/biz/ - Business & Finance

I'll give you the short answer.

>its not LINK

>>13908959
Baguette’d

>>13908959
It never gets digits like Link

>>13908959
>what went wrong?
ur dad didn't pull out

>>13908959
> meme keywords "ai, gpu, decentralized"
> meme fuzz
> meme fake partnerships
> meme memes
Op do you realize it was a fucking scam?

>>13908959
Frenchinked

>>13908959
Nothing went wrong. This is bigger than LINK.
Wait for volume increase and buy against the bottom. Strictly in that order.

>>13909000
based and redpilled, nice trips!

>>13909000
Digits don't impress me. Anyone can script for em.

>>13909022
>meme this meme that
>fake partnerships
weak fud

>>13909039
>This is bigger than LINK.
I know.

>>13908959
What went wrong is that they aren't building products which are useable or have any benefit over traditional clouds. They have a nice research project going, but its nowhere near production quality because they half-ass everything just to keep onto their "awesome" schedule. Ask yourself why the sdk has been available for 2 years now, and there is 0 people using it other than trying out the hello-world tutorial. 0 users over 2 years on mainnet with close to 100M in funding (current eth prices) should tell you everything you need to know about this project.

>>13909116
> Dropped 50%
> litteral scam
> calls "fud"
kys pajeet

>>13908959
Don't know, but at this point I assume that the market and deeper insiders consider this coin garbage and they do not take it serious, which is a drill to stay away from it. Maybe. Ipotesys

>>13909139
>What went wrong is that they aren't building products which are useable or have any benefit over traditional clouds.
it has great advantages over centralized solutiions, being decentralized you have not to build the datacenter structure
Maybe the latency can be a problem, but with 5g is not

>>13909139
>or have any benefit over traditional clouds.
False. Cheaper costs. General decentralization benefits. First time decentralized cloud computations can be verified. World first decentralized energy marketplace. No central point of failure. Companies can use iExec on the backend for computations. Companies can monetize datasets. Companies can monetize AI, and robotics.

>Ask yourself why the sdk has been available for 2 years now, and there is 0 people using it
Well for one, there are definitely people using it. You can see it on the pools yourself. Secondly, the sdk was out before mainnet so I don't know what you mean.

>>13909189
>5gFaxmPw
>5g
5G infrastructure confirmed for RLC adoption catalyst.

>>13909189
>5g
I love that iExecies always love to throw around buzzwords "muh smart cities", "muh 5g". It has nothing to do with that, the gas costs alone are higher than what anyone would ever pay for a task, their software is nowhere near able to handle high loads (I participated in both workerdrops), everything literally needs to be up & downloaded for every task, which makes machinelearning impossible because datasets are too big. Also it does not allow in-deterministic applications to run, precluding most of the interesting stuff. Their software is buggy, and the whole concept sounds nice but in detail it is not feasible on a larger scale.
If you ever think the token price will be change through adoption in the next years, think about how many tasks have to be completed per second. Add to that the absolute shit-tier tokenomics of the token and you are holding a big turd. Just admit, you got swayed by the big promises of gilles & co, but they don't care about token value. They are researchers and are pursueing a nicely funded research operation with very little bearing to what the business actually needs and wants.

>>13909261
>the gas costs alone are higher than what anyone would ever pay for a task
imagine thinking this is how it works

> another FUCKING RLC SHILL THREAD
Omg, this is embarassing

>>13909211
>World first decentralized energy marketplace

I thought POWR and SunContract are doing this already.

>>13909292
Not the same thing.

>>13909211
>Well for one, there are definitely people using it
If you are talking about the 5 RLC tasks, those are just spammed by the team to appease node holders. Look up in the explorer and you will see that it is always the exact same task, the team also admitted it.

>Secondly, the sdk was out before mainnet so I don't know what you mean.

That no one is even using their testnet with FREE computation. If no one is using that, why on earth would someone pay money to run on mainnet.

>False. Cheaper costs
The task has to be run 3 times for verification. Its not cheaper.

