/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14193729
You already know.

>>14193729
>Industry standard
>No need to mention

Because it's not a partner.

>>14193729
Because we don't need them to.

>>14193729
Chainlink is not a "partner"
They just integrate it, like Google

>>14193729
>Ribbit Capital

>>14193745
>>14193751
Anchorage advertises itself as a standard.

Also, take a look at Bisontrails. They do not support Ethereum. That's strange.

>>14193729
This image is just all the companies that invested in Libra. Chainlink obviously didn't, it doesn't mean it cannot be use.

>>14193729
>Bridgestone tires announces a partnership with Honda.
>Trucks transporting those Pirelly tires to Honda fabrics are all Mercedes
>Why aren't they announcing a partnership with Mercedes?

>>14193729
VAPORWAREEEEE

DO THE NEEDFUL SIRS INSHALLAH $1000 EOY

>>14193751
Google cloud anounced chainlink as a partner didn't they?

>>14193729
>woman's world banking
>non-profit
yikes

>>14193729
Facebook will not be using Chainlink, the people pushing this narrative are trying to make you believe they will and when its revealed that they won't there will be a huge dump, DO NOT listen to them.

>>14193856
no, its just presented chainlink usecase within their cloud platform, so more like a customer or chainlink network user

>>14193856
No some spergy google intern wrote a hypothetical use-case scenario about chainlink on a tech blog.

Let the linkers have this one though. They deserve a chance to dump some of their bags.

>>14193784
anchorage is a quorum fork (=private ethereum) so chainlink is definitely compatible
>>14193856
No they didn't

>>14193794
>>14193897
Cope.

>>14193729
>Invest in my new tech company coming out
>We've gotta let you we're partnered with Windows to use 80% Windows machines in our office!

>>14193729
NDA

You don't partner with your tool, you use it.

>>14193729
This sealed it for me. They aren’t using link. If they were they would have announced it in the blockchain part of the jnfogfaphic

Bison trails in an existing blockchain backend platform. Why would they announce it but not chainlink?

>>14193973
What the fuck is bisontrails then? Not a tool? Look at the fucking website retard it’s a smartcontract platform

If they had been using link why would they announce bison trails but not link?

>>14193729
you see that faint logo in the back?

>(((Horowitz)))

>>14193897

Any linkie NOT dumping bags right now will suicide in a year. Checkem

>>14193729
i know nothing of this project but where can i buy their coin or whatever?
i wanna buy some and ride the normie hype wave for a day or two then sell for link before it crashes back down as with everything normies touch

>>14193729
They need more time to accumulate RSR and LINK that's why they won't talk about it yet.

>>14194179
Any linkies dumping their bags right now will suicide in a year. Check em.

>>14193729
Not saying Chainlink has anything to do with Libra, but that isn't where Chainlink would be featured if it did.
Chainlink would part of the technical side of it, not the commercial side.

>>14194212
>riding the normie hype wave of a stable coin
i think you’re the normie here friendo

>>14194179
>Checkem
Your pathetic digits aren't worth checking.

>>14194264
Bison trails is literally a backend smart contract company. Why would they get mentioned but not link

>>14194292
His id says 'Bb' at the end, which is the notation for the b-flat note.
b-flat
be flat

You will be flat on the floor from suiciding so much if you sell now.

>>14194265
so how do i make money off of this? facebook stock?

>>14194236
Because they will forever be known as linkies, but at least they will die richer than if they held

>>14194325
Because the names listed in OP's pic are investors in Libra. They all bought nodes.
https://www.theblockcrypto.com/2019/06/14/facebooks-cryptocurrency-partners-revealed-we-obtained-the-entire-list-of-inaugural-backers/

>>14194163
Yes I do. Interesting.

