/biz/ - Business & Finance

>last reply 6 months ago

>>13853365

>>13853365
>the sale will align to a reward halving
explain for brainlet. will he do this before, after or at the exact moment?

>>13853400
He literally just gave permission to release it. It was written in September 2018 and kept private until now.

>>13853438
9200 confirmed top then.

>>13853425
The tulip trust unlocks january 2020. That is over 1 million BTC, BCH, BSV plus all the other Bitcoin shitforks. The next halving occurs in May 2020, so approx 1 year from now.

Tick tock

All this does is make me want to buy more Ethereum.

>strickly

>>13853466

>>13853466
explain the tulip trust for a brainlet. is that the satoshi wallet? why not just call it that?

>>13853494
It's crazy, now we know the writing is on the wall and BTC is on rented time. The reason he has to give notice so far in advance is to avoid market manipulation laws. He literally has to inform the entire world that he intends to crash BTC in advance, just to comply with regulation.

It's fucking beautiful. Core cucks are S W E A T I NG

>>13853522
it's fucking retarded and you shouldn't waste your time with this pile of garbage and lies

if he believes in SV so much then why does he have btc lmao

>>13853466
>The tulip trust

>>13853532
Which coin should I invest my $50 then anon? :3

>>13853466
not his addresses

>>13853466
>The tulip trust unlocks january 2020
sauce

>>13853365
can't wait for this cunt stain to finally expose himself so we can laugh him off the internet. tired of seeing his angry alcoholic mug

>>13853522
Here friend

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644014-Tulip-Trust-Redacted.html

>>13853365

>>13853522
There's an AI living on the Bitcoin blockchain

>>13853572
Not here to give you investment advice, just know that BSV (original Bitcoin that has no scaling impediments) will be the only Blockchain that is used in large scale industry and commerce 5 years from now. Craig will kill the other ones in the next 2 years.

Do with that information what you will.

>>13853365
>iceberg order
>value dropping significantly

More technobabble and economic illiteracy from Faketoshi.

An iceberg order is a series of limit orders, which by definition cannot push the price down (when on the sell side), only prevent it from going up, if any (forming an invisible sell wall).

>>13853623
lmao keep buying that BTC pal, I BEG you

>>13853438
>>13853466
>>13853532
>>13853586
>>13853622
>>13853639

>>13853597
https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=IOlvOiGPPio

>>13853438
So he is officially now on record for not only trying to 51% attack BCH, but also BTC (which we already knew he was dumping to keep his hashwar and then shit coin afloat). CSW is quite possibly the dumbest fraud alive.

Fuck maybe I should buy some bchSV

>>13853696
>Pure cope in text form

Friendly investment advice; long popcorn. This is going to be epic.

>>13853365
how can i have access to that slack? please post link.

i love that guy, i wish one day i can see him or touch him, he makes me horny

>>13853742
I don't know, I am not in it. I believe it's invite only, but you could ask some of the BSV guys on twitter or even reddit (/r/bitcoincashSV), that's where I got it from.

>>13853365
literally holding my breath in anticipation of this announcement of a planning of a plan to formulate a strategy of intention to possibly take some kind of action at a future date (date to be changed)

just like this one 3 years ago: https://altcointoday.com/craig-wright-will-move-earliest-bitcoins/

>>13853796
>just like this one 3 years ago
Nice find Anon. Faketoshi got an history of never delivering. There's literally 0 reason to think whatever he says will happen.

This dude is a fucking failure, huge disappointment and shame for his family.

>>13853365

> there will be no split
bch splits

> i will destroy bch
bch not destroyed

> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
btc $4000 eoy 2018

> i am satoshi
can’t sign a simple fucking message

> says I will sign after proving in court
but... wasn't the bbc stunt supposed to be a real signature? LOL

> submits a list of addresses of some fake tulip trust bullshit to court...
one of the addresses he claimed was signed by the real owner with a message saying the address is not belonging to this craig clown

> unlawfully registers a copyright on btc white paper and code in a stunt to cause a dump on btc
btc doesnt flintch

> next day copyright office confirms they didnt confirm this clown is satoshit and reaffirms that anyone can register anything with them
ultra fail

> some brainlets compare this piece of trash with trump, but trump is a winner
this clown is a loser

Guys this fakethosi clown is a fucking scam a pure and simple trash bag for everyone to see.

> He keeps putting a large biz budget for his trash biz shill army in an attempt to change public opinion
he fails miserably, anyone with one inch of brain sees this guy is a fucking trashbag scam

Fuck you and all you brainlets who support this fucking faketoshi loser piece of shit

>>13853935
>arliest-bitcoins/

How fucked do you need to be that The USofFuckingA Copyright Office has to issue a Special Press Release pointing out, you're a lying fucking weasel. The absolute state

>>13854007
Liar, they literally confirmed him.

>>13853935
based and true bitcoin pilled. green id confirms

>>13854048
>>13854007

>>13853935
well said
we need to copy pasta this

>>13854048
Because anyone can say they are Satashi retard.

They ask you if the info you provided is true, if you answer yes it gets registered, no questions asked. Just another scam card played by that faketoshi piece of shit

>>13854048
NO THEY LITERALLY SAID - THIS CLOWN VERIFIED HIMSELF -- WE INVESTIGATE AND OR VERIFY -NOTHIING-.
THEY LITERALLY HAD TO SEND OUT A FUCKING PRESS RELEASE TO DENY THIS CUNTS BS CLAIMS THAT 'they verified me as Satoshi'
HONK! HONK!

