/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13966766
Thinking back after reading that then and again now. He is seriously based

>>13966766
all my linkies are gone wtf

>>13966885
>>13966898
>>13966902
How do we summon that anon?

idk if he'll even contribute anymore after the shitshow in that thread.... I hope anon is out there and comes back to share more

>>13967029
He seemed like he was cool with it all
Come back niggeraidsfaggotcumdumpster

Best part is uncle old fag dropping in. Kek

>>13967196
>>13967324
So basically we hold 3-4 more months and find out if its all true

We will not be able to stake our Links for at least 2 years.

>>13966766
Great thread. So he's predicting SWIFT at end of 2019.

LOL and now I finally get what he was talking about. Read this about PSD2:
>https://www.evry.com/en/news/articles/psd2-the-directive-that-will-change-banking-as-we-know-it/

PSD2 is an open banking initiative that forces banks to allow customers to access & manage their finances through third parties (fintech or companies like Google & Facebook, Mint, or others). According to this anon in the above thread, SWIFT is trying to price them out by making their APIs only available through Chainlink.

By the time it goes live, SWIFT will own 30% of the supply and the LINK price will be high enough to price out a lot of the competition. The banks will get richer in the mean time off their LINK holdings.

>>13969117
This was a major part of 2017/2018 biz figuring out chainlink
I guess this is news to newlinkers?

>>13969216
Yeah. I bought all mine in April this year around $0.48. Too bad for me. At least I have a little more time to accumulate under $2.

>>13969117
>just finding out about PSD2 because spoonfed
>not having to dig through PDFs from EU to figure this out yourself 2 years ago
Nulinkers have it easy. PSYOPS is weak, the FUD is laughable, and everyone is spoonfeeding them. All the marines actually did leave this place.

>>13969331
There were other reasons to be all-in Chainlink not knowing about PSD2. Old rich always resent new rich. Nothing new under the sun

>>13966766
No, he says there will be important link node uses by april. It's june and we have a price ticker.

>>13966766
http://sys.4channel.org/derefer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.swift.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fresources%2Fswift_gpi_link_pr_sdc.mp4

>>13969397
Jesus, they just spell it all out.

>R3 Corda

>>13969526
It was confirmed this swift link gpi has nothing to do with chainlink.

>>13969621
Where was it confirmed?

>another thread reiterating 8+ month old “news”

>>13969331
I follow finretk and his group of friends.

Sadly even reddit has better info at this point.

>>/biz/thread/12912320

>>13969331
Fuck off edgelord

>>13969397
So you're telling me we won't hear the flushing at SIBOS 2019

>>13970367
Sibos is like 10 days after psd2 goes live

>>13970446
Wooohoo, can't wait. September 2019 here we come

>>13969671
Jesus anon, don’t you hear they are working with r3 Corda?

Hahaha I tried to teach you but you didn't listen

True winners win before they get into the field

Holding your neets dick, renting your money, pure luck

>>13966766
Checked

4000 sats or worse by next month. The project is possibly dead in the water after this knowledge.

Sybil attacks are possible since sybil resistance requires KYC or "trustworthy" node operators. Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous". Therefore, since most operators won't want to KYC, LINK will not be sybil resistant.

Now why does RLC make LINK obsolete in this regard? It's simple. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec's dOracles can rely on it instead of KYC for sybil resistance.

Boom. I sold all of my LINK at 1.40 because I knew after RLC v3 dumped, that even LINK would dump.

I will not be buying back after learning this. I am all in RLC at the price of 0.43$, about 0.7x ICO price

Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK was going to save me just like all of us did, but this is the nail in the coffin.

Also this guy

https://yuki.la/biz/13547557

Theres been better, more realistic larpers and you faggots believed drunkfag who has been telling you "mainnet in 1 month and big partnership every month over on over for almost a year"

>>13970904
Corporation <--> r3 Corda <--> gpi Link <--> gpi.

Check this vid: http://sys.4channel.org/derefer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.swift.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fresources%2Fswift_gpi_link_pr_sdc.mp4

>>13969397
hes saying they are using r3. The competition of chainlink

>>13971401
r3 is not an oracle network, it's a blockchain. May have oracle capabilities, but not everyone who wants to settle payments through SWIFT uses r3. The SWIFT gpi Link is blockchain/DLT agnostic as the guy in the video explains.

