/biz/ - Business & Finance

I don’t know what any of this means but I’m never selling

>>13841220
Thomas would snap they guys neck if he dares to question chainlink again
> New system new rules faggots

why didnt any of you retards question this before. i am financially ruined.

>>13841277
ask*, faggot pajeet

>>13841220
that pic is like half a year old, lmao

Swingies getting desperate.

>>13841220
>he wont have his smart contract keeping an eye on the LINK price
brainlet OP. its not up to chainlink to add that functionality, thats up to the contract coders.

more lame fud.

>>13841220
ooooo strap in boys
this literally means that chainlink can never go down only up after mainnet
ooooooooooooooo

>>13841305
this

>>13841305
even more hoops for companies to jump through. its fucking over.

>>13841305
More likely link will be a stablecoin that cannot be dumped.

>>13841220
Still not selling you will never get my stinkies.

>>13841277
Imagine you want to stake 1.000.000,01 usd but solidity cannot handle decimals hahaha linkies are btfo

>>13841332
Yes, a brand new kind of stable coin, pegged to the price of $1000.00 a piece.

>>13841220

Shouldn't the staked LINK only come into play when the contract is triggered, so there is only a fraction of a second exposure to volatility. certainly not at the beginning of the 5 year period

>>13841527
yeah it's old as shit just like all the fud that's been circulating the past few days. swing linkers aren't creative enough to come up with any meaningful or creative fud. probably because they're low iq enough to swing their ticket to freedom

>>13841489
Yes except solidity is autistic and will reeee if you use decimals.
No reason for link not to be worth enough to cover the spreads and differences especially when it achieves mainstream adoption

>>13841220
Here is how to solve the problem:
1) dump LINK and give it a meme use case (like voting on the protocol evolution)
2) use an actual stablecoin as collateral

>>13841334

Oh you're not selling, but it's not that you don't want to sell, it's that no one wants to buy your StainStinks.

>>13841570
yeah SOL doesn't allow decimals but atomic units make the fud irrelevant. i don't even get why people keep parroting it

>>13841527
brainlet no-linker here
can you explain/expand on that?

>>13841220
isn't penalty set in real dollars rather than link? Link is just a collateral

>>13841688

I don't know Im asking too, If the staked Link is exposed to 5 years of volatility in the case Op stated it simply will not work. you would have to state the penalty in usd dollars at the beginning and then its calculated vs LINK at trigger moments

>>13841601
It's a good warrant canary as to the state of the brainlet nulinkies.

>>13841901
pure soilent. name is even more retarded than that pose

>>13841236
Based

The FUD gets more inane by the day.

>>13841220
Wait, so anyone with a contract insured with link has a vested interest in keeping the price high? Which they can do by buying more link? Thanks for the shill post.

>>13841220
The solution is obvious, the goal is to prevent price decreases withe smart game theory and a proper network effect.