MOVED ANYTHING OUT OF GENESIS LATELY ??? U -PROMISED- U WOULD.. THREE FUCKING YEARS AGO!!!
HONK! HONK!

>>13854072
DAMN brown girls are really hot

news flash shit stains: wrecking btc means wrecking this entire space (i.e. public/decentralized cryptocurrencies). if btc fails, nobody, aside from you neckbeards accumulating in mom's basement, will touch a "different version" of btc.

this space is still way too young to survive an all out attack on btc.

>>13853935
*tink tink* ahem *tink tink*
Hellooo. Paging all newfags.
Please refer to the attached document, known as "BSV Shills BTFO", if you're curious about what's happening with BTC.
Use google to learn more.
That is all and have a wonderful day.
Oh as a final note....
My linkies stay stinky 1k eoy.

>12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX

Here's the fucking address from fucking block #1.
Total spent: 0.00000000 BTC

BSV is the Bitconnect of 2019, and CSW the Carlos Matos of 2019.

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX

>>13854206
>profoundly based

>>13854089
Wrong fag
>>13854067

>>13854202
and since your shitty cs curriculum at community college of nowhere didn't cover this: currency is a sociocultural construct.

that's not a buzzword -- currency is only as valuable as people perceive it to be. if you destroy btc's brand, you destroy faith in the efficacy of what it stands for (which is.. this entire fucking space).

cheering for craig means cheering against yourself. regardless of whether he's satoshi.

>>13854202
Bitcoin aka BSV will survive

>>13853594
>shit is 55% bacteria

The things I learn from a finance board.

>>13854315
no, it won't. have you tried explaining what the difference between btc and bsv is to someone who isn't in this space? let alone explaining what the difference between btc and eth is?

un. fucking. real.

>>13853365
You have made it trough my filter. Pic is your prize.

>>13854315
You most certainly won't and end up financially ruined, like any scam victim. Enjoy the show fag.

>>13854202
Bitcoin will arise from the ashes and scale.

>>13854328
Bitcoin is not for retarded hodlers and normies. It's for businesses and enterprise building, as well as government finance. Once large businesses have adopted, the normies automatically follow as they use their products and services. Degenerate gamblers on casino exchanges are not the target demographic.

>>13854372
I am doing just fine thank you. I invested in Bitcoin in 2013 before it was hijacked and sabotaged by Blockstream which is why I realize that BSV is Bitcoin in 2019, the only thing that changed is the exchange ticker.

How long until a market manipulator gets anally penetrated by the IRS and given the gamblers who used USD treatment? All it takes is for an American bank with an opposite position to tell their agency what to do.

>>13854436
Craig works with the NSA so good luck with that. You bet against him you bet against the US military. Not very favorable odds.

so csw hates btc core right? and he also wants to prove hes satoshi? what if he just moved the genesis coins which would crash btc and also prove hes satoshi

>>13854434
>I am doing just fine
And so did all the Bitconnect investors before it burned down. Very wise plan Anon.

>>13853418

>>13853365
6 months ago, we are at Yearly New Highs. What a fucking cuck faggot liar.

>>13854416
>Degenerate gamblers on casino exchanges are not the target demographic.
These people fail to understand that BTC has basically no adoption at all in the grand scheme of things. Actual adoption (not shitcoin trading and hodling) will be business utilizing the blockchain to carryout business functions. This is so beyond the realm of shitcoin trading that most of the space is going to be blindsided by it when it happens.

>>13854316
the shit you learn

>>13854501
Bitconnect was a literal pyramid scheme. Not a real asset with any utility, the only purpose is to enrich early investors at the cost of later ones through pumping and dumping price by market manipulators. Much like BTC cripple coin, the biggest pyramid scheme in crypto.

>>13854485
He can't move them because he isn't Satoshi.

>>13854541
woah...

>>13853365
these are the gayest threads.

>>13854537
Anon, don't. He doesn't know what these things are or how they operate.

>strickly

>>13853365
Damn, even if he's a fraud, what's stopping him from doing this?

>>13853935
>> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
>btc $4000 eoy 2018
craig said end of 2019 so there's a few months left
https://youtu.be/MXMCzhwm554?t=1208
20:08

>>13853935
based as fuck

>>13854610
Tulip trust unlocks January 2020 >>13853466
So there is still time to make good decisions, but it requires using logic which most here seem to be really terrible at /shrug

>>13853466
The tulip trust appears to be a contract in a specific country. Bitcoin has no jurisdiction, he would be well within his right to move the coins on a machine in another country, because the contract would not be valid there, and writing such an invalid contract would be void just by being written in the first place because of this nature of Bitcoin. Once again CSW is a larping piece of shit.

>>13854779

Is this the end biz?

>>13853935
based and redpilled

>>13854573
Part of me wants the smart guys on Biz to make it, part of me wants to say nothing and watch all the cucks get burned hard.

Decisions, decisions.

>>13853365
Oh look. It's this thread again. Choke on the biggest and blackest cock imaginable please.
Thank you.