>>13971000
>>13970829
Coward

>>13971479
Im not sure i understand where your going with this. So never the less, you guys think chainlink will be used by swift instead of r3 corda. Never heard of r3 until today, so im kind of in the dark here.

>fud when chain stink is above a dollar
>bring out hopium when chain stink is below a dollar
>pump and dump ad infinitum
it's all so tiresome /biz/

>>13971339
>>13971401
>>13971520
Corda is an execution layer like eth but permissioned
Link is the oracle network that lets corda know how many euros per dollar at the time of the transfer
Its on their damn slides

>>13967029
He was quite a good man, and from good family stock. It is too bad he is unlikely to return

>>13969117
SWIFT wil own 30% of the supply and
why the fuck does link price price out the competition? if one thing we know by now it's that price doesn't matter for users

dream on

>>13971592
Thanks for clearing it up mate, cherio

>>13971712
Api calls to member banks customers data will cost 4usd payable in link
Member banks will of course receive free api calls in keeping with their commitments to swift
Retard

>>13972017
so these challenger banks are unable to challenge banks because swift holds 30% of the link supply and .. ?

>>13972106
Read ops linked thread
This means all the fintechs looking to use psd2 to sidestep legacy banks may get proper fucked

>>13969117
>SWIFT is trying to price them out by making their APIs only available through Chainlink.
What data do Swift have to sell?

>>13972017
>Api calls to member banks customers data will cost 4usd payable in link
>>13972017
How the fuck can API CALLs be decentralised with LINK?

>>13972774
Payments messages
>>13972794
Calls come from a decentralized node network

>>13969380
There were a couple of critical issues brought up by one of the audits. Probably delayed due to that and other issue not visible to us peons.

>>13966766
If I had to guess, based anon is Sergey himself.
>I've already made it, even if Link goes to 0.
Confirmed Sergey is Satoshi Nakamoto.

>>13971309
this guy was way closer. nailed it all including the blog post which was strangely specific.

>>13966885
The Chainlink thing is a meme, it's a lottery, some vagainas are like that too.
My mom for example has a pussy like a baby, you can't see the labia
Yet my sister has a big labia even when she was a virgin
Same as the "uncut dicks smell" thing
I am cut and mine smells in just two days of not showering while my the dick of my father, who only showers once a week, never smells

>>13966766

Wow, that anon was on point with his larping. Wish they could visit us again. Would be great to get an update.

>>13971339
>Sir gay was only allowed to shake hands with the downie

>>13971339
why do i get the sense that after this event, sergey was initiated into the globopedo elite with a ritualistic child sacrifice behind those fake opera seats?

>>13973734
My guess too. Sergey is insider larper.

I'm all in and will kill myself in 2 years if I'm not rich by then. Who else depressed?

>>13975643
He probably was
Guess we are on the bad guys' team this time
At least they are profitable

>>13974846
How do you know how your fathers dick smells like?

>>13966766
Damn. That's a spicy larp. 10/10

Gay Niggers From Outer Space 9.

>>13970904
Chainlink can connect to R3, you dunce.

>>13969117
If this goes all as planned then I suspect the same legislators will eventually do something to try to hamstring Link
The question then is what will they do and how long will it take?

Can someone just please tell me unironically if I will make more than a 5X off this by next year? I don't even care about moon missions I just don't want to be a bagholder but all signs point to yes.

Also I wanted to run my own node, hopefully we get to do this later without KYC

>>13976562
Whats peoples issues with kyc? Tax avoidance?

>>13976577
Well it's not really that big of a deal to me, sounds like a pain in the ass to "interview" though

>>13976594
In all likelihood you have worms, pajeet. Get your asshole checked out and the interview will be a cool Mumbai breeze.

>>13976562
Did you actually read Sergey's mainnet blogpost?

>At the time of Chainlink’s launch on Ethereum, we will have multiple technically reviewed and sybil resistant nodes listed in our documentation. Over the coming weeks and months, our goal is to add more high quality node operators through a continually evolving/improving process. Node operators that prefer not to undergo a full technical review or sybil resistance/identity verification will of course also be included in the Chainlink network.

>>13976694
Based rare color.
But wont it just mean that the non kyc nodes will have less reputation than the kyc ones(those being older)?

>>13976562
Google PSD2 and then make a point of checking what date all EU financial institutions need to be compliant. You dumb nigger animal.

>>13977042
>>13977014
>>13976694
>>13976609
Thanks

im scared whats going to happen?

>>13976577
the people who have an issue with it are fudding terminal autists