/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14259313
link has no collaborators only paid parners

>>14259313
sauce

Substantiate your claims.

>>14259346
>>14259350
This sc was from last week. Notice anything different now?

https://www.accordproject.org/about/

the absolute state of nolinker cope

>>14259387
was quant always there or is that new?

>>14259313
based and redpilled. couldn't agree more

>>14259313

No offense but accord is a literal who in the grand scheme of things

>>14259387
>removed logo of a white label product
Not enough proof.

>>14259313
Now listen to me. You won't have a chance to buy low again, ever. You fucked up at swinging that infamous last time and you knew it was coming, it was only a matter of time. But your inflated ego made you a gambler, perfectly conscious of his fundamental error but still irrationally going for it in the hope to beat the market in some sort of a miracle. What you should do now is to bite the bullet and buy back in at an acceptable loss, what you will do is to capitulate and hopefully kys. Bye nigger, you won't be missed and you totally deserve the heart-shattering guilt that is coming for you

>>14259313
Makes post a day after DocuSign founder makes a post on LinkedIn. Seriously try harder.

>>14259313
Thanks OP, looks like today's dump is people getting out early.

>>14259313
Well there's always Matic

>>14259313
Accord and Clause are old crumbs though...

WAIT WTF I JUST GOOGLED AND WENT TO MY LINK PLAYLIST, THEY REMOVED THE VIDEO SHOWING HOW TO USE CHAINLINK WITHIN THEIR PLATFORM AND REMOVED THE MEDIUM ARTICLE WTF

https://twitter.com/accordhq/status/1031022745835003905?lang=en

>>14260029
They removed ALL their medium articles.

>>14260047
Fuck lad, I got scared.
Could this potentially be Accord (read: IBM) applying chainlink under a white label rather than namedropping SmartContract as an entity?

Pretty spooky how they removed the video showing how to implement chainlink into their product though....

>>14259556
Yeh just look at all those literal whos on their members page. No longer collaborating with the likes of IBM, R3, Standard Chartered and about 50 top law firms is bullish af for LINK!
>>14259700
>white label product
Ah i remember those hopium threads. Cute buzzword, but LINK is barely a product at this stage. They still tweet every shitcoin partnership and blog post yet removed their logo from such a credible consortium? Use your brain, anon.
>>14259877
Tom is an 'advisor' now i.e he got a big fat stack for free that he pumps by retweeting cringey LINK shills. Even if he knew Docusign had no intention of using LINK he has no incentive to say otherwise.

>>14260128
There is no proof or even suggestion of "white labeling" by anyone. It literally was mentioned around last October in some larp thread after ChainLink did the web3 thing. Sergey and no one on the team has ever mentioned "white labeling."

It makes me a little nervous that Smart Contract (and chainlink) are no longer mentioned anywhere anymore, but Quant and R3 now are...

>>14260250
Go on archive, I found an old thread where some anons had some cute lil screencaps of their CEO calling stinkies annoying and upcoming events and presentations not having SmartContract being mentioned anywhere.

>>14259877
Tom shilling LINK on linkedin seems more like pity for his friend Sergey after deciding not to use the product

>>14260345
I'm aware. I'm not sure why I'm bothering asking here if anyone has some legitimate info regarding this news. Their CEO has a phenomenal point, since mid/early 2018, linkies have just become unbearable and toxic. I'm so thankful for crypto twitter tipping me off about the Google announcement, otherwise I would have not bought back in, but I can't find any info on twitter regarding this situation.

>>14260406
Do we have any actual proof of docusign not using chainlink and discussion of their own/alternative oracles? Who else is tackling oracles in a surreptitious manner?

Are any of the twitter faggots spamming accord with questions?

>>14260451
they recently stamped their logo on Clause's website and perhaps vis versa. I haven't read much about Clause. I think it's a much simpler approach to smart contract execution with less worry about decentralization, which none of these companies really care about anyway. I could be very wrong though

>>14259333
this

Swinglinker desperation at ath

>>14259313
Poo poo
E. E
E. E

>>14260515
So, basically, the answer to my question is "no,' in that there is no actual proof that docusign (and clause) aren't using chainlink

>>14260587
well what is the relation between clause and chainlink? Can clause operate without it? Are they parallel? I honestly don't know

because docusign seems much more willing to advertise their use of Clause, which is even more under the radar than link

Hey guys I just picked up some LINK two days ago, 2 Ether's worth! I'm really excited to see where things go from here, I've lost about $45 so far but I'm not worried, haha!

;_;

Is this legit fud? I can't tell. My nerves are already frayed from the swings and continuous false highs

>>14259313
You had two years to collect below 1.65.

Too late to turn back the clock now.

Sorry not sorry.