>>13855658
Was there a previous one I missed? Link me so I can see more salty core shills

>>13853586
>The trust will be accessible by two (2) of five

Did some fag on a mongolian basket weaving forum write this

you mean i can pick up more cheap btc?

>>13853586
Wtf is that? How did you get that?

>>13855658
>implying Craig hasn't done it already

>>13855658
Blockstream faggot detected

>>13853586
Wow so Craig already has access to to tulip trust. He's just biding his time...

>>13855597
Based

>>13853935
craig is a fraud 101
this should be pinned by jannies next to the anti-begging rules

>>13856414
I’ll pin your tail, little rat

>>13856456
kys

>>13856249
Funny how there are still people in crypto who does not know about the Tulip trust.

Little babies have no idea what's coming.

>>13853935
Based. I’ll pasta this as a weapon against bsvtards

>>13853466
tfw holding BCH/BSV/ETH

burn BTC to the ground and pump BSV please satoshi

move on

>>13857790
BCH and ETH won't survive either, just a tip. There might still be some time to make the right long term decisions, but not for long. Window is closing quickly, the amount of BSV you can get today is half of what you could get about 1 week ago. And soon it will be half of that.

So if you could've afforded a 100 stack last month, now you can get only 45, and soon only 10. But I am not here to save anybody, people can make their own decisions.

>>13857855
I have 600 BSV.

I'll hold my BCH and ETH as a hedge against Craig not delivering.

>>13857922
You've already made it big then. Congrats.

poo

Why would ETH not survive? What about XMR?

>>13854202
>if btc fails, everything fails.
lmao sure it does cock smoker. When the dotcom bubble burst, it meant the end for e-commerce didn't it? That's why no one buys shit off the internet these days and we all go to brick and mortar stores for all our purchases.

wait none of that shit happened, and it took the death of shitty, bloated, overvalued shit stain products (PETS.COM/BTC) for the real players to rise up and taking over the market. The faster BTC dies, the better off the entire space will be.

>>13853522
csw tries to make retards think he will own 1mio coins in the tulip trust but it's a larp.

>>13858040
ETH is a smart contract platform that Vitalik wanted to build on Bitcoin initially, but Blockstream devs rejected him, so he made his own coin. It ended up being a piece of crap that can't scale (see the crypto kitties fiasco), and became a platform only useful for launching scam icos to defraud investors with.

But smart contracts that ethereum ellows will be possible on a Bitcoin that scales, like it was initially supposed to be. This means that ETH becomes superfluous as it can all be built on BitcoinSV with no scale ceiling. This kills ETH in a straight up competition.

As for Monero, it will run parallel to BSV for a while, because it's the preferred crime coin (unique use case) and Bitcoin is a public ledger which is not ideal for criminal activity. But eventually it will be shut down by authorities as well because it not compliant with law.

For this reason, I see Monero being one of the few coins that can actually survive the inevitable BitcoinSV dominance for a while, because it offers something no other coin does.

>>13856249
lol its been out for like 5 years

The real Satoshi was captured and his 1.2M coins were confiscated.
In the meantime Blockstream was set up to stall adoption due to the extreme complexity of the LN and when it's ready to lock BTC in a dead-end coin with a vulnerable 1st and 2nd layers, while another operation was set up, nChain, to take over the reference client of any serious attempt to fork away from BTC, with CSW who was hired to assume SN's identity and use his authority, and eventually the confiscated coins to flip BTC with a government-friendly permissioned BSV.

>>13858120

your post is full of disinformation, are you autistic because of tunnel vision?

>>13853935
>so am i to understand these are all your addresses?
>that is correct!
>okay, but we know for sure that this and this is not yours.
>oh there might be few that is not really mine honest mistake
>alright but all the rest is right?
>naturally yes all part of the tulip trust
>but this addresses owner just signed you are a liar and a fraud
>oh yeah i forgot about that one that's not mine either sorry
>...

>>13858158
Well reasoned arguments there faglord.

>>13853365
>and will be matched by a 10x leveraged short
>I, the chap who bleats on about patent law and copyright, am broadcasting my intention to commit insider trading
The absolute state of Sanjay's Vindaloo cucks

>>13853365
>We (I)
the absolute STATE of his ego

>>13854130
that's all you need to know about this fraud. he keeps making claims that he will do something big in the future but that day never comes. and people keep talking about him here, mostly because he pays indian street shitters to shill his persona.

>>13853365
> there will be no split
bch splits

> i will destroy bch
bch not destroyed

> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
btc $4000 eoy 2018

> i am satoshi
can’t sign a simple fucking message

> says I will sign after proving in court
but... wasn't the bbc stunt supposed to be a real signature? LOL

> submits a list of addresses of some fake tulip trust bullshit to court...
one of the addresses he claimed was signed by the real owner with a message saying the address is not belonging to this craig clown

> unlawfully registers a copyright on btc white paper and code in a stunt to cause a dump on btc
btc doesnt flintch

> next day copyright office confirms they didnt confirm this clown is satoshit and reaffirms that anyone can register anything with them
ultra fail

> some brainlets compare this piece of trash with trump, but trump is a winner
this clown is a loser

Guys this fakethosi clown is a fucking scam a pure and simple trash bag for everyone to see.

