believe people are actually selling at these prices. Its incredibly short sighted.

>>14328077
checked

>>14328289
>>14328403
Thing is I could also just buy more link with that money - but if lp shares rise as link rises, getting income from them probably makes it worth

>>14328464
do want you want faggot nobody is going to try to convince you unless they have open orders on the dex

>>14328464
Yep, this is the reason why I didn't take part in the crowdsale back then. Now the same question remains - which is more profitable long-term. $10k won't get you even a single share but it will get you over 5.5k LINK. It's a tough call.

>>14328510
What the fuck, wasn't 1LP share like $200 in december?

>>14328289
no that's not correct?

>>14328504
Chill we all frens here

>>14328326
this doesn't even make sense you brainlet. half this board has no idea why unregistered securities laws exist or what they even mean. LP is a security while LINK is not. this does not mean LP will get raped if they registered, and judging by the business model with baked in dividends johnny would have to be an absolute retard to not register it

>>14328617
>and judging by the business model with baked in dividends johnny would have to be an absolute retard to not register it
well...

>>14326280
>he doesn't own <shitcoin of the day>
You're right.

>>14328436
There’s 4,000 total. Are you saying the other 3,000 were burned or will never be sold?

>>14328625
well if that's the case then i'm glad he only did UI work for LINK kek

>>14328326
only burgers will fatso

>>14328591
>37.5 ETH per share
>1 ETH = $310
>1 LP = $11 625
>0.08 LP = $930

>>14328669
>implying LP won't drop at least 70% once all burgers panic sell
LP is a /biz/ meme, and /biz/ is 70% american. do the math.

>>14328510
well if u got in at crowdsale u wud be way2 up already 25% at avg 20eth and 25% 40eth 50% will be for hodl yes i initiated the linkpoolchad cartel talks the doubled the price itll probable double when link reach 30k sats

>>14328403
This is fucking retarded. That would mean 500k per year per LP.

x4000 this would be equal to $2bio revenue per year. How deluded are you?


1.2PL holder, thinking to sell it all at these prices.

>>14328756
well they are smart enuf to get in the crowdsale i assume they know how to circumvent it as well
as for u my fren im sorry u miss out might try clcg with timo he seems to be a trustworthy fag

>>14326280
I own 0.32 but I would not add any more at current prices. As things stand LP has gotten WAY overvalued relative to LINK. Don't forget that other LINK staking services will pop up over the next year or so and invariably capture some of LPs Market share. There is a maximum size that LP can grow to in terms of %of chainlink network throughput before it becomes detrimental to the network.

I wouldn't expect it to capture more than 10% - don't forget this is an additional layer of risk on top of holding LINK tokens so should offer a better potential return. At current prices it does not.

Not trying to FUD just a realist. I expect both LINK and LP to be great investments long term

>>14328643
3000 owned by team. I guess they could sell em but it would be kind of silly to sell the income stream for your own company

>>14329176
>he thinks the value of LP shares is in staking

Its only a very small piece of the pie buddy

>>14329487
No you get 25% of linkpools revenue, as I said I don't expect there to be vast sums flowing through the network for a while, at which point there will be competitors that will offer more attractive rewards than linkpool. I like linkpool, I just think matt and Jonny were greedy fucks keeping 75% of profits for themselves, and this will hamper LPs price long term.

>>14328798
>$2 billion revenue per year is a lot
>using revenue when he means profit

>>14326325
>Really makes me wonder when every second linkmarine I speak to says they own LP.
>t. one of the original 186
>>14326495
>Looking forward to LP doing eth staking. Im gonna be stinkin rich from my shares kids
it's going to be great

>>14329629
*linkpools profit

>>14327910
>fuck linkpool share!!
lol seems we have interlopers
>>14328254
>Put your faggotry to an end Metatron. You still have time to repent
yeah that's not me, interesting though that I seem to have some fans
>mfw

>>14329629
Which is a big chunk.. and for some reason you are still focused on staking rewards.

I suggest you do more research on what LP is going to offer because it doesnt sound like you have much of a clue.

>>14327910
>fuck linkpool share!!
jannies clean ^this up
I'm the real "42" anon I swear
no shoot him
>NO!, I'm the real "42" anon, I promise
>shoot him instead

>>14329779
I never mentioned the staking rewards, I meant everything, DEX, naas, it's not going to be as much as you think anon. Prepare to be underwhelmed if you've gone all in on LP in the last few weeks.

>>14329629
what do you think about CLC group?
they had this recent news regarding partnership with Leeway Hertz:

https://medium.com/clc-group/clc-group-partners-with-blockchain-development-company-leewayhertz-for-enterprise-smart-contracts-83e7930dbde5

>>14330085
The first Chainlink's Marketplace and NaaS can easily put LP's profit in the millions a month after a few years

>>14330756
I wouldn't invest in CLC, Timo showed his true colours when trying to do his little cash grab during the ICO and then behaved like a butthurt faggot when things didn't go his way. He comes across as a chink scammer IMO except he's European.

LP has far more credibility and is more likely to deliver a working product than quickly exit scam, hence Jonny was invited to join the chainlink team

>>14332099
>LP has far more credibility and is more likely to deliver a working product than quickly exit scam, hence Jonny was invited to join the chainlink team
I certainly don't disagree with you on that
I invested in the LP ICO and have done well.
Put in 4 ETH for the CLC pre-sale and cast my lot with them. Let's see what happens but it's looking like they won't reach soft cap, which means they'll look for private investors after.

>>14332099
>Timo showed his true colours when trying to do his little cash grab during the ICO and then behaved like a butthurt faggot when things didn't go his way
he tried to show off what a "kool" trader I am by swinging LINK and then tried FUDing it after he was blown out
Also didn't Jonny review their whitepaper?
Didn't LP and CLC announce that they would work together?
What happened since then? Did they distance themselves after that Timo fiasco?

>>14330756
CLCG could be the next Microsoft for what I care but because Timo is there I will not invest.
I don't know why but I just hate him and wish him a painfull death.

>>14332151
>because Timo is there I will not invest.
>>14332151
>I don't know why
I think I know why. It's something about manlets and their constant need to compensate for their stature
when you first see it, you can't unsee it lol
I eye every manlet with suspicion now, sorry for the chill manlets out there, but there's too many of them that are salty

>>14332241
I met Sergey IRL and he escapes the manlet zone by an inch or he is a really tall manlet, king manlet let's say.

Anyways, I did not realize Timo was this short, well maybe subconciously I did.
If I ever meet him I will lift him up by his ears, no joke.
If you hear about someone lifting Timo by the ears know it was me.