All the other points you are mentioning are just stuff that iExec has implemented very poorly to tick off their bucketlist and show off to their academic mates. I bet you haven't tried to use any of their stuff, or else you wouldn't be bragging about it.

>>13909261
>their software is nowhere near able to handle high loads (I participated in both workerdrops), everything literally needs to be up & downloaded for every task, which makes machinelearning impossible because datasets are too big
what are you referring to when you say ''everything needs to be updated'' ?
Example: you have a dataset, what do you have update and download?

>>13909316
>those are just spammed by the team to appease node holders
Shit fud.
>Look up in the explorer and you will see that it is always the exact same task, the team also admitted it.
Elaborate fud. You are trying very hard.

>That no one is even using their testnet with FREE computation. If no one is using that, why on earth would someone pay money to run on mainnet.
Are you a year behind? We're on v3 now. Mainnet. Shit's done and being used with real $RLC. You think all of a sudden thousands of people are going to start using a new crypto tech that doesn't have any real dapps yet? You're delusional. It's being used by mostly dapp devs and hobby miners.

>The task has to be run 3 times for verification. Its not cheaper.
It doesn't have to be run 3 times for verification. It is cheaper.

>All the other points you are mentioning are just stuff that iExec has implemented very poorly to tick off their bucketlist and show off to their academic mates.
Shit fud.
Troll detected, disregarding future posts.

>>13909367
You want to run a machine-learning model on dataset X. To do this, the model and the dataset have to be uploaded to all the nodes. Most deep-learning datasets are 10Gb+. Nodes are chosen at random, so you would need to re-upload many times. The time it takes to do all this is already longer than the current maximum time for a task (1h I think).

>>13909392
you can literally verify what I said in 10 seconds but you choose to call it fud. Seething bagholder detected. Have fun with your poverty.

>>13909415
False.

>>13909443
Post proof then. I bought under ICO. Nice try.

>>13909462
Wow that was hard. 5RLC tasks every hour to the same shitty price-feed dapp. This is what the mainnet usage looks like at the moment. No-one except the team would pay fucking 5RLC to get the price of eth lol.

>>13909415
dont argue with shills. They're literally NPCs

>>13909415
Again, with 5g will be much faster
>>13909447
>False
Can you elaborate?

>>13909486
Sorry, cut out the headers

>>13909495
> thinking that someone would upload a deep-learning dataset over their 5g mobile connection
the state of RLC shills.

Anyway, I'm outta here. Have fun with your bags. Maybe one day you will realize you are being duped.

>>13909486
>This is what the mainnet usage looks like at the moment
That's one pool. Also most likely a proof of concept/test. Also, v3 just came out you can't seriously expect there to be a ton of people using it. It will take time for things to develop and gain adoption.

Also, here's the real stats you fucking faggot

active workers: 87
active worker last day: 113
active cores: 286
completed tasks: 586
running tasks: 29

KYS

>>13908959
Just because they're "working with" IBM doesn't mean they aren't scuzzy street shitters.

>>13909539
Yea surely this means nothing and is fake.

>>13909316
>Look up in the explorer and you will see that it is always the exact same task, the team also admitted it.
This is just not true. The mainnet is not brimming with tasks but is alive and kicking.
>That no one is even using their testnet with FREE computation.
Not correct. Are you looking at Ropsten, instead of Kovan?
>The task has to be run 3 times for verification. Its not cheaper.
How do you mean?
You can select a task execution category or just cap the amount of gwei for it.

>>13909558
>Yeah surely Lydia Shafer talking about Komodo means nothing and is fake

>>13909569
He's literally making elaborate sounding shit up as fud because everyone knows you literally can't fud iExec.

>>13909538
lmao, you know that the https://explorer.iex.ec/mainnet shows all tasks on mainnet, right?