> He keeps putting a large biz budget for his trash biz shill army in an attempt to change public opinion
he fails miserably, anyone with one inch of brain sees this guy is a fucking trashbag scam

>>13858216
lol why are you copypasting this cringey shit in every bsv thread, are you autistic

>>13858220

Where should I buy now that it's kill on binance? Okex?

>>13858202
Well it's his coins, but the actual plans are made by him and his team in unison.

>>13858238
Can still get it on Poloniex.

>>13853935

B
A
S
E
D

>>13858251
Polo and bittrex has no volume or liquidity. Damn why did the chink have to sperg out like he did.

>>13856249
Did you just swallowed the Craigpill? I did and my reaction was similar.

>>13856210
he actually included satoshis pgp key there that is why it's 2 of five lest the real satoshi lay claim of the stash. with a multisig there is no danger of that and he could use it for his fraud. dude is not stopping at half measures when committing a fraud.

daily reminder, that this is the only key that matters:
DE4E FCA3 E1AB 9E41 CE96 CECB 18C0 9E86 5EC9 48A1
rest is just smoke and bullshit

>>13856210
where is the fifth key btw? i only count 4

>>13853365
OMG guys i am genuinely worried RN!

>>13853586
David Kleiman died nearly six years ago.
Under this trust, Creg would've gotten the Bitcoin from this trust back in 2014.

>>13858380
stop being a cuck it was the 6k -> 3k drop.

>>13854048
>we asked him if he was Satoshi and he said yes
They didn't investigate or confirm anything you retard.
They merely recorded that Creg was claiming to be Satoshi.

>>13853365
>taking financial advice from a con man

>>13858120
Jesus Christ where was this video from?

>Vitalik Boogerin

>>13858382
there is always next year and an other excuse.

>>13858382
>>13858475
I mean it says so right there.

>>13854779
THIS>>13854906

Probably the dumbest post I have read in a long time!

>>13858390
I don't think anyone takes him serious, his mum come out sayin he 'adds bits on'.
pretty sure its the article below.
http://archive.is/kjuLi

>wants us to believe he is bitcoin's creator
>literally calls bitcoin "tulips" like a buttcoiner

>>13858527
>>13858382
>If I should die, Dr. Wright will be returned shares in the Tulip trust.. at his discretion
>SHARES in the TRUST
>AT HIS DISCRETION
hey faggots, it just means CSW's portion of the trust got bigger it doesnt mean the trust is unlocked. it also says it csw's discretion, which means he can do whatever the fuck he wants.

STIFF

>>13853365

The roach is still kicking!

xD

Hilarious

>>13858552
It means the trust is over you dumbass.
If he started a new trust, there would have to be a new principal trustee and a new document.

Because this one has been over since 2014.

>>13853935
this

>>13858578
there was no trust and there is no trust right now. the bitcoins that never were.

>>13858598
That too.

>>13853365
Imagine being so deluded as to think the mind behind bitcoin, who stated his ambitions very clearly and shunned publicity and wealth, could possibly be this greedy narcissistic sociopath.

Say hello to Metanet!
Now your shitposts are immortal.

>>13858429
Wrong fag >>13854067

BSV is the real bitcoin.
screenshot this

>>13858454
Idk, Vitalik has some gems out there I tell you

>>13858652
Damn, we really out here

>>13858120
nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
>https://www.ccn.com/dr-craig-wright-can-destroy-anonymous-coins

>>13854067
Literally what I said here: >>13858429

>>13858699
>brags
pretty much
RANT FREE

>>13853365
What does this mean after all? Sell in May 2020 and rebuy after the major dump?

If Bitcoin dies everything in crypto dies

>>13858552
>15 months after my death
You just forgot the most important part, nice cherry-picking
>not divulge identity of satoshi
Before dying he literally said he had no idea about satoshi identity, if you want to know about satoshi you better ask to Peter Todd

>>13858824
BTC blockstream coin is not Bitcoin, so we are safe. But yes, everything else but BSV, which is Bitcoin, dies.

>>13858860
Look, nobody can be so brainwashed, tell me how to join paid shilling cause I may need few extra bucks

>>13858847
Ok so, let me get this straight. You say BTC is a coin used by most criminal organizations as a way to launder money and to work around the law, and your big plan is bankrupting them?
Well, you better start running.

Which coin should I invest in so I won't get Brownpilled?

>>13858888
Replace BTC with USD and what you are saying will start to make some sense
BTC for money laundering? KEK.
If you consider Deutsche Bank only with Russian and Danish Banks only we are already talking about hundreds of billion, more than the entire cryptocoin capitalization. Imagine globally...

>>13858888
You think permissioned (centralized, censurable, backdoored) fake blockchain is what we want to replace the current banking system?
Fuck you

>>13858908
You should go all in Tether (legit moon potential!) and hold it on Bitfinex, the most trusted exchange in the business.

>>13853466
im unironically shaking

>falling for the conference pump
not going to make it

>>13853935
Absolutely based

>>13858824
But Segshitcoin isn't Bitcoin, BSV IS therefore you should be happy when it engulfs the entire market cap

the fuck is wrong with this guy? christ he'd better get properly punished for this shit one day. chaos this cunt is sharting.

>>13853365
>long term advance notice
Oh OK thanks creg.