>>14194438
Perhaps, but the other thing that doesn’t seem to make sense to me is if coinbase is running a node, why wouldn’t chainlink have already been listed on coinbase?

if bsv is fb partner i will kill myself if dubs i video

>>14194505
>if coinbase is running a node, why wouldn’t chainlink have already been listed on coinbase?
I was talking about Libra nodes, not Chainlink nodes.
All those parties bought Libra nodes.

Another source:
https://medium.com/@johnsmithen93/facebook-finally-secures-dozens-of-investors-for-libra-but-aims-for-more-98817e73c05c
>Facebook finally secures dozens of investors for Libra

You forgot zil. Not even joking.

Did linkers seriously think Facebook would use a coin that finally just launched a buggy barely usable mainnet like 3 weeks ago?

>>14194522
>kek wills it
>z+q
>Vision
>5am

>>14194545
No but coinbase must know about link being used if it is

Why wouldn’t they have listed it as a tradeable crypto on their platform already?

>>14193880
>>14193897
>>14193918
>Coindesk article specifically calls it a partnership..

Somehow "not a partnership"

>>14194667
Like I said, I'm not claiming Chainlink has anything to do with Libra.
But the listing thing does not imply anything.

>>14194617
Google did just that, lmao.

>>14193729
this list was leaked, not announced.

>>14193880
>>14193897
>>14193918
cope

>>14193880
>>14193897
>>14193918
>Coindesk article specifically calls it a partnership..

Somehow 'not a partnership'

>>14194819
>guys the website that ran ads for bitconnect said this is going to be huge so it's definitely not a scam

Don't so this to yourself. Take profit while you can.

>>14195327
Why wouldn't they run ads paid for by Bitconnect?

>>14194438
I don't think BisonTrails bought a node for 10 mil. They only received 5.25mil in funding: https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchain-startup-bison-trails-receives-525-mln-investment-backed-by-galaxy-digital

>>14194819
>They are working with money movers SWIFT as well as database company Oracle
Where did they get Oracle from?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5-i_ZDH_BE

>>14194667
Coinbase doesn't get to do whatever it wants. Sergey must allow it to be listed and it also has to be legal in the US since Coinbase is a US-based company.
It's too early for LINK to be listed without the risk of being labeled a security

>>14195363
Don't think all you want, this is the information we have now.

>>14195363
Hilarious.

>everyone on biz: “yes they bought a node for mode than 10 million “
>only 5.25 mil in funding

Sub $1 eow

>>14195327
I had an internship at one of the most popular crypto news sites, fact-checking isn't that much of a thing

>>14195445
wow, finally watched the video, this is real

>>14195363
Source on the 10 mil node buy-in?

>>14195735
Literally posted everywhere brainlet

>>14195773
what?

>>14195783
Just google libra reserve, they are charging $10 mil to run a node

>>14195803
Nothing about 10 mil being the minimum.

>>14195824
https://bitcoinist.com/visa-paypal-10-million-run-facebook-coin-node/

Stfu

>>14193856

Yes, the team even listed google in their official partners database

>>14195868
Again, that's just what those parties say they'll pay.

>>14195445
Just now realizing, this is my last week of waging.

>>14193871

Lol the deluded linkies don’t care they just want to pump and dump vaporware bags

>>14194212

ITS A STABLECOIN FUCKING DELUDED LINK FAGGOTS

>>14196100
>vaporware
cope

>>14195880
No it’s not. It’s the minimum mentioned in multiple articles. I’m not going to spend time looking it up but it’s mentioned everwhere as the minimum

>>14196232
>No it’s not.
Except it LITERALLY is.

Headline from your own link:
>VISA, PAYPAL SAY THEY’LL PAY $10 MILLION TO RUN ‘FACEBOOK COIN’ – REPORT

>>14196212

Circle the wagons to protect your scam

>>14196279
So Google is protecting the scam that is Chainlink?

>>14196292
I want in on the google scam

>>14196292

No you are

>>14196323
I'm making Google protect the scam that is Chainlink?

