/biz/ - Business & Finance

Yep we’re all schizophrenic

go build something

>>13956289
the thing is sergey never has to announce them, chainlink is a backend infrastructure that nobody needs to know about. we are lucky if the partner themselves announces it cause you well know that chainlink aint fucking announcing shit.

>>13956332
oh sweet anon... i...

>>13956370
oh summer child..i...

>>13956370
But they are being announced next week.... r...r...right?

>>13956332

>scammed by larpers, the oldest trick in the book

>>13956289
Trust the process

>>13956332
Chainlink gives competitive edge for businesses think they will still announce partnerships? If I was looking for a competitive edge I wouldn't announce to my competitor's

>>13956289
4000 sats or worse by next month. The project is possibly dead in the water after this knowledge.

Sybil attacks are possible since sybil resistance requires KYC or "trustworthy" node operators. Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous". Therefore, since most operators won't want to KYC, LINK will not be sybil resistant.

Now why does RLC make LINK obsolete in this regard? It's simple. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec's dOracles can rely on it instead of KYC for sybil resistance.

Boom. I sold all of my LINK at 1.40 because I knew after RLC v3 dumped, that even LINK would dump.

I will not be buying back after learning this. I am all in RLC at the price of 0.43$, about 0.7x ICO price.

Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK was going to save me just like all of us did, but this is the nail in the coffin.

>>13957203

how is the token price gonna rise to meet the required collateral price if they don't publicise they are using the network?

>>13957212
Give up privacy or get sybil'd, my cucks.

>>13956289
Unfortunately all the partners thought it would provide useful functionality to them, but instead got an ethereum price checker. They said it was a fundamental miscommunication with the team, and wanted to reconsider future work with chainlink.

>>13956289
Everything was a lie. The “marines” all dumped and left. The end.

how's a partnership with the Italian government sound?

>>13957404
Sounds like sweet little lies

>>13957404
That’s would mean something if they were the AUSTROHUNGARIAN EMPIRE, but a bunch of literal who city states isn’t going to change anything
-linklet’s and Garabaldi BTFO

>>13957404

LOL we are officially quant shitcoin tier

>>13956289
Not gonna lie, former Chainlink node operator here. This is fucking hilarious watching Sergey crash and burn. But in all seriousness we can't let this guy get the a hold of json parser

> Sergey used sybil attack!
> It's super effective!

>>13956289
>We have not partnered with ChainLink, they are only using our public API to query data
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh boi