>>13858120
My thoughts have been running along similar lines, although I'm also looking into other alts like DigixDao, Florins Vidt and Dynamic. What do you think about the prospects of such coins and do you have any others you think might last long term?

>>13854130
announcing the anouncement

>>13853365
Fine, lets put our buy orders @1USD that day

>>13853623
The level of retardation here is staggering

>>13854779
Serious retardation in this thread you need to stop posting here

>>13854275
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/0e3e2357e806b6cdb1f70b54c3a3a17b6714ee1f0e68bebb44a74b1efd512098
>Output total 50.00000000 BTC 0.50 USD
1 cent btc. fuccckk i miss 2009.

pump

>>13853543
If you understood you would've invented it

>>13859171
And people say he is not a nice guy?? Pff

lmao
you fags are all bark and no bite

>>13853466
I'm gonna need some sauce on this, I call bullshit. Post the addresses.

>>13854295
the truth is. there can be only one crypto. every other coin that exists is literally inflation. right now we are all still early adopters. in the end only one coin will win and it will be the coin used by everyone.

>>13861513
Some people have figured out through blockchain analysis that over 1 million Bitcoin very likely belong to Satoshi, like this one:

https://bitslog.com/2013/04/17/the-well-deserved-fortune-of-satoshi-nakamoto/

It's basically all the unspent coins with a similar mining pattern from the very early addresses.

>>13854072
How many Trons for her?

>>13861642
Yep, someone gets it. This game is winner takes all. If your blockchain can't scale, you've already lost.

>>13861825
I dont think that is what he was requesting. It's more or less unargued that 'Satoshi' has prob. around a million untouched BTC, give or take. The question being, what has any of that got to do with this deluded fantasists invented 'Tulip Trust' ? Any time hes been asked to provide the addresses, hes just pasta'd the first-known wallets, usually with the results, ACTUAL owners start posting messages on them, stating (literally) 'Craig Wright is a fraud and a liar'. Then, he starts screaming that HE never posted that address (although he quite obviously did) and, 'its a forgery!' etc.
tldr, provide PROOF of the ACTUAL existence of this 'Tulip Trust' - Protip: posting other ppls wallet addresses, or rnd Word BS cut and paste docs, is NOT proof of anything, other than the fact, you have none

>>13859484
yessss

>>13862026
>hes just pasta'd the first-known wallets, usually with the results, ACTUAL owners start posting messages on them, stating (literally) 'Craig Wright is a fraud and a liar'. Then, he starts screaming that HE never posted that address (although he quite obviously did) and, 'its a forgery!' etc.

This was a forged document submitted to the court by Kleiman's team, not by Craig. Respect the facts instead of this pathetic lying, and I might give you a better response next time.

>>13862205
>here we go
And where did 'Kleimanns team' obtain this document, pray tell? Let us follow this particular doc down the rabbit hole, put an end to this fucking nonsense once and for all, finally

>>13853365
>Microsoft Core MSFT Stock

>>13862230
Send a fucking email to Dave Kleiman and ask faggot, why the hell would I know why he is submitting fake documents to a court.

>>13862278
lel

how the hell is he so confident that satoshi is dead? i mean one transaction and this guy is in prison for fraud. why doesn't he care ffs?

>>13862278
I mean Ira*, brainfart.

he's gonna market sell his 0.5 btc get tethered up guys

>>13862299
Because he is Satoshi, retard. How do people with this low IQ even make it through life? Sheer luck? It's a great mystery to me.

>>13862409
yes yes craig that's nice. now spend 10 seconds sending that transaction or fuck off.

> there will be no split
bch splits

> i will destroy bch
bch not destroyed

> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
btc $4000 eoy 2018

> i am satoshi
can’t sign a simple fucking message

> says I will sign after proving in court
but... wasn't the bbc stunt supposed to be a real signature? LOL

> submits a list of addresses of some fake tulip trust bullshit to court...
one of the addresses he claimed was signed by the real owner with a message saying the address is not belonging to this craig clown

> unlawfully registers a copyright on btc white paper and code in a stunt to cause a dump on btc
btc doesnt flintch

> next day copyright office confirms they didnt confirm this clown is satoshit and reaffirms that anyone can register anything with them
ultra fail

> some brainlets compare this piece of trash with trump, but trump is a winner
this clown is a loser

Guys this fakethosi clown is a fucking scam a pure and simple trash bag for everyone to see.

> He keeps putting a large biz budget for his trash biz shill army in an attempt to change public opinion
he fails miserably, anyone with one inch of brain sees this guy is a fucking trashbag scam

Fuck you and all you brainlets who support this fucking faketoshi loser piece of shit

>>13862454
he could deliver >>13854093
at ANY moment, y'kno
JUST when you least expected it, Tulips Arose!
>or maybe not

>>13862607
ffs, wrong post quote >>13854130
>just too many too choose from

>>13853365
> there will be no split
bch splits

> i will destroy bch
bch not destroyed

> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
btc $4000 eoy 2018

> i am satoshi
can’t sign a simple fucking message

> says I will sign after proving in court
but... wasn't the bbc stunt supposed to be a real signature? LOL

> submits a list of addresses of some fake tulip trust bullshit to court...
one of the addresses he claimed was signed by the real owner with a message saying the address is not belonging to this craig clown

> unlawfully registers a copyright on btc white paper and code in a stunt to cause a dump on btc
btc doesnt flintch

> next day copyright office confirms they didnt confirm this clown is satoshit and reaffirms that anyone can register anything with them
ultra fail

> some brainlets compare this piece of trash with trump, but trump is a winner
this clown is a loser

Guys this fakethosi clown is a fucking scam a pure and simple trash bag for everyone to see.