>>14196256
https://bitcoinist.com/facebook-crypto-nodes-10-million-globalcoin/


https://www.washingtonpost.com/pb/business/facebooks-answer-to-bitcoin-poses-a-double-threat/2019/06/17/9becc67c-9108-11e9-956a-88c291ab5c38_story.html?nid=menu_nav_accessibilityforscreenreader&outputType=accessibility&utm_term=.515ae80fc8d3

Go FUCK yourself pajeet

>>14196340
>reportedly
k

>>14196178
Are you a brainlet? Of course it is a stable coin. That's not the point, the point is that they will use it and a partnership with mastercard/Visa to link your transactions with your Facebook profile, creating the largest Big Data marketing in history. To do this they will need to bring all off-chain transactions from credit card companies onto their blockchain. That is why this is a big deal for ChainLink.

>>14194179
it is very easy to tell you have gotten into crypto at most 1-2 years ago.

>>14196382
No retard, that’s not how chainlink could be used here. The way it could be used is for the PEG

>>14193751
incorrect, Google does not integrate Chainlink, and never will. That blog post literally says nothing about Google using Chainlink. Stop spreading lies to pump your useless bags.

>>14196444
>That blog post literally says nothing about Google using Chainlink.
see >>14196212

It literally shows Google Cloud running a Chainlink node.

>>14194212
>>14194357
christ you are definitely the normie here, leave this website

>>14193935
unironically this

>>14196403
Wrong.

>>14196444
just stop

>>14193856
They actually didn't announce anything. It was not an announcement. They neither integrate nor partner. They literally just made a blog post about some of the interesting use cases of BigQuery, their own product.

They are not integrating. They are not partnering. When will linkies stop lying? It's pretty fucking transparent and desperate.

>>14195466
that sounds like a legit decentralized ecosphere you got there.

>>14194819
kek, you realize that you can get anything written on coindesk for around 5k right? The only source in the article is the blog post, and the blog post is 100% clear that is it NOT a partnership and NOT an intergration. There is 0% doubt in the post at all.

>>14196541
It's sad how visiblty desperate nolinkers are now that LINK is approaching $2

>>14196462
no. It shows a random marketing guy at Google running a node, and posting about it. Google is not running a node. Some random marketing guy who writes blog posts for Google is.

>>14196625
Not sad at all. What's sad is the hundred of Linkies who actually believe this is a partnership, or that Google is using Chainlink, when the blog post clearly says otherwise.

>>14196707
really cringe
I know you own link and are fudding
it's sad

>>14196382

WHY THE FUCK DO THEY NEED CHAINLINK TO DO THAT YOU MONGREL KILL URSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!!’n

holo is implement facebooks GraphQL and is the only platform that can handle the large tps needed

>>14193729

Libra is an association right? Since Facebook is a partner.

Libra is autonomous, how autonomous from Facebook in what legal framework?

>>14196730
kek, nice argument. Everyone reading this thread just sold Link cause I proved that it's not a partnership, and that you have nothing to refute it.

>>14196807
lmao yeah good job nigger we already said it wasn't, it's an integration for GOOGLE'S BIGQUERY CHAINLIN NODE

suck a cock you fucking loser, sad thing is you probably have like a 10k stack

>>14196707
>It shows a random marketing guy at Google running a node
Pretty sure it says "Cloud Platform", lmao.

Also, pretty sure this is the official Google Cloud twitter account: >>14194803

>>14196807
>everyone in this thread sold link because i proved i'm a retard faggot
lmao forgot to address this

>>14196794
kek you non-programmers are so fucking retarded. I work with GraphQL daily, am I a Facebook partner? Give me 10mil.

You don't have a shred of understanding of any of the tech you talk about, you all think that using a public product like big query === partnership.

Truly pathetic.

>>14196862
Read the blog post. It says that someone could use both Chainlink and BigQuery together if they wanted. It does not say that or imply in ANY way that Google is using Chainlink, integrating, or partnering. They are literally just demonstrating a use case of their own product to market it.

