/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13872223
It will probably dump unless there are huge some announcement to go with it.

>>13872223
There hasn't been any single mainnet launch that didn't dump.

can someone explain to me what exactly mainnet means pls

>>13872253
Not true, BTC mainnet surge.

>>13872223
It will dump extremely hard.

>>13872223
Serg the Zerg of Nazarov dies of a heart attack on stage after stress eating 6 big-macs before the main presentation. Dubs confirms.

More importantly. What to buy and when.

>>13872262
Noone knows. That was the point of the blog post.

Blog post will be 44 more fun uses for LINK (Think CryptoKitties etc...) and then sideways for 16 more months

>>13872242
this

my sense though is that adoption is there, but it takes time to integrate systems - especially legacy ones that are old and shitty - and that will mean a slow ramp up in terms of actual usage

will take time, we'll probably see a repeating j curve, as with pic related

but there should be at least some traffic going through the network initially, that would give a nice spike

>>13872269
>comparing the only worthwile cryptocurrency with a literal Ethereum token with no confirmed use on day 1

>>13872223

the thing is, with development taking this long + the test net being available the whole time, doesn't it make sense for some companies to have contracts/jobs ready to go? i doubt they would wait until main net to start writing the code/stocking up on link.

>>13872319
sure, there may be a ton of companies ready to go with external adapters

but those are the providers of data, who are the consumers? who is going to be calling a chainlinked contract in _their_ smart contracts?

one pool of users are other crypto companies, or tech companies starting to branch into crypto

the other is institutional platforms, which will use chainlink internally, while abstracting it away from customers - I highly doubt those platforms are ready to go

>>13872223
Anticipating a dump. Preparing my nerves so they don’t get me to sell.

already set a stop loss at 1.10 for 25k of my stack

>>13872223
*2 days fren

dump to 10k sats

>>13872277

oh no no no no no

it will pump extremely hard

>>13872223
I am either killing myself or not

>>13872561
this

you are stupid as fuk if you don't set a stop loss...this thing can tank down 40-50% and you are fuked better to take profit and buy back in

>>13872561
>>13872571
Are you seriously going to kill yourself because retards on /biz/ lied to you? I'm telling you right now what's going to happen. Mainnet will come and go, and there will be nothing from the Chainlink team. What you should do then is sell. You'll probably only have a few days to sell because everyone else will be selling too. Then you'll have money instead of worthless tokens. Maybe spend some of it and re-invest the rest.

>>13872223
This will dump like rlc. Screencap

>>13872414
i meant both sides. chainlink may be obscure to retail investors but to those that look to use the network, they've had a lot of time and a lot of resources to prepare for main net. i think wanchain even demoed a dapp that uses link. initial traffic may be low but i doubt it will be nonexistent or low for long

>>13872223
>he thinks the tech matters in crypto

>>13872600
Should I sell now?

>>13872600
I am too autistic to figure out if you are going on with the joke or you did actually take that shit seriously

>>13872223

Vaporware to the highest degree. Won't be or do shit either.

>>13872637
I personally think you should because I don't believe in LINK even a little. It has been around too long and developed too little. Nothing, in fact. Do you realise that?

I have a question. Do you own any coins that have a gui wallet? Because I have multiple. It's not much but it's something. Chainlink never end made "something". There isn't even an official wallet that you can send your coins/tokens to so it the project can look somewhat legitimate. What have they been working on? Nothing. Two years of nothing.

You don't have to sell now but you should sell immediately after mainnet when nothing happens.

>>13872658
How long should I sell after mainnet when nothing happens?

>>13872658
this

>>13872670
When the month is June and there isn't even a hint of a working product, you sell. If they announce that mainnet is delayed, you sell immediately.

Remember the larp a few weeks back claiming that mainnet was ready?

He stated that:

- Mainnet itself would be underwhelming. Still lots of things to build out etc.
- The partnerships would be big.

That sounds about right to me... it could be an EEA type run in the next few months. ETH still isn't really "used" and neither does Chainlink for a nice price jump following some announcements. Following that we will see greater and greater surges as usage increases in 2020.

>>13872658
I too am incapable of finding out where the github / pivotal is. Make sure to put your link filters on, fellow biz anons. Don't look at this scam, nothing has ever happened with it.

>>13872658
Why would there be a separate wallet for an ethereum token? That would rise more concerns than the current situation. MEW+Ledger is perfectly fine. Chainlink isn't meant for you, it's meant for institutional users. GUI wallets are mostly for scamcoins.

>>13872699
I've personally looked at the pivotal despite not being a programmer. What did I see? A whole bunch of writing. That's it, writing. Comments, leading people to believe that they're working on something.

Here's another question: Has anyone even seen a picture of what's going to be released? Even if the product isn't ready, you'd think they would show snippets of it. They haven't shown anything ever, have they.

>>13872684
Where are they going to release this? Their blog? Twitter?
When are they supposed to make an announcement?

I just want it to bleed down to 50-70c again. I'm never fucking selling my stinks but i can't buy the top of this recent pump we are gonna go down for sure. This place is an echo chamber no one outside gives a fuck about link. Several wales are manipulating the price and will dump hard on mainnet. The idea that this would just take off and never fall back down is ludicrous. Even if we pump to 3 bucks we will bleed out over the summer and autumn until genuine adoption starts taking place.

I’m selling right now, not even gonna wait for this incompetent two man team any longer

>>13872714
https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1128322749137596416

There you go. It actually blew my mind that they gave a date for mainnet. There was finally a day I could wait for to pass and then say "I told you so".