> He keeps putting a large biz budget for his trash biz shill army in an attempt to change public opinion
he fails miserably, anyone with one inch of brain sees this guy is a fucking trashbag scam

Fuck you and all you brainlets who support this fucking faketoshi loser piece of shit

>>13862454
Would it eve matter if he was?
The market decides the value of coins not one man.

>>13862711
yeah but his fairying around like a self-entitled nonce has caused so much tension in the community that no good can come of it.

> there will be no split
bch splits

> i will destroy bch
bch not destroyed

> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
btc $4000 eoy 2018

> i am satoshi
can’t sign a simple fucking message

> says I will sign after proving in court
but... wasn't the bbc stunt supposed to be a real signature? LOL

> submits a list of addresses of some fake tulip trust bullshit to court...
one of the addresses he claimed was signed by the real owner with a message saying the address is not belonging to this craig clown

> unlawfully registers a copyright on btc white paper and code in a stunt to cause a dump on btc
btc doesnt flintch

> next day copyright office confirms they didnt confirm this clown is satoshit and reaffirms that anyone can register anything with them
ultra fail

> some brainlets compare this piece of trash with trump, but trump is a winner
this clown is a loser

Guys this fakethosi clown is a fucking scam a pure and simple trash bag for everyone to see.

> He keeps putting a large biz budget for his trash biz shill army in an attempt to change public opinion
he fails miserably, anyone with one inch of brain sees this guy is a fucking trashbag scam

Fuck you and all you brainlets who support this fucking faketoshi loser piece of shit

Core shills bumping my threat with their pathetic pasta lol.

This one has them seething hard, you can almost feel the rage through the monitor

>>13862205
It was submitted by csw, faggot

>>13862921
Try refuting it

>>13853438
where? do you have any evidence of this at all?

Frankly if it was established beyond a reasonable doubt that this low grade car salesman con man of a doctor was really the inventor of Bitcoin I bet the price would fall immediately to 0.
He is so pathetically ridiculous that most people would sell their bitcoins rather than having to put up with this buffoon as the forever inventor of Bitcoin.

>>13863169
I will probably go all in in ETH
I imagine many people will follow

>>13858120
bitching about cryptokitties clogging ethereum is the litmus test for dunning-kruger opinions about this
the gas market performed as intended during the initial rush. the network literally never slowed down or crashed. newbies letting their gas price autosuggested to 20 by primitive wallets got their tx stuck for a while, that's about it. worth noting at 100 gas price, ethereum transactions were still cheaper than bitcoin
no later than the next weekend, eth devs of all stripes came up with network improvements to drive down the costs and increase thoroughput
three weeks later, costs were back to normal
then for the following year and a half, regular improvements were made
hundreds of dapps have been running on layer 1. layer 2 solutions have matured through 2018, and some popular dapps seamlessly run millions of transactions there
ofc, if you're the average btc bagholding retard who gets your news from coindesk, you don't know that. more importantly, you don't WANT to know that. after king shitcoin has been gimped into a purely speculative tool for market manipulators, you have to cling to the store of value narrative for dear life. ignore all information, refuse to learn, stick to debunked talking points. bitch about the 2016 DAO while the 2018 parity bailout failed. complain about emission rate (that you call inflation, because it's a serious economic term and makes you feel like a serious man talking about serious money - even if any economist could tell you this is not what inflation means), even though by design ethereum emission rate naturally trends towards 0 as we approach infinity, not unlike bitcoin pow stretching decades - save for the fact bitcoin has no plans to deal with decreasing block rewards, except "the price will magically rise forever because deflation". cry about PoS being about the rich, when the minimum level of entry for bitcoin mining is an ASIC farm
bitcoin has swapped fundamental value for spiritual value. gl with that

>>13862946

Sure thing, got some time to spare to debunk this steaming pile of shit:

> there will be no split
>bch splits
It's a statement of intent. He never wanted a split and tried to prevent it, but ABC implemented centralized checkpointing directly into the code, and overwriting nakamoto consensus, essentially destroying themselves as Bitcoin in the process. Even Andreas Brekken admitted that what they did was a really really devastating mistake.

Craig also said, "you split, we bankrupt you" - look at what happened to Jihan Wu and Bitmain, they went bankrupt lmao, and Roger has never been the same since then, now dodging courts for the lawsuit he has been served. Not going well for them.

> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
>btc $4000 eoy 2018

Fake quote, never seen him say end of year 2018. He did say BTC will eventually be zero, and look at the thread you are in - the OP spells it out.

> i am satoshi
>can’t sign a simple fucking message

Possession of keys is not proof of creation. If you are in possession of a house key it does not mean you built the house. It's a non-sequitur. There's so much evidence already in the public domain that together proves he is Satoshi, but it requires intelligence and discernment, something most people lack.

> says I will sign after proving in court
>but... wasn't the bbc stunt supposed to be a real signature? LOL

He did sign in private, with several witnesses, read Andrew O'Hagans piece 'The Satoshi Affair' where the session is described. Not for the public though.