Those stats mean shit, if all the tasks are spammed by the team. "It will take time" Suuure, if what the anon said is true and there are no actual users since over a year, it will take a truly long time. So maybe 1 user by 2022, 2 users by 2024 and in 2026.. well funds ran out.
RLCtards are the worst and most defensive bagholders of all. Shows that they know deep in their core that the project is shit and are just trying to unload their bags.

>>13909116
>>13909039
>"iexec is bigger than Link!"
Then why did iexec have to literally lie to make themselves seem bigger than Link?

>>13909607
>lie to make themselves seem bigger than Link
imagine having to lie to make yourself seem bigger than another literally-who project

>>13909588
>Those stats mean shit, if all the tasks are spammed by the team
That's funny because they clearly aren't.
>Suuure
Cope detected
> if what the anon said is true and there are no actual users since over a year, it will take a truly long time
v3 hasn't' even been out for a month you stupid faggot

You're clearly fudding now. KYS.

>>13908959
you do realize in USD terms it is up over 130% this year?

>>13909539
> Iexec got hired from IBM to do some shit task, like they do with dozens of companies.
> No one speaks about fucking "rlc".
> Iexec scammers claim they have "big parnersip sirs mooning"
> They steal money from fools dumping this "digital nothing"
> They pay pajeets to shill on retard boards and scam other morons
> Since this is not a regulated market, they get away with it
This is it

>>13909607
Because iExec makes link obsolete with a sideproject. It was just easy bait. Like a bully picking on you in highschool. Sorry if that brought back memories.

>>13909648
Yeah but incredibly undervalued for what it is.
I guess I should just stop shilling here and stealth accumulate each bottom.
>>13909650
pajeet tier fud
we need flags on biz

>>13909569
show me one task on the explorer that is not a 5RLC team spammed task.

Ropsten testnet is being used to test by the team, and maybe once in a while also someone else. But if it were actually used by people, you would see many tasks per second, not just one every few hours or so. And thats for free computation.

>>13909667
>14 posts by this ID

I assume you're hired to shill this and are paid cents per hour? What third world shithole you in?

Nothing went wrong. Price is literally meaningless until v5 is out. Don't worry, this is the amazon of blockchain.

>>13909667
lol,
There is big potential but at this Market cap now... not much opportunity.
It also has its faults, just look at this thread not everything is pure FUD.
I would look else where if you want to make it.

>>13909685
Slippery slope and admitting defeat.
Hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahah

>>13909653
If you flat-out lie for everyone to see, you're just bullying yourself.

>>13909703
Why do you think the future potential success of a project and the current market cap of its tokens are correlated?

>>13909703
>There is big potential but at this Market cap now... not much opportunity.
Literal what lmao the fud is getting retarded now.
>>13909706
First to call someone a liar is usually lying themselves.

>>13909724
>First to call someone a liar is usually lying themselves.
Fucking lmao.
Imagine unironically posting this.

>>13909705
you are claiming victory because the testnet was used once or twice for a hello-world tutorial ? Literally everything the anon said about iExec is correct and you are just screaming FUD!!! You poor soul. How does it feel to be going mental over an investment in a shitcoin ?

>>13909732
Fucking lmao.
Imagine calling someone a liar on an underwater mongolian basket weaving forum.

>>13909745
Getting paid by the post, are you?

>>13909739
>"muh it's not being used by anyone!"
>"o-o-ok anon maybe some people are using it..."
fucking retard LOL

>>13909739
> Same imbecile shilling an already dumped pnd scam over and over
Neck yourself Gilles

>>13909755
Are you literally doing a victory dance because someone did the hello world tutorial on testnet?

Are you retarded? How's the bag doing?

>>13909756
link is dumping, i bet you're salty

how hard you get JUST'd OP?

>>13909761
> same imbecile faking a lame rlc-link competition in every shill thread to draw attention on its worthless scamcoin
neck yourself gilles

>>13909760
>86 workers
must be the entire iExec teams family
literal 20 iq faggot retards LOL

>>13909775
salt detected
https://iex.ec/decentralized-oracles/
>https://iex.ec/decentralized-oracles/
https://iex.ec/decentralized-oracles/
>https://iex.ec/decentralized-oracles/
https://iex.ec/decentralized-oracles/

>>13909769
Hard enough to bear a grudge, apparently.
Too bad he's directing that grudge away from iexec, while they're the ones who fucked themselves over.