>>13872714
Nobody's going to spoonfeed you the most basic stuff, learn to google

>>13872714
Blog post at some point before mainnet on the 30th. The blog post is all I am really interested about as I assume that it will include details about data providers and clients. Mainnet won't have staking or reputation.

>>13872713
I totally get what you mean. I think that some pictures to show the program they are writing would be an excellent addition and would help investors understand exactly what they are buying. But I suspect that they don't have anything - I've never seen a picture of one of these oracles either. Pretty suspicious if you ask me.

>>13872262
Google the Tulip mainnet

>>13872223
dgaf i'm strapped in until the fucking end

>>13872713
>over a year on testnet with various demos of product available
>information about pivotal epics readily available, velocity of activity positive even if you don't understand specifics
>really hoping this isn't a serious post

>>13872816
You mean the testnet with 6 (six) transactions? You think I haven't seen the explorer? I'm not fudding LINK for fun; I'm trying to save any recent buyers from the upcoming disaster.

If dubs a massive dump will happen the day after mainnet

>>13872868
You fucked up bud - you were meant to use that IP to act like another party agreeing with your previous post. Now you're standing out like a sore thumb.

Le sigh baka
Better luck next thread I guess

>>13872883
Did you just ignore my argument because my VPN changed my IP (and ID)? It's okay. I hope that you're still holding Link. Nothing would make me happier. I'll still be here in a week when one of us will be right. It'll be me, of course.

>>13872868
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSAUHIfideY

YOU WILL COME OUT NO MORE

>>13872223
The worst dumpening biz has ever seen there will unironically be a few suicides.

>>13872914
Oh right sorry - we're switching to the new IPs now? Yeah no I don't hold any link - these fools will though. Absolute scam coin. We're far more intelligent and hold btt and other assets.

>>13872921
The only people I legitimately want to kill themselves are the people who shilled LINK nonstop. Idiots who bought the top are just dumb but the spammers destroyed a board.

>>13872934
Agreed, fellow biz anon. Those linkers will definitely kill themselves at the end of all this. They did ruin our board so it is what they deserve.

>>13872982
>Those linkers will definitely kill themselves at the end of all this

Actually, the people I want to die are the least likely to kill themselves because they bought in earlier. If someone bought at... 50 cents, they're still up. They won't be up in a month but they're still up right now. So... I have to hope that they hold all the way down.

>>13872934
>>13872982
I ain't selling.

>>13872992
>>13872982
How much link do you hold I'm onto you fuckers

>>13872934
>>13872982
we will own this board in 5 years

>>13872992
What do you hold?

>>13872699
https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink

>>13873008
I'd rather not say what I hold. Among linkies is actually the very last place I would reveal my investments. I don't want them making it by accident.

What did Sergey mean by this

>>13872992
i bought at .55 and got my dad in at 1.19. We run this shit nigger we never selling fuck you and fuck your motrher i'm going to find you little nigger boi i'm goign to drink your fucking nigger blood
.

someone please tell me this isn't going to dump on mainnet

>>13873166
How new are you? Of course it will.

Just buy more.

>>13873166
>>13873199
>How new are you? Of course it will.
>Just buy more.
This but it's literally dumping now. Swing linkers will get the rope. It will pump

>>13873166
i-it's not going to dump haha...

But for real always do the opposite of what /biz/ says. Think about it, these fucking autistic niggers have been shitposting about how this is a scam for 2 whole years. I don't know if the breadcrumbs are legitimate or not but let's go off what we know from events that /biz/ has mostly no control over.

1) The current marketcap is over $1 billion without any public knowledge of the project and it's mainnet isn't even out yet. Near silence from the development team as well, WHO is buying these fucking tokens?
2) It's capped at 1 billion tokens. Period.
3) It's one of the few projects in crypto with a legitimate use and if it's adopted with the current plan each individual token will be worth more than 10X it's current value easily That's a small sample of the project's scope.

It probably will dump on mainnet, but who gives a fuck? The question is if it has a working product or not, because that's what will determine the future. What's it going to do, pump to $3 and dump down to $2?

>slow climb to 2$

>>13872472
>>13872579

on which exchange?

You guys are all literal brainlets. Reddit is gonna hear about the partnership[s] that are under NDA and the coinbase listing and theyre all gonna pour their dirty inferior plebbit money into it resulting in the biggest green dildo that you've ever seen in your lives. NOBODY is invested in this besides biz and a few whales. Reddit actually thinks chainlink is a scam thanks to all of you retards. Whatever comes out of the blogpost and whatever happens on the day of mainnet, it's going to be big enough to hit the front page of /cryptocurrency/ and NONE of you are gonna be able to generate enough fud to keep them from investing in it. We've made it frens

>>13872277
It will dump extremlY hard, upward.

>>13873541
>Tfw dumping the last of my money into it tomorow for one last LINK purchase before singularity

>>13872269
BTC dumps every year.

Disappointment for 12-16 months. Not enough price action at this early stage.. what did you really expect?

>>13873158
>i'm goign to drink your fucking nigger blood

That can't be healthy.

>>13873158
Do you want to catch AIDS?

>>13873575

Dude don't fucking tempt me, I'm so close to going up one rank in the link army but the price is too high now.

>>13872262
Thats when you get 5 million dollars. But a snail starts to chase you.

>>13873762
>but the price is too high now.

Jan 2020, link is supported around the $1500 mark and rallying strong. you thought $1 was far too expensive compared to a sensible $0.35.