/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14005965
>BSV goes up when every other coin goes down
hmmmm

>>14005965
Fuck off

>>14005980
It can only mean one thing......
.....
.....
.....
...
>scam
>faketoshi
>calbin waaaaaayre
>pajeet!

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA feel bad yet? just the beggining

>>14005980
Hahahaahahahahaahahahahahahahaah

>>14006118
based satoshi literally inventing energy-conserving space-time warping on the down low to ensure faster TX time for BSV (true bitcoin)

>>14005965

KYS

>>14005965

>>14006102

The power of Corecuckery

Is this you, faggot

LOL

>>14005965
Hearty kek to those worshipping that dinosaur coin.

140 billion Mcap vs 4 billion... yeah let’s laugh at btc

>>14006132
Btc magazine. What an unbiased source.kek. try harder

>>14006216
I btfo this hearsay yesterday. Get new material you pathetic cunt.

>>14006240
any arguments against any of the points instead of ad hominem?

>>14006258
No you didn't pajeet

>>14006284
Yes, you just don't know it because you have the brain capacity of a slug.
>it's hear say
>NOooo it's not, it says right here on this jpg that someone said creg would send them monry back and he didn't
>yes, that's called hearsay anon, not evidence.
>pajerrt you so dumb it's literally right here in this JPG hahaha

>>14006334
>it's hearsay in a court of law therefore he's satoshi
cool logic

>>14006348
Fucking hell, you really are simple. Contrary to what you may believe not everyone thinks a fucking image off the internet is sufficient to prove something.
>it's hearsay in a court of law therefore it doesn't prove he's not satoshi
Get checked mate, you're on the wrong side of the IQ bell curve.

Pic related is from a NASDAQ press release about a 300m dollar investment into squire. These people do their due diligence before making calls like that. Squire does its due diligence before appointing people as advisors and if i walked up to either or them and dumped your "trove of evidence" on them they'd burst out lasting. Get with the real world cunt.

Related link though i don't expect you to read it. https://www.yours.org/content/on-the-satoshiness-of-dr-craig-s-wright-6d80f2050fe1

>>14006102

thanks for all the pics, pajeets gonna pajeet, fuck them.

craig pajeet wright isnt satoshi and he never will

>>14006661
>Samefagging this hard to try validate your pathetic effort

>>14005980
That's what Bitcoin always does, anon.

>>14006170
>when the cope has it's own musical number

>>14006570
Bumping to show blockstream shill btfo...again.

>>14007999
>appeal to authority
investing a lot of money doesn't mean the due diligence is correct or even if a factor, if they know retards like you will believe it.

>>14007999
>>14006570
Your argument is basically of the form "well lots of wealthy people gave money to Bernie Madoff so obviously they did their due dilligence on him, therefore Bernie Madoff is legit!"

Pretty fucking stupid.

>>14006238
35x sweeeeet

cant wait for bsv to tank so i can laugh at all you street shitting nigger lovers

>>14008164
No my arugment is that you are using shitty memes from the internet circulated by people with an interest in ensuring bitcoin doesn't scale as your proof he is a fraud. Many other people are building on bsv and making substantial plays to back SV regardless of whether creg is satoj because it can scale. If even one of your shitty pics was true it wouldn't make a shred of difference to the success of BitCoin or to these big businesses onboarding.
Your Bernie Madoff comparison is apples to oranges bruv. I wouldn't expect any better from a pathetic shill such as yourself.

>>14009207
>our Bernie Madoff comparison is apples to oranges bruv
Your argument was quite literally "all these other people have put in a lot of money, so obviously the due dilligence was done!" when money implying due diligence doesn't follow at all (see: Bernie Madoff)

>i-it doesn't matter if he's satoj
lol, this damage control. He lies about being Satoshi, what else is he lying to you about? Dude has been lying and exaggerating his whole life and you think he's going to be honest with you about the tech?

I guess you'll have to learn the hard way. Can't fix stupid. Have fun.

>>14009207
Oh and in b4 >the tech is fine
Top kek BSV cucks are truly delusional

Reorg your life like your shitcoin reorgs itself

>>14009462
Reorgs only matter to miners. I still get my coffee.

>>14005965

>>14006264
That's not ad hominin.
Ad hominin is a personal attack....
I said that source has too many biases with is a valid reason to be skeptical.
Imagine being this dumb..

>>14005965
Imagine not buying the real bitcoin for <$250

>>14009528
>That's not ad hominin.
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/9/Ad-Hominem-Circumstantial

Educate yourself

>>14006102
>>14006118
>>14006132
>>14006146
>>14006188
>>14006202
>>14006216
>>14006236
>>14006247
>>14006264
>>14006284
>>14006348
>>14008039
>>14008164
>>14009389
>>14009462


imagine being so desperate
imagine the smell

>>14009508
>reorgs only matter to miners
The absolute state of BSV tards.

>>14009544
Not an argument.

>>14009550
Tell me how a reorg stops me from receiving my coffee.

>>14009532
When considering your sources of information you always check for biases. It's not the same as avoiding the conversation with a personal shot, or denouncing the character or motives.

A magazine for BTC that makes money off of it is always going to shill for BTC to continue making money and should be looked at skeptically. The reason why I question the motives beyond that was there was no sources in the image posted, just points from a heavily biased source. Therefore my skepticism was valid.
Unessecarily questioning a person's motives due to character or beliefs are a bit different. Nice try

>>14009591
>When considering your sources of information you always check for biases
Not an argument. If you can't criticize the main thrust of the point and all you have to say is "i-it's biased" then your opinion is worthless.

>>14009544
lol, imagine walking around with a dick on your head expecting people to legitimately take you seriously

>>14009573
Deep reorgs put any 0conf and even 1conf transaction at risk of double spend from hostile miners.

But I guess if security of network is worth >muh coffee go ahead

>>14009655
How does a reorg allow for a double spend?

>>14009699
When a chain gets reorged there is no guarantee that the transactions in the replacement chain are the same versions of transactions that were in the chain that got reorged. Especially when it's a deep fucking reorg like 6 blocks (this is what happened in april with BSV) which is a fucking hour+.

transaction 1 in block 1 gets double spent as transaction 2 in block 2. Chain reorgs to block 2 and block 1 gets orphaned. Whoever just accepted block 1 as payment got fucked. Deep reorgs causing double spends have happened on other networks.

The 6-block reorg that happened on BSV wasn't even intentional, just a result of retarded block sizes that are unable to propagate across the network properly. So what happens when someone actually attacks the network, if the network can't even not reorg itself under non-malicious conditions?

>>14009834
That could only theoretically be a problem when you have full blocks and transactions don't make it to the next block. But even then that doesn't allow for a double spend. So no.

>>14009625
kek

imagine how much time he is wasting to stay poor at the end anyways

>>14009857
>That could only theoretically be a problem when you have full blocks. But even then that doesn't allow for a double spend.
Nope, full blocks make it easier but not necessary. Look up finney attacks

>>14009915
That's not a reorg. The attacker is holding back a found block from broadcasting, then attacking, then broadcasting. No reorg occured. The attack only makes sense items greater than a few thousand (likely hundreds of thousands in the near future) at least, otherwise just mining the block is more profitable. Most merchants and services factor this into their 0conf tolerance.

>>14005965
what do you actually know about BSV?

if you can't give me a legitimate answer you're a faggot