>>13909793
If you read the rest of the thread I said where I bought in at, retard. =)

>>13909793
rlc shill threads are usually by some heavily JUSTed retard that behaves like this garbage will solve every single problem humanity has.

It's actually pretty funny. Before they release something they claim this will be the time their shitcoin will change the world. Then it inevitably dumps on their retarded bagholder asses after which you get cope posts like
>>13909690

If you come to these threads for anything but the spectacular autism by people like >>13909791
you're definitely doing it wrong.

>>13909791
> same imbecile shilling a shitcoin scam for months
> same imbecile that told 20$ EOY after v3
> the shitcoin dumped as usual at 0,40$
neck yourself gilles

>>13909824
massive cope
I bought below ICO price like a smart anon would
you are a pajeet and a sub 100 IQ retard

>>13909828
I am actually the only person that shilled here for months and during that time you could've made a 6x, but instead you lost money buying LINK at the top and then here comes RLC making link obsolete with a literal sideproject.

The dOracle actually works already. LINKies BTFO.

>>13909714
I dont think this at all.
but for this to 2x you would need a MC of 70 mil or so. For it to get to 70 mil everything they are planning needs to work out.

There are other coins with equally or better plans then this that are currently at 3 or 4 mil mc. The chance of them getting to 30 mil is a lot higher than RLC getting to 70 mil and this will result in a 10x.

Its all about risk and reward. RLC is not that risky but it also has very poor rewards.

>>13909860
keep posting. I'm here for the freakshow anyway

>>13909876
Shit tier fud.
>There are other coins with equally or better plans then this that are currently at 3 or 4 mil mc.
>better plans
>plans
iExec RLC is a working product.

>>13909880
How heavy are those link bags? They're about to get much heavier :)

>>13909739
I actually used to really like this coin as I saw huge potential in it but threads like this put me off.

Either the company is taking the low road any paying the dumbest pajeets to shill it like:
>>13909755

Or it just attracts the worst people in crypto which is in itself a bad sign for a project.

>>13909898
>waaah i used to liek rlc but teh bad man maed a poest abut muh linky coin
kys retard
>>13909898
>waaaaah teh bad pepl on biz is a bad sign for investing
Literal retard tier.

>>13909894
Imagine projecting this hard. How much did you lose on those linkies? Did you move to RLC after getting absolutely JUST and now you think *that* shitcoin is the one to make your rich after you got rekt on the other one?

>>13909685
Anon, the screenshots you posted are about Deals, not Tasks. Deals are part of the V3 update and are for brokering and order matching, hence the ETH price fetch.
Obviously, there are not many tasks running, but adoption is the hardest part for any platform.

>>13909876
you mean dadi? They are the only ones with actual client adoption in this space I know at least.

>when your project is so shit you have to troll and insult people into posting in your thread

Just ignore him, guys.

>>13909860
If you weren't any fag from inside you would have already sold this shit.
It seems you've an infinite supply of shit to dump and you need some retard to buy it

>>13909919
No, if you knew how to read(you pajeet), I said I bought under ICO.
Nice cope.
>>13909922
He's a retard don't bother.
>>13909924
>dadi
literal shit tier

time to move out of COPEnhagan OP

>>13909924
Not just talking about this space but sure even DADI is a better investment then this. in terms of R/R

>>13909914
This is actually just becoming fun to watch. Even Link doesn't attract autism like this.

>>13909876
lol? 35m mcap is nothing... look at link, they are behind RLC in progress yet have a 400m mcap.

