/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14048751
HOLY FUCKING SHIT.

They had a year to accumulate. A fucking year.

>>14048751
Timestamp:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cNmGrLPoTo&feature=youtu.be&t=161

>muh chainlink
Window's closing bizlets

>>14048751

But Gilbert doesn’t wear the same checked shirt everyday...how can I trust him?

>>14048751
THIS IS NOT A FUCKING DRILL

Everything Should Be Made as Simple as Possible, But Not Simpler - Albert Einstein

Three Lines of Code, Faggots - Gilbert Verdian

>>14049261


“So what we’ve done is instead of just announcing one client and one thing, we’re announcing that we’re working with SIA. So, SIA is leading European payment infrastructure. And what we’re doing with SIA is interconnecting blockchain networks with SIA, and doing settlements, which are central bank settlements, with the central bank in Italy. So what Overledger is doing is we’re actually bringing blockchain and interoperability to all of SIA’s clients, which are 580 banks. So, Overledger could be rolled out to all these institutions, financial services, banks, at scale, and have interoperability to get the benefits of this.”

>>14049150
Yeah i dont like that he seems to have more than one shirt.

Quanties think they are the next TCP/IP to rule the world, yet a proprietary software that you need to pay a license fee for will never be a global international standard.

They think Chainlink can't connect blockchains together... but it can and so can so many other protocols with much more determinism, less trust, and cheaper.

The whole point in using a decentralized backend like a blockchain is to get deterministic services, yet they think using a trusted software to run all your transactions through is logical. In fact, it ruins the entire value proposition.

They think of themselves as the blockchain of all blockchains yet it's proprietary software and you need to pay a license to use. Again, it doesn't make sense to use proprietary software to leverage decentralized backends.

There is also a major problem in their tokenomics model. There is no way of actually knowing how the token is used since everything is negotiated behind closed doors. They say you have to hold it to get a license fee, but how can anyone prove it? They say you pay to sign data like transaction fee but no one can prove that either. There are no on-chain metrics to prove anything unlike all other protocols. For all we know they could be doing a freemium model with these companies to test out to see if they like it.

Then don’t get me started about Shillbert always hyping up the coin and nothing to show. There is zero transparency about what is actually going on since the whole project is not an open protocol. They should just be an STO and it would make a lot more sense.

>>14049409
>nothing to show
SIA
Central banks
Nice pasta tho

>>14049409
Nice copypasta.
That shit worked in LINK threads, but not here.
KYS.