/biz/ - Business & Finance

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

>>13995006
He's your typical con man and link is a scam.

You are a MANIAC!

>>13995041
dude... SO ARE YOU
you are in every fucking thread saying the exact same shit

"the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result"

>>13995055
Based insane and deluded marines

But that's wrong. I am not fucking selling. Never. Heard me? Ever!

very interesting man
nobody can just casually get an internship at firstmarkcapital. background, history unknown yet still well connected

Fucking scammer

Reminder that crypto price is no indicator of the well-being of the company that's behind it.

Reminder that cryptos are not stocks.
You're not investing in the company, you're merely trying to profit off them.

Reminder that the opinion of speculators don't and shouldn't matter to the company.

>>13995006
based schizoposter

>>13996236
>I GAVE Chainlink $32m and all I got were these crappy tokens

AHHHHHHHHHHH

>>13995006
based

>>13995265
post the Vitalik one

>>13995006
also hopefully there is no need to remind anons of infamous 'oracle incident'

>>13995265

Based and redpilled

>>13996255
The tokens are not crappy, they are gold sir

https://youtu.be/V1hWPtNjLoQ

>>13995024
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>Nobody knows anything about this guy's past.
actually everyone who's not a zoomer newfag does
he's ran borderline scams in the cryptosphere for a few years, starting with secureAE which was a shitclone of part of a shitcoin (NXT)
basically he's not outright a scammer, but he's not competent either. he's deep inside the ecosystem and uses that knowledge to jump on whatever trend seems popular
the 2017 ICO bubble was obvious, and oracles were a common topic in ethereum spheres, so... there you go

>>13997093

Guys I have a confession... after holding Link for almost 2 years and not selling a single Link I got weak and panicked last night and sold 25% of my stack at the bottom. Around 85 cents... what are the chances I actually sold the bottom? Are we going back to planet 50 or not? I’m worried and I regret my late night drunken decision.

>>13997132
bottom is not in yet, might be a little pump tomorrow because of the news but after the news (which will be nothing), we are going to 60c region.

>>13995055
>>13995133
>>13995311
>>13996255
Kek watching over all LINK threads as usual

>>13995006
It's not funny u guys my best friend keeps getting crushed by wave after wave thinking this will be the moon mission buying more and more at highs and then desperately selling at lows to get his money back to pay rent.

Could simply buy 10k, forget about it for 12-24 months, then become insanely wealthy.

10k bag is 9,000 USD right now. (Got mine for 3,500). How much longer will you wait to get yours?

>>13995265

>>13997621
>intrincate

>>13995006
I hope you went back to bed Sergey, it’s almost time for you to be at the office!