> submits a list of addresses of some fake tulip trust bullshit to court...
>one of the addresses he claimed was signed by the real owner with a message saying the address is not belonging to this craig clown

Already debunked that ITT, the forged document with fake addresses was submitted by Kleiman, not by Craig.

>>13863275
> unlawfully registers a copyright on btc white paper and code >in a stunt to cause a dump on btc
>btc doesnt flintch

His copyright is fully lawful, it is recognized by the US copyright office, and they confirmed that he submitted proof of whitepaper authorship in their public statement. Also already linked in ITT. He never said that this act would cause anything to the price of any coin.

> next day copyright office confirms they didnt confirm this >clown is satoshit and reaffirms that anyone can register anything with them
>ultra fail

Factually wrong, already linked >>13854048 and >>13854067

Rest is just pure core cuck cope not worth responding to.

Actually all of it is just pure bullshit from core cucks who for whatever reason have an extreme aversion to facts. Hurt craig at all costs, just keep repeating the same lies over and over until the NPCs think it's reality.

>>13862933

>>13854289

>>13863275
>was submitted by Kleiman
so, you are suggesting, Ira Kleiman (who knows shit about Bitcoin etc) forged this document, then submitted it to the courts? If not, then, where did Ira obtain this document? Don't you feel it would be helpful to track down the EXACT origins of this document, stop similar misunderstandings arsing?
It couldn't be, for example, the document UNARGUABLY originated from cregs office, was undisputedly used as 'proof' for years in various court cases (till PROVEN complete bullshit) and as a consequence, ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS ORIGINATING FROM creg, HIS OFFICE OR HIS GENERAL VICINITY COULD OR SHOULD NOW REASONABLY BE REGARDED AS SIMILARLY FORGED?
Come on, follow the logic of your statements through here. All this cherry-picking when or when not documents ORIGINATING from creg are 'authentic' (ie, till PROVEN complete horseshit) - its fucking laughable now

>>13863275
Debunked my ass, it was submitted by craig
On page 38 you find the “Craig is a fraud” address
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.24.4.pdf
bsv brain dead shillers btfo

>>13863288
Fucking bsv braindead liar: https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html

>the Copyright Office does not investigate whether there is a provable connection between the claimant and the pseudonymous author.

>>13863664
Point Of Order, chief: It wasn't 'submitted' by creg in the Florida case, which is the point this arsehole is going to pick up on and run with (again) while avoiding the actual issue. It was originally from the Australian Tax Case, where it would have been submitted by Creg/was discovered by ATO (same thing). Ira submitted it in the Florida case, and creg ONLY started claiming this as forgery 15 MONTHS afterwards, when it was proven to be bullshit anyway

>>13863288
yeah you don't have time to explain, that's why you pay 1000 pajeets that do have time to shill your shitcoin endlessly until we puke

>>13863692
Do you have reading comprehension problems you fucking retard

In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.

>In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.

In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.

>In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.

>>13863664
Ask yourself where that document came from and whether its authenticity is attested to in the affidavit. There's your answer.
Also, trivial forensic image analysis shows that the addresses were tampered with. Try again.
Also read:
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/why-code-must-not-be-law-438e2cafe2e4
Also as a bonus:
http://financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/001593.html
Somebody thought they could get away with blackmailing Craig with fake docs and instead they're getting BTFO in court. The only place the tactic gained even a small amount of traction was on social media where lies can be easily amplified by idiots like you. Have a nice life.

>>13863646
>>13863664
What part of submitted by Kleiman do you not understand? Please shoot yourselves.

>>13863736
>Everyone who supports Drumpf is a Russian bot

calvin is losing hope about craig being satoshi

>>13863768
>In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.
"yes I am Satoshi"
what a fucking proof...
B R A I N D E A D

>>13863790
ORIGIN: creg/cregs office
DISPUTED: YES/NO
FUCKING ANSWER CUNT

>>13863816
>>13863823
SEETHING

>>13863811
Tulips not blooming, eh Calvin?
lmao

>>13863801
>Trump: Perpetual winner. Will get reelected for POTUS
>Satoj: failed in every goal he set for himself. Probably can't wipe his ass properly, therefore reeks of shit.

>>13863842

>>13863842
just horseshit that goes round in circles because thy refuse to answer to answer a(ny) simple question, while flooding the place with obtuse bullshit. Its like the whole Satoshi thing, sign, or STFU. End of the day, its creg whose going to have to answer for all the mountains of forged BS in court.

>>13862278
Let me get in my roflcopter

>>13863811
The fuck are you talking about?

>>13863945
why are you using day old Tweets to counteract something he just said? Face it, loose-cannon cregs being cut loose, finally - Calvin didn't get where he is today by backing losers y'kno

>>13862869
Lets debunk this pile of shit.

> there will be no split
>bch splits
It's a statement of intent. He never wanted a split and tried to prevent it, but ABC implemented centralized checkpointing directly into the code, and overwriting nakamoto consensus, essentially destroying themselves as Bitcoin in the process. Even Andreas Brekken admitted that what they did was a really really devastating mistake.