>>13909929
>Just ignore him, guys.
but making fun of retarded children is what I come to biz for

>>13909930
>If you weren't any fag from inside
>pajeet english
street shitter detected
>>13909943
I'm up 2.5x :)

>>13909962
>I'm up 2.5x
wow. congratz. Maybe check out the S&P500. I heard it's up about that much too

>>13909929
>>13909930
>>13909922

What if, by some very small chance, these RLC shills are not retarded but are actually working for a competitor? They are acting retarded ON PURPOSE.

I know this is probably way above anything these shills could imagine but interesting anyway.

>>13909945
dadi has shit tier tokenomics
rlc tokenomics shit on all cloud computing coins because of PoCo.

>>13909969
Being up 2.5x on an extremely risky/unknown asset is something only a god could do.
I bet you're in the red, huh. That's why you're rageposting here.

Anons, you don't realize that this fucking moron is scamming this board for months.
This is not funny, people lose money on this fucking frauds.

>>13909953
The best way to make fun of him is to keep iexec threads barren and dead like they always were before the Link debacle.

french scam that copied golems whitepaper now devs are dumping their tokens after they got caught lying about link

>>13909950
This space is way over valued. most coins should crash another 90 percent to get close to their actual worth.

Anyway that is not the point I am making, the point is that doubling 35 mil is HARD, it requires a huge inflow of fund. going 10X on a small cap of 3 mil requires LESS inflow than the 2x example.

Very simple to understand I would think?

>>13909973
>They are acting retarded ON PURPOSE
I'm pretty sure there's only one guy on biz who heavily overinvested in this shitcoin, keeps getting JUSTed and has to cope by making threads like this. When he gets called out on being a JUST bagholder he just instinctively attacks you for "holding LINK". I assume he also got rekt by LINK, otherwise the random animosity is inexplicable.

And I don't believe he's retarded on purpose. I doubt he could contain it without meds (which he clearly doesn't take)

>>13909976
At this point it is clear you are just trolling here, but anyway, it's the exact oposite. DADI has long token lockups for nodes while Poco "locks" 1/3 of the amount of RLC for the task for the duration of the task.. that has 0 effect on token velocity. i.e. RLCs tokenomics are complete shit.

>>13909992
>scamming
I've been posting extremely detailed posts under 1x ico price. I haven't shilled until it's time to buy the dip, I'm not that big of an asshole. I'm a long term holder just raising awareness.

>>13910017
>fake deflationary mechanism
Yeah I bet that'll end up well.
LOL.

>>13910005
you can say that about anything though? RLC is one of the few projects in this space with an actual product (unlike others cough cough chainlink cough cough).

>>13909993
I would prefer to see him permbanned, this is a fraud (they) do openly and on a regular basis.
We passed the "random shitcoin shill" phase long time ago.

>>13910061
You can't ban people for peddling scams. Biz would be literally empty

>>13910053
>unlike others cough cough chainlink cough cough
are you serious?
their fucking mainnet is TODAY
get fucked with your french scam
link is 10x iexec for a reason

>>13910061
Back to plebbit faggot.

>>13910072
>judging coins by marketcap
Imagine the smell.
LINK will only be 2x iExec soon.

>>13909000
Trips check'ed. IExec btfo by Kek

>>13910065
Basically they are stealing money from people anon.
Since there's no thread history and there's a lot of kids and retards, they go on over and over.
What if people starts selling drugs, phishing or other illegal activities here?
I think they get permbanned.

>>13910108
>reddit tier comment
kys nigger

>>13910108
>What if people starts selling drugs
I would be thrilled to see an actual product being advertised on biz rather than proof-of-concept software that nobody needs

>>13910122
>>13910085
>>13910073
Aw shit he snapped. Time for your pills boo-boo

>>13910133
>snapped
I just don't care for your dumb shit.
Bump my post more.

>111 replies
And to think, iexec threads used to struggle to get to 10 posts before they started lying about Chainlink.

>>13910143
Go to your mom and ask her for the pills

>>13910133
He likes when you share pictures of gilles the fag and his mongoloid colleague

>>13910150
>lying
Prove that the chart was false.
>protip: it wasn't.
>but muh TC acquirement!
Cope.
>>13910161
Ask your mom for my condom I used on her and go fuck yourself with it.