>>14260587
where's the proof they ever where using link

>>14260618
It is legit. They've also removed other associates, including APPG UK Government and Digital Asset, which is weird because their recent forum was backed by UK officials and DA was present. It's also not the first time weird shit happens with Accord so it's hard to tell. Rory is keeping quiet about this. Their first showcased smart contract product is an insurance contract by law firm Clyde Co and it uses centralized trusted data feeds as far as we know. The firms are content with trusted solutions for the time being. The trustless revolution isn't gonna happen overnight. Selman and Hunn were replying to questions about oracle problem today basically saying it wasn't the priority.

>>14260687
and this FUD is universally applicable to all the other big names. Accord was our link to R3, corda, hyperledger, docusign. We've heard zero about SWIFT since the PoC. Safe to say it's all dead. No facebook despite the Cheng connection and Sergey possibly giving them a presentation. There's literally nothing left. Google was a blog post nothing burger. Just shitcoins trying to ride the coattails of our pump and newly acquired fame.

Rory is a fucking cocksucker. I'm unironically thinking of selling my ICO stack right now

>>14260614


Why are you trying to be funny? You probably gotta make your life a joke to be able to even cope.

>>14260852
Just moved my entire stack to binance I AM NOT BAG HOLDING THIS SHIT DOWN TO $0.20c FOR A SECOND TIME!

>>14260861
probably pretty stupid of you but good luck§

>>14260687
>oracle problem not a priority
we are fucked. time to sell my bags.

Lmao faggots. We had a deal: fud is over after mainnet. You motherfuckers can suck on my balls you're not getting my linkies

>>14260950

this isn't 'presentation by the toilets' tier fud, this is real.

>>14260852
Those have always been only silly rumours. IC3 is actually all that really matters.

>>14260984
Are you dumb? Accord is a big deal.

>>14260973
no exactly this is even worse kek, they tweeted out something regarding smartcontracts like 5days ago

>>14260984
>excuse me mr noseberg?
>yea what is it?
>you know that decentralized Oracle blockchain middleware we are planning on integrating with that would save us billions a year?
>yes what about it?
>well it would appear someone is photoshopping their CEO onto a bunch of pictures of nazis and fat guys. Here's one where he's stomping around a city like Godzilla.
>what?! Unacceptable! Cancel everything!

Get the fuck out of here with this fucking retard nigger faggot tier fud. Suck by soon to be rich as fuck cock you nigger kikes

>>14259479
Quant joined Accord BEFORE Chainlink.
Check the UCL blockchain + Accord connection.

>>14259313
This is really good FUD. But when combined with the mountain of shitty FUD being posted at the same time I am very suspicious of it. Not selling.

Just imagine using a board where you've carefully crafted a gaymername and uploaded an edgy avatar and have to be careful what you say on it because some admin could ban you permanently for using the word nigger or tranny but you wouldn't dare use such a word because diversity is your strength and only black lives matter and you were born with a penis but maintain that you are truly a girl inside and by transitioning finally, FINALLY you wouldn't be an outcast weirdo anymore and other gaymertards will give you the love that your mom never could and you will finally have some sort of social life beyond when you buy your GameFuel Mountain Dew at the local 7-11 and the Pajeet says tak-you-veddy-much. Just imagine.

>>14259387

People posting my screen caps, feels weird, I’m low power level wagie, glad someone got some use from a little breadcrumb I found.

Feels weird lol.

>>14261114
and yet only one of these gets shilled by google. Move along pajeet there are smoyboys to scam.

>>14261123
lmao

>>14261130
You can have Google Cloud.
I'm happy with accord project and SIA.

Reminder: only people with incentives try to FUD this hard perfectly timed with a dump.

Reminds me of the fake “shill service” website the discord trannies made last year which anons exposed in under 10 minutes. Days of effort ruined for them

>>14261123
Fucking based. Discord faggots literally have avatar pictures and their own little username so that their internet investor "friends" know who they are. Fucking lmao /biz/ should auto ban anyone who has discord in their browser history fucking teen secret club house faggots.
Hey if the truth upsets you just go back and change your avatar picture to an angry face HAHAHAHAHAHA

>>14261101
really? so what went wrong in the last 5 days?

>>14261229
or I'm just trying to determine if I should sell my fucking stack because this is unironically the worst FUD I've seen in 2 years. Technical FUD is meaningless if companies with millions of dollars and 140IQ engineers choose to integrate it. When they decide its worthless then nothing else matters

>>14261229
That was my favourite moment on /biz/. Concrete evidence that they have literally zero effect on price and yet here they still are, because it's not as much about actual market manipulation as it is trying to show off for each other. Utterly pathetic.

>>14261265

This is the only FUD I've seen in the past 2 years that actually has any substance.

>>14261302
well fuck me sideways just market sold my entire ICO stack thanks anon!