Craig also said, "you split, we bankrupt you" - look at what happened to Jihan Wu and Bitmain, they went bankrupt lmao, and Roger has never been the same since then, now dodging courts for the lawsuit he has been served. Not going well for them.

> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
>btc $4000 eoy 2018

Fake quote, never seen him say end of year 2018. He did say BTC will eventually be zero, and look at the thread you are in - the OP spells it out.

> i am satoshi
>can’t sign a simple fucking message

Possession of keys is not proof of creation. If you are in possession of a house key it does not mean you built the house. It's a non-sequitur. There's so much evidence already in the public domain that together proves he is Satoshi, but it requires intelligence and discernment, something most people lack.

> says I will sign after proving in court
>but... wasn't the bbc stunt supposed to be a real signature? LOL

He did sign in private, with several witnesses, read Andrew O'Hagans piece 'The Satoshi Affair' where the session is described. Not for the public though.

> submits a list of addresses of some fake tulip trust bullshit to court...
>one of the addresses he claimed was signed by the real owner with a message saying the address is not belonging to this craig clown

Already debunked that ITT, the forged document with fake addresses was submitted by Kleiman, not by Craig.

>>13854130
Lets debunk this pile of shit.

> there will be no split
>bch splits
It's a statement of intent. He never wanted a split and tried to prevent it, but ABC implemented centralized checkpointing directly into the code, and overwriting nakamoto consensus, essentially destroying themselves as Bitcoin in the process. Even Andreas Brekken admitted that what they did was a really really devastating mistake.

Craig also said, "you split, we bankrupt you" - look at what happened to Jihan Wu and Bitmain, they went bankrupt lmao, and Roger has never been the same since then, now dodging courts for the lawsuit he has been served. Not going well for them.

> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
>btc $4000 eoy 2018

Fake quote, never seen him say end of year 2018. He did say BTC will eventually be zero, and look at the thread you are in - the OP spells it out.

> i am satoshi
>can’t sign a simple fucking message

Possession of keys is not proof of creation. If you are in possession of a house key it does not mean you built the house. It's a non-sequitur. There's so much evidence already in the public domain that together proves he is Satoshi, but it requires intelligence and discernment, something most people lack.

> says I will sign after proving in court
>but... wasn't the bbc stunt supposed to be a real signature? LOL

He did sign in private, with several witnesses, read Andrew O'Hagans piece 'The Satoshi Affair' where the session is described. Not for the public though.

> submits a list of addresses of some fake tulip trust bullshit to court...
>one of the addresses he claimed was signed by the real owner with a message saying the address is not belonging to this craig clown

Already debunked that ITT, the forged document with fake addresses was submitted by Kleiman, not by Craig.

>>13864088
>Possession of keys is not proof of creation
>>13864040

>>13864088
>>13864111
debunking ≠ spamming, give it a rest already

>>13853365
Eh, people that believe in Jew fud are retards. Always go bull when the Jew fuds. This is how you beat them at their own game.

>>13863945
He was telling everyone about how Craig is Satoshi and how important that is because satoshi is the creator of bitcoin and has the vision for (((metanet))) etc.
suddenly he is all "it doesn't really matter if he is satoshi or not"

>>13864156
also he was advertising big news at the conference. but I guess it won't be about craig signing anything.

>>13861642
this
is why
i buy
the real bitcoin

>>13853365
Why don't we just, you know, eliminate the problem?

>>13854476
>printing completely fake business cards
its not like any scam artist would ever think to do this

>>13854518
you just low key shilled ETH and didn't even realize it

>>13862454
this is the real issue at hand.
we all know that craig is a greedy ego maniac.
if he was actually satoshi and subsequently one of the richest men on the planet, he would be diligently using that fortune to his benefit rather than arguing with trolls online and getting himself humiliated at every turn and banned from twitter.
the kind of brilliant mind that it took to create Bitcoin would never be engaged in the school yard theatrics and emotionally out of control antics of the Craig we see in the media bi-weekly.
there is just so many red flags at this point that prevent even the slightest possiblity of CSW being satoshi.

as many other anons have pointed out, CSW is more likely to be engaged in a long-con and being paid by Ayre to perpetuate the fraud that he is satoshi in hopes of building BSV and ultimately defrauding investors - eventually when their scam is fully exposed, losing all of their investment. not to mention the fact the SEC will definitely be going after BSV since it has been advertised as a security on countless instances thru many arrays.

>>13864385
because its not a problem you fool this is an amazing opportunity if it actually would happen

>>13864156
Dude your IQ is below room temperature. He is making the point that even if you don't believe that Craig is Satoshi, there are things happening on BSV worth paying attention to besides the personality drama. He is literally tweeting with the hashtag #CraigIsSatoshi in half of all his recent tweets, including the one you linked.

Can't believe people as dumb as you actually exist. Thanks for the endless bumps though, more people get to see how fucked Corecoin is.

>>13853466
>implying such thing exists

if i was csw i would sell nothing january 2020. then watch the btc gang celebrate yet another "evidence" that csw is a scammer, and have them pouring money into btc in hype for the halving, now that all doubts are gone.

and when the priced is pumped high in april/may i would crash it all

easy

>>13865165
>easy
but csw is a scammer, face the truth

>>13853400
lol so he sold the bottom? ouch

>>13864725
>49 posts already
>Imagine paying 5 dollars for a pajeet shill this active