But you're too stupid to comprehend any of that. I'm talking to the people with money reading this who are selling their bags after I've just proven it's not a partnership.

>>14196925
>Read the blog post. It says that someone could use both Chainlink and BigQuery together if they wanted.
Yes, Google Cloud said that.
Showing this image: >>14196212
featuring Google Cloud's own Chainlink node.

cope

>>14196940
no, the image does not demonstrate Google's node. It demonstrate a Google customer's running a node. Google does not run a node. Google sells BigQuery. But you are too stupid to understand this. Smart people are reading how I am BTFO all your arguments and proving beyond a doubt that this is not a partnership. Keep bumping the thread, you're just making more people sell.

>>14196994
The "Chainlink node" in that image falls under the "Cloud Platform" section, and has the "Cloud Platform" color.

cope

>>14197007
yes, a customer of Google Cloud, like me for example, a developer, not a retard like you, is running a Chainlink node, on my Google Cloud Server. I rent the server. I rent Big Query, I run the node, on Google Cloud.

The fact that you think this is a partnership, just proves how little you know about tech and how low your IQ is.

Guess what else I'm running on Google Cloud, my own apps. Is Google integrating my apps? Am I a partner of Google? No. I am a customer of Google. The only person running a node in this image, is a customer of Google. Not Google itself.

Keep em coming, I love BTFO all your argument, destorying any credibility you have and making everyone with a brain dump their Link.

>>14197089
>yes, a customer of Google Cloud, like me for example, a developer, not a retard like you, is running a Chainlink node, on my Google Cloud Server.
That's what integration is, yes.

>The fact that you think this is a partnership
Stop using chinky definitions of words.

>>14197127
No, an integration would mean that they provide an automated way to run a node. For example AWS has Ethereum node integration, they have official images with Eth nodes ready to go.

This blog post, is clearly not an integration. It's literally just some marketing guy at google being like, "hey look at this, this is is a pretty cool way to use our product", while carefully making sure to not endorse it in any way, because it's not a partnership or integration.

You can run anything on Google cloud. It's not an integration. I can run my own apps that I make in my basement. It is not an integration at all.

How does it feel being outclassed and getting BTFO over and over?

>>14197202
You're rationalizing.

Google Cloud officially introduced Chainlink integration to the world at large.
Cope from there.

>>14197226
No, you are. I literally proved with facts that it's not an integration. You have no arguments. You are not a developer and have low IQ. You simply lack the context to understand what integration, partner, or what even is Google Cloud, whereas I use Google cloud every single day.

>>14197251
No, you're using semantics to reduce the significance of the Google Cloud announcement.

>>14196884
>>14197089
>>14197251
>I proved with facts
>didn't prove anything besides he's a retarded faggot
I see you've learned from the jews, just say the opposite of reality and maybe someone will buy it.

GOOGLE BIGQUERY CHAINLINK NODE
sucks to suck cuck

>>14197286
>Google Cloud announcement.
it's literally not an announcement. Read the blog post. also kek at how pathetic your last few posts have been. Anyone with money reading this thread definitely dumped their bags. I have completely destroyed any credibility you and other Linkes had.

>>14197329
>it's not a partnership!
>it's not an integration!
>it's not an announcement!
Time for your schizo pills.

>>14197329
>Hey linkies, my name is John, and I hate every single one of you

>>14194216
If they were to use Chainlink, they would not "accumulate" it through an exchange. Why would they? That is probably what the 650M LINK reserve is for.

I'm still not saying that Libra wouldn't use Chainlink.

>>14197329
like woah dude yeah you got people to sell their bags and dump the price up another 2 cents, thanks please get more people to sell their bags

>>14196725
>cope
>cringe
>no linkie

>>14196444
Kys. Everything you said is false.

>>14193776
Kek

>>14193729
imagine the selfies

>>14193729
Do not fuckin buy this garbage, do you really want to own a jewkerberg coin? That's the opposite of free

>>14198415
Kekd