>>13910172
Absolute chads.
This is how you command a room.

>>13910150
> 111 replies
> 90 from OP (that is gilles fedak the fag)
> 21 from people insulting him and his shitcoin
Nice, let's keep on bumping the thread

>>13910175
Using insults that suit a 12 year old is a sign of autism. Maybe you don't need pills but a tardwrangler?

>>13910197
>13 posts by this id

>>13910202
>15 posts by this ID

>>13910208
>complete lack of self awareness
yup, it's autism

>>13910175
>Prove that the chart was false.
For one thing, the Chainlink white paper from 2017 talks extensively about SGX integration.
Also, iexec themselves admitted it was "outdated" on the same day that they posted it, and pulled it immediately. Pic related.

>>13910208
I love RLC, you know Gilles Kekfag

>>13910225
>OP defending against retards has 2x more posts than the retards ganging up on him
More news at 11.

>>13910228
Talk means nothing in crypto. Haven't you learned? They were even aware of the relationship between TC and LINK, but knew it meant absolutely nothing.
Like I said, the chart was right and still is right.

>>13910240
>defending against retards

>complete lack of self awareness
yup, it's autism

>>13910225
What's wrong with OP engaging in his own thread?

>>13910240
Gangin up on frenchs is always funny, Gilles Fagkek

>>13910249
>the chart was right and still is right.
iexec themselves admitted the chart was wrong on the very same day that they posted it.

The chart also said Witnet was on mainnet, which is also hilariously wrong.

>>13910254
>look mom I did the switcheroo!
Imagine having that image saved on your PC. Shame.
>>13910261
Even more fun watching sergey get blacked and yellowed.

>>13910270
outdated =/= wrong.
Also, you can't prove that the chart was wrong, you can only talk about the tweet, showing that you know the chart was right.

>witnet
literal who?

I don't know why there is so much hate about this coin, prolly because linkies are afraid, but you can hold both and hedge

>>13910228
RLC bitches on suicide watch
BIZ GETS B A G U E T T E D ONCE AGAIN

>>13910313
>I don't know why there is so much hate about this coin
Because they're lying Pajeets.
Just like OP.

>>13910294
>p-pls talk to me

>>13910313
>prolly because linkies are afraid

>>13910333
checked

>>13910294
You do too many "memes" to be just someone that bought a coin and is 2x

>>13910313
Oh look you managed how to switch ip, this rlc technology is incredible

>>13910359
Kill yourself.

>>13910375
> switchs ip
> answer to his own post with the other ip
Gilles you're so desperate

>>13910387
you are either retarded or a nigger

>>13910387
you are either a nigger or retarded

>>13910536
> switchs another ip
That's unbelievable, thanks to rlc technology you can have all ip you want, gilles the cocksucker?

>>13910387
you are a retarded nigger

>>13910555
Just ignore the faggot. He obviously gets off to people insulting and degrading him and bought a 4chan pass just so he can bump his own threads. What a desperate, sick fuck.

>>13908959
It just hasn't been discovered yet.

Think how big of a deal data renting will be from these next years onward. Data is the new oil. iExec are building a private data renting marketplace where AI can rent data to grow exponentially from.

This is a huge accelerator for AI and is needed. They know what is coming. And what's impressive is this is only one of the fields they're innovating in. Even their government knows what's up and gave them a $2 million grant.

>>13909261
Yeah the ETH costs are ridiculous for worker profit, I don't even think it will be profitable when iExec stops feeding the workers.
But they know this, which is why they're introducing an off chain solution. I think it's way too soon to count it out, they've only just released a product. Needs time to perfect.

>>13910585
This is not desperate, he's working and gets paid for that, as you can see:
>>>13910625

If someone gets paid to shill a fraud, this is an illegal activity.

>>13910555
is that guy signaling peace, or that he is kissing macron's wife's vagina?