/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14073801
Why not $10k ?
Pompeet !

Nano is Green (Like my IDs)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JChBTohSHlM

>anon
>nano

nano is cooked, flip it over

I wish. I have 1500 NANO, I just want to make it someday.

>>14074068
nice,
bought 100k

>>14074068

If there ever was to be a cryptocurrency embedded into the chans, the decentralized, free, and instant ability of nano makes it easily the best choice. /biz/raeli's were posting about raiblocks way before most anyone else knew of it also.

Makes one think.

>>14074292
/biz/ was balls deep in XRB and now calls NANO a redditcoin. The lels.

>>14074442
thats because now its nothing but bagholders and reddit moonboys and the devs dont do anything and the coin was basically a scam. also this coin doesnt do anything either. This shit is the pets.com of crypto

>>14074480
>One of the only working, decentralized, and paradigm shifting cryptocurrencies in the space is a scam

>BTC will never go above $5.00

Back to plebbit you fucking nannie shilltards. You ruined your own shitcoin by shilling it literally every fucking where while it dumped all the way down

>>14074521
He thinks tribalism influences anyone with an IQ above 80

Nano around the world demonstration (live main net, currently in use): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmOtl9H9su8

>>14073801
if the devs manage to make nano resistant to spam while keeping it fast (at least 100 transactions per second), it will easily be worth $100+, lads. Thats the only doubt i have about nano now

>>14075229
see this just posted today:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/bym8v6/announcing_dpow_v3_now_in_beta/

>>14075229
Mind boggling ignorance.
You realise that "if" was the difference between bitcoin and every other failed currency? Were you born in 2009?
You're basically saying "if the (incompetent) nano devs come up with a genius-level industry-defining idea, totally out of the blue, then it will be worth something."
LOL

>>14075247
yep delegated pow is what they think will solve the spam problem. If they do not make nano spam resistant by v22, i will dump my bags at market price.

>>14075247
Actually I think I misunderstood that thread. Dynamic Proof of Work is being released in the V.19 update, which is at 94% completion. I expect we will find out how effective it is in the coming weeks. The team is in London and has a meetup 1 week from now, so I expect the final touches to be worked on shortly after this event is over.

You can learn about Dynamic Proof of Work, and how it can replace fees to prevent spam here: https://medium.com/nanocurrency/dynamic-proof-of-work-prioritization-4618b78c5be9

It kind of works like how captchas here work, except that your device has to perform a small amount of work if you are sending more transactions that the network can handle, at a scaling difficulty based on the amount/load. I imagine there will be some tricks to identify bad actors too, such as sending nano in a loop, or sending .0000001 nano transactions.

Buy the rumor, sell the news. This will pump to 40k sats I am thinking by v.19 release if the network can overcome a spam test. Once we start going up, and TA suggests Nano has one of the largest cup and handles in crypto history, ever, we may very well pull an ETH or LTC.

>>14073801
Im literally ALL IN

>>14075301
Here comes the salty bitch again

At least you recognize the potential, even if you are 98% NaCl.

>>14075301
have you ever noticed that "if" is what differentiates anything successful from anything that proves a failure later? Saying that in hindsight is pretty easy you idiot, but if there is not a single point of doubt or uncertainty about an investment, theres no more money to be made.

I seriously get chills everytime I watch this. Normies will eat it the fuck up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JChBTohSHlM

>>14074068
>anon
>nona

Some more tasty tid bits... combine this archived thread with the screenshot of Charlie Lee responding to questions about Nano and Coinbase. His response was give it 2 years, a little over 1 year ago. Tick tock...

>>/biz/thread/8704162

>>14075404
>understandable, but the proof is written clearly between the lines. that's all this space is... speculation and theory. unless you managed to hack some shit and gain access to classified information. I prefer to go the more traditional investigative route by connecting dots, which I've seem to be pretty damn good at. The way to thrive in survival is by being the best at not being seen, so instead of drawing attention to myself-- I clue you fucks in. Call me whatever you want. Makes no difference to me, you don't even exist in my mind-- you're an elaborate illusion drummed up by my own imagination so I don't realize how alone I really am in this life/world. Go find a reason why Nano experienced such volume on the 25th of February, was it the coinbase tweet? Probably not because it would've happened instantaneously on the day it was posted, the volume run up did not happen until DAYS after the news released. There is ONE OTHER TIME THIS SAME EXACT POINT FOR POINT SITUATION HAPPENED-- Bitcoin Cash. Massive, upon massive amounts of volume surged days or weeks(can't remember) before the announcement, for literally no reason, exactly like nano experienced. And then they were investigated(still are) for insider trading. So if you have a fucking brain, you'll realize what Coinbase did here to protect themselves from FURTHER insider trading claims. They posted the news first, then the volume after. With Bcash it was volume first, news after.