/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14030295
AAAAAAAAAA WHAT IS THIS IT IS GOING TO FAST REEEEEEEEEEE

>>14030311
Checked

>>14030295
LITERALLY DUMPING RIGHT NOW. TARGET 9K SATS

WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT?!

We may very well never go under $1 again boys

>>14030295
HOLY SHIT WERE GOING TO MAKE IT

>>14030295
Jesus, should I buy in? I refuse to miss this and its looking like its not a meme anymore

curse you faggots

A USED CONDOM JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE

Chain Link private reporting for roll call.

>>14030311

I will never own Link just for the simple fact that a bunch of basement dwellers who go REEEEEEEEE are into it

>>14030311
>>14030319
The
SINGULARITY !

>>14030333
Checked

>>14030318
dumping upwards you mean

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>14030339
Imagine being so sad and ruining your own life like this

>>14030339
STAY POOR POO IN THE LOO also: REEEEEEEEEEE

sooooo

why

why are we mooning?

>>14030339
Those REEing neckbeards made millions off BTC and ETH. Guess you shouldn't buy those either.

>>14030339
imagine THIS is the reason you stay poor

PRESS "T" TO THUMBS UP WITH BASED SERGEY

>>14030333
>Meme=bad

derp derp

>>14030399
TTTTTTTTTTT

>>14030333
Just did my first swing trade, made a cool $3.60

later virgins

>>14030386
accord project showcasing docusign contract as well as ibm with hyperledger tech. chainlink literally involved in everything.

>>14030339
Favelanon said the same thing. Poorfags think alike LMAO

>>14030399
T

>>14030339
thanks for showing your low IQ off

>>14030399
T

>>14030427
never swing link you'll get left behind marine

>>14030339
>tfw the autism force field
all according to plan

>>14030332
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>14030454
favelanon does't own link? also, where is the guy?

What is the utility for link?

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>14030295
Dead Cat Bounce

>>14030339
Implying neckbeards didnt get rich off
BTC and ETH

>>14030563
It can be used to buy lambos

>>14030563
when it hits zero it will solve the incel problem via mass suicides

Bullish
>https://www.linuxfoundation.org/press-release/2019/06/linux-foundation-to-host-the-accord-project-to-develop-open-source-framework-for-smart-legal-contracts/

Holy shit it's happening

Money is nice, but is anyone else genuinely excited about the technology? Link will make my anarcho-capitalist cyberpunk utopia come true

It's literally dumping you tards

>>14030295
It’s dumping again you fuckers

>>14030585
Imagine believing this

>>14030606
Not for long, swinglinkers taking profit before they get absolutely justed. Remember this when they are posting and crying about how much Link they lost. They are getting theirs now, give them zero pitty when it happens.

I had 12k LINK but I sold 2k now I only have 10k. I want my 2k LINKs back now.

Quant (qnt) has a CEO who is actually making connections in the real world, leave the biz fantasy world and join the future. Memes are fun but exponential gains are life changing.

>>14030510
Jokes on me my order didnt get filled and now I'm left holding 1k linkies that i dont want

>didnt buy the dip

>>14030339
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>14030598
>I'm in it for the technology

>>14030604
>>14030606
>15 min candle turned red
>dumping
You're the same weak-handed faggots who buy high sell low then post pink wojaks and curse the world

>>14030598
Sorry quixote, but you have another thing coming. link is one of the final pieces to absolute domination of the masses. It will herald the coming era when the elite begin to literally evolve into a seperate species from the populace herd of cattle. Link is your final opportunity to NOT be the cattle.

>>14030693
how much link to not be cattle?

>>14030563
Link makes u pee pee and poo poo

>>14030693
>an economy of decentralized oracles run by a reputation system that punishes people for not providing true, accurate data is the key to global domination
it isn't "global domination" if the people doing the "dominating" are waiting on you hand and foot

>>14030399
T

>>14030558
Hopefully gutted in a ditch

>>14030735
If you don't know the number by now you don't deserve it, cattle.

Rejected hard

>>14030735
if link is as successful as some projections say you could be a millionaire with dozens of link or less but that would require a great deal of adoption and time
more realistically you'd probably need 10s of thousands of link

Thoughts on qnt?

I have 5 link yes im so happy i used my allowance on linky stat stinky !!