>>14261274
the real manipulation is all these faggots (and now brittany venti) that bought into bullshit breadcrumbs and hype each other into a frenzy over shit that has no relevance to link at all. Next up: Oracle and cloudexpo

>>14261423
Those two are legit events. also, don't pretend that swinglinking retards weren't overshilling the facebook thing to force the hand of newfags

I feel sad for the retards who still haven't sold while they have the chance.
Link will drop 70%, at least.
Screenshot this, it will happen.

>>14261446
Cool FUD schizo

I actually feel sad for these sheep that unironically hold LINK.

>Buys 600MMC coin
>WiLl i MaKe iT aNoN????

>>14261104
The real linkpill is that there is literally a small group individually holding 100k+ stacks and they are part of the reason every pump bleeds and will dump their entire stack as soon as they're comfortable.

They are the ones who meme'd "don't swing it's a bad idea", "100$ is fud it will go higher" etc.

>>14261505
>he still thinks market cap is a relevant number
Newfags need to be banned

>>14261569
>and will dump their entire stack as soon as they're comfortable.
ETH went through the same. It always recovered and I believeLINK will too.

bump

Damn anons I think my hands are getting weak

>>14260640
>These men and women will create the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Imagine being this deluded

>>14259313
MOTHERFUCKER DELETE IMMEDIATELY, WE HAVENT FINISHED THE PUMP

>>14259346
ffs stared at it for a solid half a minute before realising it's never going to converge to the middle

>>14261116
This. Best fud the discord has managed for some time. Reminds me of the dark days of about 1 year ago. Not selling.

>>14260250
>It makes me a little nervous that Smart Contract (and chainlink) are no longer mentioned anywhere anymore, but Quant and R3 now are...
These companies have engineers capable of recognizing link for what it is - a json parser with kyc.
They were promised decentralized oracles.
I would dump the project after the disaster that was the mainnet launch too.

>>14262905
Thanks for showing off your sub 90 IQ, I chuckled.

>>14263101
You have to go back.

>>14263116
I was on 4chan before reddit existed.
(what am I even doing with my life)

>>14261446
And tron will climb 70% cause reasons. Crypto isn't rational.

>>14261104
0.13% of the circulating supply.
When you get above 0.05% not selling into pumps becomes a very long ordeal because you tank the price.
You lost probably your best chance ever to actually dump this at anywhere close the current valuation

>>14263134
To discord. Just hold your links and don't be a cunt.

>>14263314
I have never used discord

>>14263325
Fine time for you to get involved frendo

>>14263107
Just fudding, I actually believe this

>>14261446
Idiot Alert on isle Biz... Lol

You fag fudders can suck on my balls. This shit is going beyond the Moon and your fucking fud won't stop it.
FUCK FUDDERS
FUCK SWINGLINKERS
FUCK NOLINKERS
FUCK YOU SHLOMO
FUCK JANNIES
FUCK NIGGERS

HH 14/88, PRAISE SERGEY AND BLESS KEK

>>14260421
>uses the phrase 'toxic' unironically
I think it might be best for you if you sell all your Link
Nano or Hot seem more your speed

>>14263413
based

>>14259313
>including Docusign
WHO THE FUCK IS TOM GONSER YOU FUCKING IDIOT PAJEET?

Ugh. this is weird fud. Look the accord project is cool, and their recent conference was well done, but it's not the end of the world one way or another.

Digital Asset used to be listed and now they are not, and also Digital Asset JUST presented at the accord conference.

I don't know if CL is talking with R3 although I strongly suspect they are. And I don't think R3 gives a shit one way or the other if chainlink is part of accord project or not. Accord project is like a nonprofit trade association, it's not a guild that can blackball anybody.

Regarding clause, yes, as noted it seems that the Clause guys are not particularly focused on the oracle problem because they are not particularly focused on self-executing, blockchain smart contracts. They are more focused on digitizing contracts. Ok, good for them. Dan Selman and Peter Hunn seem like smart guys and they are working hard. But chainlink does not need their approval.

Stop blowing this out of proportion.

>>14263629
1 million IQ post

>>14260214
Did anyone mention this yet?

https://cointelegraph.com/news/digital-asset-partners-with-amazon-aws-aurora-on-smart-contract-language-interoperability

>>14263749
Yeah but according to the anons in this thread, digital asset is DOOMED because its no longer shown on the accord project website.

Yes, this has been a huge week for DA, and honestly I think in the long run all the integrations that DA announced this week will turn out to be much bigger news than the Facecoin.

Also, DESU I think DA is a much bigger deal than clause, b/c they are focused on working directly with enterprise customers right now.

I don't know for a fact that DA is working with CL but I believe it to be true.

>>14263825
>I don't know for a fact that DA is working with CL but I believe it to be true.
Among other reasons, they are working with ISDA on smart derivatives and these will require trustworthy, i.e. distributed, oracles.