/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14285074
youre going to have a lower roi with btc and eth, so if you want a safer portfolio go ahead but if you want more reward go for link

>>14285074
>fell for the all in LINK meme
Anon fuck what anyone says, if you don’t have your right position in BTC, you’re not gonna make it

Im all in on Tron and i dont have second thoughts. Use your gut, common this is America!

Have faith Anon

Chainlink is the unironic best pick for this bullrun

500x profits easily

>>14285092

yeah, LINK still has a lot of room to grow and is probably the better play for the next 12 months or so.

>>14285092
>so if you want a safer portfolio go ahead but if you want more reward go for link
what this guy said
if you have less than 5 figures, it's not worth the spread
when you're at 5 figures and approaching 6 figures the golden trinity is ideal

>>14285074
Stinky

I only own Link and am buying more. It's your money but I'm full on this Link ship with no regrets.

Unironically put in all my life saving in LINK.

If Chainstink fails then the whole crypto is useless.

That’s how important decentralized oracle is.

>>14285074
Sell all your LINK.

When the LINK mainnet came out, it became clear that LINK was a fraud. There were no doubts left.

When it came out several years ago that IOTA was a fraud, it still enjoyed a massive pump afterwards perhaps courtesy of its founders in a last-ditch attempt to save it. So it is with LINK.

I am studying astrology, and have calculated the astrological chart for LINK. It shows that LINK has it to become famous as it undoubtedly has. But it shows Sergey's image to be illusory. The chart doesn't show large financial gains, just a desire for them.

>>14285074
You need look back in the chainlink archives more. You should be comfy, not anxious.

>>14285279
if you have above $10,000 it can be worth it to be spread across 2-3 cryptos along with some holdings in ICOs if you're not a burger
ICOs have been my highest gains by far even more so thank link

>>14285074

When people post "have sex", what do they really mean? I've been seeing this posted across every board in different variations or evolutions. Is it meant to be taken literally? Is it meant as an insult? Is it a response used to try to distract in a discussion from the actual discussion? I imagine most posters are male. For a poster to tell another poster to have sex, it implies said poster is not getting sex, or not getting enough sex- and that it should be their primary focus, either to ail them of their implied defect, or to gain the upper hand in an exchange of words. It seems like a coordinated attack on a board full of NEET virgins that is gaining traction and spreading. Is it possible there is something more actually going on? What is it about these two little words that have so much efficiency in trolling? It can be used to insinuate a lot, with so little effort. The best part is, it's completely open to interpretation. It allows a myriad of reasons of defectiveness and creates a situation of defensiveness for the person on the receiving end. If they attempt to defend themselves, it only comes across as giving credibility towards the person saying "have sex". Think about it. A lot of people on these boards are overcompensating...fit with muscles, fa with clothes, biz with money, etc. Saying "have sex" seems to be a way to cut through the bs, and make the person look like they're trying too hard. Even if you try to ignore it, it warps the perception of others, or at least makes them think about why you're not having sex. You could literally be having sex while posting, and someone could say "have sex" and no one would ever know that you were actually having sex the whole time. When is coinbase going to add chainlink?

>imagine selling at this price.

>>14286071
stop replying to pasta tard

>>14285074

No matter what you do you wish you did something else

>>14286107

Ironic.

Within cells interLINKed

>>14285110
Begone pajeet

>>14286094

>>14285412
yeah, but oracles can be built by someone else duhh

>>14287106
Cringe

>>14285236

I have 6 figures and still 99% LINK 1% Quant

>>14287305
>I have 6 figures
phat boy
I like to dampen the fluctuations by having the trinity spread
it's more pragmatic when you have bigger holdings

>>14287305
>99% LINK
yeah you'll be fine
>pic related
replace ETH with LINK for a vision into the future

ffs people on this board are absolutely ridiculous. No wonder you're all poor. Every teeny tiny fluctuation in value for any coin either means BUY (if the price went up) or SELL (if the price went down). Do you guys even know what the word "investment" means?

>>14287523
this is why some people will never make it
not that people should marry their coins but a lot of lot people are going to be buying and selling shit at the slightest movements and eventually they will fuck up
it's especially bad for burgers since they get taxed for doing that shit