>>14030830
>thoughts on giving your money to a scam?
Whatever gives you the kick you need, anon

>>14030332
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>14030768
It is. Cattle are also tended to, all of their needs fulfilled, all medical needs met, fed and watered, they live reasonably comfortable lives to varying degrees, depending on the farm. Until the usefuleness of the cow expires. The lives of human cattle will be exceptionally comfortable, for a time.

>>14030828
I will sit on my 155 links and pray for price jump that will make me millionaire.

>>14030830
everything else is a shitcoin. End of story.

The pump will resume within the next 2 hours, possibly $2 end of day.

>>14030857
imagine you know the next eth and you only managed to get 150 of them

>>14030862
>dude trust me

>>14030858
Everything other than link or everything other than qnt?

>>14030339
Based and bait pilled (9.5/10)

>>14030399
T

>>14030598

When it all collapses, we are either getting a communist, atheist hell-hole or a right-wing theocracy. ((Communism)) and religion are the only ideas people are willing to fight and die for.

Anarcho-capitalism is for degenerates who want the best of both worlds anyways.

>>14030295
It's literally dumping at the moment

if green id and digits we're going to $10 by end of next week

>>14030913
everything other than LINK is a shitcoin end of story

>>14030999
witnesssed

digits say its gonna hit 1000

>>14030948
if brown then link is shit

Here comes the dump.to 80 cents, bye retards and thanks for holding my bags

back to .80 cents we go

>>14031036
>>14031106
>s-sell guys it's going to 80 cents because I just sold

>>14031106
good I need more LINK

>>14031106
Yeah your dick is going back to 0,80 cm

>>14031036
I'm never selling and will never stop buying Smartcontract.com's Chainlink Tokens

Fuck were gonna follow the meme chart aren't we

>>14031248
if true then it's only up from here again

>>14031248
which chart are you referring too? Hit me up

Quick, someone make a chainlink blade runner pic

Look at this shit, the indicators are all set for this cup and handle to fucking explode. J-curve incoming

>>14031307
Psychology of a bubble

>>14031248
>>14031267
>>14031307
>>14032103

Look at the charts the mini cycle already played out.

>>14031036
Lol, silly child.

>>14030862
>2 hours later

I am homosexual and I hold the ethereum token called Chainlink.

this post did not age well

get out of here quick

Marines, why we dumpin?

>>14032954
LOL

>>14030548
I don’t know if im falling for a high quality pasta bait but this is BASED to a large extent.

>>14030591
lol

This is going under appreciated today on #cryptotwitter. @AccordHQ is now THE standard open source legal framework for #smartcontracts. Given #chainlink is the oracle in their software stack, that makes it THE open source standard for decentralized oracles.

>>14034349
too bad it doesn’t affect THE price
how does it feel to be THE biggest faggots on biz

>>14034376
>lets get rich quick go..uys
oy vey

>>14030387
Both of those reached double digits within a couple years. What’s the highest LINK has sold for? $2?

>>14034376

Feels great

>>14034376
Thooooper, thanks for askin.

>>14034402
>BTC reached double digits a couple years after its creation

lmao

Homosex

>>14034444
CZECHED

>>14030339
RRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>14034444
checked

>>14030547
All according to keikaku

who 5min chart here
the most patrician time frame with the most efficient candles

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

Not with that sell wall 270k link at 14700

>>14036095
isn't that bullish as fuck?

>>14030332
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>14035978
You are a MANIAC!!!

do i put $100 into link or something like phx, hot, or one? i have link holds but i don't want to buy at this price

>>14036165
ada

>>14036165
>i dont want to buy the next eth for a dollar
imagine how many people are going to regret this

>>14036176
I even have close friends who watched me get rich off eth and still ignore me. Can't help em though I don't blame them for not being autistic.

>>14036176
fair enough

>>14036176
Honestly, if I hadn't bought all of my LINK at 30-45 cents I would want to kms right now.

>>14035978
This

>>14034402
10k is highest so far. Have you not been paying attention?

>>14036176
I made sure all of my friends and family got some. My brother didn’t buy in his own so I gave him about 1 LTC worth back when litecoin was over $100 and not a pitiful fucking shitcoin trying pump based off of some faggot supply shock scam. Everyone I know will make money from Link. I refused to be the target of even minor resentment, despite it costing me a little nibble of my stack. Invest in the people you care about even if they’re too lazy/won’t listen. Doing anything else just makes you a bitter austistic virgin who will never be based. Never.

>>14036595

kek

>>14036687
Just enabling the non autists. Shame on you.

>>14036595

unironically this